What's new

Military strikes against Assad's Syria | Updates & Discussions.

LOL what?
Right, the Mossad sent it's 17 million agents in Egypt to the streets to demonstrate against Morsi.
Your comment is an insult to millions of Egyptians. Weather you think the coupe was justified or not you cannot ignore the legitimacy of the mass demonstrations. The problems surfacing then were real ones.

And how is that even relevant to my post you quoted?

Obama also support elements of Al Queda that work with Muslim brotherhood.
 
http://news.**********/top-us-lawmakers-rally-behind-obama-syria-plan-023928554.html

Putin softer over Syria, Obama gains support for strike

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday struck a more conciliatory tone ahead of this week's G20 summit, saying Moscow would take "decisive" action if the West proved who used chemical weapons in Syria.

Putin's comments came as US lawmakers begin rallying behind President Barack Obama's plan to launch military strikes against Syria over a suspected poison gas attack outside Damascus that killed hundreds.

And as Obama seeks to cobble together an international coalition to back his plans for military intervention, France was Wednesday to hold an emergency parliamentary debate on the Syrian crisis.

Putin, in an interview apparently aimed at presenting a more pragmatic face to the world ahead of the G20 summit in Saint Petersburg, said he did not exclude Russia agreeing to US-led military strikes if it was proven Syria's regime had carried out the August 21 attack.

But, he told state-run Channel One television, the West still needed to put forward watertight proof of the circumstances of the attack, which some Russian officials have blamed on rebels.
View gallery."
Facts on the more than two million Syrians who have …
Graphic illustrating a breakdown of the more than two million Syrians who have fled their war-ravage …

If there was clear proof of what weapons were used and who used them, Russia "will be ready to act in the most decisive and serious way," Putin said.
 
http://news.**********/top-us-lawmakers-rally-behind-obama-syria-plan-023928554.html

Putin softer over Syria, Obama gains support for strike

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday struck a more conciliatory tone ahead of this week's G20 summit, saying Moscow would take "decisive" action if the West proved who used chemical weapons in Syria.

Putin's comments came as US lawmakers begin rallying behind President Barack Obama's plan to launch military strikes against Syria over a suspected poison gas attack outside Damascus that killed hundreds.

And as Obama seeks to cobble together an international coalition to back his plans for military intervention, France was Wednesday to hold an emergency parliamentary debate on the Syrian crisis.

Putin, in an interview apparently aimed at presenting a more pragmatic face to the world ahead of the G20 summit in Saint Petersburg, said he did not exclude Russia agreeing to US-led military strikes if it was proven Syria's regime had carried out the August 21 attack.

But, he told state-run Channel One television, the West still needed to put forward watertight proof of the circumstances of the attack, which some Russian officials have blamed on rebels.
View gallery."
Facts on the more than two million Syrians who have …
Graphic illustrating a breakdown of the more than two million Syrians who have fled their war-ravage …

If there was clear proof of what weapons were used and who used them, Russia "will be ready to act in the most decisive and serious way," Putin said.
As I have said. No one wants Assad gone, we will strike....the Russian will come in as saviors. At least a real country will be in charge. Seriously...who doesn't see the back-room dealing.
 
Surprisingly the US aren't afraid of Syria air defense. I want to see how F18 fares with S300 - S400. Shooting down 10-20 planes would be awesome.
 
1176153_10151663260117971_1088701063_n.jpg
 
Surprisingly the US aren't afraid of Syria air defense. I want to see how F18 fares with S300 - S400. Shooting down 10-20 planes would be awesome.

Syria does not have S-300 and the S-400 has not been deployed outside of Russia to date.
The only S-300 in the vicinity might be on Russian vessels. If Russia chooses to engage the American aircrafts 10-20 lost planes would be the least of their concerns and everyone's elses for that matter.
 
Analysis: Obama growing isolated on Syria as support wanes

r


By Fred Barbash

WASHINGTON | Sun Sep 8, 2013 11:38pm EDT

(Reuters) - White House efforts to convince the U.S. Congress to back military action against Syria are not only failing, they seem to be stiffening the opposition.

That was the assessment on Sunday, not of an opponent but of an early and ardent Republican supporter of Obama's plan for attacking Syria, the influential Republican chairman of the House intelligence committee, Mike Rogers.

Rogers told CBS's "Face the Nation" the White House had made a "confusing mess" of the Syria issue. Now, he said, "I'm skeptical myself."

Congress will be in session on Monday for the first time since the August recess. Debate on Syria could begin in the full Senate this week, with voting as early as Wednesday. The House of Representatives could take up the issue later this week or next.

Obama is expected to spend the next several days in personal meetings with members.

Some Democratic opponents of a military strike, meanwhile, were looking for a way to spare Obama's administration the effects of a "no" vote.

Representative Jim McGovern of Massachusetts suggested that the president withdraw his request before it is defeated, saying on CNN's "State of the Union" that there was insufficient support for it in Congress.

There are no signs that Obama is considering that, but speculation about the possibility that the administration might delay a vote surfaced on Sunday when Secretary of State John Kerry, speaking in Paris after meeting Arab foreign ministers, did not rule out returning to the United Nations Security Council to secure a Syria resolution.

A U.S. official who asked not to be named later squelched that speculation: "We have always supported working through the U.N. but have been clear there is not a path forward there."

Obama is scheduled to address the American public on television on Tuesday, but even his political allies fear that his acknowledged power as an orator will be tested, given that polls show a majority of Americans opposed to his plan for military action.

White House Chief of Staff Dennis McDonough suggested that the speech will repeat points Obama has already made several times.

"What he'll tell the country is what this is, which is a targeted, limited, consequential" use of military force, McDonough said during a round of appearances on Sunday TV shows.

"He'll also tell the country what this is not. This is not Iraq. This is not Afghanistan. This is not an extended air campaign like Libya."

'FLOOD THE ZONE' IS NOT WORKING

Most opponents of the proposed U.S. military strike do not contest the administration's view that the Syrian government gassed its own people on August 21. Their expressed concerns focus instead on the effectiveness and potential unintended consequences of a U.S. military response.

Only about a quarter of the Senate's 100 members and fewer than 25 members of the 435-seat House have been willing to go on record in support of Obama's request, according to a tally by the Washington Post. Seventeen senators and 111 House members are on record against.

Leaders of both parties have characterized Syria as a "conscience vote," not subject to the usual pressure for party discipline. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, for example, has not made a personal pitch for votes in any of the five "Dear Colleague" letters she has sent her fellow Democrats.

The White House plans to step up what it has called a "flood the zone" lobbying effort this week, with briefings on Capitol Hill by Secretary of State John Kerry and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel.

The influential American-Israel Public Affairs Committee will deploy hundreds of activists to lobby Congress in support of Obama's plan. However, similarly intense lobbying by the White House last week proved unsuccessful.

Rogers, among others, faults Obama for not starting months ago to build congressional and public support on Syria.

"They don't have strong relationships in Congress today - that's a huge problem for them," said Rogers. "I think it's very clear he's lost support in the last week.

As for the lack of public support, Rogers added: "You have a reluctant commander in chief, first of all, who's trying to come to the American people and say, 'I'm going to do something, but I'm not going to do a lot.' They're not sure exactly what we're trying to do."

Another Republican supporter, Illinois Representative Adam Kinzinger, said on ABC's "This Week" that he had "reached out to the White House and said, 'hey we support the strike on Syria, we're going to help you round up support if you need it.' I haven't heard back from the White House yet."

(Additional reporting by Mark Felsenthal; editing by Christopher Wilson)

Analysis: Obama growing isolated on Syria as support wanes | Reuters
 
According to a famous VNese political analyst Nguyễn Ngọc Trường, Syria cant survive more than 90 days if US decide to attack.....

Russia should make more effort if she wanna protect mr.Assad ..
 


You know you are wrong even when FOX news insults you, sad part being its right in many of its views. :omghaha:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom