What's new

Is Russia's New Armata Tank the Best in the World?

Agree

  • YES

    Votes: 12 46.2%
  • No

    Votes: 14 53.8%

  • Total voters
    26
Both Challenger and M1A2 have been known to take hits from Kornet and suffer minimal damages. The only way to destroy the M1A2 was attacking it from the back. Most US tank casualties at Iraq are M1A1 and not the later. And Challenger 2 is considered to be the most armoured tank. The Leopard 2 tanks outperformed US tanks in the recent tank games held by NATO at US.

And the "most protected" is only claimed by Israel.
5 tanks were destroyed in lebanon , 2 of those were mark 4 , and only one by missile (kornet) hits.
Overall more than 1000 missiles were used by hizballah. Id call it an excellent record
 
5 tanks were destroyed in lebanon , 2 of those were mark 4 , and only one by missile (kornet) hits.
Overall more than 1000 missiles were used by hizballah. Id call it an excellent record
That's according to Israeli records. Actual records are much higher. Also, note that the purpose of ATGM is to penetrate the tank and the numbers are much higher in that case. And not all those were fired at tanks. Some were fired at fortifications, other vehicles and soldiers.
 
That's according to Israeli records. Actual records are much higher. Also, note that the purpose of ATGM is to penetrate the tank and the numbers are much higher in that case. And not all those were fired at tanks. Some were fired at fortifications, other vehicles and soldiers.
Sorry, but you're wrong, this is the actual record, Israel doesn't hide its casualties, that's a Muslim thing.
 
Sorry, but you're wrong, this is the actual record, Israel doesn't hide its casualties, that's a Muslim thing.
It's the truth. Israel hide their and exaggerate enemy numbers. That's psychological tactic used at war. Calling it a "Muslim thing" proves the knobhead you are.
 
It's the truth. Israel hide their and exaggerate enemy numbers. That's psychological tactic used at war. Calling it a "Muslim thing" proves the knobhead you are.
Israel hide , israel steal ,israel lame and u got all the facts.
Trolls are common around here
 
That's a Saudi tank and it's the weapons compartment. In the first video, the full length has the crew escape after the explosion.
There was no Challenger that was hit by any Kornet.
And I just proved you wrong by showing you those videos.
Considered? by who? source it.
the Leopard 2 at recent games held by *NATO*, Israel is not in NATO.
US didn't field the M1A2 at Iraq. All tanks are M1A1.

Here are Merkava tanks getting blown up.
26.jpg
 
Merkeva isn't bad but it is still no where near the top tanks, such as those mentioned. But of course it will outperform cold war era Soviet tanks.
I have to disagree on that. The powerpack of Mk4 is a US licencebuilt version of the Leo2 engine. The 120mm gun is in no way inferior to German and US 120mm guns, neither is munition. The gun stabilization and fire control equipment is top of the line, as is battle management system. The armor pack is modern, and active protection system included. The design optimized crew survivability. Claiming Merkava IV is not in the top tier MBTs without (source reference of) explanation why it isn't top tier just doesn't do.
 
That's a Saudi tank and it's the weapons compartment. In the first video, the full length has the crew escape after the explosion.

US didn't field the M1A2 at Iraq. All tanks are M1A1.
Ahahahaha you are such a liar, the crew is already dead by then.
There are 2 tanks destroyed in the first video, one from the side, one from the front.

When did I mention the M1A2 Abrams in that quote?
 
Israel hide , israel steal ,israel lame and u got all the facts.
Trolls are common around here
Guess, you ran out of probable reasons and thus decided to start trolling yourself. Embarrassing, to be hones. Just stop replying, at least you can have your dignity that way.
 
That's according to Israeli records. Actual records are much higher. Also, note that the purpose of ATGM is to penetrate the tank and the numbers are much higher in that case. And not all those were fired at tanks. Some were fired at fortifications, other vehicles and soldiers.
The design purpose of ATGW is to destroy tanks, to put them out of action, preferably permanently.

As michines, tanks are expendable, while trained crews aren't. What counts here is (comparatively high) crew survivability.

Actual records? As kept by ...? As published or can be accessed where, by whom (with what reputation and reliability)?
 
Guess, you ran out of probable reasons and thus decided to start trolling yourself. Embarrassing, to be hones. Just stop replying, at least you can have your dignity that way.
Ahahaha that Merkava picture BTW, that's a Mk1, do you know how much improvement there is between the Mk1 and the Mk4?
the difference between the M1A1 and the A2 is not nearly as much as the one between the Mk1 and Mk4.
 
Ahahaha that Merkava picture BTW, that's a Mk1, do you know how much improvement there is between the Mk1 and the Mk4?
the difference between the M1A1 and the A2 is not nearly as much as the one between the Mk1 and Mk4.
Except the video isn't of MK1.
 
Except the video isn't of MK1.
First one- You cant see shit.
Second one- clearly missed the tank, damn Hamas is so bad
3:26- no gas getting out of the tank, no flames, no penetration
3:44 you can clearly see 2 explosions, thanks to the Trophy, the tank wasn't even hit. the molten jet went to its side.
4:45, Namer, it survived against a Kornet.
5:15- No hit, thanks Trophy
6:10- That's a T72, totally, the Merkava doesn't have fuel on its back, it have side armor covering the tracks, and the Merkava has 8 wheels and not 7.
 
I have to disagree on that. The powerpack of Mk4 is a US licencebuilt version of the Leo2 engine. The 120mm gun is in no way inferior to German and US 120mm guns, neither is munition. The gun stabilization and fire control equipment is top of the line, as is battle management system. The armor pack is modern, and active protection system included. The design optimized crew survivability. Claiming Merkava IV is not in the top tier MBTs without (source reference of) explanation why it isn't top tier just doesn't do.
The 120mm gun can't penetrate the M1A2 and multiple shots at the same spot needs to be used to penetrate it. It also uses depleted Uranium rounds and armour compared to Israel's "Composite matrix of laminated ceramic-steel-nickel alloy. Sloped modular design". It can withstand 1,300mm of HEAT as well (hull and turret).
 

Back
Top Bottom