What's new

Iranian Nuclear Doctrine

My post May 7, 2021 about the realistic usage of nuclear weapons below. It should be clear for everyone there are no rules. History is rewritten, ethics and morals change hands, etc. Usage of nukes is a real possibility. Even today for Iran, under the 'fatva', which focuses on nukes as WMDs, it is possible the usage of tactical theater nuclear weapons is allowed. The simple fact that we even utter these words normalizes the act and makes it a real possibility.

 
LOL!!🤪
I cant help but notice that all of the recent atlantic council articles on iran were written by 💩zionists💩,funny that eh?🤔

I`m sure its just a coincidence...... 😏
Correct. Any western source is suspect. Even so the articles are telling.
 
-----------------> AZARI-IRAN NUCLEAR DOCTRINE explained:
- Enrich Uranium, not to make the bomb for Iran protection, but ship them to Iran's friend or wolf in sheep clothing, russia for free.
- Give away your heavy water for frree eventhough they sell for $700/galon. LOL
- If signing NTP weren't bad enough by an azari shah, lock Iran into even a worse deal like JCPOA by azari mullahs.
- Fatwa against the bomb and ICBM, while Iran surrounded by hostile nuclear armed states that want nothing but destruction of Iran including the use of nuclear warheads against her.
- Brag about how good your conventional forces are, while your foes threaten to use tactical nuke against you, still refuse to acknowledge MAD.
- Hijab is more important to these pedophile azaris. Beat Iranian young girls to death for not wearing head scarfs, but blow just hot air at US/Israel assassinating your top general and nuclear scientists, which turned out to be the regime top mullahs who were instrumental in that. May be that's why your SL travels around Iran with a russian S350 AD in tow (not even a B373 or Iranian made ones), fearing people in his own rank.
- Deal after deal, gradually Negotiate away Iran's nuclear program, missiles, and drones while making them look like a deal of life time.

PS- They claim that the drone which assassinated the General flew from Qatar. If this is true and If I were in charge of Iran, Qatar would have been pulverized to set an example for those Areb(bles) and turkers, what would happen to them in a case like this. This alone tells me If jooz or angloz use SA or Iraq or or Jordan or turkey or Azarisisjan to attack Iran, the regime will not be able to do anything to them, because they are backed by nuclear armed states, and Iran refuse s to build the bomb over some islamic fatwa.
 
Last edited:
Why is this guy posting from Holland allowed to spew crap all over Iranian threads???
 
Why is this guy posting from Holland allowed to spew crap all over Iranian threads???
You are not an Iranian either, so what on hell's creation are you doing here?
Second, dont just CALL it a crap, PROVE it if you can. Another words, don't just sing it, bring it like I do.
 
Why is this guy posting from Holland allowed to spew crap all over Iranian threads???
Put on ignore list. Which is why nobody with minor amounts of brain tissue sees or responds to the person(s) you might be referring to. Ghosting is the best and most effective tool.
 
Last edited:
Biden adviser discussed possible outreach to Iran on nuclear program with Oman: sources
https://www.axios.com/2023/05/30/iran-nuclear-program-oman-outreach-deal-mcgurk#
View attachment 932451

The flag of Iran is seen in front of the International Atomic Energy Agency headquarters in Vienna.

Brett McGurk, President Biden’s senior Middle East adviser, took a low-profile trip to Oman earlier this month for talks with Omani officials on possible diplomatic outreach to Iran regarding its nuclear program, according to five U.S., Israeli and European officials.
Why it matters: The Biden administration has said it is extremely concerned about the advances in Iran's nuclear program and the risk of it leading to a regional military escalation.
  • Axios reported in April that the Biden administration discussed with its European and Israeli partners a possible proposal for an interim agreement with Iran that would include some sanctions relief in exchange for Tehran freezing parts of its nuclear program.
Behind the scenes: McGurk traveled to Muscat on May 8 after a trip to Saudi Arabia with national security adviser Jake Sullivan and a visit to Israel to brief Prime Minister Netanyahu about the U.S. talks in Riyadh, four Israeli and U.S. officials said.
  • The Muscat visit wasn’t made public by either the U.S. or Oman. The officials said the main issue that was discussed was a new diplomatic push over Iran’s nuclear program with Omani mediation.
  • “The Omanis are holding proximity talks between the U.S. and Iran," a senior Israeli official told Axios using diplomatic jargon for negotiations done through an agreed upon third party without a face-to-face meeting.
Three senior Israeli officials claimed the White House is exploring through the Omani government whether the Iranians are open to taking steps that would put some limits on their nuclear program and de-escalate the regional situation and what they would want in return.
  • “The Americans want a time out," one of the senior Israeli officials told Axios.
  • A White House National Security Council spokesperson pushed back on the Israeli officials’ claims. “There is no U.S. discussion of an interim deal and no discussion of sanctions relief, or closing safeguards cases," the spokesperson said.
  • A senior European diplomat said that the "U.S. is working with the Omanis on the Iranian issue."
  • The White House NSC spokesperson said they won’t comment on regional diplomacy "of which Iran is one aspect."
The Israeli government is concerned about a possible push by the Biden administration for a “freeze for freeze” interim agreement with Iran, three Israeli officials told Axios.
  • Israeli Minister for strategic affairs Ron Dermer and National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi are expected to discuss these concerns during their visit to the White House on Thursday, as Axios previously reported.
  • The Omani and Iranian foreign ministries did not respond to requests for comment.
Between the lines: The Korea Economic Daily reported on Tuesday that South Korea and the U.S. are discussing ways to release $7 billion in Iranian funds held in South Korea. The funds are a South Korean debt for oil imports from Iran.
  • Such unfreezing of funds has been floated by the Iranian press several times in the last year as a possible step in the context of a deal between the U.S. and Iran either on the nuclear issue or as part of a prisoner swap.
The big picture: Several Iranian media outlets reported on Tuesday that Iran has reached an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on closing an investigation over the Marivan undeclared nuclear site near Abadeh, south of the city of Isfahan.
  • Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu exposed the site at a press conference in September 2019 and claimed it was part of Iran’s undeclared nuclear weapons program.
  • Satellite images of the site that showed Iran had conducted several rounds of demolition activity in the area between July 2019 and December 2020 fueled suspicions that Tehran was attempting to hide its nuclear work there.
  • Since the end of 2019, the IAEA has been investigating the issue, with visits by UN inspectors to the site.
The IAEA didn’t comment on the Iranian press reports.
  • The agency is expected to issue quarterly reports ahead of a board meeting scheduled next week.
  • The State Department said it "cannot comment on what the IAEA may put out before it does so."
  • "We have full confidence in the IAEA and in Director General Grossi, and we look forward to the IAEA’s reports in the coming days," a State Department spokesperson added.
According to the Iranian press reports, the IAEA also decided to close the investigation around a recent incident in which UN inspectors discovered Iranian scientists enriched a small quantity of uranium to the level of 83.7% — the closest to the 90% level needed for nuclear weapons.
  • As part of an agreement with the IAEA, Iran agreed to re-install a number of IAEA cameras at a nuclear facility in Isfahan. The cameras were removed last June after the IAEA voted in favor of a resolution criticizing Iran.
The problem is that these traitor azaris are negotiating Iran's wealth away. As you can see, they always do their part of agreement in whole not even step by step, before the other side make any move to meet their part of the deal.

Like the JCPOA, when these azari turk clones gave away tons of Iran's enriched uranium and heavy water for absolutely nothing except getting Iran more sanctioned, then the same azaris released the hostages before US released Iran's own funds, now US refuses to do so. How is that possible? Can someone explain this please?

As you can see, something is seriously wrong with these azari turds. They either are so stupid that they can't help making the same mistakes with the same people over and over again, or they are just moles in Iran.
In conclusion, azaris, turks, jewz, and hindus are all alike in that they're liable to ruin any country thery step in.


Put on ignore list. Which is why nobody sees or responds the the person(s) you might be referring to. Ghosting is the best and most effective tool.
Yup, it's much easier to ignore reality while holding an opium pipe, and post your pipe dream as comments hoping no one would call you out on them. LOLOLOL
 
Partisan indicates the new deep Fordow facilities are a quasi ‘dead man’s switch’ to rush to not only create multiple devices but immediately target predetermined US, European, and Israeli sites with the devices utilizing ICBMs not dissimilar to current Iranian satellite carriers:

 
Partisan indicates the new deep Fordow facilities are a quasi ‘dead man’s switch’ to rush to not only create multiple devices but immediately target predetermined US, European, and Israeli sites with the devices utilizing ICBMs not dissimilar to current Iranian satellite carriers:

Let's hope this is true and not one of your pipe dream. If this were true however, why would these mullahs ship nearly all of Iran enriched U and heavy water to ruissia for absolutely nothing in JCPOA 1.0? Dont' you think Iran would have needed those enriched U for those 'so called' RUSH TO CREATE MULTIPLE DEVICES?

Mullahs have been sabotaging their own missile and nuclear programs, thus no ICBM, and No nukes, but lots of hot air and imaginary red lines and a wonderful fatwa. They ended up hanging one of their own top mullahs for assassination of nuclear scientists. I am willing to bet that the assassination of the Good General was also made possible with a little help from one of their own rank.
 
Partisan indicates the new deep Fordow facilities are a quasi ‘dead man’s switch’ to rush to not only create multiple devices but immediately target predetermined US, European, and Israeli sites with the devices utilizing ICBMs not dissimilar to current Iranian satellite carriers:


BTW, after a catastrophic event the facility will disconnect and even the SL can’t countermand .
 
I hope Iran has 5-6 nukes

They need them

And Pakistan should send them to Iran otherwise they will just expire
 

Back
Top Bottom