What's new

Indonesia’s unexpected success story

FDI (Foreign Direct Invesment) in Billion USD

1670408325501.png


If we look at Indonesia's investment climate based on data on the realization of foreign direct investment in the third quarter of 2022 at the Ministry of Investment/Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM) still recorded a growth of 63.6% or increased to RP168.9 trillion or equivalent to US$ 11.8 billion compared to the same period last year (year-on-year/yoy).

This investment contributed to the total investment in Indonesia reaching 54.9% with the absorption of labor reaching 142,444 people.
 
Asia-Pacific, Economy & Trade, Environment, Featured, Global Governance, Headlines, TerraViva United Nations

OPINION

Asia: the Power of Connections and their Consequences​

By Simon Commander and Saul Estrin

1671102103364.png

Figure 1: Overall Concentration Ratios: Top 5 Firms


LONDON, Nov 24 2022 (IPS) - In our recent book, “The Connections World: The Future of Asia”, published by Cambridge University Press in October 2022, we argue that mutually beneficial links between dynastic business houses and political elites have been important drivers behind Asia’s extraordinary renaissance. Yet, these close ties now threaten future economic growth.

That is because the ubiquitous Asian corporate structures of Business Groups systematically work with politicians in Asia to create excessive market power and overall concentration. They have proven remarkably adept at entrenching themselves.

Although, by concentrating resources in relatively few hands, this was quite an effective engine of growth in the past half century, the limitation of competition and brake on innovation threatens future progress.

The pervasive and highly resilient networks of connections running between businesses and politicians have provided a common backbone to Asian development and have cut across political systems. We characterize these networks as the Connections World.

That world comprises a web of interactions between businesses and politicians/political parties that are highly transactional and commonly contain significant degrees of reciprocity.

Thus, politicians look to firms to make campaign or personal contributions; pay bribes; provide jobs for family or associates whilst also providing reciprocal favours, such as creating jobs in regions or at moments that are politically advantageous.

At the same time, businesses look to politicians for protection from foreign or domestic competition; to supply subsidies, loans and/or public sector contracts. All parties benefit from these interactions, creating a stable political economy equilibrium.

These arrangements have served Asia well over the past half century, with Asia’s share of the world economy rising from 9% in the 1970s to nearly 40% now. However, the connections world will provide a less supportive foundation for growth in the future for a variety of reasons. Neither politicians nor business groups have sufficient interest in stimulating competition, whether through the entry of domestic or foreign multinational as competitors.

Moreover, because Asian business groups are often highly diversified, with the control of the oligarch or dynasty enhanced by cross-holdings and ownership pyramids, their economic consequences must be measured not only by the traditional measures of market power, but also by overall levels of concentration as, for example, indicated by the share of total revenues for the largest five firms relative to GDP.

To put this in context, while the market concentration ratio (CR5) of the largest US firms, mainly in tech sectors, is often high, the five-firm overall concentration ratio is only around 3%. The comparable figures across Asia in 2018 are much higher, as can be seen in Figure 1. The CR5 in South Korea exceeds 30% and even in very large economies – India and China – it exceeds 10%.

The findings are even starker when we consider the largest ten firms (CR10). In the US, this is only around 4% but in South Korea exceeds 40% and in India and China exceeds 15%.

Looking forward, the consequences of the connections world will be far less propitious, not least because growth will have to rely increasingly on innovation. The existing networks are, for the most part, ill-suited to promote innovation which thrives on an open ecosystem of science universities and business parks, capital funders, lawyers and entrepreneurs and a healthy willingness to risk and lose.

Moreover, the connections world crowds out new entrants, soaks up capital and skilled workers and managers and suppresses the competitive environment so essential for the trial-and-error process at the heart of much successful innovation. Even when the business groups themselves are innovative, there is relatively little innovation going on in the wider economy.

What should be the policies and other measures that could address the shortcomings of the connections world? Central to the policy menu for loosening the grip of entrenched business will have to be measures designed to induce the transformation of business groups into more transparent and better governed businesses, while also radically weakening the links between politicians and business.

This will not happen naturally because the mutual benefits from market entrenchment and political connections outweigh any gains to the current players from reform. The required policies will need to include changes to corporate governance that undercut pyramidal ownership structures, mergers and cross-holdings, that impose inheritance taxes and shift to new types of – and targets for – competition policy.

Some of those policies were successfully introduced in the USA under Roosevelt. More recently, Israel has adopted criteria in competition policy for overall, as well as specific market, concentration levels, while South Korea has placed high inheritance taxes at the heart of their raft of policies to weaken the vice-like grip of their gigantic business groups.

At the same time, measures need to be adopted aimed at limiting the discretionary scope and incentives for politicians to leverage their connections for personal or family benefit. Although hard to achieve, incremental improvements, such as through audited registers of interests, can start to affect behaviour.

In short, although many commentators have already declared the 21st century to be Asia’s, that is far from predetermined. Unless the sorts of policies that we propose are introduced to roll back the tentacles of the connections world, many Asian economies will in fact find themselves unfavourably placed to exploit their potential in the coming decades.

Simon Commander is Managing Partner of Altura Partners. He is also Visiting Professor of Economics at IE Business School in Madrid.
Saul ESTRIN is Professor of Managerial Economics at LSE and previously Professor of Economics and Associate Dean at London Business School.


IPS UN Bureau

 
Latest IMF projection (October 2022)


Indonesia vs Türkiye Economy 1960 - 2030​

 

PPSK Bill Passed, Sri Mulyani Reforms Indonesia's Financial Sector​

Khairunnisa, Okezone · Thursday 15 December 2022 13:52 WIB

1671109724424.png

Finance Minister Sri Mulyani (Photo: Okezone)

JAKARTA - Minister of Finance (Menkeu) Sri Mulyani Indrawati stated that the step to reform the financial sector is the main requirement to build a dynamic, sturdy, independent, sustainable and just Indonesian economy.

"Indonesia's financial sector reform is the main prerequisite," she said at the 13th Plenary Meeting of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia for the Second Session of the 2022-2023 Session Year in Jakarta, Thursday (12/15/2022).


ALSO READ: Sri Mulyani Affirms P2SK Law Does Not Interfere with the Independence of BI, OJK and LPS

Sri Mulyani said there are 17 laws related to the financial sector that have been in force for a long time and some have even exceeded 30 years so they need to be adjusted to the dynamics of changing times.

In addition, she said the latest conditions and challenges as well as adding to the urgency of reforming the Indonesian financial sector such as the shallowness of the domestic financial sector, especially the low public savings in the form of pension funds and insurance.

In addition, Indonesia's financial sector assets are still dominated by short-term funding sources, namely the banking sector.

READ ALSO:Legit! Sri Mulyani Sets Tax Exemption for These Items, What Are They?

Then, the interest rate on domestic loans is still relatively high compared to countries in the region, resulting in a high-cost economy.

Reforms must also be carried out due to aspects of governance and law enforcement in the Indonesian financial sector that still need to be improved.

Next, the financial inclusion index in Indonesia still needs to be improved, there is technological disruption, especially digital technology such as financial technology (FinTech) and the growth of human resources (HR) supporting the financial sector which is relatively slow.

According to Sri Mulyani, these various things show the inability of the national financial sector to meet large economic needs independently.

"Especially when connected with our common dream to achieve the vision of a Golden Indonesia in 2045," said Sri Mulyani.

Therefore, the government carried out financial reforms, one of which was through the Draft Law on the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector (RUU P2SK).

"We believe that our efforts will bring the P2SK Bill to achieve its goal of reforming Indonesia's financial sector for a more prosperous future for the nation," she said.

 
1584625574.jpg

A teller shows dollar banknotes at a money changer in Jakarta. (Antara photo)

Indonesia’s Foreign Debt Down 7.6%​

BY :WHISNU BAGUS PRASETYA
DECEMBER 15, 2022

Jakarta. Indonesia’s external debt stood at $390.2 billion as of October, down slightly by 7.6 percent from the same month last year, Bank Indonesia reported on Thursday.
The October foreign debt is also $5 billion lower than the amount in September.

The amount of the government’s external debt has been in a steady decline since March, totaling $179.7 billion in October from $182.3 billion a month earlier.

The reason for the declining trend is because the government bonds have been largely shifted to domestic markets amid highly volatile global financial markets, Bank Indonesia spokesman Erwin Haryono said in a statement.

In addition, the government’s recent repayments have been bigger than the amount of new liabilities.

Erwin said the government’s foreign debt is intended to finance productive sectors and national economic recovery programs.

Read More:

Health and social programs took the biggest share of funding from the government’s foreign debt, accounting for 24.5 percent, he said.

The education sector was the second-biggest recipient with 16.6 percent, followed by defense, government administration, and social insurance (15.3 percent), the construction sector (14.2 percent), and the financial service and insurance sectors (11.6 percent).

Erwin claimed the government’s overall foreign debt remains manageable because long-term liabilities make up for 99.9 percent.

Corporation and private household debt was down by 3 percent to $202.2 billion year-on-year, also dominated by long-term liabilities of 75.2 percent.

The overall foreign debt is equivalent to 29.6 percent of the country’s GDP.

 
BloombergBloomberg

Bond Investors See Indonesia’s Hot Streak Extending Into Next Year​

Ronojoy Mazumdar and Marcus Wong
Fri, 16 December 2022 at 5:00 am GMT+7·3-min read


5d8b27bb286f99cbc0a7c5692c2ebe5e


Bond Investors See Indonesia’s Hot Streak Extending Into Next Year​

(Bloomberg) -- Indonesian bonds have outperformed most of their emerging Asian peers in 2022 and a number of investors are betting that will be the case for next year too.
Most Read from Bloomberg
The nation’s debt may benefit from foreign inflows attracted by one of the highest real yields in the region and the prospect that interest-rate hikes are nearing their peak, according to William Blair Investment Management. JPMorgan Asset Management is overweight on Indonesia, while DBS Bank Ltd. sees the country’s bonds outpacing their regional counterparts.

“Indonesian bonds are relatively attractive compared to emerging Asian peers, with higher real yields than the likes of India and Thailand,” said Johnny Chen, a money manager at William Blair Investment in Singapore. “As inflationary pressures dissipate in the U.S. and the Fed slows the pace of hikes, the rupiah will likely benefit from portfolio flows.”

Indonesia’s debt —- considered one of the bellwethers for global emerging markets — is gaining attraction as the central bank is seen nearing its terminal rate, while policy makers in the US are expected to keep tightening for some time. Relatively high yields and a law seeking to expand the central bank’s mandate to buy government bonds in times of crisis may also bolster the Asian nation’s securities.

Indonesia’s bonds have done better than most of their regional peers in 2022 in what has been a difficult year for global debt markets. The securities delivered a loss of 5.9% for dollar-based investors, behind only Malaysia and China in emerging Asia. Bonds in Taiwan, the Philippines and South Korea all slid more than 10%.

Rupiah bonds are likely to keep attracting inflows as they offer some of the highest real yields in the region, according to DBS Bank, which expects foreign inflows of $3 billion to $7 billion next year.

Indonesian debt may also benefit amid light positioning after overseas investors trimmed their holdings by about $7.5 billion this year, a record outflow in data compiled by Bloomberg starting in 2010. Global funds have already started returning, snapping up $1.5 billion of the securities in November and about the same in December so far.
‘Strongly Benefit’

“The technical picture of the Indonesian bond market is also cleaner as foreign exposure has collapsed over the course of the last couple of years and positioning is far from heavy,” said Kenneth Akintewe, head of Asian sovereign debt at abrdn in Singapore.

“A potential recovery in EM flows would likely strongly benefit Indonesian rates and FX,” he said. “A lot can still go wrong, FX volatility remains elevated and yields are some ways away from the cheaper levels seen in October so investors still have to tread carefully.”

Indonesia’s 10-year bond yields fell by 60 basis points in November, the biggest decline in four years, as inflation slowed and traders bet Bank Indonesia will slow its pace of rate hikes. They have still climbed more than 50 basis points in 2022.

“Just reducing underweights can move these markets quite significantly,” said Lin Jing Leong, a rates strategist at Columbia Threadneedle Investments in Singapore. “With Indonesia being more high yielding than all other Asian markets, it tends to be the first one that investors re-enter, and reform fundamentals are quite positive.”

 
AlhamduliLLAH

1671914660.jpeg

Tax Revenue Exceeds 2022 Target: Finance Minister​

BY: HERU ANDRIYANTO
DECEMBER 25, 2022

Jakarta. Finance Minister Sri Mulyani Indrawati claimed on Saturday that the materialized tax revenue exceeded this year's target.

"Good news ahead of New Year: the tax revenue target is met 100 percent at the national, provincial, and district levels,” Sri Mulyani wrote on her Facebook account.

According to her, the overall tax revenue has reached Rp 1,634.4 trillion ($104.8 billion) as of December 14, equivalent to 106 percent of the government target which was set at Rp 1,485 trillion.

“My sincerest appreciation and gratitude to all tax officials for their hard work throughout 2022,” Sri Mulyani said.

For next year, the government aims to collect Rp 1,718 trillion in taxes.

"This target has been carefully calculated by taking into account a projected decline in commodity prices and slower economic growth at the estimated 4.7 percent. It’s going to be a challenge for the tax directorate,” she added.

Despite the substantial revenue, the state budget suffers a deficit of Rp 237.7 trillion or 1.22 percent of the gross domestic product.

Total revenue stood at Rp 2,479.9 trillion against overall spending of Rp 2,717.6 trillion, according to Finance Ministry figures dated December 14.

 
Last edited:

How Indonesia is navigating the economic storm​


Kawasan-SCBD-Jakarta-Selatan.-ist.jpg

Jakarta Central Business District

SRI MULYANI INDRAWATI
December 28, 202222:43

During the opening of the summit of G20 finance ministers and central bank governors in October, I warned that the world is facing increasing and compounding risks from high inflation, weak growth, energy and food insecurity, climate change, geopolitical fragmentation, and rising debt distress. Low-income countries will bear the highest burden, but middle-income and even advanced economies also face the prospect of substantial pain.

The global economy has been heading into a perfect storm. The COVID-19 pandemic has left scars on all our economies, precipitating a drop in aggregate demand and then aggregate supply. The symptoms are similar to those of a “liquidity trap,” with third-party funding in the financial sector remaining high while the real economy stagnates. To solve this problem, the great 20th-century economist John Maynard Keynes proposed countercyclical fiscal policy. If the economy works well, the annual budget deficit should be reined in; but if the economy is slowing, deficits should be permitted to grow.

Indonesia, under a 2003 law, disciplined its fiscal policy by limiting annual budget deficits to less than 3 percent of gross domestic product and total public debt to 60 percent (using the same parameters as the EU’s Stability and Growth Pact). But when COVID-19 caused the economy to contract, the annual budget deficit was expected to rise above 3 percent of GDP to create room for stimulus. To enable that flexibility, the government waived the budget deficit limit.

Within weeks of the World Health Organization’s March 11, 2020, declaration of a pandemic, the Indonesian government revised the budget law to allow for an expanded deficit. Indonesia’s annual deficit then grew to 6.5 percent of GDP in 2020, before falling to 4.6 percent in 2021 as the economy recovered. In “Keeping Indonesia Safe from the COVID-19 Pandemic,” a book published by the Indonesian Ministry of Finance in 2022, we detail how Indonesia managed to be one of the few countries in the world that sustained its economic performance even through a global aggregate demand shock.

By expanding the deficit, the Indonesian government kept growth from shrinking by more than 2.1 percent in 2020, and created the conditions for 3.7 percent growth in 2021, with consumer price inflation remaining low, at 1.7 percent in 2020 and 1.9 percent in 2021. Moreover, in 2021, economic output increased by about 1.6 percent, exceeding its level in 2019. This year, the annual budget deficit is expected to be about 4.5 percent, reflecting the government’s response to the latest wave of global supply-side shocks. But starting in 2023, the deficit should return to below 3 percent, barring another crisis.

After the initial economic storm that COVID-19 whipped up, the global economy is now in the midst of a second tempest. Mobility restrictions and other public health measures from the height of the pandemic disrupted services, snarled supply chains and curtailed production in key sectors such as semiconductors (which are used in many other manufactured products, including new cars). The total value added in global manufacturing decreased by 4 percent from 2019 to 2020, as did the number of mother vessels shipping freight between major ports.

1672341857351.png


Unlike the first storm, this second one brought both weaker growth and high inflation, owing to the rising cost of global production and transport, which were pushed even higher in 2022 by the spike in hydrocarbon and food prices. The Indonesian crude price rose above $100 per barrel and settled around a consensus forecast of $105 per barrel, on average. As food prices have risen, tens of millions more people have fallen into food insecurity. Unfortunately, regardless of what happens in the geopolitical domain, food prices are likely to remain high as a result of ongoing climate shocks.

These food and energy supply pressures have left a heavy burden on the global economy, which is still struggling to heal from the wounds that the pandemic inflicted on global value chains. Nonetheless, Indonesia’s economy remains relatively resilient, for several reasons.

For starters, Indonesia’s own connections to global value chains are weighted more heavily toward food and beverage products than automotives and electronics. Second, the country generates a healthy share of its electricity from renewable energy sources. And third, Indonesia has a greater comparative advantage in raw materials than intermediate goods, which means it is less exposed to semiconductor shortages. It also means that it benefited from windfall income and a current account surplus when the prices of primary products (including palm oil, coal, rubber and nickel) rose in 2021.

Looking ahead, however, Indonesia still aims to boost domestic manufacturing by producing more intermediate goods, particularly for major global value chains such as automotives and electronics.

In 2022, the pandemic shock to aggregate demand met new shocks to the supply of food and energy stemming from the war in Ukraine, resulting in forecasts of global stagflation and recession in 2023. Yet Indonesia’s economy continues to move in a positive direction, with significant improvements both in aggregate demand, as measured by the consumer confidence index, and aggregate supply, as measured by the purchasing managers’ index.

A higher consumer confidence index allowed Indonesia to maintain robust growth in the second quarter of 2022, when year-on-year household consumption growth exceeded total economic growth for the first time since the start of the pandemic. With the consumer confidence index still rising from July at 123.2 to August at 124.7, and the purchasing managers’ index increasing in the third quarter of 2022 from 51.3 in July to 53.7 in September, Indonesia’s economic performance continued to improve as the year progressed.

Against the backdrop of an increasingly gloomy global economy, Indonesia and a few other countries have become exceptional. The same advantages that have helped shield it from the storms of the past few years should continue to do so again in 2023.

  • Sri Mulyani Indrawati is Finance Minister of the Republic of Indonesia.
 
Trust on Government



1679298560028.png

1679298622802.png



2023-edelman-trust-barometer-level-of-polarization-in-v0-8j7o84db9dda1.jpg
 
1679299240958.png

Edelman-Trust-Barometer-1600.jpg

 

Trust in Singapore Govt rises in 2023 Edelman Trust Barometer report​

By
The Online Citizen
-
March 15, 2023
13



trust-Govt-696x348.png


Trust in Government for countries (Edelman Trust Barometer survey)
The latest Edelman Trust Barometer report reveals that trust in the Singapore Government has risen by two percentage points, reaching a record high of 76%.

According to the survey, the government remains the most trusted institution in the country, with trust in non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and businesses declining, while trust in the media remains comparatively high.

Singapore’s government trust ranks fourth-highest among the 28 countries surveyed, trailing China, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia.

Trust in NGOs and businesses in Singapore was higher than in several other countries, including Sweden, Germany, Japan, Spain, and South Korea. Trust in the media stood at 59%, with China, Indonesia, and Thailand reporting higher levels.

The Edelman Trust Barometer report, released on Wednesday, is based on a survey of over 32,000 respondents across 28 countries. Fieldwork for the 2023 edition was conducted between 1 November and 28 November 2022 through 30-minute online interviews.

The report reveals a global trend where high-income earners exhibit more trust in institutions, such as government, NGOs, businesses, and media, compared to low-income earners.

In Singapore, there was an 18-point trust gap between high and low-income earners, the seventh-largest gap among all countries surveyed. This gap highlights a potential area of concern and signals the importance of addressing income inequality to foster greater trust in institutions.

trust-income-737x1024.png

Another key finding from the survey is the decline in economic optimism in Singapore. Only 36% of respondents expressed optimism about their families being better off in five years, an all-time low for the country.

Despite this decline, Singaporeans were found to be less polarized than respondents from countries like the United States, Germany, and South Korea. Only 33% of Singapore respondents believed their country is more divided today than in the past, compared to the global average of 53%.

polarise-1024x993.png


The report also sheds light on respondents’ attitudes towards polarization and civility.

In Singapore, 44% of respondents believed that the lack of civility and mutual respect today was “the worst they have ever seen.”

Additionally, fewer than one in three Singapore respondents said they would be willing to help someone they strongly disagreed with. These findings emphasize the need for fostering a culture of tolerance and respect for diverse opinions in order to strengthen social cohesion.

 

Indonesia: Inflation back within target but BI likely on hold until end of year​

Headline inflation finally reverted to target in May, with headline inflation slipping to 4.0% year-on-year
1686056437562.png

Jakarta, the capital of Indonesia

Indonesia
5 June 2023

Headline inflation back to target after a year​

Headline inflation slipped below expectations to 4.0% YoY, roughly 0.1% higher compared to the previous month. Inflation is back within Bank Indonesia's (BI) 2-4% target after 12 months and will likely stay within target for the rest of the year.

Headline inflation enjoyed a much more pronounced moderation this year, sliding back within target even ahead of BI's expectations.

Lower energy and food prices from a year ago level helped push headline inflation lower or unchanged across all items in the CPI basket. Meanwhile, core inflation was also down, dipping to 2.7% YoY and also lower than market expectations (2.8%).

Inflation back within target after 12 months​

1686056459703.png

Badan Pusat Statistik

Price stability objective reached but BI likely on hold to steady the IDR​

Bank Indonesia was one of the first central banks in the region to pause its tightening cycle earlier this year. BI Governor Perry Warjiyo who had expected inflation to slow gradually and revert to target by 3Q, has kept rates at 5.75% since the 16 February policy meeting.

Despite the quick reversion to target for inflation, we believe BI will carry out an extended pause to shore up support for the Indonesian rupiah, which was down roughly 2.15% for the month of May.

Thus we expect BI to retain policy rates at 5.75% until the end of the year and only consider cutting policy rates should global central banks opt to ease monetary policy.

 

Will Jokowi’s Economic Legacy Survive Beyond Indonesia’s Election?​

Since taking office in 2014, Indonesia’s leader has eschewed the nostrums of Western neoliberalism. The country’s trajectory will likely continue into a more challenging age.

Will Jokowi’s Economic Legacy Survive Beyond Indonesia’s Election?

Indonesian President Joko Widodo boards a flight to Jakarta at Komodo Airport, in Labuan Bajo, West Manggarai Regency, after the conclusion of the 42nd ASEAN Summit, May 11, 2023.
Credit: Facebook/Presiden Joko Widodo


By Samir Puri
May 19, 2023


There should be no surprise that the summit of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), hosted by Indonesia last week, was branded with the slogan “Epicentrum of Growth.” President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo is well known for his focus on infrastructure and living standards and he views ASEAN first and foremost as a forum for trade and investment.

This economy-centric approach has proved popular at home, winning Jokowi reelection in 2019, while his high popularity ratings today reflect Indonesia’s continued strong growth in the face of a global recession. Indeed, with most of the world beset by stagflation, Jokowism has become a point of keen interest for the economic commentariat.

Even a cursory glance at his record since 2014 demonstrates a pragmatic but populist economic policy that favors state guidance over privatization and liberalization.

The prominence of Indonesia’s state-owned enterprises (SOEs) epitomizes this approach. They have consistently served as the driving force behind infrastructure development and other social welfare initiatives – and that is by design.

As international economist Kyunghoon Kim argued in a recent paper, Jokowi and his SOE Minister Erick Thohir have been deliberate in shifting the focus of state enterprises from profit generation to domestic development in sectors such as banking, mining, and construction.

Thohir was cherry-picked for the ministry in 2019, after having run Jokowi’s successful reelection campaign, and Kim notes how he has leveraged his private sector expertise to ensure that foreign investment falls into line with the national interest.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

Putting Indonesia first is also at the heart of Jokowi’s downstreaming policy, a post-2018 innovation under which the country’s significant natural resources are manufactured into products at home rather than exported abroad as raw materials.

The government-owned Indonesia Battery Cooperation, for example, combines mining, smelting, and production capabilities, delivering high-value finished products to international markets, on top of supplying Indonesian nickel to a handful of distributors. This has helped the country to gain a foothold in the lucrative and booming electric vehicle (EV) market, and its benefits are being applied to other industries, from energy to consumer goods.

And while “resource nationalism” may go against the Western neoliberal consensus, Indonesia’s mineral wealth gives it the power to dictate terms to the benefit of government revenues, and to newly upskilled workers in the form of higher wages.

Jokowism, therefore, is deliberately populist yet pragmatic and even committed free traders have admitted its success.

However, with elections on the horizon in February 2024 and the Indonesian leader reaching the end of his two-term limit, there are questions as to how long it will remain the status quo. Given that Jokowi remains the country’s most popular politician – and may do so for some time yet – his successor is likely to want to pick up his economic legacy.

The ruling PDI-P party’s presidential nominee, Ganjar Pranowo, and Defense Minister Prabowo Subianto (who is also chairman of the Gerindra Party) are the two frontrunners to replace Jokowi. Neither has indicated a change in approach to Indonesia’s economy.

To the contrary, both men have benefitted from aligning closely with the president, Ganjar as a fellow PDI-P man and Prabowo as a foe-turned-friend, having lost to Jokowi in 2014 and 2019 but serving loyally in his cabinet since then.

If Ganjar and Prabowo are neck and neck in the race to win Jokowi’s endorsement, then their choice of running mates could prove crucial.

In terms of signifying their commitment to the president’s economic philosophy, Economy Minister Airlangga Hartarto is thought to be a shrewd VP pick, as is the aforementioned SOE boss, Erick Thohir.

Hartarto, as chairman of the Golkar Party , is fairly well positioned in Prabowo’s “Grand Alliance,” while Thohir is polling strongly as a running mate for both Prabowo and Ganjar.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

Speaker of Indonesia’s House of Representatives Puan Maharani has also been touted for the Ganjar ticket. Her legislative nous and political capital – Puan is the eldest daughter of PDI-P leader Megawati Sukarnoputri – would certainly be of value in executing on the economy.
The tickets are clearly still in flux and running mates likely won’t be chosen until October. That said, there is little doubt that economic issues such as consumer prices and employment will dominate Indonesia’s 2024 elections.

No candidate is going to break comprehensively with the past nine years of policy under Jokowi – the political and economic risk is simply too high. Instead, they will surely be focused on building a team that can take up the mantle of Jokowism in his absence.

And because Indonesians won’t settle for the same for long, any viable ticket will need to have the ideas and experience to take the country forwards – and to do so in an era of even greater economic and geopolitical upheaval than was experienced in Jokowi’s tenure.

AUTHORS

GUEST AUTHOR​

Samir Puri​

Dr. Samir Puri is a visiting lecturer in War Studies at King’s College London and a former senior fellow at IISS-Asia.

 

Back
Top Bottom