What's new

Indonesia Defence Forum

Like i said before the missile capability was never removed. Janes got it all wrong. They just repositioned the RHIB to the center of the stern.

We can see the KCR-60 missile box launchers (although still a dummy launchers) from this recent pic taken by admin of Asean Security Observer Facebook at IMDEX 2019: https://m.facebook.com/pages/category/News---Media-Website/Asean-Security-Observer-137531102958800/
Yep, always doubt that particular report from Jane's too. The mounting always there in front of the RHIB anyways, just the dummy missile boxes that seems to be missing.

Also that pic of KCR-60 from IMDEX 2019 clearly shows that they replace the secondary gun behind the main mast from what it used to be an old Oerlikon 20mm cannon into Yugoimport-SDPR M71/08 20mm, similar to those used on Pari-class PC-40 Patrol Boats. The M71/08 cannon itself is unique due to it actually is the latest evolution of the Zastava M55 20mm cannon, most famously known domestically as "Triple Gun", still in service with Indonesia Air Forces' Paskhas & Polairud (literally: Water and Air Police) patrol ships.
 
Last edited:
Yep, always doubt that particular report from Jane's too. The mounting always there in front of the RHIB anyways, just the dummy missile boxes that seems to be missing.

Also that pic of KCR-60 from IMDEX 2019 clearly shows that they replace the secondary gun behind the main mast from what it used to be an old Oerlikon 20mm cannon into Yugoimport-SDPR M71/08 20mm, similar to those used on Pari-class PC-40 Patrol Boats. The M71/08 cannon itself is unique due to it actually is the latest evolution of the Zastava M55 20mm cannon, most famously known domestically as "Triple Gun", still in service with Indonesia Air Forces' Paskhas & Polairud (literally: Water and Air Police) patrol ships.
Janes report was based from a screenshot pic from a poor quality video and quickly made a conclusion that the missile capability was removed just because they did not see any box launchers. They totally overlook at the missile mountings which is still there.

20190519_103358.png


Unfortunately many local media took reference in their report based from that Janes article.
 
.....

^^ Looks like KRI Tombak-629 already installed with Terma C-Guard Decoy Launching System.

Terma C-Guard Tube Launcher:

c-guard-tubes_464.jpg


https://www.terma.com/surveillance-mission-systems/naval-solutions/c-guard-naval-decoy-system/
I'm not so sure about that,
  • The configuration of 4 tube on one module never seen before used on C-Guard system IINM. The smallest tube number I could find on C-Guard system mention only 6 tube on one module (DL-6T Launcher).
  • The profile of the tube looks a bit different to a regular C-Guard tube, they're too clean, I couldn't see the payload locking mechanism at the front-end of the tubes, but we could see that at the back-end of the tubes on the picture above.
    c-guard-and-canto.jpg
  • The C-Guard usually mounted directly on the floor without any pedestal and back-blast deflector. While the decoy on these ship were mounted on a raised pedestal and had a back-blast deflector behind the tubes.
  • The decoy first seen fitted to these boats on December 2017 together with fitting-out of other Chinese equipment, while the contract signing with Terma for these system (C-Guard) happened on December 2018.
  • This made me leans on Chinese origin for these decoy tube, particularly a variation of this launcher fitted on Azmat-class FAC of Pakistan Navy. It has the same side profile, same pedestal & same back-blast deflector. The only differences to our boats seems to be the number of the tubes, KCR-60 had 4 tubes on each module and PNS Azmat had 6 tubes on each module.
    695833_original.jpg
Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Also worth of note, that ESM arrays beside the main radar on KRI Tombak 629 looks pretty much the same with the one fitted on KCR-40 boats KRI Clurit & KRI Kujang, which in turn also look similar to the arrays mounted beside the main mast on Chinese Type 056 corvettes.
Type_056_corvette_anti-ship_missiles.jpg
 
I'm not so sure about that,
  • The configuration of 4 tube on one module never seen before used on C-Guard system IINM. The smallest tube number I could find on C-Guard system mention only 6 tube on one module (DL-6T Launcher).
  • The profile of the tube looks a bit different to a regular C-Guard tube, they're too clean, I couldn't see the payload locking mechanism at the front-end of the tubes, but we could see that at the back-end of the tubes on the picture above.
    c-guard-and-canto.jpg
  • The C-Guard usually mounted directly on the floor without any pedestal and back-blast deflector. While the decoy on these ship were mounted on a raised pedestal and had a back-blast deflector behind the tubes.
  • The decoy first seen fitted to these boats on December 2017 together with fitting-out of other Chinese equipment, while the contract signing with Terma for these system (C-Guard) happened on December 2018.
  • This made me leans on Chinese origin for these decoy tube, particularly a variation of this launcher fitted on Azmat-class FAC of Pakistan Navy. It has the same side profile, same pedestal & same back-blast deflector. The only differences to our boats seems to be the number of the tubes, KCR-60 had 4 tubes on each module and PNS Azmat had 6 tubes on each module.
    695833_original.jpg
Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Also worth of note, that ESM arrays beside the main radar on KRI Tombak 629 looks pretty much the same with the one fitted on KCR-40 boats KRI Clurit & KRI Kujang, which in turn also look similar to the arrays mounted beside the main mast on Chinese Type 056 corvettes.
Type_056_corvette_anti-ship_missiles.jpg
Maybe you are right.
 
Hello I'm new. Can you tell me why TNI or Police didn't use thermal and night vision when they fight against OPM? I saw some videos where they shot at OPM blindly in general direction based on where the guns sound come from. If they use thermal vision, they can get OPM's precise location on the mountain.

It can't be because the lack of budget, can it?
 
Hello I'm new. Can you tell me why TNI or Police didn't use thermal and night vision when they fight against OPM? I saw some videos where they shot at OPM blindly in general direction based on where the guns sound come from. If they use thermal vision, they can get OPM's precise location on the mountain.

It can't be because the lack of budget, can it?
I think you already know the answer lol
 
Naval Main Base, Welcomes Three Australian Warship HMAS Canberra (FFG02), HMAS Newcastle (FFG06) and HMAS SUCCESS(OR34) in JICT II Tj. Priok Jakarta International Container Terminal (JICT) II Tanjung Priok.

Chief of Staff of Indonesian Navy Admiral Siwi Sukma Ajie, SE, MM and Commander Lantamal III Jakarta First Admiral TNI Denih Hendrata, SE, MM, received visit of two warships from Royal Australian Navy, HMAS Canberra (FFG 02) and HMAS Newcastle (FFG 06). The second arrival of the vessel as part of the Indo-Pacific mission endeavor in 2019

In addition to military cooperation also strengthen the relationship deeper friendship between Indonesia and Australia in a variety of security issues, counter-terrorism, maritime security, humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, peacekeeping and defense industrial cooperation.

Jales Veva Jayamahe

58950143_135942390831914_367304363645629333_n-jpg.561022


59726510_166264121065492_6113694158232652890_n-jpg.561023


61125914_851171548596546_145047921985616540_n-jpg.561024


59827931_377560526187943_3251583549665932611_n-jpg.561025


59535122_537123766817821_4136394583733100927_nb-jpg.561031


59358952_193323051650416_1288555909632207665_n-jpg.561026




two tni-al officers onboard HMAS Canberra
melihat-lebih-dekat-kapal-perang-australia-hmas-canberra-mp4_000731400-jpg.561232

melihat-lebih-dekat-kapal-perang-australia-hmas-canberra-mp4_000749500-jpg.561233


 

Attachments

  • 58950143_135942390831914_367304363645629333_n.jpg
    58950143_135942390831914_367304363645629333_n.jpg
    71.3 KB · Views: 2,455
  • 59726510_166264121065492_6113694158232652890_n.jpg
    59726510_166264121065492_6113694158232652890_n.jpg
    56.2 KB · Views: 2,440
  • 61125914_851171548596546_145047921985616540_n.jpg
    61125914_851171548596546_145047921985616540_n.jpg
    86.6 KB · Views: 2,447
  • 59827931_377560526187943_3251583549665932611_n.jpg
    59827931_377560526187943_3251583549665932611_n.jpg
    87.9 KB · Views: 2,455
  • 59358952_193323051650416_1288555909632207665_n.jpg
    59358952_193323051650416_1288555909632207665_n.jpg
    98.3 KB · Views: 2,439
  • 59535122_537123766817821_4136394583733100927_nb.jpg
    59535122_537123766817821_4136394583733100927_nb.jpg
    85.6 KB · Views: 2,376
  • Melihat Lebih Dekat Kapal Perang Australia HMAS Canberra.mp4_002456000.jpg
    Melihat Lebih Dekat Kapal Perang Australia HMAS Canberra.mp4_002456000.jpg
    163.9 KB · Views: 14
  • Melihat Lebih Dekat Kapal Perang Australia HMAS Canberra.mp4_000731400.jpg
    Melihat Lebih Dekat Kapal Perang Australia HMAS Canberra.mp4_000731400.jpg
    173.7 KB · Views: 1,725
  • Melihat Lebih Dekat Kapal Perang Australia HMAS Canberra.mp4_000749500.jpg
    Melihat Lebih Dekat Kapal Perang Australia HMAS Canberra.mp4_000749500.jpg
    149.4 KB · Views: 1,709
Last edited:
Indonesia is quietly talking to the United States about the purchase of 32 new Lockheed Martin F-16 Viper jets and six C-130J cargo aircrafts.

Indonesia-US-Joko-Widodo-Donald-Trump-900x540.jpg

US President Donald Trump and Indonesia’s President Joko Widodo shake hands during a meeting on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany, July 8, 2017. Photo: AFP/Saul Loeb

To pacify Trump, Indonesia seeks American arms
Jakarta is weighing big-ticket US weapons purchases to rebalance trade relations and maintain privileged access to US markets

ByJOHN MCBETH, JAKARTA
Indonesia is quietly talking to the United States about the purchase of 32 new Lockheed Martin F-16 Viper jets and six C-130J cargo aircraft in what may partly be an effort to remove the country from any possible sanctions as the US-China trade war returns to a boil.

Well-placed Washington sources speculate that the Indonesians are seeking to protect their Generalized Scheme of Preferences (GSP) access, as well as to ward off possible US congressional retaliation against friendly countries that have recently purchased Russian military hardware.

Indonesia does not appear to be prominent on US President Donald Trump’s radar. But a US$12.6 billion bilateral trade imbalance and a rising trend of protectionism in Washington could change that, despite Indonesia just reporting its largest monthly trade deficit since 2013.

Two-way US-Indonesia trade last year hit $28.2 billion, a 7% increase over the previous year, with Indonesian exports outweighing US imports by $20.8 billion to $8.2 billion. Those flows only slightly closed the US’ deficit gap compared to 2017.

During a visit that year, US Vice President Mike Pence made it clear to President Joko Widodo that he had to do a lot more to “level the playing field and break down barriers” to ensure US exporters can fully participate in the Indonesian market.

US-Mike-Pence-Joko-Widodo-April-2017-e1558339622788.jpg

Indonesian President Joko Widodo (R) and US Vice President Mike Pence at Merdeka Palace in Jakarta on April 20, 2017. Photo: AFP/Bay Ismoyo/Pool
While there is no timeline, Indonesia received another reminder of what is at stake with a visit last week by Bart Thanhauser, US Trade Representative Office director for Southeast Asia and the Pacific. His visit was part of an ongoing year-long GSP eligibility review related to Indonesia’s presence on a list of 16 trading partners with which the US has big trade deficits.

“I don’t think Indonesia is more on the radar than anyone else,” says one executive familiar with the talks. “I don’t think Trump actually knows where Indonesia is. But the State Department is certainly putting more emphasis on private sector trade and investment and overall economic growth.”

Most of the attention is focused on horticulture, beef imports and agricultural quotas in general, along with patent laws and draconian 2012 legislation which stipulates that all electronic data generated by foreign banks, insurance, e-commerce and credit card companies should be housed in Indonesia.

“There are large differences in how regulations are written and applied,” says one US government commercial guide. “Domestic interests often take advantage of the non-transparency of the legal and judicial systems to undermine regulations to the detriment of foreign partners.”

Indonesia’s protectionism has always been a sticking point. But while the resolution of the ownership battle over Phoenix-based Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold’s Grasberg mine in Papua province has taken at least one irritant off the table, it has since been replaced by the de facto nationalization of the oil and gas industry.

State-owned oil company Pertamina took over the Mahakam block, the country’s second largest gas field, from French giant Total in 2017 and now has plans to assume control of Chevron’s 200,000-barrel-a-day Rokan oilfield in 2021, in addition to many other smaller producing blocks.

Indonesia-Chevron-Oil-and-Gas-Energy--e1558339940836.jpg

An Indonesian worker at a Chevron energy facility in her country. Photo: Chevron/Twitter
Overall, Trump and his advisers won’t find many US manufacturers have moved significant jobs and operations to Indonesia, which is still struggling to rationalize its nationalist economic policies with a desire for more foreign investment to revitalize its faltering manufacturing base.

Finance Minister Sri Mulyani Indrawati and other key figures in the Widodo administration clearly understand the contradiction, but it will take a dramatic change of policy direction by the president for foreign investors to start taking notice.

The latest target of Trump’s ire, blacklisted Chinese telecom giant Huawei, has made major inroads into the Indonesian market over the past eight years, supplying low-cost equipment to state-run Telkomsel and most of the other mobile phone providers.

Industry sources say that has been accomplished through generous financial packages, targeted inducements and the company’s proclivity for agreeing to most of the terms of a contract, including often rigid service performance indicators.

Indonesia is still five years away from making the transition to 5G, with government regulators wisely delaying the issuance of spectrum until they are satisfied existing 3G and 4G networks have been brought up to an acceptable standard.

That will also save the government from having to make any difficult decisions that could rile the US or China.

On the military front, it is still not clear whether Indonesia’s plans to buy 11 advanced Su-35 FlankerE multi-role fighters from Russia will run into the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), which penalizes procurers of Russian military systems.

The air force has said it will have no option but to terminate the deal if US sanctions are enforced, but as a spokesman has noted: “We need to operate a combination of East-made and West-made fighters. Politics is uncertain, and we need balance because if we have problems with the West, we can use aircraft made in the East.”

US-F16-Vipor-Jet-Defense-Air-Fighter-Lockheed-Martin-e1558340065527.jpg

A Lockheed Martin F-16 Vipor jet with weapons under its wings. Photo: Lockheed Martin
Ironically, the Indonesian military only went shopping in Russia in the early 2000s because of a US arms embargo which began with the Dili, East Timor, churchyard massacre by Indonesian troops in 1991 and was only strengthened following East Timor’s bloody separation from Indonesia eight years later.

Although Indonesia already has a squadron of twin-engine Sukhoi Su-27/30 jets, the subsequent lifting of the embargo has seen the delivery in the last two years of 24 refurbished US-made F-16s and eight Boeing AH-64E Apache attack helicopters worth an estimated $1.4 billion.

Indonesia’s intended purchases, including the $1.1 billion Su-35 deal, fit with an ambitious air force modernization plan, announced in June 2018, to bring its force level up to eight fighter squadrons and six refreshed transport squadrons by 2024.

It currently has six fighter squadrons spread across Java, Sumatra, Kalimantan and Sulawesi, with an inventory that includes 25 F-16C/Ds, 16 Su-27/30s and 24 British Aerospace BAE Hawk 200s.

Government sources say the C-130 workhorses are a higher priority than the costly, state-of-the-art Vipers because of the steady depletion of its current 18-strong fleet, invaluable in flying troops and relief supplies to remote parts of the archipelago.

US-Indonesia-Jim-Mattis-Ryamizard-Ryacudu-January-24-2018-e1558340309417.jpg

Indonesia’s Defense Minister Ryamizard Ryacudu and then US Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis at a ceremony in Jakarta, January 23, 2018. Photo: Government Handout
Apart from its normal transport role, the Super Hercules C-130 can also be quickly configured for prolonged maritime surveillance duties with belly-mounted radar and roll-on, roll-off sensor stations in place of cargo.

The Indonesians have yet to publicly announce their interest in the F-16V, which was first demonstrated at the Singapore Air Show in 2012 and only went into service with Taiwan’s Air Force this year.

Developed to inter-operate with Lockheed’s fifth-generation F-35 and F-22 fighters, the latest F-16 variant can be deployed against enemy air defenses and also in air-to-air, air-to-ground and deep interdiction and maritime missions.

US analysts advise Indonesia to continue conducting business as usual and say there is no need for Jakarta to make any major announcements on military procurements or highlight joint military exercises or other unilateral endeavors.

High-level US visits in the recent past by Pence and then Defense Secretary James Mattis went a long way, they say, to establishing Indonesia’s value to the US as a democracy of strategic importance. But whether that assessment extends to the mercurial and unpredictable Trump is a different matter.

https://www.asiatimes.com/2019/05/article/to-pacify-trump-indonesia-seeks-american-arms/
 
What is the chance for Indonesia's defense spending to go up more than 0.8 on Jokowi 2.0?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom