What's new

Indian Space Capabilities

We are in a race,indeed we are

I agree with this one
we don't want to be caught with our pants down again
1st time it was the lack of navy becauz of which we were colonized & Humiliated by the Brits
Never again shall our children should share the same fate that our ancestors did
 
I agree with this one
we don't want to be caught with our pants down again
1st time it was the lack of navy becauz of which we were colonized & Humiliated by the Brits
Never again shall our children should share the same fate that our ancestors did

Indeed,who knows what happens next,,,space may be weaponized.
We need to be prepared
 
We are not in a space race,are we? We have set our priorities.



We are in a race,indeed we are
I don't know what you both r fighting for or about . Rather than working in tandem we r bitching each other.. Not good .. And by the way we r hell in a race ..a race to achieve greatness, as this cruel world is not belong to loosers as they will perish like the way you both know whome... But is for the winners who helps in change this world to their Wants... As life itself is a race..isn't it
 
Anyone reading knows what i have written is correct,,the answers u seek are in public domain,,i can just download it from the isro site,,there is nothing secret in that super fanboy.

Lower T/W always doesn't meat to be inferior quality if products......................Lower efficiency of GSLV is due to because its lower power. I mean if you develop 100cc engine of 100kg weight than it doesn't mean that 200cc engine weight would be 200kg. Definitely bigger engine would have efficient T/W ratio.
If your intentions were to bring ISRO's technical backwardness to public, than everybody know about that. Your humble contribution really doesn't contribute here.

And few days earlier you were admiring ISRO on its achievements............................you evoked too much early from your fantasy boy.8-)
 
Lower T/W always doesn't meat to be inferior quality if products......................Lower efficiency of GSLV is due to because its lower power. I mean if you develop 100cc engine of 100kg weight than it doesn't mean that 200cc engine weight would be 200kg. Definitely bigger engine would have efficient T/W ratio.
If your intentions were to bring ISRO's technical backwardness to public, than everybody know about that. Your humble contribution really doesn't contribute here.

And few days earlier you were admiring ISRO on its achievements............................you evoked too much early from your fantasy boy.8-)


I posted the figures on how far we are behind and there is nothing wrong in knowing that,,,,achievements are good and all but we need to do better.

The discussion here was on our cryogenic tech and i just posted that china developed a similar cryo with 78 kn thrust in 1994 itself and uses a 700 kn one now,,,so we better buck up
 
Even russians are struggling now,,,,proton m has crashed 2 times in the previous attempts,they have no money for r&d and result is before everyone.

I just hope we pump more money in cryogenics and semi cryos................we need bigger engines.
currently usa has a cryo with 2900 kn thrust,,,china with 700 kn and we are still at 75 kn and that too only 1 successful launch.

Second problem is due to bad metallurgy our cryo has an inferior t/w ratio compared to global counterparts,,,we need to speed up research there too

They have pumped much more money than us.

The CE-20 is the first Indian cryogenic engine to feature a gas-generator cycle.[3] The engine produces a nominal thrust of 200 kN, but has an operating thrust range between 180 kN to 220 kN and can be set to any fixed values between them. The combustion chamber burns liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen at 6 MPa with 5.05 engine mixture ratio. The engine has a thrust-to-weight ratio of 34.7 and a specific impulse of 444 seconds (4.35 km/s) in vacuum.

Be assured, power of Indian cryogenic engines will only increase in coming years.
 
They have pumped much more money than us.



Be assured, power of Indian cryogenic engines will only increase in coming years.

Who denies they have not pumped money.
Point is can't we even pump 1billion$ extra per year on research??

Thats the whole point man
 
Who denies they have not pumped money.
Point is can't we even pump 1billion$ extra per year on research??

Thats the whole point man

As our economy improves and crosses the mark of two trillion dollars, you will see many pleasant changes.

Right now lack of funds is holding back may projects.
 
As our economy improves and crosses the mark of two trillion dollars, you will see many pleasant changes.

Right now lack of funds is holding back may projects.

We have no problem in giving 1 billion$ extra to isro at all if we can afford(which i doubt) 15-20 billion per year on food security and god knows how much more in stupid schemes.

As i stated earlier,,its all about vision,,don't expect shit when fools are sitting at the top
 
We have no problem in giving 1 billion$ extra to isro at all if we can afford(which i doubt) 15-20 billion per year on food security and god knows how much more in stupid schemes.

As i stated earlier,,its all about vision,,don't expect shit when fools are sitting at the top
As the saying goes... if you pay peanuts, you get monkeys

A few of my friends actually quit ISRO & BEL just for pay!
 
As the saying goes... if you pay peanuts, you get monkeys

A few of my friends actually quit ISRO & BEL just for pay!

Everyone knows this man,,i have been saying this for a year now.
Pay them well and see what happens in 5 years.

Also can't we spare just 1 billion$ for research per year??
damn
 
Can't wait for the maiden launch of the crew module on board the GSLV Mk3........
Is the launch this month or the next????
 

Back
Top Bottom