What's new

Indian NRC/CAB reaction in Bangladesh

Governor of West Bengal (a BJP stalwart and a right wing Rajasthani clown) clashing with Mamata on war of words. How can this clown defy an elected Chief Minister of a state? Is it because she took a hard stance against CAA/NRC?

Time for people in WB to throw out these RSS Sanghi scum from West Bengal along with the Bihari, Gujju and Marathi business owners who sponsor them! Starve these a-holes and support our WB dadas who care about the future of a strong West Bengal.

I suggest Bangladeshi tourits travelling to Kolkata not to support these RSS supporter Gangu businessmen next time they go to Kolkata for either shopping, hotel stays or restaurants or medical tourism. Mamata should prepare a list of RSS supporter businesses and Bangladeshi tourists can not support these idiots. @AfrazulMandal and @Joe Shearer dada your thoughts.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Unprecedented": Mamata Banerjee On Bengal Governor's "Abusive" Letters

The Governor responded, tweeting: "I find no substance in her version, both in fact and law" and also indicating that a fresh chapter will be written in this face-off, saying: "Reply will be sent as her letter has content to which I cannot subscribe"
All IndiaReported by Monideepa Banerjie, Edited by Chandrashekar SrinivasanUpdated: May 02, 2020 11:26 pm IST


Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and Governor Jagdeep Dhankar continue clash (File)

May 2, 2020
Mr Dhankar, however, also sought to play down the confrontation slightly given the coronavirus crisis, saying this was "no time to bicker" and calling on the Chief Minister to "focus on the grim situation and work in togetherness".

Earlier this week Mr Dhankar, in the second of a two-letter retort, accused Ms Banerjee of trying to cover up "monumental failures". He attacked the Chief Minister over what he called diversionary tactics and appeasement politics.

Ms Banerjee responded with a five-page letter reminding the Governor she was elected head of state and he was only nominated - a point she underlined in her second letter.


The Chief Minister quoted from three Supreme Court judgments to underline Mr Dhankar's status, pointing to a 2016 ruling in which the top court said "... not within the realm of the Governor to embroil himself in any political thicket. Governor must remain aloof from any disagreement, discord, disharmony... within individual political parties... Governor must keep clear of horse-trading".

At the end of the pointed letter Ms Banerjee told Mr Dhankar, in no uncertain terms, that he had limited powers to bring about any change and urged him to act "politely".

eovg73m_bengal-governor-jagdeep-dhankhar-at-mamata-banerjees-puja-twitter_625x300_28_October_19.jpg

Bengal Governor Jagdeep Dhankhar and his wife at Mamata Banerjee's Durga Puja last year (File)

"In a nutshell... if you do not agree with my government... you may politely bring your grievance to my attention... if it still not resolved to your satisfaction, there is, unfortunately, no other power in you, so long as my government commands the confidence of the legislature," she said.

"Truth is always bitter but that is the constitutional truth," Ms Banerjee wrote.

The Chief Minister also urged the Governor to "desist from intensifying your efforts to usurp powers, especially during the humongous crisis which the nation and West Bengal are grappling with".

Bengal has reported around 800 COVID-19 cases and 33 deaths so far but the figures have been questioned by the Governor.

Across the country over 38,000 have been infected and 1,218 killed. The nationwide lockdown to break the chain of transmission, scheduled to end on Sunday, has been extended by two weeks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mamata Banerjee scathing reply to Governor Jagdeep Dhankar calls his letter 'missile', says 'desist efforts to usurp power in Bengal'
The West Bengal Chief Minister accused the Governor of preaching and sermonizing constitutional norms without practicing it and violating it.

858437-mamata-governor-back.gif


Ankita Bhandari
@ankita_katty
Updated:
May 02, 2020, 20:27 PM IST


Kolkata: West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee hit out at Governor Jagdeep Dhankhar on Saturday (May 2) and accused him of trying to usurp powers amid the coronavirus crisis. The Chief Minister asked him to desist from using official communications and logos on social media.

"Such words and such communications of such content, tenor and tone from a Governor to an elected CM are unprecedented in the annals of Indian constitutional and political history. Your words against me and my ministers and officers can be described as vituperative, intemperate, intimidating and abusive," Mamata said in her 13-page reply to Governor Dhankhar.

Accusing him of preaching and sermonising constitutional norms without practising it and violating it, Mamata said the Governor may not agree with her policies, but unfortunately, he has no other power than bringing it to her notice, as long as the government commands the confidence of the legislature.

"I beseech you to desist from intensifying your efforts to usurp powers, especially at the time of crisis.... You should desist from using official communications/logos for your continuous tweets on social media," she said.

The scathing attack from Mamata came after the Bengal Governor shot off two letters to the Chief Minister accusing her of hiding details regarding coronavirus cases in the state, and simultaneously asking her to cooperate with the Inter-Ministerial Central Team, which has visited the state to assess the situation.
 
Under Modi, India’s Press Is Not So Free Anymore

By Vindu Goel and Jeffrey Gettleman

Photographs by Saumya Khandelwal
  • April 2, 2020

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/02/world/asia/modi-india-press-media.html

NEW DELHI — The Media One anchorman Vinesh Kunhiraman went on air as usual on March 6, ready to tell the station’s five million viewers in India’s Kerala State about the death anniversary of a beloved comedian and the latest news on the coronavirus pandemic.

Just a few minutes into the broadcast, he saw the managing editor rush to the studio floor, gesturing wildly. “I realized something was not right,” Mr. Kunhiraman recalled.

The station’s uplink suddenly went dead. Mr. Kunhiraman’s image dissolved into a blue screen. A bland message told viewers there was no signal. “We regret the inconvenience,” it said.

But this was no technical difficulty. The station had been cut off by an order from India’s Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. The government decided to block the channel for 48 hours because it had covered February’s biggest news story — the mob attacks on Muslims in New Delhi that flared into broader unrest — in a way that seemed “critical toward Delhi Police and R.S.S.,” the order said.

India’s free press has played a crucial role in protecting this country’s democracy since its independence from Britain in 1947. But journalists here now feel under attack.

Since Mr. Modi came to power in 2014, they say, his government has tried to control the country’s news media, especially the airwaves, like no other prime minister in decades. Mr. Modi has shrewdly cultivated the media to build a cult of personality that portrays him as the nation’s selfless savior.

At the same time, senior government officials have pressed news outlets — berating editors, cutting off advertising, ordering tax investigations — to ignore the uglier side of his party’s campaign to transform India from a tolerant, religiously diverse country into an assertively Hindu one.

With the coronavirus pandemic, Mr. Modi has gotten more blatant in his attempt to control coverage and, as with other difficult stories, some Indian news executives seem willing to go along.

Right before he announced the world’s largest coronavirus lockdown, on 1.3 billion people, Mr. Modi met with top news executives and urged them to publish “inspiring and positive stories” about the government’s efforts. Then, after the lockdown stranded half a million migrant workers, with some dying along the highways, his lawyers persuaded the Supreme Court this week to order all media to “publish the official version” of coronavirus developments, although outlets are still allowed to carry independent reporting.

An association of leading broadcasters was quick to praise the court decision, which many intellectuals said was yet another attack on India’s constitutionally guaranteed freedom of speech.

Through an aide, India’s information and broadcasting minister, Prakash Javadekar, initially agreed to discuss the government’s media policies. But in the two weeks since then, Mr. Javadekar has declined to answer any questions, including a written list emailed to him. His aide cited the demands of the coronavirus crisis.

India’s media universe is vast, perhaps the biggest in the world: More than 17,000 newspapers, 100,000 magazines, 178 television news channels and countless websites in dozens of languages. Thousands of Facebook pages call themselves news publishers, and YouTube is filled with local bulletins on everything from real estate trends to police raids.

But Mr. Modi’s ministers have leaned on business leaders to cut off support to independent media, slowly strangling their operations. His government has pressured media owners to fire journalists who have criticized the prime minister and told them to stop running features like hate-crime trackers that have embarrassed Mr. Modi’s party.

Police say Hindu nationalists were behind the 2017 murder of Gauri Lankesh, a female newspaper editor hailed as one of India’s most crusading journalists.

Like other populist leaders, Mr. Modi and his ministers bristle at any public criticism, whether from business executives, foreign leaders, or even schoolchildren.

And for the most part, Indian news outlets have knuckled under, concluding that since much of the public supports the prime minister, they should, too. Even skeptical journalists censor themselves, afraid to be branded anti-national by a government that equates patriotism with support for Mr. Modi.

His government has also imposed the strictest restrictions on foreign journalists in decades, suddenly and without explanation. Visas have been tightened, and foreign journalists have been banned from hotbeds of unrest such as northeast India and Jammu and Kashmir, a Muslim-majority area that was stripped of its statehood in August and put under a severe crackdown.

The Indian Express, just decided to cut salaries.

Even as Mr. Modi constantly touts India as the world’s largest democracy, its ranking on the Reporters Without Borders press freedom index is 140 out of 180.

“In the past six years, the Indian media has deteriorated,” said Shakuntala Banaji, a media professor at the London School of Economics. “There is no semblance of truth or responsibility left in the vast majority of media reports.”

the government announced the crackdown in Kashmir, M.K. Anand, the managing director of Times Network, sent his editors a directive.

“We are India’s leading news broadcasters,” he wrote in a WhatsApp message, seen by The New York Times. “It is important that we stay firmly with the national government at this juncture instead of focusing on finding faults.”

The Modi government has been particularly concerned about broadcast media, which reach into every corner of the country. It has approved very few new TV channels, and even Bloomberg, the American media giant, has been unable to get a license, despite investing millions of dollars with its Indian partner.

In this environment, sharp criticism of Mr. Modi can end careers. After a host at the Hindi news channel ABP questioned the results of one of the prime minister’s initiatives to help poor farmers, the satellite transmission of the show was interrupted every time it was broadcast, said several people who worked at the station. The channel’s owners pressured the host, Punya Prasun Bajpai, to resign, and as soon as he left, the transmission interruptions stopped, the former employees said.

And after another ABP anchor, Abhisar Sharma, criticized Mr. Modi on live television about public safety, he was pulled off the air the same day. He, too, said he was pressured to quit.

short video went viral, a state education officer filed a criminal complaint against Mr. Jaiswal, accusing him of conspiracy, false evidence and cheating, a crime that can draw up to seven years in jail.

His source at the school was promptly arrested. Fearing he was next, Mr. Jaiswal fled to New Delhi, where he hid for several weeks.

“Sometimes I felt like committing suicide,’’ he said.

Even though an investigation eventually vindicated his reporting and the police dropped the charges against him, Mr. Jaiswal continues to be stalked by people connected to the school, he said.

He has reason to be afraid. Several Indian journalists have been killed in recent years, from a Kashmiri newspaper editor shot outside his office to a young journalist in Chhattisgarh found tied up in a forest.

the police had done little to stop Hindu mobs as they rampaged against Muslims.

But the broadcast ministry claimed that what these two stations reported “could enhance the communal disharmony across the country.” After many complaints about the shutdown, the broadcasting minister, Mr. Javadekar, reversed the orders the next morning.

“Press freedom is absolutely essential in a democratic setup and that is the commitment of the Modi government,” Mr. Javadekar said at a news conference, implying that the orders had been issued without his consent.

“But let me also say,” he concluded, “that everybody accepts that it has to be a responsible freedom.”

merlin_171175212_bfbe69cf-2bfe-4e57-865e-80566951c7fc-articleLarge.jpg

merlin_171175212_bfbe69cf-2bfe-4e57-865e-80566951c7fc-articleLarge.jpg

NDTV has laid off hundreds of journalists after what executives say was government pressure on its advertisers.
Bilal, I don't think you understand the title of this thread.

This is not an anti-India political thread. People browsing this thread are looking to learn more about the Bangladeshi reaction to CAB/NRC.
 
Governor of West Bengal (a BJP stalwart and a right wing Rajasthani clown) clashing with Mamata on war of words. How can this clown defy an elected Chief Minister of a state? Is it because she took a hard stance against CAA/NRC?

Time for people in WB to throw out these RSS Sanghi scum from West Bengal along with the Bihari, Gujju and Marathi business owners who sponsor them! Starve these a-holes and support our WB dadas who care about the future of a strong West Bengal.

I suggest Bangladeshi tourits travelling to Kolkata not to support these RSS supporter Gangu businessmen next time they go to Kolkata for either shopping, hotel stays or restaurants or medical tourism. Mamata should prepare a list of RSS supporter businesses and Bangladeshi tourists can not support these idiots. @AfrazulMandal and @Joe Shearer dada your thoughts.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Unprecedented": Mamata Banerjee On Bengal Governor's "Abusive" Letters

The Governor responded, tweeting: "I find no substance in her version, both in fact and law" and also indicating that a fresh chapter will be written in this face-off, saying: "Reply will be sent as her letter has content to which I cannot subscribe"
All IndiaReported by Monideepa Banerjie, Edited by Chandrashekar SrinivasanUpdated: May 02, 2020 11:26 pm IST


Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and Governor Jagdeep Dhankar continue clash (File)

May 2, 2020
Mr Dhankar, however, also sought to play down the confrontation slightly given the coronavirus crisis, saying this was "no time to bicker" and calling on the Chief Minister to "focus on the grim situation and work in togetherness".

Earlier this week Mr Dhankar, in the second of a two-letter retort, accused Ms Banerjee of trying to cover up "monumental failures". He attacked the Chief Minister over what he called diversionary tactics and appeasement politics.

Ms Banerjee responded with a five-page letter reminding the Governor she was elected head of state and he was only nominated - a point she underlined in her second letter.


The Chief Minister quoted from three Supreme Court judgments to underline Mr Dhankar's status, pointing to a 2016 ruling in which the top court said "... not within the realm of the Governor to embroil himself in any political thicket. Governor must remain aloof from any disagreement, discord, disharmony... within individual political parties... Governor must keep clear of horse-trading".

At the end of the pointed letter Ms Banerjee told Mr Dhankar, in no uncertain terms, that he had limited powers to bring about any change and urged him to act "politely".

eovg73m_bengal-governor-jagdeep-dhankhar-at-mamata-banerjees-puja-twitter_625x300_28_October_19.jpg

Bengal Governor Jagdeep Dhankhar and his wife at Mamata Banerjee's Durga Puja last year (File)

"In a nutshell... if you do not agree with my government... you may politely bring your grievance to my attention... if it still not resolved to your satisfaction, there is, unfortunately, no other power in you, so long as my government commands the confidence of the legislature," she said.

"Truth is always bitter but that is the constitutional truth," Ms Banerjee wrote.

The Chief Minister also urged the Governor to "desist from intensifying your efforts to usurp powers, especially during the humongous crisis which the nation and West Bengal are grappling with".

Bengal has reported around 800 COVID-19 cases and 33 deaths so far but the figures have been questioned by the Governor.

Across the country over 38,000 have been infected and 1,218 killed. The nationwide lockdown to break the chain of transmission, scheduled to end on Sunday, has been extended by two weeks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mamata Banerjee scathing reply to Governor Jagdeep Dhankar calls his letter 'missile', says 'desist efforts to usurp power in Bengal'
The West Bengal Chief Minister accused the Governor of preaching and sermonizing constitutional norms without practicing it and violating it.

858437-mamata-governor-back.gif


Ankita Bhandari
@ankita_katty
Updated:
May 02, 2020, 20:27 PM IST


Kolkata: West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee hit out at Governor Jagdeep Dhankhar on Saturday (May 2) and accused him of trying to usurp powers amid the coronavirus crisis. The Chief Minister asked him to desist from using official communications and logos on social media.

"Such words and such communications of such content, tenor and tone from a Governor to an elected CM are unprecedented in the annals of Indian constitutional and political history. Your words against me and my ministers and officers can be described as vituperative, intemperate, intimidating and abusive," Mamata said in her 13-page reply to Governor Dhankhar.

Accusing him of preaching and sermonising constitutional norms without practising it and violating it, Mamata said the Governor may not agree with her policies, but unfortunately, he has no other power than bringing it to her notice, as long as the government commands the confidence of the legislature.

"I beseech you to desist from intensifying your efforts to usurp powers, especially at the time of crisis.... You should desist from using official communications/logos for your continuous tweets on social media," she said.

The scathing attack from Mamata came after the Bengal Governor shot off two letters to the Chief Minister accusing her of hiding details regarding coronavirus cases in the state, and simultaneously asking her to cooperate with the Inter-Ministerial Central Team, which has visited the state to assess the situation.

Could not agree with you more strongly. This lackey is a pet of Amit (Encounter) Shah and Kailash Vijayvargiya, whose son famously used a cricket bat as his chosen mode of political expression, and got even a wretch like Modi criticising that act of violence against a government officer doing his duty.
 
Governor of West Bengal (a BJP stalwart and a right wing Rajasthani clown) clashing with Mamata on war of words. How can this clown defy an elected Chief Minister of a state? Is it because she took a hard stance against CAA/NRC?

Time for people in WB to throw out these RSS Sanghi scum from West Bengal along with the Bihari, Gujju and Marathi business owners who sponsor them! Starve these a-holes and support our WB dadas who care about the future of a strong West Bengal.

I suggest Bangladeshi tourits travelling to Kolkata not to support these RSS supporter Gangu businessmen next time they go to Kolkata for either shopping, hotel stays or restaurants or medical tourism. Mamata should prepare a list of RSS supporter businesses and Bangladeshi tourists can not support these idiots. @AfrazulMandal and @Joe Shearer dada your thoughts.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Unprecedented": Mamata Banerjee On Bengal Governor's "Abusive" Letters

The Governor responded, tweeting: "I find no substance in her version, both in fact and law" and also indicating that a fresh chapter will be written in this face-off, saying: "Reply will be sent as her letter has content to which I cannot subscribe"
All IndiaReported by Monideepa Banerjie, Edited by Chandrashekar SrinivasanUpdated: May 02, 2020 11:26 pm IST


Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and Governor Jagdeep Dhankar continue clash (File)

May 2, 2020
Mr Dhankar, however, also sought to play down the confrontation slightly given the coronavirus crisis, saying this was "no time to bicker" and calling on the Chief Minister to "focus on the grim situation and work in togetherness".

Earlier this week Mr Dhankar, in the second of a two-letter retort, accused Ms Banerjee of trying to cover up "monumental failures". He attacked the Chief Minister over what he called diversionary tactics and appeasement politics.

Ms Banerjee responded with a five-page letter reminding the Governor she was elected head of state and he was only nominated - a point she underlined in her second letter.


The Chief Minister quoted from three Supreme Court judgments to underline Mr Dhankar's status, pointing to a 2016 ruling in which the top court said "... not within the realm of the Governor to embroil himself in any political thicket. Governor must remain aloof from any disagreement, discord, disharmony... within individual political parties... Governor must keep clear of horse-trading".

At the end of the pointed letter Ms Banerjee told Mr Dhankar, in no uncertain terms, that he had limited powers to bring about any change and urged him to act "politely".

eovg73m_bengal-governor-jagdeep-dhankhar-at-mamata-banerjees-puja-twitter_625x300_28_October_19.jpg

Bengal Governor Jagdeep Dhankhar and his wife at Mamata Banerjee's Durga Puja last year (File)

"In a nutshell... if you do not agree with my government... you may politely bring your grievance to my attention... if it still not resolved to your satisfaction, there is, unfortunately, no other power in you, so long as my government commands the confidence of the legislature," she said.

"Truth is always bitter but that is the constitutional truth," Ms Banerjee wrote.

The Chief Minister also urged the Governor to "desist from intensifying your efforts to usurp powers, especially during the humongous crisis which the nation and West Bengal are grappling with".

Bengal has reported around 800 COVID-19 cases and 33 deaths so far but the figures have been questioned by the Governor.

Across the country over 38,000 have been infected and 1,218 killed. The nationwide lockdown to break the chain of transmission, scheduled to end on Sunday, has been extended by two weeks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mamata Banerjee scathing reply to Governor Jagdeep Dhankar calls his letter 'missile', says 'desist efforts to usurp power in Bengal'
The West Bengal Chief Minister accused the Governor of preaching and sermonizing constitutional norms without practicing it and violating it.

858437-mamata-governor-back.gif


Ankita Bhandari
@ankita_katty
Updated:
May 02, 2020, 20:27 PM IST


Kolkata: West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee hit out at Governor Jagdeep Dhankhar on Saturday (May 2) and accused him of trying to usurp powers amid the coronavirus crisis. The Chief Minister asked him to desist from using official communications and logos on social media.

"Such words and such communications of such content, tenor and tone from a Governor to an elected CM are unprecedented in the annals of Indian constitutional and political history. Your words against me and my ministers and officers can be described as vituperative, intemperate, intimidating and abusive," Mamata said in her 13-page reply to Governor Dhankhar.

Accusing him of preaching and sermonising constitutional norms without practising it and violating it, Mamata said the Governor may not agree with her policies, but unfortunately, he has no other power than bringing it to her notice, as long as the government commands the confidence of the legislature.

"I beseech you to desist from intensifying your efforts to usurp powers, especially at the time of crisis.... You should desist from using official communications/logos for your continuous tweets on social media," she said.

The scathing attack from Mamata came after the Bengal Governor shot off two letters to the Chief Minister accusing her of hiding details regarding coronavirus cases in the state, and simultaneously asking her to cooperate with the Inter-Ministerial Central Team, which has visited the state to assess the situation.
Bangladesh and West Bengal have done much better than most Indian states.

It would have better for all of Bengal to be united under Bangladesh instead of the Hindurashtra.
 
Bangladesh and West Bengal have done much better than most Indian states.

It would have better for all of Bengal to be united under Bangladesh instead of the Hindurashtra.
Change your flags, never heard anyone saying joining Bangladesh, even Muslims.

BD govt says that if their is really any illegal Bangladeshi in India, then we are ready to take them back. But first you have to prove them they are really illegal Bangladeshi, otherwise no reason to recognize anyone as so called illegal Bangladeshi!

Tricky question by BD minister, how will you identify a BD Muslim? Will you give him a plate of pork to identify? What BSF is doing, when they have jurisdiction of 14 KM from border?

Between there are loads of BD people not only in WB but throughout India, for example the rickshawalas in Noida are invariably from BD. Many other are established with their hard work.

Bygones should be bygones, can't start a witch hunt now, since practically not possible.

About CAB, our state doesn't have a religion like others. We can't have a barbaric act like this in place. Lets seal the border and make everybody life happy.
 
Last edited:
Change your flags, never heard anyone saying joining Bangladesh, even Muslims.

Even though West Bengal may not choose to join Bangladesh, it needs to assert its self-determination more forcefully than it presently does. Otherwise Cowbelt interests will always push for and hold WB hostage to Cowbelt theatrics like CAA/NRC and economic interests that benefit the Central and Western States.

I am really proud of Garga and TMC folks in general when they have put up a determined and stiff resistance to the BJP and Delhi-led cow-belt Hindutva invasion of WB. propagation of Hindutva Hooliganism/Racism, and to put the final nail in the coffin of Bangla culture and communal harmony in Bengal. TMC has to continue the effort - to keep Bangla Culture and intellectualism respectable India-wide. A red salute from all of us in Bangladesh!

It seems to me - that most Kolkata BJP folks are rather an uncultured and uneducated bunch and hired guns for cow-belt hooligans.


Tricky question by BD minister, how will you identify a BD Muslim? Will you give him a plate of pork to identify? What BSF is doing, when they have jurisdiction of 14 KM from border?

Between there are loads of BD people not only in WB but throughout India, for example the rickshawalas in Noida are invariably from BD. Many other are established with their hard work.

Bygones should be bygones, can't start a witch hunt now, since practically not possible.

About CAB, our state doesn't have a religion like others. We can't have a barbaric act like this in place. Lets seal the border and make everybody life happy.

Dada there is no point in going after Ricksha-wallas making 3 or 4 dollars a day - I am a bit surprised that RSS folks make it such an issue, which probably is for vote getting purposes.

These are poor people looking for making more money and they will defy borders in any case, they don't really care about legalities. That also applies to illegal lower class Indians (from seven sisters areas in NE) working in apparel factories in Bangladesh and more importantly, highly paid Indian managers making upwards of 10-12 lacs a month and even Indian CEO's of major Bangladeshi companies (whose pay packages are even higher), who are mostly tourist visa over-stayers. These people don't pay local taxes, nor do they contribute to local economy.

I think Indians (because of their disproportionately higher salaries) probably transfer more money to India in Hundi process than do Bangladeshis (if any, staying in India) transfer to Bangladesh (as they are poor folks).

This sort of laissez faire arrangement is hard to regulate, and is probably not worth the effort. After a while, people tend to go back home to their original domicile in any case.
 
Last edited:
No, they're mostly concentrated in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Kashmir, West Bengal, Maharashtra, Kerela and but there are some outcroppings elsewhere as well.
Alright, so the plan is
1) Populate East India with Illegal Bangladeshi
2) Bring the indian muslims in the middle of india and arm them and start a civil war
3) While they are fighting we annex east india and pakistan will annex west india.
The End. So what you think of my low class plan:guns:
 
Alright, so the plan is
1) Populate East India with Illegal Bangladeshi
2) Bring the indian muslims in the middle of india and arm them and start a civil war
3) While they are fighting we annex east india and pakistan will annex west india.
The End. So what you think of my low class plan:guns:

The year is 2030 Gazwa e Ghuspetia is in full swing, amid all this BN SWADS are engaged in heavy fighting against a much larger RSS detachment, here's live footage recorded by a civilian :

Note that SWADS react aggresively after the Sanghis call them "ghuspetia" at 0:18

 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom