Indian Army incapable of fighting war

[Amalek]

The idea of "Akhand Bharat" is not bad, at all, provided, under some forced mechanism, it is ruled by Muslims, as it happened during the medieval periods. This Muslim rule shall ensure that fundamental rights of Hindus, as subjects, are protected, in accordance with the Islam.

Subjects are protected under a secular Constitution. A Hindutva country or an Islamic country can never guarantee equality to all citizens. The minorities are always second class citizens in such instances.

Pakistan was created because Muslims wanted an Islamic state. They wanted to preserve their status of the medieval times.

Everyone would have been better off under a united country under a secular Constitution. Muslim population of United India would have been 65 million, compared to 100 million Hindus. The risk of Hindutva fanatics would have been nipped in the bud.

Two nation theory is bullshit. Millions of Pakistanis living in the West prove it. If Muslims and non-Muslims could not live together, then there wouldn't be 200 million Muslims in India, or millions of Muslims in the West.

Secular democracy is the only way of the future.

 

[Politico]

on 27 feb indian airforce is completely knocked out and they are unable to fire single missile.I think we have advantage in terms of our airforce and most of indian army is in iok so if we destroy most of indian army by using tactical nukes there will be no one left to fight with us and whole india will be easily captured.Indian airforce will fail to provide air cover to their army and once their airforce command system is destroyed our fighter jets can easily provide aircover to our ground forces to defeat their army on ground

How old are you ?

 

[SIPRA]

Subjects are protected under a secular Constitution. A Hindutva country or an Islamic country can never guarantee equality to all citizens. The minorities are always second class citizens in such instances.

Pakistan was created because Muslims wanted an Islamic state. They wanted to preserve their status of the medieval times.

Everyone would have been better off under a united country under a secular Constitution. Muslim population of United India would have been 65 million, compared to 100 million Hindus. The risk of Hindutva fanatics would have been nipped in the bud.

Two nation theory is bullshit. Millions of Pakistanis living in the West prove it. If Muslims and non-Muslims could not live together, then there wouldn't be 200 million Muslims in India, or millions of Muslims in the West.

Secular democracy is the only way of the future.

My post, to which you are responding, was a sarcastic jest, to those Hindus, who are aspiring for an "Akhand Bharat". You have unnecessarily written a long serious post, in response.

In any case, your post is full of historical and political inaccuracies, to which I don't agree, but would not respond, since it would open a Pandora's box or a whole can of worms.

Also, it doesn't relate to the topic of this thread.

 

[Tom M]

on 27 feb indian airforce is completely knocked out and they are unable to fire single missile.I think we have advantage in terms of our airforce and most of indian army is in iok so if we destroy most of indian army by using tactical nukes there will be no one left to fight with us and whole india will be easily captured.Indian airforce will fail to provide air cover to their army and once their airforce command system is destroyed our fighter jets can easily provide aircover to our ground forces to defeat their army on ground

You must be kidding. Do you think we are playing "Raise of Nations"?? LOL

 

[ranadd]

You must be kidding. Do you think we are playing "Raise of Nations"?? LOL

Everyone will wait with shock and awe.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Agree with all, what you have narrated so beautifully, but I have never believed in this lie that Nehru and Gandhi were secular, or something like it. They were "Soft Hindutvists", who thought that Muslim can be subdued more effectively, by adopting secularism, as a political narrative. Never forget that attack on Kashmir was ordered by Nehru, with full support of Gandhi and Lord Mountbatten.

As ever sir, your addendums are gratefully accepted.

Subjects are protected under a secular Constitution. A Hindutva country or an Islamic country can never guarantee equality to all citizens. The minorities are always second class citizens in such instances.

Pakistan was created because Muslims wanted an Islamic state. They wanted to preserve their status of the medieval times.

Everyone would have been better off under a united country under a secular Constitution. Muslim population of United India would have been 65 million, compared to 100 million Hindus. The risk of Hindutva fanatics would have been nipped in the bud.

Two nation theory is bullshit. Millions of Pakistanis living in the West prove it. If Muslims and non-Muslims could not live together, then there wouldn't be 200 million Muslims in India, or millions of Muslims in the West.

Secular democracy is the only way of the future.

Firstly, india is not a secular nation. It is Hindutva "by stealth". Secondly, in the west, we are not ruled or influenced by Hindutva (at least not yet), hence no risk here of beef lynching, jayshreeram attacks, mosques being razed, politicians making chauvinistic and toxic misogynist comments about minority female communities...etc

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

Agree with all, what you have narrated so beautifully, but I have never believed in this lie that Nehru and Gandhi were secular, or something like it. They were "Soft Hindutvists", who thought that Muslim can be subdued more effectively, by adopting secularism, as a political narrative. Never forget that attack on Kashmir was ordered by Nehru, with full support of Gandhi and Lord Mountbatten.

"He was a great Hindu" - Jinnah in his condolence message for MK Gandhi

 

[Tom M]

"He was a great Hindu" - Jinnah in his condolence message for MK Gandhi

If it was the other way around Gandhiji would had wrote "He was a great human being".

And that is the difference between a statesman and a politician.

 

[Amalek]

Firstly, india is not a secular nation. It is Hindutva "by stealth". Secondly, in the west, we are not ruled or influenced by Hindutva (at least not yet), hence no risk here of beef lynching, jayshreeram attacks, mosques being razed, politicians making chauvinistic and toxic misogynist comments about minority female communities...etc

India was created as a secular nation. It has a secular Constitution. But over the last few decades, cross-border terror attacks in Kashmir and across India by Islamic militants have sowed the seeds of hatred in the hearts of Hindus against Muslims. It was never like this.

A unified India would not have these problems you have mentioned, because Muslims would have been is very large numbers, leading to an equilibrium.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

India was created as a secular nation. It has a secular Constitution. But over the last few decades, cross-border terror attacks in Kashmir and across India by Islamic militants have sowed the seeds of hatred in the hearts of Hindus against Muslims. It was never like this.

A unified India would not have these problems you have mentioned, because Muslims would have been is very large numbers, leading to an equilibrium.

Why should Muslims have to be of a critical mass before they have the right to worship in their mosques, eat beef privately and walk down the street without being asked to say jayshreeram or jai hind? Are we animals that we need the safety of a herd? Nope. Plenty of Hindutva have clearly stated the assassin of Gandhi was a hero. Hindutva has always lurked in the shadows, waiting to usurp power. Even when congress were in power, all we ever heard from educated, civil society was "politics in India is about pandering to the demands of the Muslim vote", as though Muslims were simply a commodity to be bought as necessary and their concerns were not of any real importance. Muslims were never respected as equal partners in your "democratic secular state". They realise now how they have been used and how nobody actually wants them in india.

India is failing fast, now that the fraud of this false nation held together only by mughals and brits has been exposed.

 

[ranadd]

India is failing fast,

So fast.