What's new

If there is a war between China - Viet Nam in SCS

China has airbase in SCS,it gives China a great advantage in projecting her air power.

200511813242802.jpg

2012020114514023725.jpg


China has many Refueling aircrafts,Aerial refueling is the technology that Chinese aircrafts mastered while Vietnamese don't have.

1248773758768.jpg

1248773678944.jpg

1248773624361.jpg

IHJn3.jpg

d12ce.jpg
 
China has airbase in SCS,it gives China a great advantage in projecting her air power.

200511813242802.jpg

[/IMG]

This is Phú Lâm (Woody) Island in Hoàng Sa (Paracel) Islands of Vietnam, which is illegally occupied by China from 1974. It has the distance to the nearest island of Trường Sa (Spratly) Islands about 640km, to Big Spratly Island (a main island of VN) about 1,000km.
If China use it to attack Trường Sa (Spratly) Islands, we will destroy its airport by missiles from coast of Vietnam...
 
This is Phú Lâm (Woody) Island in Hoàng Sa (Paracel) Islands of Vietnam, which is illegally occupied by China from 1974. It has the distance to the nearest island of Trường Sa (Spratly) Islands about 640km, to Big Spratly Island (a main island of VN) about 1,000km.
If China use it to attack Trường Sa (Spratly) Islands, we will destroy its airport by missiles from coast of Vietnam...

if you dare to use your limited number of missiles to attack Chinese airbase,then all your airbases and missiles launching sites will be wiped off the face of the earth.

New friends come from US NAVY to hep Vietnam people.

haha,you wish,they didn't even help you in 1974 when you were supposed to be allies.
 
Will the US defend Philippines if China attacks?
By Jojo Malig, ABS-CBNnews.com
Posted at 07/25/2012 10:58 PM
MANILA, Philippines - The US military might not come to the Philippines' aid if Chinese forces attack Filipino ships and claimed territory in the disputed Spratly Islands and Scarborough Shoal, international affairs experts have warned.

While the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty (MDT) requires Manila and Washington to support each other if either of the 2 countries are attacked by a third party, the United States has yet to make a full commitment with regard to the Spratlys and Scarborough Shoal, according to the International Crisis Group (ICG).

"The treaty text leaves the extent of US commitments open to interpretation," the ICG said in its latest report on the territorial disputes in the West Philippine Sea.

"While the text calls for the US to respond to an armed attack against the Philippines, Manila only received 'vague assurances' that Washington would uphold the treaty during the Scarborough standoff," the ICG added.

"Furthermore, the US has not confirmed whether the scope of the treaty covers contested territories in the South China Sea," said the Brussels-based organization, which advises governments and world bodies like the United Nations, European Union and World Bank on the prevention and resolution of armed conflicts.

It added that MDT predates the Philippines' territorial claims in the West Philippine Sea, resulting in uncertainties how the US will interpret its application to disputed territories in the event of a conflict.

US neutral in Philippines-China dispute

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton earlier said Washington is neutral in the Philippines-China dispute and is instead focused on ensuring free navigation, unimpeded commerce and stability in the West Philippine Sea.

The ICG also mentioned an analysis of Asian affairs specialist Thomas Lum, who said in an April 2012 report for the Congressional Research Service that the US does not consider the MDT and subsequent renewals to extend to features in the West Philippine Sea.

"Some Philippine officials have suggested or sought assurances that the treaty obliges the United States to come to the defense of the Philippines if China were to take disputed territories in the South China Sea by force, while some US interpretations limit US intervention to a foreign military attack on the main Philippine islands or upon Philippine military forces," Lum said.

However, he added, that "the Obama administration has not further specified the circumstances under which the US armed forces would intervene on behalf of the Philippines."

"The Manila Declaration of November 16, 2011, did not lay out specifically the circumstances in which the United States would defend Philippine claims in the South China Sea," he said.
 
If the US can drop not one but two nuclear bombs on Japanese cities killing over 250,000 an instant and indiscriminately kill hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese and also Filipinos during its bloody American colonial history and yet today these countries idolized and worship the US means that even the most brutal and bloodthirsty of enemies can become your good friend.

After China takes back full control of SCS, there will be no more disputes and we will all be good friends too.
:cheers:
 
if you dare to use your limited number of missiles to attack Chinese airbase,then all your airbases and missiles launching sites will be wiped off the face of the earth.

Why do you think that we don't dare?
Isn't that we spank your PLA in 1979? :cheesy:

haha,you wish,they didn't even help you in 1974 when you were supposed to be allies.

At the time the U.S Army was forced to withdraw from Vietnam in 1973 and pledged not to intervene in Vietnam again.
South Vietnam was cut off from US aid.

>>>China is a dirty opportunists guy...
 
Why do you think that we don't dare?
Isn't that we spank your PLA in 1979? :cheesy:

haha,still remember the pain that we spanked you in 1979,we destroyed the whole north Vietnamese 6 provinces,killed thousands of your troops and civilians,tore apart all your infrastucture and took back home everything worth some money back to China.did you even try even to touch a grass on our side of the border??lol..
 
If the US can drop not one but two nuclear bombs on Japanese cities killing over 250,000 an instant and indiscriminately kill hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese and also Filipinos during its bloody American colonial history and yet today these countries idolized and worship the US means that even the most brutal and bloodthirsty of enemies can become your good friend.

After China takes back full control of SCS, there will be no more disputes and we will all be good friends too.
:cheers:

Robbers can not never be friends. Shoot a mouth dirty enemy.
 
If the US can drop not one but two nuclear bombs on Japanese cities killing over 250,000 an instant and indiscriminately kill hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese and also Filipinos during its bloody American colonial history and yet today these countries idolized and worship the US means that even the most brutal and bloodthirsty of enemies can become your good friend.

After China takes back full control of SCS, there will be no more disputes and we will all be good friends too.
:cheers:

The difference is today they [the US] did not occupy the islands of Vietnam, not blatantly "inviting international bids" on the lots in Vietnam's EEZ, not blatantly establish "Xaxa city" [LOL chinese] on the islands of Vietnam, not to continue to threaten Vietnam ...
So why dont we see them as friends? :cheers: or chinese? LOL chinese!!!! :lol:
 
US didn't dare to defend its treaty ally S.Vietnam in 1974,facts show that their military protection treaty is like toilet paper,N.Koreans shelled S.Korean island and sank S.Korean submarines,US didn't dare do anything about it to protect its treaty ally.

Battle of the Paracel Islands - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Military engagement

In the early morning of January 19, 1974, Vietnamese troops from the HQ-5 landed on Duncan Island and came under fire from Chinese troops after opening fire first on the Chinese while advancing toward the shores. Three Vietnamese soldiers were killed and two others were injured. Outnumbered, the Vietnamese ground forces withdrew by landing craft, but their small fleet itself drew up close to the Chinese warships in a tense standoff.

At 10:24 a.m., Vietnamese warships HQ-16 and HQ-10 opened fire against the Chinese warships. Then, HQ-4 and HQ-5 did the same. The ensuing sea battle lasted for about 40 minutes, with numerous vessels on both sides sustaining damage. The small Chinese warships maneuvered into the blind spots of the main cannons on the larger Vietnamese warships and succeeded in damaging all four Vietnamese ships, particularly the HQ-10. The Nhật Tảo (HQ-10) could not retreat because her last working engine was disabled in the battle; the crew was ordered to evacuate, but her captain, Major Navy Lt. Commander Ngụy Văn Thà, remained and went down with his ship. HQ-16, severely shot by a friendly ship, the HQ-5, was forced to retreat westwards. Meanwhile, HQ-4 and HQ-5 were also forced to retreat.

The next day, Chinese jet fighters and ground-attack aircraft from Hainan bombed the three islands, and were followed up with an amphibious landing force. The South Vietnamese Marine garrison on the islands was captured, and the naval force retreated to Đà Nẵng.

While the battle was going on, the Vietnamese fleet detected two Chinese reinforcing warships rushing to the area; China later acknowledged that these were the Hainan-Class submarine chasers #281 and #282. Despite South Vietnamese reports that at least one South Vietnamese craft had been struck by a missile, the Chinese insisted that what the Vietnamese saw were RPGs fired by the crew of #389 and that no missile-bearing ships were involved in the battle. In addition, the South Vietnamese fleet also received warnings from the United States that their naval radar had detected additional Chinese guided missile frigates and jet fighters on their way from nearby Hainan. South Vietnam requested assistance from the US Seventh Fleet, but the request was rejected.
 
haha,still remember the pain that we spanked you in 1979,we destroyed the whole north Vietnamese 6 provinces,killed thousands of your troops and civilians,tore apart all your infrastucture and took back home everything worth some money back to China.did you even try even to touch a grass on our side of the border??lol..

Vietnam will always be our little brother, never forget that. Right now the leaders that control Vietnam are not China-friendly, but leadership always changes, we just need to make sure the next change of leadership in Vietnam is pro-China.
 
The difference is today they [the US] did not occupy the islands of Vietnam, not blatantly "inviting international bids" on the lots in Vietnam's EEZ, not blatantly establish "Xaxa city" [LOL chinese] on the islands of Vietnam, not to continue to threaten Vietnam ...
So why dont we see them as friends? :cheers: or chinese? LOL chinese!!!! :lol:

Correct, and after China uses force to take back the islands, in 10 or 30 years it will be different than "today", you get what I'm saying?

Here let me explain, after China regains full control of SCS and all its islands there would be no more disputes, no more "occupation", because by now, they are all recognized as part Chinese jurisdiction.
 
Correct, and after China uses force to take back the islands, in 10 or 30 years it will be different than "today", you get what I'm saying?

Here let me explain, after China regains full control of SCS and all its islands there would be no more disputes, no more "occupation", because by now, they are all recognized as part Chinese jurisdiction.

Where was China "controlling" in the East Sea, then now you are dreaming "take back"? lol
See a map of China in 1904, [also many other old map of China], it was not related to the East Sea.

Vietnam is a joke. a monkey country :lol:

Clearly, monkeys are better than dogs, Right?

Slaves of Mongolia, Man, Japanese and Britain until 1997, don't have normal human brain to saying about monkey.

And Portugal until 1999

haha,still remember the pain that we spanked you in 1979,we destroyed the whole north Vietnamese 6 provinces,killed thousands of your troops and civilians,tore apart all your infrastucture and took back home everything worth some money back to China.did you even try even to touch a grass on our side of the border??lol..

Then, who was defeated by the girls of the Vietnamese militia?
 
Back
Top Bottom