What's new

ICC may scrap rotation policy for presidents

luckyyy

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
-1
Jun 7, 2011, 01.02am IST TNN

NEW DELHI: The International Cricket Council's (ICC) system for appointing presidents is set to undergo a significant change with the world body planning to table a proposal to scrap the current rotation policy at its next annual general meeting of board members in Hong Kong on June 28.

The move is likely to be opposed by Pakistan and Bangladesh, the two full members who are next in turn to nominate a president and vice-president, according to a cricket website. The proposal formed the main topic of discussion at an ICC governing committee meeting in Chennai last week.

The earlier ICC method, starting in 1996 with Jagmohan Dalmiya's tenure, saw a rotation of the president's post among full member countries. In 2007, the post of vice-president, to be nominated by a pair of countries, was also created. Australia-New Zealand, West Indies-England, India-Sri Lanka, Pakistan-Bangladesh and South Africa-Zimbabwe form the pairs.

The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) is worried over this development and chief Ijaz Butt has even written a letter to the ICC on this issue, according to reports in the Pakistan media. PCB's fear is that this may be an attempt to sideline it at a time when Pakistan cricket is struggling to come to terms with one controversy after another.

The system was under scrutiny last year when former Australia prime minister John Howard's candidacy for vice-president (who is president elect) was rejected outright by other members at the annual conference in Singapore, and Kiwi Alan Isaac was eventually chosen. If the present system remains, Isaac will take over from incumbent Sharad Pawar, followed by a nominee from Pakistan/Bangladesh in 2015.

Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) chief Ahmed Mustafa Kamal told sections of the Pakistani media: "We want one cycle of the president rotation policy to be completed. Pakistan's Ehsan Mani already had a chance to be president and now we want one nominee from Bangladesh for the vice-president and then the president's post at the ICC."

Mani slams Pawar's policy

Former ICC chief Ehsan Mani has slammed the Sharad Pawar-led ICC's reported move to do away with the rotational policy for appointment of presidents after 2015, suggesting that India might have initiated it.

"I don't know why the ICC wants to change it. If it is going to be changed I want to ask who are the people behind this. Sharad Pawar's term is ending next year. The question which can be asked is that if there is anything India want to jump the queue and an Indian getting the ICC president's post," he added.

Nine out of 10 Test playing nations have reportedly signed on the ICC's proposal to change the rotational policy and Mani termed it unusual.

The Times of India on Mobile
 
If Nine out of 10 Test playing nations have reportedly signed on the ICC's proposal to change the rotational policy , how can BOTH Pakistan and Bangladesh be opposed to the changed?
 
If Nine out of 10 Test playing nations have reportedly signed on the ICC's proposal to change the rotational policy , how can BOTH Pakistan and Bangladesh be opposed to the changed?

bangladesh opposed but signed , pakistan opposed but didn't signed yet..
 
So Pawar wants to be Sepp Blatter of ICC? At least that will distract him from his corrupt practices in India.

I'm all for this change ;)
 
Indian after enjoying the Seat............now pushing for stop of rotation of seat................everybody must get equal rights....every country has right to sit on that seats.
 
Indian after enjoying the Seat............now pushing for stop of rotation of seat................everybody must get equal rights....every country has right to sit on that seats.

Why does every country have a right to sit on that seat? The ICC is a democratic institution, and if 9 out of 10 countries agree with a decision, then Pakistan HAS TO abide by it.

---------- Post added at 04:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:20 PM ----------

Indian after enjoying the Seat............now pushing for stop of rotation of seat................everybody must get equal rights....every country has right to sit on that seats.

Why does every country have a right to sit on that seat? The ICC is a democratic institution, and if 9 out of 10 countries agree with a decision, then Pakistan HAS TO abide by it.
 
Indian after enjoying the Seat............now pushing for stop of rotation of seat................everybody must get equal rights....every country has right to sit on that seats.

It is still better than appointing Ijaz big butt the president of ICC
 
great move. now that india is pumping more money into the game than everyone else, it's only fair that india presides over ICC. Day every country starts contributing equally, maybe we can go for the rotation policy!
 
We beleive in Democratic rules..
9 out 10 has voted..
BDCricket board had made some noise eventually they signed...

Now only one left:--PCB..

They will do it soon..let wait n watch:cheers:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom