What's new

IAF violated Pakistan air space| Forced to return

So its acceptable for the Webmaster to post comments like "Indians are clowns"?
What is clown worse than "Pathetic, liars, terrorists, etc. etc. etc." Especially when Indians are clearly seen making gaffes that are akin to clowns?
 
and *** hole zardari did not condemend the iaf cowarfd act and said it is technical falt by iaf i want to say to him this technical falt why do not happen by paf fighter jets in indian aerospace and why any chinese fighter jets do not do this technical falayu i think we as a nation should pray to almighty ALLAH that take out this zardari as a presiden he even dosent know what he is saying he makes pakitsani case very low if this same thing paf fighter jets had done we know what would indian govt will do.
 
Of course unacceptable I was surprised by Webmaster's comments I earlier thought those were translations.

If IAF violates Pakistan's airspace then it's a circus and we know who takes part in it, don't we ? :wave:
 
I think PAF should release images if there are any to slap these Indian cowards.
 
What is clown worse than "Pathetic, liars, terrorists, etc. etc. etc." Especially when Indians are clearly seen making gaffes that are akin to clowns?

Well, that's a matter of opinion.

If I think that some member is acting like an idiot, can I call him an idiot?

But I guess clown would not qualify as a gaali.....
 
Of course unacceptable I was surprised by Webmaster's comments I earlier thought those were translations.



from now plz ke some urdu classes do not take hindi classes if you do you will get even more worst
 
Of course unacceptable I was surprised by Webmaster's comments I earlier thought those were translations.
Emotions are flying high. You should expect a lot more sterner messages from Pakistanis. We let Indians fly with a lot of crap during the Mumbai episode considering that emotions were at an all time high.

India is a very unpopular entity in Pakistan ever since the news broke out that India tried to or will attack even after Pakistan did all these things for her.
 
So you think Pakistan has around 100 nukes just to be overcome by its enemies, actually there's no limit to what one can imagine.

strange T-Rex. i think you are from a non-military background so you are talking like this. i have a healthy respect for PA officers and take them as professionals.
Its not easy to use "nukes". Be rest assured, if there is a chance of confrontation, US, UK, France, Germany, Canada, Russia along with others and India will immediately ensure that the threats posed by them are removed in the earliest phases of war via SF missions and airstrikes at whatever the cost. Anyways US is in control of those now and they are under its threat forever. That is the condition for Pakistan being safe from direct US intervention yet.
Next, any use of nuclear warhead, even in tactical situation will call for massive retaliatory strike from India, and India has 80 times the industrial base than Pakistan not to mention the facilities. There is something known as the industrial and military capacity to maintain stockpiles, something you are unable to appreciate I guess. Strike and that will be the ultmate solution to a vexed question. Think clearly and not be jingoistic.
 
There is no point in trying anymore I think, same with WoT, these are all distractions. Time to reclaim our country instead of helping the Indians and Americans destroy us.
 
No matter what you say about ISI and PA Mr. Phony X , the Hindutava ideology is taking its toll in India and it will continue to do so.
Just to change the taste, what is your view about all the trouble in Assam and Naga Land.
Also I will be obliged if you could shed some light on Sikh freedom Struggle as they are still very active outside India, is there any chance that their movement will gain momentum again.

well its not phoney X :cheers:
anyways the question you have asked certainly merits a great thought. let me go back a bit in history. the mistake was making Nehru the PM in waiting post independence and not Jinnah. The latter was the better of the two and he would have maintained India as one country. Now at the time of independence, Nehru gave land from British India to Burma which included areas of grazing claimed by Nagas till river chindwin as their own. the "greater nagaland" as a result of administrative reorganisation was cut down. this led to resentment. the same problem as in pakistan is there, people have no employment. so the problem continues. The fact that it is landlocked and the only things they produce is sold at high costs due to transport to plains of india led to lack of development in NE.
the problem of Assam is migration of Bangladeshis disguised as Bengali labours. There is extensive resentment of the local Bodos (original inhabitants) to this peaceful invasion and as they have settled and are thriving under the secular character of india which has ensured that we can not do anything against these foreigners as you will cry foul and anti-islam. that is the fact.:what:
 
GOP has a laid back and casual attitude. Our government is still not clear what to do and what course of action would be right ? Pakistan Armed Forces are fully aware of the situation but GOP is the front in their eyes as well.

Frankly, I don't see this government going on for long with this kind of attitude.
 
strange T-Rex. i think you are from a non-military background so you are talking like this. i have a healthy respect for PA officers and take them as professionals.
Its not easy to use "nukes". Be rest assured, if there is a chance of confrontation, US, UK, France, Germany, Canada, Russia along with others and India will immediately ensure that the threats posed by them are removed in the earliest phases of war via SF missions and airstrikes at whatever the cost. Anyways US is in control of those now and they are under its threat forever. That is the condition for Pakistan being safe from direct US intervention yet.
Next, any use of nuclear warhead, even in tactical situation will call for massive retaliatory strike from India, and India has 80 times the industrial base than Pakistan not to mention the facilities. There is something known as the industrial and military capacity to maintain stockpiles, something you are unable to appreciate I guess. Strike and that will be the ultmate solution to a vexed question. Think clearly and not be jingoistic.

well its not phoney X :cheers:
anyways the question you have asked certainly merits a great thought. let me go back a bit in history. the mistake was making Nehru the PM in waiting post independence and not Jinnah. The latter was the better of the two and he would have maintained India as one country. Now at the time of independence, Nehru gave land from British India to Burma which included areas of grazing claimed by Nagas till river chindwin as their own. the "greater nagaland" as a result of administrative reorganisation was cut down. this led to resentment. the same problem as in pakistan is there, people have no employment. so the problem continues. The fact that it is landlocked and the only things they produce is sold at high costs due to transport to plains of india led to lack of development in NE.
the problem of Assam is migration of Bangladeshis disguised as Bengali labours. There is extensive resentment of the local Bodos (original inhabitants) to this peaceful invasion and as they have settled and are thriving under the secular character of india which has ensured that we can not do anything against these foreigners as you will cry foul and anti-islam. that is the fact.:what:

Please stick to topic and don't derail thread.
 
are you talking abut this file foto

the image is a file.
secondly yes intrusion is taking place and its not the first time IAF has done it. its a great exercise for plotting the SAM sites and RADARs deployed by PA/PAF as also to ascertain the Forward bases occupied by PAF so far. wont be surprised to see more of these now. AWACs held by india (a couple of A-50s we have, not Phalcons yet) as also AEWs will have good feeds off this. Also its needed for determining the frequencies in use with AC radars with PAF as also creating enough electronic signature to create effective counter measures
i am unsure about the combination of ACs being claimed by Pak media. Su-30s definitely are not for use in these sits, they are on CAP in North and along Arabian Sea and NOT in West yet. Mirages in J&K? That is a joke. They are not there by miles. Mig-29s I can agree and Mig-21s and they are not coffins (only for adversary they are now). Strange that PAF claims "heavily weaponised" IAF ACs. Were they escorting them to see the armament? Are they really so unprofessional? I see only jingoism here, no hard facts. Its like claiming Pak SSG is active in Mumbai case!!!!! (we know they are active in J&K):cheesy:
 

Back
Top Bottom