What's new

Germany, France to jointly develop 'Leopard 3' tank

Hindustani78

BANNED
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
40,471
Reaction score
-47
Country
India
Location
India
Germany, France to jointly develop ′Leopard 3′ tank | News | DW.DE | 22.05.2015
Date 22.05.2015

Germany and France are considering cooperation on developing a successor to the tank "Leopard 2." The current model has been in service since 1979, and aging Bundeswehr equipment is currently in stark focus.


The German Defense Ministry announced its plans for the "Leo 3" (as it's likely to be nicknamed in Germany) in a report on Friday to the Bundestag, which was obtained by multiple media outlets.

"Technologies and concepts will be investigated between 2015 and 2018 in joint studies also involving German industry," Markus Grübel, a deputy minister in the German Defense Ministry told his parliamentary colleagues. He cited the Leopard 2's long years of service as the reason that a new battle tank was required.

The Leopard 2's 50-year service life is set to expire in 2030. The tank, which came into service in 1979, was conceived as part of a plan for Cold War-era land defense. Germany commissioned more than 2,000 of them at the peak of the arms race of the early 1980s. Currently, however, only about 240 are in active service; but last month, citing the security situation in Ukraine, Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen annnounced plans to reactivate 100 mothballed Leopard 2 tanks. In November of last year, von der Leyen also announced a move to add more than 100 aditional "Boxer" armored personnel carriers to the Bundeswehr's ranks.

The Defense Ministry is in the process of drawing up a new "white paper" listing Germany's security policies and goals for the present day.

The manufacturer of the current Leopard 2, Krauss-Maffei Wegmann, is scheduled to fuse with French firm Nexter Systems in the course of this year. This has prompted media reports in Germany saying that the new Franco-German firm, with more than 6,000 staff and a combined turnover of around 2 billion euros ($2.2 billion), could be a strong candidate to win the contract to develop a new battle tank for the German Bundeswehr.

Equipment shortfalls in sharp focus

The plans come at a difficult time for the German military, especially where hardware is concerned. New parliamentary ombudsman to the Bundeswehr, Hans-Peter Bartels, called on parliament in his inauguration on Thursday not to scrimp on military spending, saying German troops needed "100 percent" of the required gear, not "70 percent."

His predecessor, Hellmut Königshaus, told DW this week that his job had often been difficult, and that Bundeswehr reform is very much a work-in-progress. In January, Könighsaus also pointed out that some barracks were "dilapidated," but it is its weaponry that has dominated the headlines in 2015.

Even the Bundeswehr's standard-issue assault rifle, the G36, has come under fire for losing accuracy as the weapon heats up. Meanwhile, Airbus' new military transport plane, the A400M, suffered a crash this month and is being thoroughly scrutinized. Its Transall predecessor is therefore expected to stay in the skies longer than planned.

Other problems have hit Bundeswehr helicopters operating in anti-piracy missions off the Horn of Africa, and more generally, Germany is under pressure from NATO to meet the bloc's defense spending targets. However, very few alliance members spend the recommended 2 percent of total economic output on their armed forces.

The government in Berlin is also seeking to reinvent Germany's international approach to military affairs, gradually moving away from the overwhelmingly pacifist stance adopted in the immediate aftermath of the Second World War. Critics at home argue however, the government should concentrate on solving the Bundeswehr's equipment problems, before adopting a more active international military footing.
 
I want to know why its called Leopard 3 and not Leclerc 2.
@Taygibay
maybe because the name "Leopard" is synamous with one of the best tanks designs ever, and the fact over 3,000 have been built and in use by 18 different countries....compared to Leclerc that isn't as well known and only 862 have been built and in use with France and UAE.


wish the U.S would get in on this.

the Armata has set the bar on technologies that a next gen should have.
 
@Gabriel92 The answer is in the text :
The manufacturer of the current Leopard 2, Krauss-Maffei Wegmann, is scheduled to fuse with French firm Nexter Systems in the course of this year. This has prompted media reports in Germany saying that the new Franco-German firm, with more than 6,000 staff and a combined turnover of around 2 billion euros ($2.2 billion), could be a strong candidate to win the contract to develop a new battle tank for the German Bundeswehr.
Pure journo stuff so far, no reports of such procurements underway.

I want to know why its called Leopard 3 and not Leclerc 2.
Well, GreatOne, C130's answer below is not bad ...
maybe because the name "Leopard" is synamous with one of the best tanks designs ever,
but I'd still go with the above I gave Gab.
The source is a German news outlet ( albeit a very good one ) and talking to its home crowd.

At present, Franco-German procurements are very variable with Berlin often downsizing its orders in the end.
They whine for lead and complain Airbus is too French but they barely go to war with the stuff once acquired.
Ask the Brits about how useful the Germans are regarding Typhie development for fun!

Until this gains credit from govt sources on both sides of the Rhine, I'd use caution on its veracity.
We'll see, Tay.
 
A Franco-German tank ! :o:

So is it going to have an autoloader like the Leclrec or not ? :unsure:

Which is to say aren't French and German tank design ideologies fundamentally different to each other for their to be a potential for a joint-project here ? :undecided:


Erg... that's just to replace their ageing Leopards i think,because there are no plans to replace our Leclercs yet,we are currently modernising 200 of them (I hope more in the future,it depends on the next govt :bunny: and the next white paper) and will keep them far beyond 2030 (even 2040.) :yay: :nana:
Anyway,let's see how the project goes. (If we will really develop a tank with them..)
 
Last edited:
I want to know why its called Leopard 3 and not Leclerc 2.
@Taygibay
Marketing obviously: the Leo 1/2 series has been produced and sold in far greater numbers than LeClerc and predecessors (AMX-30/32/40).

A Franco-German tank ! :o:

So is it going to have an autoloader like the Leclrec or not ? :unsure:

Which is to say aren't French and German tank design ideologies fundamentally different to each other for their to be a potential for a joint-project here ? :undecided:
Leo 1 and AMX-30 are both offspring of a common German-Franco tank project .... It was due to De Gaulle, who took France out of NATO, that the Germans decided to persue a purely national project (Leo1). Subsequently, the French did the same (AMX-30)

Leo 1 prototype
url


AMX-30 prototype
65476_AMX_30_Prototype_1.jpg


proto_a2.jpg


amx30_proto.jpg


Likewise the US-German common MBT-70 spawned to national tanks, the Leopard 2 and the M1 Abrams.

 
If KMW and Nexter Joint venture is same quality like Airbus consortium, than Russia has nothing to fear from funny words like Leopard or Tiger (In Nato case, a papertiger)

rofl

8 european Airbus employees got roasted over spain. what a pitty

I hope @MarkusS was also under them. emm..i mean not under them of course. rofl
it seems so, because he is absent here. o_O:-)

Or he got himself fired because he designed the flawed part of the engines.

:lol: good work comrade! Your sabotage is appreciated! At least you were a true italian communist! :enjoy:
 
If KMW and Nexter Joint venture is same quality like Airbus consortium, than Russia has nothing to fear from funny words like Leopard or Tiger (In Nato case, a papertiger)

rofl

8 european Airbus employees got roasted over spain. what a pitty

I hope @MarkusS was also under them. emm..i mean not under them of course. rofl
it seems so, because he is absent here. o_O:-)

Or he got himself fired because he designed the flawed part of the engines.

:lol: good work comrade! Your sabotage is appreciated! At least you were a true italian communist! :enjoy:

You know I appreciate you LordTyredannus, if mostly for comic relief, but …
this kind of post bordering on personal death wishes if not menaces is going to get you in trouble, komsomolsk.

Besides, laugh all you want at Airbus, until Russia catches up to world first place in pax planes,
which judging by the SSJ saga is far in the future even with Boeing's help, it is all just jest and lies!

Come on, don't get your example from Markus, come back to your usual surrealist self
and have a good day, Tay.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom