What's new

Faulty Defence Planning: Why should armed forces suffer because of incompetent policymakers?

Sea of changes in Indian Defence Policies after BJP came to power ?

  • Yes for sure - Very energetic THUMBS UP!!!

  • May be - Need to wait and watch !!!

  • Not at all - Congress was better . THUMBS DOWN !!!


Results are only viewable after voting.

Ind4Ever

BANNED
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
3,579
Reaction score
-3
Country
India
Location
India
Faulty Defence Planning: Why should armed forces suffer because of incompetent policymakers?

Brigadier Arun Bajpai (Retd)

plus.gif

18 April, 2015
1
0.0/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thanks to the Babus straddling the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and playing the game of General General without knowing anything about the matters of military and the Saint do nothing.
During the tenure of AK Antony as defence minister of the Congress, which ruled the country for last one decade, we bought from Russia the 45500 ton Aircraft Career which joined the service with Indian Navy in Nov 2013 at the cost of 2.23 Billion Dollars.
We then bought 45 MIG 29 K fighter aircrafts from Russia for 2 Billion Dollars to operate from its deck. Lo and behold this costliest weapon platform in service for last one year plus till date had no integral air defence protection despite the Navy crying hoarse. It is only now that Barrack 1 missiles are being mounted that also after cannibalising the same from Indian Navy Frigate INS Godavari.

This just gives an idea how the adhocism besets this country. The problem lies with the higher Indian defence management system where these Babus (bureaucrats) and Netas (political leaders) have kept the three service headquarters separate from MOD by feeding the fear to the leaders that if army is not kept under tight leash meaning Babu control they will do the coup. PMs like Nehru liked this tune of babus.

It is only now the Defence minister Manohar Parrikar has said that within three months he will install the Chief of defence staff system sanctioned since 2003. It is not just Navy suffering, the Indian air force which has a sanctioned strength of 45 Squadrons are down to just 34 squadrons, just two more than Pakistan for lack of fighter aircrafts and Indian Army has not inducted any artillery gun since 1986.

The big question is why these Netas and babus who have brought the Indian armed forces to this dire straight be allowed to get away. Why no accountability is fixed in our democracy on these people? Why should armed forces suffer because of these incompetent people? Need of the hour is for the Indian public to get more concerned about the security of the country and not leave this important issue to these self serving Netas and Babus.



- See more at: http://www.merinews.com/article/fau...cymakers/15905847.shtml#sthash.CvehOKqp.dpufĺ
 
Faulty planning PLUS faulty equipment manufacturers. Why is army, navy, air force forced to buy whatever DRDO, HAL, OFB etc. comes up with just for the sake of indigenisation? Defense is not a swadeshi movement. If the army says a foreign product is good buy it without hesitation instead of waiting for DRDO to come up with an equal.

It was DRDO who vetoed army plans to buy US fire-finding radars that help to locate enemy guns firing shells. DRDO claimed it could indigenously make their own radars. 1999 happened and thanks to lack of fire-finding radars the army had to face the brunt.
 
and army generals are not some saints they are the main accused, they too take bribes,
 
Of course, Indian posters on this website will never ever blame Congress. Just because they ruled India for over 50 yrs...means absolutely nothing in their feeble minds. The blame is on luck, karma, PSU's, etc.
 
If DRDO cannot make something useful then blame the customer, makes perfect sense.

The requirements and design should be frozen before undertaking the research and development of prototype, with a written promise of inducting the platform after successfully demonstrating the required parameters within agreed upon time frame.
 
The requirements and design should be frozen before undertaking the research and development of prototype, with a written promise of inducting the platform after successfully demonstrating the required parameters within agreed upon time frame.

in real life it is unrealistic to freeze requirements
 

Back
Top Bottom