What's new

Enough With The Indian Mig-21 Bison Versus Pakistani F-16 Viper Bullshit

even hater of pakistan and most loyal to indians christine fair did not buy it IAF lies
 
India was even not accepting Mig21 downing until ISPR came up with Abhinandhan video and bitch slapped them. Search youtube videos where all Indian news channels were reporting that "All Indian pilots are accounted for". This was their news headline from 10.00 am till 3.00 pm.
on this very own forum indians were claiming he is pakistani mole :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
I believe the Indian narrative is correct. When Pakistan lied about not using F-16s for the Feb 26th skirmish, it became clear that they would lie about everything. I mean it's common sense when Indians even showed pieces of AMRAAM which only an F-16 can fire from their inventory...you know they are lying about everything else.

3 different Indian radars showed an F-16 disappearing few minutes before our Mig-21 was shot. You can't dispute that proof. Again, we showed the proof about F-16 were involved.

If Pakistan can deny they even used F-16, there is no way in hell that they will accept their F-16 was shot down by an Indian Mig-21.
f-16 did not carry h-2 and H4 weapons ISPR stand correct but you indians will keep living in fantasy world . ISPR said we did not used F-16 to attack india attack package was mirages and thunders . f-16 was protecting pakistani skies as guard . it was question do paksitan used f-16 to attack indian target answer is no pakistan did not used f-16 . amercan weapons are not mean to attack any country . that is why your airforce was showing amraam like a condom in delhi look they beat us with amraam . did you heared that 2 hours press briefing ?


our real plan was to hit 6 indian targets that day and show the retaliate to world . when pakistani package took-off from airbases they were going to bomb india . abhinandan and rest BS came in middle of our operation . paksitan planned not to use US weapon to attack india from begening . but in middle of that operation sri nagar airbase over reacted by firing missiles and launching jets wich failed miserably shooting down own chopper and paksitani vipers shot down abhi . it was not pre planned .
 
Last edited:
It's your Indian establishment problem that they still haven't understood what was said and in turn, educate their population accordingly.

No F16 was used in the strike package. The weapons used , the standoff munitions, F16s cannot carry those weapon systems becuase they are made in Pakistan.

F16s were only doing their guard duties and took out hostile mig21 and su30.

Hope this helps.
Its not that complicated ..they just have their had in sand
 
sir IAF claims it killed 300 people in camp despite eye popping crystal clear images from satellites, then IAF chief goes on public stating i dont believe these images..

Sir, this was about the Tyler Rogoway article. Your conclusions based on that article followed.

No one would have objected to your putting out your point of view about other issues, and labelling them as you pleased, but to misread the Rogoway article, present it back to front and try to convert it into a handmaid of propaganda is something else.

By all means feel free to object to the claims of the IAF. Rogoway does not talk about that. He talks about the recorded performance of the IAF during the mentioned exercises, and the possibility, based on these records, of their having acted in identical fashion on the 27th. Your 'interpretation' of his conclusions is what is under discussion, not other issues, right, wrong or funny.
 
we might be amateurs, have childish views and knowledge; but not even a 9 year kid makes claims as your IAF chief did. ..how can a neutral person think of any good of IAF when they read such laughable statements..

Please feel free to think of the IAF as you will. That, as I had mentioned, is an asset; it completely undermines the rational analysis of the situation, and of future situations, by the PAF. Unfortunately, there is no guarantee that this kind of whataboutery exists within the PAF; it is a great advantage if it does, but we can only hope.
 
RIP SU-30.

Indeed.

You left out lots of other mythical objects. Perhaps in later posts, we will learn from you that the winged horse Pegasus was also a casualty.

Your audience is awaiting your next two-word gripping chapter filled with exciting action, moving melodrama, suspense and scintillating bravery. There may even be one or two breaths bated.
 
Not even a single anaylsist including the most bizzare and idiotic one took IAF serious ..
This was the level of claims they made..

It seriously hurt any small impression of professionalism left in IAF

We are not discussing any one of your army of bizarre and idiotic analysts; we are discussing one analyst, whose analysis is available in print, visible, as the OP. So if you launch your evaluation of his analysis with a summation of those other bizarre and idiotic people, your adoring audience needs to be forgiven for getting confused; they think you are talking about Rogoway.

Such confusion seriously hurts any small impression about the levels of reading comprehension on display.
 
s a matter of fact that day it was not just the MIG21 which went down by PAF
There was SU30MKI as well went down on Indian side

Are these the views of the bizarre and idiotic analysts mentioned earlier, or are these your own conclusions?
 
India was even not accepting Mig21 downing until ISPR came up with Abhinandhan video and bitch slapped them. Search youtube videos where all Indian news channels were reporting that "All Indian pilots are accounted for". This was their news headline from 10.00 am till 3.00 pm.

I note that you garner your views of the events on the battlefield from YouTube. And the reports of the encounter on news headlines.

A humble suggestion: why not play out these things on a suitable game platform, with intellects matching yours from the Indian side - surely one or two might be found - and settle things conveniently? Why fly the planes at all?
 
Its not that complicated ..they just have their had in sand

Rogoway, or Indians at large? Whom were you responding to? Is this usually the pattern of your answers? Are we to expect that in future, too, a printed article by X, Y or Z will be countered by a faithful interpretation of the battle near Betelgeuse?
 
hum heejroon ke sath nhi larty jo khud ko marna shuru ker deen that day your IAF slaughtered 6 of thier own men and one civilians on ground . :undecided: aysi chu tya air force se acha hai panga hi na lo ap log .

keep dreaming. we never surrendered .
 
Last edited:
Indeed.

You left out lots of other mythical objects. Perhaps in later posts, we will learn from you that the winged horse Pegasus was also a casualty.

Your audience is awaiting your next two-word gripping chapter filled with exciting action, moving melodrama, suspense and scintillating bravery. There may even be one or two breaths bated.
SU-30 has the radar cross section of a building. If an agile low profile Mig-21 Bison got knocked from the sky then why can't a SU-30?? Only shoot down India got that day was of its own search and rescue helicopter (sent to rescue the downed SU-30 pilots).
 

Back
Top Bottom