By israeI nuks they have no need even f35 they are safe with nuks . If Egypt is threat for Israel Saudi Arabia is not far and they have advanced f15 . Saudi can be threat for them what is different
I don't see why Saudi Arabia or Egypt need Nukes. One warhead full of Sarin would mess up all of Israel.
Wouldn't an EMP disable their ability to launch the missiles themselves?
I'm not saying that. A preemptive strike would fry the electronics on board the missiles right? Therefor disabiling their ability to launch.
Has it not been done with nukes?
Almost all electronic devices used on military applications are EMP-hardened, and I would guess that this especially applies to ballistic and cruise missiles. There is also the possibility of bombing the cities using F-35s or sending the missiles through submarines, which are believed to hold the bulk of the arsenal.
Then again, couldn't a missile based attack like the Jericho just be targeted by a ABM with a nuclear warhead? Would simplify the need for precision guidance. Russia does that with their ABM system over Moscow.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/israels-secret-nuclear-biological-and-chemical-weapons-nbc/5352454
Well, nuke on Israel would pretty much destroy everything except the underground bunkers of Jericho that built to withstand nuclear blast
Iran has chemical weapons as well, as do some other Arab countries that we don't know of. If Israel retaliates via these three options being Nuclear, Biological, or Chemically than I expect the same from Arab states or Iran. If Iran launched say 300 BM that I doubt you could intercept every single one of them but I'm not sure how many TELs that Iran has.
Tsar bomba?
