‘Drink it if it’s safe’: South Korean lawmaker challenges Japan officials to consume treated Fukushima water

[Hamartia Antidote]

Does north korea possess the same advantages over south korea that these countries do over their adversaries

Yeah, it's this little thing called nuclear weapons.

 

[S.Y.A]

Yeah, it's this little thing called nuclear weapons.

more hype. using nukes will render the territory useless, and will affect their own as well. like you claimed, they want unification, and see it as a renegade province. if that is the case then the south's destruction is not their goal. its not the US.

 

[Zsari]

The Koreans in general hold a more negative view of China than Japan. South Korea is entirely aligned with the Western style of polity, not to mention the alignment with the US.

Of course S. Korea is tied to the US war bandwagon as its government does not even have command of its own troops. But regardless of how the US press S. Korea and Japan together to kiss and make up, the hostility between the two will not go away, and that will make any coalition against China ineffective.

 

[nahtanbob]

Technology doesn't belong to anyone exclusively, do you use paper? I m talking about cultures, that Indian guy says China has no culture, do you agree?

people beg to differ. Xi wears a Western suit because West has the dominant technology

 

[Vikramaditya-I]

Of course S. Korea is tied to the US war bandwagon as its government does not even have command of its own troops. But regardless of how the US press S. Korea and Japan together to kiss and make up, the hostility between the two will not go away, and that will make any coalition against China ineffective.

The US don't need an effective counter from other east Asians and things spiral out of control, they want just enough so that China is boggled down for years. It's the same strategy that worked effectively against Russia. The Americans defeated Russia without firing a single bullet.

 

[Vikramaditya-I]

Buddha was a Nepalese, not Indian. You Indians are Hindus, not Buddhists, there are no connections.

"According to Buddhist tradition, Buddha was born in Lumbini, in what is now Nepal to royal parents of the Shakya clan."

"Buddha was a Nepalese, not Indian. You Indians are Hindus, not Buddhists, there are no connections." Etylo Up until 2008, there was only one Hindu state in the world, that's Nepal. You failed history bro, don't try to debate on things you don't know.
Nepal didn't come into existence until Prithvi Narayan Shah unified it in the 18th century. That was the first time, a king unified different chieftains and kingdoms together. And guess where Lumbini is located.

oh i see, an indian clone with no intention to discussed but all ITS purpose here is to troll like an animal.

Your poor attempt at making simple rhetoric is noted.

 

[etylo]

"Buddha was a Nepalese, not Indian. You Indians are Hindus, not Buddhists, there are no connections." Etylo Up until 2008, there was only one Hindu state in the world, that's Nepal. You failed history bro, don't try to debate on things you don't know.
Nepal didn't come into existence until Prithvi Narayan Shah unified it in the 18th century. That was the first time, a king unified different chieftains and kingdoms together. And guess where Lumbini is located.

India as a state never existed in history until 1947 the British created. So don't make up that Nepal belonged to India, period.

Quotes about Nepal:

"Around 600 BCE, small kingdoms and confederations of clans arose in the southern regions of Nepal. From one of these, the Shakya polity, arose a prince who later renounced his status to lead an ascetic life, founded Buddhism, and came to be known as Gautama Buddha (traditionally dated 563–483 BCE)"

Although Nepal is a Hindu religion dominated state now, what does that make you Hindus in India related to Buddhists world wide ? Lol.

 

[Vikramaditya-I]

Although Nepal is a Hindu religion dominated state now, what does that make you Hindus in India related to Buddhists world wide ? Lol.

Maybe you should've read more instead of trying to make stuff up. It always had a Hindu majority. Also, India's relation to it is because Buddha became Buddha in what is today's Bihar under the Mahabodhi tree today it is the Mahabodhi temple. And who spread Buddhism across the world? Indian kings like Ashoka. How about that LOL

 

[etylo]

Maybe you should've read more instead of trying to make stuff up. It always had a Hindu majority. Also, India's relation to it is because Buddha became Buddha in what is today's Bihar under the Mahabodhi tree today it is the Mahabodhi temple. And who spread Buddhism across the world? Indian kings like Ashoka. How about that LOL

You Indians can claim all the BS credits you want, but Buddha was Nepalese.

 

[Vikramaditya-I]

You Indians can claim all the BS credits you want, but Buddha was Nepalese.

And I am batman.

 

[etylo]

And I am batman.

You are too shitty to be batman hero, but more like cowman.

 

[Vikramaditya-I]

You are too shitty to be batman hero, but more like cowman.

Is that so? I like that you are an ignoramus just rambling left and right over silly things. Maybe read something more instead of embarrassing yourself and your countrymen.

 

[etylo]

Is that so? I like that you are an ignoramus just rambling left and right over silly things. Maybe read something more instead of embarrassing yourself and your countrymen.

Talk of foolishness and ignorance, that's what you people are best known for. Try to take credits that are not yours always by blatantly lying.

 

[Vikramaditya-I]

Talk of foolishness and ignorance, that's what you people are best known for. Try to take credits that are not yours always by blatantly lying.

And yet, your claim is without any evidence to back it up.
You seem to be salty about the fact that 'Buddhism originated in India' it was propagated by an Indian king named Ashoka around the world. Rest of your arguments are just copium you are high on. You can use whatever internet you have, and figure it out.

 

[etylo]

And yet, your claim is without any evidence to back it up.
You seem to be salty about the fact that 'Buddhism originated in India' it was propagated by an Indian king named Ashoka around the world. Rest of your arguments are just copium you are high on. You can use whatever internet you have, and figure it out.
View attachment 932131

Lol, in wiki, it is clearly stated that Buddha was born in Nepal, and you Indians just won't accept the fact and stubbornly claim Buddha was Indian just as you Indians foolishly claim that Chinese martial arts were created by Indians, LMAO.