What's new

Does Pakistan pose a bigger threat to India after Babar III launch?

Having a second strike capability was just a matter of time for Pakistan.
 
No, because India already demonstrated similar capwbility back in 2013.

Compare our coastline with yours (from bay of bengal to gujrat ) + "we may die but will surely take yku down with us " thats our policy for india . our priority is how to strike india .
.
.
What if ten Submarines (2 Agosta + 8 Chinese) loaded with babur 3 ordered to leash hell at india .
 
Pakistan's threat to India is posed not as much by its weapons (since it already has plenty good ones) as it is by those in charge, namely, the Pakistani jarnails.

The same jarnails who hang and exile PMs, carry out coups, assassinate civilian leaders, launch wars all by themselves, and then lose badly in the same wars, discriminate between good and bad terrorists. Basically they are moving and taking Pakistan in a direction exactly opposite to what a modern progressive democracy should be going in.

and mind you, they pose more of a threat to Pakistan itself than they do to India.
 
Well the capability we are talking about we had it 3 years ago and as soon as Pakistan gets Chinese sub's Pakistan is going to declare it's 1000 kilometers version of slcm Babar 3 its gone happen and yeah I can understand Indian experts saying it's fake because they want to stWell the capability we are talking about we had it 3 years ago and as soon as Pakistan gets Chinese sub's Pakistan is going to declare it's 1000 kilometers version of slcm Babar 3 its gone happen and yeah I can understand Indian experts saying it's fake because they want to sustain sense of superiority in their people and be sure after some years you gone say some guy on PDF said and that is exactly what is happening now
 
Pakistan's threat to India is posed not as much by its weapons (since it already has plenty good ones) as it is by those in charge, namely, the Pakistani jarnails.

The same jarnails who hang and exile PMs, carry out coups, assassinate civilian leaders, launch wars all by themselves, and then lose badly in the same wars, discriminate between good and bad terrorists. Basically they are moving and taking Pakistan in a direction exactly opposite to what a modern progressive democracy should be going in.

and mind you, they pose more of a threat to Pakistan itself than they do to India.

If we look at development of Pakistan deterrence weapons and the reason, you would be asking questions to NaMO in first place along with Indian Generals threatening of so-called strike, cold feet doctrine and what not. Found nothing but mere blames and indian media representation.

Though just a recent news...not going to far in history......

PM Narendra Modi government tried to kill me in a plane crash: Mamata Banerjee
 
Last edited:
Yes Pakistan try to Hide its Card But it wont exceed 700KM which is the range of ground version but Pakistan Still need longer range Systems
Even Pakistan have decades of experience this is a new territory
ground version is reported to be atleast 1000km range missile by many experts and media.
 
Isn't the ground attack version has 1500km already? Shouldn't B3 have 3000Km range atleast?
 
Isn't the ground attack version has 1500km already? Shouldn't B3 have 3000Km range atleast?
Travelling through water is harder than travelling through air. The B3 has to travel under water after being launched and that severely degrades the fuel remaining.

Besides B3 might have been slightly modified and shortened in size to allow it to be launched from a sub torpedo bay.
 
Yes , without any Doubt ... with coming of 8 AIP Subs along with longer range CM none of Indian Coastal City will be safe from Nuclear attack ( second Strike )

Even with announced 450km range B-3 is threat to Indian coastal assets, because once an naval officer on board of PN ship told me, "we are not afraid to go closer to enemy to fight war, we will do what is necessary to fight war for nation, even if we have to take big risks". Submariners are usually dare devils around the world.

With B-3 PN in it's history first time have achievd capability to hit any coastal asset India have.
 
Even with announced 450km range B-3 is threat to Indian coastal assets, because once an naval officer on board of PN ship told me, "we are not afraid to go closer to enemy to fight war, we will do what is necessary to fight war for nation, even if we have to take big risks". Submariners are usually dare devils around the world.

With B-3 PN in it's history first time have achievd capability to hit any coastal asset India have.

it will be depend of PN strategy , if we decide to go for the Offense , than one Sub lingering around Indian Coast can create Havoc within their Fleet, unless and until its tracked and Destroyed , No sailor will have a Good sleep ..
 
There is one point I want to add here it is that the Akula Subs that India currently lease are to expire in 4 years and at that point India will lose its Agni Submarine Launch as Akula already has Ballistic Missile launch tubes and that made its job easy but after 4 years India will lose that edge if it decides to not renew that lease and with Pakistan's capability India requires that edge more than ever. But India moving towards French tech is pissing off Russians and they might back Down from the Deal That can result in Indian to re Develop the missile System as Akula were initially designed for such missiles. With French Subs they need to develop a more compact nuke design and that is an area where India Lacks a lot.
 
Well they were fried any way in case of war.. I don't know a bit more frying would be called a bigger threat... but alot of avenues do open up for Pakistan.... and India is not the only or the biggest threat we are facing today
 

Back
Top Bottom