What's new

Cohn: Sikh separatists out of touch with homeland

Isaq Khan

BANNED
Joined
Feb 27, 2010
Messages
463
Reaction score
0
Cohn: Sikh separatists out of touch with homeland

Published On Tue Apr 27 2010
By Martin Regg Cohn Deputy Editorial Page Editor

Police came out in force, deployed for a weekend parade by as many as 100,000 Sikhs marching through the streets of downtown Toronto. The media also took up positions for potentially the biggest story in town on a slow news day.

It’s been a bad news month for Canada’s Sikhs: a bungled B.C. parade that glorified Sikh separatists and terrorists as martyrs; sinister warnings for politicians to stay away; death threats on Facebook; and unseemly brawls in Brampton.

Against that backdrop, it’s worth taking stock of all the bad news swirling around Sikhs — and stacking it up against the reality on the ground. Not just in Canada, but in India’s Punjab, the inspiration for much of the recent tension in B.C.

As much as some Sikh Canadians cling to the dream of Khalistan — a separate Sikh homeland — it exists only as a historical footnote in India. Despite the distant rumblings in Canada, all is quiet in Khalistan.

A quarter-century ago, the epicentre of Punjab’s political earthquake was the Golden Temple in Amritsar, near the border with Pakistan. Revered by pious Sikhs, it is now cultivated assiduously by visiting Canadian politicians harvesting votes back home.

Premier Dalton McGuinty paid his respects at the temple, Prime Minister Stephen Harper has made the pilgrimage and Jean Chrétien before him.

Pilgrims and politicians alike circumambulate barefoot along its white marble tiles, beneath copper-plated roofs overlaid with 100 kilograms of gold foil. Turbaned worshippers bathe in calming waters of the pool of immortality.

But the walls are still pockmarked by bullet holes, vestiges of the 1984 battle that pitted armed militants against Indian army forces, leaving 1,000 dead. The insurgency spread like wildfire across the plains of the Punjab, claiming an estimated 17,000 lives.

Ordinary Sikhs played a decisive role when they turned against a movement beset by terrorist violence. There were human rights violations on both sides. But by the 1990s, the police were gathering vital intelligence from villagers and beat back the militants.

Today, the Punjab is at peace. And Khalistan is long forgotten.


Since 2005, India has been ruled by a Sikh prime minister, Manmohan Singh; from 2005 to 2007 the army was also helmed by a Sikh, Joginder Jaswant Singh. Sikhs could hardly claim they were being ruled by outsiders when their brethren were running the country — and the army.

Over the years, Sikh separatists have made their peace with the rest of India. When Chrétien visited the Golden Temple in 2003, his host was Manjit Singh Kalkatta, an erstwhile Sikh separatist.

When I returned to Amritsar two years later to write about the movement, I sat down with Kalkatta, a preacher and firebrand politician. He was still bitter about how separatism had been beaten back, but acknowledged that most Punjabis were enormously proud that one of their own had become prime minister.

At the time, the high priest of the Golden Temple, Giani Joginder Singh Vedanti, told me that Sikhs wanted greater autonomy but the separatist movement had lost its way.

“The violence was not accepted by the Punjabi masses, so it was unsustainable,” he said, speaking in his capacity as Jathedar Akal Takht — the world’s highest Sikh authority. “We don’t want to be separate from the Indian nation, because we are very much part of the Indian nation.”

So how can Canada still be incubating a virulent strain of Sikh separatism, while in India all is quiet? Why is it that an Indian prime minister, who happens to be a Sikh, has to take Canada’s prime minister aside to warn him about the activities of separatist militants on our soil?

One of the shortcomings of living in the diaspora is that you live at such a great distance from the daily lives of the people you left behind. If separatists in the Punjab have given up their dream, so too should their fellow travellers in the Canadian diaspora.

Not only are they desperately out of touch with the politics of the Punjab, they are on a different wavelength from their fellow Sikh Canadians in the mainstream.


http://www.thestar.com/opinion/colu...n-sikh-separatists-out-of-touch-with-homeland
 
Be it Sikhs or Hindus mindless violence isn't just part of our genes,its not part of our religion,tradition or culture .We cant sustain it or justify it to ourselves more than anyone else.It something ingrained deep in our psyche ...thats why u saw the common Sikhs of Punjab turned the tide against militancy.history shows We rise and turn to violence only to defend ourselves.We can debate the virtue of such a quality ,but thats what we are.
 
Its true that there are few people who want to revive the Khalistani movement but to be honest practically thats not possible...Punjab is the most peaceful state now and developing very fast...people who support Khalistan are mostly based outside India who are responsible for funding the movement.But if you look in Punjab the story is different.

In Punjab people do talk about the Khalistani movement and Babbar Khalsa,but no one wants to get associated with it.not because they are frightened of getting caught but simply they have realised its actually a misleading movement just spreading terror with the support of some anti India elements sitting in their homes.....Sikhism teaches protecting the weak that our gurus have done and not killing innocents.As a sikh I am happy to be represent myself as an Indian...so that should clear many a doubts among the members who encourage sikhs to form a different nation.people in Punjab are very happy and devloping very fast and has zero terrorism.
1465.gif
 
Its true that there are few people who want to revive the Khalistani movement but to be honest practically thats not possible...Punjab is the most peaceful state now and developing very fast...people who support Khalistan are mostly based outside India who are responsible for funding the movement.But if you look in Punjab the story is different.

In Punjab people do talk about the Khalistani movement and Babbar Khalsa,but no one wants to get associated with it.not because they are frightened of getting caught but simply they have realised its actually a misleading movement just spreading terror with the support of some anti India elements sitting in their homes.....Sikhism teaches protecting the weak that our gurus have done and not killing innocents.As a sikh I am happy to be represent myself as an Indian...so that should clear many a doubts among the members who encourage sikhs to form a different nation.people in Punjab are very happy and devloping very fast and has zero terrorism.
1465.gif

Yups....the so called Khali-sthan movement only lives... on the internet ...on zootube....and Kenedda.....:rofl:
 
I hate that...........why my posts are deleted ?

Where is freedom of Speech and freedom to have an opinion ?

I do not like that.
 
It was a non starter.

Spurred from the outside, never existed anyway.
 
It existed !!!!!

and it was time when majority were in favour of saparate Country!!!!

:bunny:

I have lived thru the entire insurgency in Punjab from 83 to 92. It was a fear psychosis created by unbridled fundamentalists created by the Govt who later hacked them down.

The fact that Pak actively helped them also did not go un noticed finally the futility of it all was realised aided by strong action.
 
I have lived thru the entire insurgency in Punjab from 83 to 92. It was a fear psychosis created by unbridled fundamentalists created by the Govt who later hacked them down.

The fact that Pak actively helped them also did not go un noticed finally the futility of it all was realised aided by strong action.

In my opinion, if Khalistan would have been declared by the Sikhs, it would have been accepted by Pakistan. If it was'nt for the soviets in Afghanistan, Pakistan could have also used military action for the creation of state but Mother Russia was right behind and it would not have been wise.
 
In my opinion, if Khalistan would have been declared by the Sikhs, it would have been accepted by Pakistan. If it was'nt for the soviets in Afghanistan, Pakistan could have also used military action for the creation of state but Mother Russia was right behind and it would not have been wise.

Now..now

If aunty had ba**s she would have been an uncle !

This one is very tall. The consequences of military action across an IB are very different from those across an LOC.
 
It existed !!!!!

and it was time when majority were in favour of saparate Country!!!!

:bunny:

The majority never speaks bro so let us leave that out. Vested interests was leading the quest and the voilence. And it gets really nice when you have easy funding from our closest friends.

Anyway, it is was Indira's folly that snowballed in to the resulting Khalistan movement. The dissonance in youth due to the unemployment and the poverty fuelled it even more and they became part of the voilence on the behest and encouragement of their "successful" uncles in Kanneda. The thing fell flat on its face only when the majority got involved.... shame all the bloodshed. The only minor solace is that even though bloody, we at least take learnings out of our mistakes. It would have been a much safer region if our friends would also take learnings out of the results of their actions.....
 

Back
Top Bottom