What's new

Chinese Foreign Affairs News & Discussions

Indian perfidy causing problems along Sino-Indian border

I intentionally picked the official Indian government maps from 1947 and 1950 in The Hindu Archives.

You Indians refuse to acknowledge the official maps from your own government. This is ridiculous.

Your government has been hiding the truth from the Indian people and that's why you Indian nationalists are all brainwashed.

1. After 50 years, the Indian government refuses to release the archives on the events of 1962. It will show that you Indians are the aggressors.

2. The official Indian government maps from 1947 and 1950 clearly show that India decided to REDRAW them to include China's Aksai Chin between August 15, 1947 and 1950.

3. You Indians also REDREW the map for South Tibet/Arunachal Pradesh to swallow Chinese territory into India. On pre-Independence maps, the Indian border clearly excluded South Tibet (see Global Security map below from 1916-1937 of self-delimited Indian border).

It is Indian perfidy that has been causing problems along the Sino-Indian border.

In the future, there will be a Sino-Indian war when China reclaims the territory that has been stolen by India. I want all of you Indians to know your country is at fault.

----------

Global Security: Arunachal Pradesh "claim is not reflected on pre-Independence maps"

tEtiG.jpg

"Arunachal Pradesh...claim is not reflected on pre-Independence maps." Prior to the land-grab of Chinese territory after Indian independence in 1947, Indian maps clearly excluded China's South Tibet/Arunachal Pradesh.

Reference: India-China Border
 
BBC News - Asean talks: US and China pledge to co-operate on Asia

"Asean talks: US and China pledge to co-operate on Asia
12 July 2012 Last updated at 04:25 ET

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her Chinese counterpart Yang Jiechi have said their countries will co-operate on Asia issues.

BrO8c.jpg

Mrs Clinton says the US will not ''take sides'' in regional disputes in Asia
...
The US has no territorial claims in the region and will not ''take sides'' in disputes, she stressed."
 
U.S. did nothing to help its ally South Vietnam as China took control of Paracel Islands in 1974

Since the U.S. didn't lift a finger to help the democratic South Vietnamese in 1974 as China took control of the Paracel Islands, why would the U.S. lift a finger to help communist Vietnam in the South China Sea?

----------

China's Military Moment - By Jim Holmes | Foreign Policy

"China's Military Moment
A window of opportunity is closing in the South China Sea. Will Beijing strike?
BY JIM HOLMES | JULY 26, 2012

L2qnq.jpg

...
Chinese vessels carrying amphibious troops and operating under fighter cover from nearby Hainan Island engaged a South Vietnamese flotilla bereft of air support. One Vietnamese destroyer escort lay at the bottom of the South China Sea following the daylong battle. China's flag fluttered over the islands.

The skirmish was real -- and the date was Jan. 17, 1974.
(article continues)"
 
Law: China is first possessor and true owner of South China Sea islands and water territories

China is asserting its sovereignty over its first discovery of the South China Sea from 2,000 years ago and afterwards.

Finders keepers. Stay out of Chinese waters and islands.

Law (see citation below):

1. China is the first discoverer of South China Sea islands and territorial waters. China is the "first possessor" and "true owner."

2. "If the true owner never intends to give up his claim of ownership, it remains his."

Emanuel Law Outlines: Property Keyed to Dukeminier, Krier, Alexander ... - Massey - Google Books

"Massey - 2010 - Law - 464 pages
The first possessor becomes the next True Owner. But if True Owner... never intends to give up his claim of ownership, it remains his. ... Trespassing finders of abandoned property are denied title unless the trespass is “trivial or merely technical."

----------

The Chinese government, Han Dynasty, claimed sovereignty (see definition below) over the South China Sea and islands in its official government records 2,000 years ago.

The Chinese Han Dynasty government is the first possessor, claimed sovereign rights as evidenced by imperial records, and true owner of the South China Sea islands and water territories.

As written in the law books (see Massey 464 pages), "But if True Owner [China]... never intends to give up his claim of ownership [over the South China Sea islands], it remains his."


----------

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sovereignty

"sov·er·eign·ty
   [sov-rin-tee, suhv-] Show IPA
noun, plural sov·er·eign·ties.

1. the quality or state of being sovereign.

2. the status, dominion, power, or authority of a sovereign; royalty.

3. supreme and independent power or authority in government as possessed or claimed by a state or community.

4. rightful status, independence, or prerogative.

5. a sovereign state, community, or political unit."
 
Spratly Islands have belonged to China since ancient times

Ocean-faring Chinese explorers had claimed the Spratly Islands a thousand years ago.

[Source: Wikipedia article on Spratly Islands with primary sources listed in footnotes]

"Ancient Chinese maps record the "Thousand Li Stretch of Sands"; Qianli Changsha (千里長沙) and the "Ten-Thousand Li of Stone Pools"; Wanli Shitang (萬里石塘),[7] which China today claims refers to the Spratly Islands. The Wanli Shitang have been explored by the Chinese since the Yuan Dynasty and may have been considered by them to have been within their national boundaries. [8][9] They are also referenced in the 13th century,[10] followed by the Ming Dynasty.[11] When the Ming Dynasty collapsed, the Qing Dynasty continued to include the territory in maps compiled in 1724,[12] 1755,[13] 1767,[14] 1810,[15] and 1817.[16] A Vietnamese map from 1834 also includes the Spratly Islands clumped in with the Paracels (a common occurrence on maps of that time) labeled as "Wanli Changsha".[17]"

AYyG4.jpg

By the twelfth century, names for the South China Sea islands began to appear. The Paracels and the Spratlys were referred to more consistently as Changsha and Shitang. By the mid-fourteenth century, Shitang could be accurately identified as the Spratlys. There is also evidence of Chinese naval control over some areas of the South China Sea, which resulted in complete Chinese dominion of the South China Sea in the late thirteenth century. Finally, in the fifteenth century, Zheng He's seven voyages placed the South China Sea islands on the official navigational charts. In this map, the Xisha Islands are called Shitang, and the Nansha Islands are referred to as Wansheng Shitang Yu.

4FpGz.jpg

The Map of South and East Ocean Sea Routes was drawn in between 1712-1721 by Qing (Ching) Dynasty Fujian (Fuchien) Province Navy Commander Shi Shibiao, the son of a famous Qing Dynasty imperial officer. This map clearly shows the sea routes, time, and descriptions from Chinese coastal ports to Japan, Laos, Vietnam, Indonesia, Brunei, Cambodia and the Philippines. On this map, the locations and names of the Southern Sea Islands (Nanhai Zhudao) are very accurate. The map shows Chinese sovereignty over the South China Sea islands (including Nansha Islands, Xisha Islands, Zhongsha Islands and Dongsha Islands).

rHQ1x.jpg

1834 Vietnamese map showed the islands as Chinese "Wanli Changsha."

[Note: Thank you to HuziHaidao12 for the first two pictures and captions.]
 
Below, I have provided a citation of Chinese relics from the Yuan Dynasty (1271-1368) found near Hsisha Islands in the South China Sea. Can any Vietnamese or Filipino provide a reputable citation of Vietnamese or Filipino relics in the South China Sea that predates 1368? If you can't, you have just admitted to Chinese sovereignty over the South China Sea islands.

----------

Chinese Archeology,chinese civilization

"32 cultural relics discovered in South China Sea

HBizf.jpg


Archaeological teams have discovered Yuan dynasty blue and white porcelain for the first time in the South China Sea along with 32 newly-discovered ancient sites near Hsisha Islands, the 2010 South China Sea underwater archaeological team announced on June 1.

After 35 days of underwater archaeological work, South China Sea underwater archaeology team discovered 32 underwater cultural relics and found blue and white porcelain of Yuan Dynasty in South China Sea for the first time.

Source:Xinhua News"

[Note: China's Yuan Dynasty was from 1271-1368 (see China Yuan Dynasty (1271-1368), Mongolian, Kublai Khan, Emperors)]
 
French oil company Elf discovered 15th century Chinese galleon in South China Sea

BBC News | Asia-Pacific | Undersea treasure chest stirs up tensions

"Undersea treasure chest stirs up tensions
Thursday, April 29, 1999 Published at 20:40 GMT 21:40 UK
By David Willis in the South China Sea

eyu8B.jpg

The discovery has drawn huge crowds to Brunei's national museum

Shipwrecked treasure, recently recovered from the bottom of the South China Sea, is threatening to inflame a diplomatic row over an area believed to be rich in oil.

Divers working for the French oil company Elf, stumbled across the wreck of a 15th Century Chinese galleon containing a hoard of priceless porcelain and ceramic pieces.

ZlMmB.jpg

Divers working for an oil company stumbled across the wreck

The ship went down off the coast of Brunei and is thought to contain one of the largest hauls of buried treasure ever uncovered.

Using the same two-seater submarine as those used to survey the Titanic, archaeologists uncovered an Aladdin's Cave of intricately painted ancient pottery.

For more than two months, a daily haul of hundreds of artefacts were hauled to the surface. Back on land, a vast hanger was built to clean and catalogue the discoveries, thought to be worth millions of dollars.

Timeless beauty


E9jGb.jpg

The treasure haul is thought to be worth millions

"It's a fascinating project," says John Perry, Managing Director of Elf Petroleum Asia.

"The artefacts themselves, in their day may have been ordinary things in the street but today they have a timeless beauty, which is so hard to define but so real to touch."

For Brunei, a nation keen to lessen its dependence on oil revenue, the discovery has become a source of new national pride.

The artefacts provide the tiny sultanate with something money alone cannot buy - symbols of a cultural identity which, officials hope, will boost tourism.

Historical claims


SZCBm.jpg

Hundreds of items each day have been recovered

But the discovery of a series of such wrecks has been seized upon by China as evidence reinforcing its historical claims on the South China Sea.

Beijing says the discoveries prove Chinese vessels have been sailing the area since ancient times.

Five other countries in the region also lay claim to all or part of area's maritime territory - in particular to the Spratly Islands, which are reputed to hold the key to a much needed new source of oil. (article continues)"

----------

Chinese shipwreck from 15th century validates Chinese imperial records

These historical Chinese shipwrecks and artifacts validate Chinese imperial records. Chinese imperial records do not discuss only trade routes and trade outposts that extend to Brunei. Chinese imperial records also describe the first discovery and claim of sovereignty over the South China Sea islands and maritime territories.

These historical wrecks provide additional support to authenticate Chinese imperial records.
 
Red Flag over Sansha City -- Beijing Review

5F9cX.png


China's Jurisdiction over the South China Sea

"China's Jurisdiction over the South China Sea
UPDATED: July-3-2012 NO. 27 JULY 5, 2012

- China first discovered and named the reefs, islets and the surrounding waters of the Xisha, Zhongsha and Nansha islands, and has exercised sovereignty control continuously over the area.

- In A.D.110, the government of the Han Dynasty (202 B.C.- A.D.220) set up a government agency on Hainan Island, which marks the beginning of central governance over Hainan Island and the islands in the South China Sea. At that time, Chinese people often navigated on the South China Sea and lived and fished around the Xisha Islands and the Nansha Islands.

- In A.D.971, the navy of the Northern Song Dynasty (960-1127) cruised the Xisha Islands. This was the earliest record of China's naval patrol in the area.

- In the Yuan Dynasty (1271-1369), Emperor Kubla Khan sent astronomer Guo Shoujing to conduct astronomical observations in the Zhongsha Islands, which evidenced the government's sovereignty over the area.

- In 1911, the Guangdong Provincial Government of the Republic of China proclaimed that the Xisha Islands were put under the jurisdiction of Hainan's Yaxian County (currently known as Sanya City).

- After the end of the World War II, according to the Postdam Declaration issued in July 1945 and the Cairo Declaration issued in 1947, the Republic of China sent high commissioners to the Xisha Islands from 1946 to 1948 to take over the archipelago. A takeover ceremony was held on the islands, and a monument was put up to assert China's sovereignty. The government also stationed army and set up a service station for fishermen on Taiping Island, the largest of its kind in the Nansha Islands.

- In March 1959, the Central Government of the People's Republic of China set up the administrative office for the Xisha, Nansha and Zhongsha islands, which was governed by Guangdong Province.

- In October 1984, Hainan Administrative Region was set up, which took over the administrative office.

- In April 1988, Hainan Province was set up and the administrative office was put under the province.

- In June 2012, the State Council approved the establishment of Sansha City, which governs the Xisha, Zhongsha and Nansha islands and their surrounding waters. Meanwhile the administrative office for the area was abolished."

[Note: Thank you to Greyboy2 for the newslinks.]
 
Could NATO ever go to war with China? No. See CNN citation.

The answer is "no." The U.S.-led NATO has always said it is a defensive shield. The leaked reports by the Obama administration indicated NATO would not support Turkey if it attacked Syria (see citation below from CNN).

Also, the idea of attacking China is pure idiocy. China has plenty of thermonuclear weapons (in the hundreds of megatons) to fry all of the NATO countries to a crisp.

----------

Can Turkey force U.S. and other NATO countries to attack Syria?

"Can Turkey force U.S. and other NATO countries to attack Syria?
By Adam Levine, CNN
June 25th, 2012
...
If NATO was looking for a fight, this would be a good opportunity to invoke Article 5, but there is no appetite for a military conflict with Syria at the moment, several NATO diplomats told CNN's Elise Labott on Sunday.

There are many factors that weigh against a military response. First and foremost, the North Atlantic Council has to agree to it. Also, even if agreed, each member can contribute as they see fit.

"This is an individual obligation on each Ally and each Ally is responsible for determining what it deems necessary in these particular circumstances," according to a description of the charter posted on the NATO website.


The United States and many other countries have been vocally opposed to military intervention and will not be quick to encourage Turkey to press the issue. After Syrian troops shelled refugees on the Turkish side of the border earlier this year, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta made clear that the bar was high for Turkey to claim the need for a collective self-defense.

Panetta was asked about invoking Article 5 at a House Armed Services Committee hearing in April.

"I think it's clear that the only way that the United States would get involved militarily is if there's a consensus in the international community to try to do something along those lines. And then obviously ensure that the international community is able to get the - the authorities required in order to make that happen," Panetta said. "They would have to make clear that what is happening there really does truly represent a direct threat to Turkey. And I think at this point, that's probably a stretch."


In her statement Sunday, Clinton said the U.S. would keep in contact with Turkey as the country determines its response. The U.S. will "work with Turkey and other partners to hold the Assad regime accountable," Clinton said.

NATO members agreeing to respond to this incident is "inconceivable," wrote James Joyner on the Atlantic Council blog. Joyner, who said he opposes military intervention in Syria, felt the incident does not rise to the level of such a response.

"The operative word that almost certainly disqualifies this incident from an Article 5 response is 'attack.' Turkey was engaged in aggressive action along its border with Syria during a particularly tense situation and flew into Syrian airspace," Joyner wrote on Friday, "While shooting down the plane was almost certainly an overreaction - the Assad government has said as much - it's hardly an 'attack.'"

Additionally, Joyner said, the article demands response "to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area."

"Given that the incident is already contained - that is, not likely to be followed by any sort of follow-on action by Syria absent further provocation - said security already exists. Indeed, a NATO or Turkish response would make the area more, not less, secure," Joyner maintained."
 
Official 1876 Japanese map proves Diaoyu Islands belong to China

134-year-old map says Diaoyu Islands belong to China- China.org.cn

"134-year-old map says Diaoyu Islands belong to China
August 22, 2012

An official Japanese map published 134 years ago doesn't include the Diaoyu Islands, indicating that the islands were not part of Japan's territory.

w4RSq.jpg

Zheng Hailin, a Chinese scholar who has studied in Japan, shows a map he got there which doesn't include the Diaoyu Islands. [Photo / Guangming Daily]

Zheng Hailin, a Chinese scholar, went to Japan to study history and international law in the 1990s and bought a Japanese Map there. The map was published in 1876 by Japan's Army Staff Bureau and doesn't have the Diaoyu Islands on it.

According to international law, a country's official map has legal effect over its territorial claims, and Zheng's map clearly denies all claims that the Diaoyu Islands are Japan's territory.

Zheng says that according to his studies, a Chinese book from 1403 is one of the first books to have documented the Diaoyu Islands. The islands were included as part of southeast China's Fujian province in 1562.

Evidence suggests that the Diaoyu Islands have been China's territory since ancient times, and China holds territorial sovereignty over them for discovering, naming and annexing these islands."
 
@Martian2

Can you answer me a question:
How many mad Chinese like you run around in the world?

As I stated in a thread here in the forum before, in order to become a truely Super Power, China should make friends, not enemies!
You should listen to me. China´s foreign policy is the worst in the world. Look around you, nearly all of your neighbors are hostile and anxiously, even North Korea fears overwhelming Chinese dominance.

Last but not least I do not want to further comment on your repeatly aggressive postings on Vietnam, they are just annoying. Shut up!
 
@Martian2

Can you answer me a question:
How many mad Chinese like you run around in the world?

As I stated in a thread here in the forum before, in order to become a truely Super Power, China should make friends, not enemies!
You should listen to me. China´s foreign policy is the worst in the world. Look around you, nearly all of your neighbors are hostile and anxiously, even North Korea fears overwhelming Chinese dominance.

Last but not least I do not want to further comment on your repeatly aggressive postings on Vietnam, they are just annoying. Shut up!
When PLA tanks roll into Hanoi and Saigon, South East Asia will enjoy at peace at last.
 
Spratly Islands have belonged to China since ancient times

Ocean-faring Chinese explorers had claimed the Spratly Islands a thousand years ago.

[Source: Wikipedia article on Spratly Islands with primary sources listed in footnotes]

"Ancient Chinese maps record the "Thousand Li Stretch of Sands"; Qianli Changsha (千里長沙) and the "Ten-Thousand Li of Stone Pools"; Wanli Shitang (萬里石塘),[7] which China today claims refers to the Spratly Islands. The Wanli Shitang have been explored by the Chinese since the Yuan Dynasty and may have been considered by them to have been within their national boundaries. [8][9] They are also referenced in the 13th century,[10] followed by the Ming Dynasty.[11] When the Ming Dynasty collapsed, the Qing Dynasty continued to include the territory in maps compiled in 1724,[12] 1755,[13] 1767,[14] 1810,[15] and 1817.[16] A Vietnamese map from 1834 also includes the Spratly Islands clumped in with the Paracels (a common occurrence on maps of that time) labeled as "Wanli Changsha".[17]"

AYyG4.jpg

By the twelfth century, names for the South China Sea islands began to appear. The Paracels and the Spratlys were referred to more consistently as Changsha and Shitang. By the mid-fourteenth century, Shitang could be accurately identified as the Spratlys. There is also evidence of Chinese naval control over some areas of the South China Sea, which resulted in complete Chinese dominion of the South China Sea in the late thirteenth century. Finally, in the fifteenth century, Zheng He's seven voyages placed the South China Sea islands on the official navigational charts. In this map, the Xisha Islands are called Shitang, and the Nansha Islands are referred to as Wansheng Shitang Yu.

4FpGz.jpg

The Map of South and East Ocean Sea Routes was drawn in between 1712-1721 by Qing (Ching) Dynasty Fujian (Fuchien) Province Navy Commander Shi Shibiao, the son of a famous Qing Dynasty imperial officer. This map clearly shows the sea routes, time, and descriptions from Chinese coastal ports to Japan, Laos, Vietnam, Indonesia, Brunei, Cambodia and the Philippines. On this map, the locations and names of the Southern Sea Islands (Nanhai Zhudao) are very accurate. The map shows Chinese sovereignty over the South China Sea islands (including Nansha Islands, Xisha Islands, Zhongsha Islands and Dongsha Islands).

rHQ1x.jpg

1834 Vietnamese map showed the islands as Chinese "Wanli Changsha."

[Note: Thank you to HuziHaidao12 for the first two pictures and captions.]

Stop lying about Islands of Vietnam. In old books of China is very vague, chinese have been written about Over Sea (海外) Islands, no words were stating that such Islands belong to China.
The old map of China, it is stated that the Sea is named: "Jiao Zhi" Sea, the Sea of Jiao Zhi people, today Vietnamese.

th


The map printed in China in time of Man Quing Dynasty didn't drawn up Islands becourse Chinese in the past time, they accepted that Islands belong to Vietnam.

th


And map 1834 here is " Full Map of Vietnam" stating Island are part of Vietnam.

rHQ1x.jpg
 
Last update 19/10/2012 13:30:00 (GMT+7)
Historic maps support VN's island sovereignty

VietNamNet Bridge – As many as 80 old maps published between 1826 and 1980, of which 10 indicated Hoang Sa (Paracel) Islands and the Truong Sa (Spratly) Islands belong to Viet Nam, will be handed over to Da Nang's Institute for Socio-Economic Development next month.

The maps are part of a collection belonging to the president of the Institute for Vietnamese Culture and Education (IVCE), Tran Thang, an American with Vietnamese origin. The institute is a non-profit organisation founded in New York in 2000.

Thang said by email earlier this week the ancient maps were published in England, America, France, Germany and Scotland.

He said he bought them from antique shops in the US, England and Poland.

"As Vietnamese, we all have an obligation to preserve our country and to take part in shaping the future of Vietnamese society," Thang said in the email.

"In the map collection, 70 maps indicate that the frontier of Southern China is Hainan island and 10 maps indicate that the Paracels belongs to Viet Nam," he said.

"During my collecting of antique maps, I found two Postal Atlas Map of China books which were published by the Directorate General of Posts, Ministry of Transportation of the Republic of China in 1919 (consisting of 49 maps) and in 1933 (29 maps) and one Atlas of the Chinese Empire, published by the China Inland Mission in 1909 (23 maps).

None of the three books list the Paracels and Spratlys in the maps and index pages."

Thang said he was going to donate all the maps to the Da Nang-based Institute for Socio-Economic Development (ISED) which had been studying Paracels and Spratlys issues.

ISED vice director Tran Duc Anh Son said the collection of old maps was significant evidence that the two archipelagoes belonged to Viet Nam.

"We can classify that the collection comprises of three kinds of maps: 68 old maps of China showing that China did not have the Paracel and Spratly islands; six maps that indicate those islands belonged to Viet Nam; five maps of the Southeast Asian region that show Paracel and Spratly archipelagoes are under Viet Nam sovereignty," Son said.

"We would display the map collection at the city's Hoang Sa Islands District museum. We plan to show off the collection in the ‘Sea and Islands Week' to be held in Khanh Hoa Province next April," he said.

He said Thang had bought the maps with his own money and some from his friends.

Son, who has been doing a social science study on "Viet Nam's sovereignty over the Hoang Sa Islands" for primary schools, said he would include information from the collection in his study.

Ly Son Island, 30km offshore from Quang Ngai Province, still preserve Am Linh Pagoda, which was a worshipping place for seamen who had been dispatched to the Paracel Islands in the Nguyen dynasty, since the 17th century.

A museum of the two archipelagoes displays over 200 ancient documents and 100 objects which prove that Paracel and Spratly islands belong to Viet Nam.


20121018171754_c4-2.jpg


Historical evidence: An old map of Viet Nam,
which was printed by Prevost Bellin in Germany,
also shows that the southern extent of China as being Hainan Island.


Historic maps support VN's island sovereignty - News VietNamNet

20121018171754_c4-1.jpg


Navigating the past: An old map of China dating back to 1933 that was published by the Ministry of Transport of the Republic of China.
The map shows the southern extent of China as being Hainan Island.
 
How crash cover-up altered China’s succession

BEIJING: "Thank you. I'm well. Don't worry," read the post on a Chinese social networking site. The brief comment, published in June, appeared to come from Ling Gu, the 23-year-old son of a high-powered aide to China's president, and it helped quash reports that he had been killed in a Ferrari crash after a night of partying.

It only later emerged that the message was a sham, posted by someone under Ling's alias — almost three months after his death.

The ploy was one of many in a tangled effort to suppress news of the crash that killed Ling and critically injured two young female passengers, one of whom later died. The outlines of the affair surfaced months ago, but it is now becoming clearer that the crash and the botched cover-up had more momentous consequences, altering the course of the Chinese Communist Party's once-in-a-decade leadership succession last month.

China's departing president, Hu Jintao, entered the summer in an apparently strong position after the disgrace of Bo Xilai, previously a rising member of a rival political network who was brought down when his wife was accused of murdering a British businessman. But Hu suffered a debilitating reversal of his own when party elders — led by his predecessor, Jiang Zemin — confronted him with allegations that Ling Jihua, his closest protege and political fixer, had engineered the cover-up of his son's death.

According to current and former officials, party elites, and others, the exposure helped tip the balance of difficult negotiations, hastening Hu's decline; spurring the ascent of China's new leader, Xi Jinping; and playing into the hands of Jiang, whose associates dominate the new seven-man leadership at the expense of candidates from Hu's clique.

The case also shows how the profligate lifestyles of leaders' relatives and friends can weigh heavily in backstage power tussles, especially as party skulduggery plays out under the intensifying glare of media.

Numerous party insiders provided information regarding the episode, speaking on the condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals from the authorities. Officials have investigated the aftermath of the car wreck, they say, including looking into accusations that a state oil company paid hush money to the families of the two women.

Under Hu, Ling had directed the leadership's administrative center, the General Office, but was relegated to a less influential post in September, ahead of schedule. Last month, he failed to advance to the 25-person Politburo and lost his seat on the influential party secretariat.

Hu, who stepped down as party chief, immediately yielded his post as chairman of the military, meaning he will not retain power as Jiang did. "Hu was weakened even before leaving office," said a midranking official in the organization department, the party's personnel office.

Ling's future remains unsettled, with party insiders saying that his case presents an early test of whether Xi intends to follow through on public promises to fight high-level corruption.

"He can decide whether to go after Ling Jihua or not," said Wu Guoguang, a former top-level party speechwriter, now a political scientist at the University of Victoria in British Columbia. "Either way, this is a big card in Xi Jinping's hand."

Ling, 56, built his career in the Communist Youth League. At an early age, he secured the patronage of Hu, who led the Youth League in the early 1980s and brought Ling to the General Office in 1995. "Hu didn't come with a lot of friends, but Ling was someone he knew he could trust," said the organization department official. "Officials said that if Ling called, it was like Hu calling."

Ling played a central role in moving Youth League veterans into high offices and undermining Hu's adversaries. Ling also wielded leverage over internet censorship of leaders' affairs, and sought to use it to benefit his patron.

"Negative publicity, including untruths, about Xi Jinping were not suppressed the way publicity about Hu Jintao was," said one associate of party leaders.

As his influence grew, Ling tried to keep a low profile. About a decade ago, his wife closed a software company she owned and formed a nonprofit foundation that incubates young entrepreneurs. The couple sent their son, Ling Gu, to an elite Beijing high school under an alias, Wang Ziyun. "Ling Jihua told his family not to damage his career," a former Youth League colleague said. "But it seems it can't be stopped."

Still living under an alias, Ling Gu graduated from Peking University last year with an international relations degree and began graduate studies in education. One of his instructors said his performance plunged later in his undergraduate years. "I think there were too many lures, too much seduction," he said.

Before dawn on March 18, a black Ferrari Spider speeding along Fourth Ring Road in Beijing ricocheted off a wall, struck a railing and cracked in two. Ling was killed instantly, and the two young Tibetan women with him were hospitalized with severe injuries. One died months later, and the other is recovering, party insiders said.

Under normal circumstances, party insiders said, suppressing such news to protect the image of the party would be a routine matter. But Ling Jihua went further, they said, maneuvering to hide his son's death even from the leadership.

The Beijing Evening News published an article and a photograph, but the topic was immediately scoured from the internet. Later, the families of the two women in the car received payments from China's largest state oil company, according to a top executive with a major foreign multinational. He said large sums had been paid "to make sure they shut up." A publicity executive for the company, China National Petroleum Corporation, declined to answer questions about the matter.

When overseas Chinese-language media reported in June that the Ferrari driver had been Ling's son, the Hong Kong-based magazine Yazhou Zhoukan published a story debunking the reports, citing the message on the social networking site. "The source for this was Ling Jihua's office in the General Office," said a journalist close to the situation.

But the attempted cover-up spun out of Ling's control.

Party insiders said that the police recorded the surname of the victim as Jia, which sounds like the word for "fake," a notation police officers sometimes use when the truth is being obscured. The move set off rumors connecting the dead driver to a recently retired party leader, Jia Qinglin, who was infuriated and took his grievance to Jiang, the former president.

The Central Guard Bureau, which manages leaders' security, also was mobilized to assist in the cover-up, the insiders said. That riled the bureau's former chief, an ally of Jiang, and the current chief, Cao Qing, who already had qualms about Ling.

"They say that Ling was always calling up Cao Qing and telling him to do this and do that," said one woman from an official family. "Ling was excessive and disrespectful."

The issue came to a head in July as the leadership debated Bo's fate and hashed out plans for the leadership transition. "Just as they were discussing the arrangements, the old comrades raised this," said an official from a central government media organization. "They said that leaders have to obey party discipline, so this person was not qualified to be promoted to the Politburo."

In one exchange with Hu, Jiang also questioned Ling's "humanity" over accusations that he maintained his busy schedule and did not properly observe his son's death, several people said.

Hu felt compelled to sacrifice his ally, partly because the party was also pursuing the case against Bo on disciplinary grounds. "Hu didn't want to give the others something they could use," said a relative of a former leader.

In a pivotal shake-up, Ling's designated replacement, an old colleague of Xi's, arrived in July, six weeks before the reshuffle was publicized.

By September, party insiders said, Hu was so strained by the Ling affair and the leadership negotiations that he seemed resigned to yielding power. As Hu's influence faded, Xi began taking charge of military affairs, including a group coordinating China's response to the escalating row with Japan over disputed islands.
 

Back
Top Bottom