What's new

China: Here Are Some Great Things About Toxic Air

JayAtl

BANNED
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
8,812
Reaction score
-14
China's state-run TV tries to put a positive spin on toxic haze.

china_toxic_air_benefits_1210.jpg

Buildings in Lianyungang, China, are shrouded in smog on Dec. 8, 2013



Read more: China's Smog Has Benefits, State Media Outlet Says | TIME.com China's Smog Has Benefits, State Media Outlet Says | TIME.com

You can’t make this stuff up. On Sunday, with swaths of eastern China shrouded in a polluted haze, Chinese state media decided to release a list of five “surprising benefits” of smog. Here, courtesy of Wang Lei, an editor for China Central Television’s website, are five good things about bad air:

1. It unifies the Chinese people.
2. It makes China more equal.
3. It raises citizen awareness of the cost of China’s economic development.
4. It makes people funnier.
5. It makes people more knowledgeable (of things like meteorology and the English word haze).

I’d like to think the piece as well-intentioned satire. Perhaps it was. But the article, which has since been pulled, was followed by another piece of pollution promotion. On Monday, the Global Times published a piece that said air pollution might help the Chinese military by obscuring sight lines, reducing the effectiveness of surveillance and weapons systems.



Read more: China's Smog Has Benefits, State Media Outlet Says | TIME.com China's Smog Has Benefits, State Media Outlet Says | TIME.com


:china::sarcastic::sarcastic::sarcastic::sarcastic::sarcastic:

Smog? It bolsters military defence, says Chinese nationalist newspaper :triniti::triniti::triniti:


http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1376804/smog-it-bolsters-military-defence-says-chinese-nationalist-newspaper


“Smog may affect people’s health and daily lives … but on the battlefield, it can serve as a defensive advantage in military operations,” said an article on thewebsite of Global Times, a nationalist newspaper affiliated to the Communist Party’s mouthpiece thePeople’s Daily.
 
Last edited:
what?? really?
chinese themselves?
 
60 years ago, London was even more polluted than Beijing is today. The Desolation of Smog
131203_fog_edit.jpg


131203_fog.jpg


131203_fog_2_2.jpg


131203_fog_3_.jpg


131203_0_fog2.jpg


131203_fog_2_3.jpg


131203_fog5.jpg


131203_fog_2_.jpg


Above left, a man walks a bicycle up a flight of stairs that descend into a gloom of smog in Harbin, China, on Oct. 21. On the right, pedestrians in Blackfriars, London, wear masks to prevent inhaling smog on Nov. 18, 1954.

131203_fog_3_2.jpg


Above left, a train emerges from smog near Dalian, China, on Jan. 29. On the right, passengers read the departures board through a smoggy haze in Liverpool Street Station, London, on Jan. 29, 1959.

131203_fog6_edit.jpg


Above top, the Beijing skyline is barely visible on June 5. Below, the persistence of London's air pollution is evident on a smoggy April 22, 2011.

On Dec. 5, 1952, a thick layer of fog settled over the streets of London, blanketing the city. This was no ordinary wintery mist, but rather a noxious haze of sulfur dioxide from coal-fired industrial factories and cookstoves in London homes.London's Great Smog hung in the air for five consecutive days; visibility was reduced to mere feet and cars were abandoned or led off the road by police with traffic flares. It was the "nation's worst air pollution disaster" and remains the deadliest smog event on record. According to the Telegraph, the devastation the smog wrought "only became apparent when undertakers reported that they were running out of coffins and florists had sold all their flowers." In the following three months, an estimated 13,000 people died of respiratory complications.

The hazy scenes of London's Great Smog bear a striking resemblence to modern-day images of China's urban centers on their most polluted days. And though China has never had an event to match those four days in London, its pollution problem is persistent and pervasive. In 2010, air pollution contributed to 1.2 million deaths in China. Between 1981 and 2001, particulate levels in its major cities were five times greater than what the United States experienced before 1970. And the problem is worsening at an incredible rate. In 2009, the concentration of particulate pollution in the Chinese city of Harbin averaged 101 micrograms per meter, according to the World Health Organization. Four years later, in October 2013, levels were up tenfold, a new record.

This week, Gina McCarthy, the new head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), said she would be meeting with partners in China in the coming days to address air pollution issues, but was careful to stress that this is not an challenge limited to China. The West, too, has faced hazardous pollution. "We have been there before," she said on Monday, Dec. 2. The comparison bears consideration; what follows is a series of photo pairings -- smog in London then, and in China now.


  • London's Great Smog rolled into city's streets on a "mass of cold air," and remained, trapped by a layer of warmer air above. PM 2.5 -- the mass, in micrograms, of particles larger than 2.5 micrometers in a cubic centimeter, a common measure of hazardous air pollution -- rocketed to 1,600, a record China has yet to approach even on its worst days.



    Perhaps the closest China has come was the smog that settled over Harbin, a city of 10 million people in northeast China, in October. As PM 2.5 climbed to 1,000, the city effectively shut down, closing schools, airports, and highways.

    Above top, Beijing residents ride a bus through smoggy streets on Jan. 23. Below, a bus passes Christmas shoppers on London's Regent Street, on Dec. 5, 1952.

The Great Smog of 1952 prompted Britain's 1956 Clean Air Act, which led to legislation in the United States. In New York, in particular, pollution had become a major problem: particularly deadly clouds of smog were blamed for 200 deaths in 1963 and 168 more in 1966. These events were pivotal in motivating Congress to establish the EPA and pass landmark clean air laws. Like China today, most of that pollution was caused by burning coal and, to a lesser extent, by heavy traffic in cities like Los Angeles.

"We know what planning can do," McCarthy said of the EPA's work with China. "We know there are many ways in which you can engage your states, and in China's case provinces, to bring a sense of urgency to this issue."

"I am hopeful," she said. "One of the reasons I am hopeful is that I know what we've been able to accomplish in the United States."


The United States has set limits on the amount of pollution for daily exposure -- breathing air with PM 2.5 of more than 35 for 24 hours is hazardous, according to the EPA's guidelines. That number is even lower in South Korea, Japan, and the European Union. But in China, air quality is classifies as "good" even as PM 2.5 levels creep up toward 100. The skewed metric "takes into account the level of our current stage of development," a minister at China's Ministry of Environmental Protection said in June 2012, referring to the country's industrial reliance on coal.

U.S. consulates in China have started monitoring pollution levels and releasing the readings at levels considered a serious health hazard. That has drawn sharp rebukes from China's Ministry of Environmental Protection, which accused the United States of violating international law.

The smog in 1952 London was so dense that it seeped into buildings, causing theater performances to be canceled. Nurses reportedly could not see the length of hospital corridors.

The United States has tried a variety of tacks in dealing with China's rampant air pollution, and some measures -- like measuring and publicizing China's deadly air quality -- have clearly irked Beijing. Though the United States hasn't stopped reporting its pollution readings, it's also trying a honey-not-vinegar approach.

"EPA and the Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) in China have a deep and strong relationship," Gina McCarthy said Monday, ahead of her trip to China. "MEP in China knows they are facing significant air quality challenges. They have known that for some time. We have known that as well. For the past 15 years, we have been working with them in depth on ways of addressing their air quality challenges." The United States is well-suited to the task, McCarthy said, because the United States has itself "faced these challenges."

And it's true. China's air quality may be deadly but so, too, were the dark blankets of pollution that hung over major American cities just a few decades ago. In the 1940s and 1950s, streetlamps in Pittsburgh were left on during the day due to illuminate streets that were often darkened by smog from coal-fired steel plants. In addition to the deadly smog episodes in New York in the 1960s, a severe event in the mill town of Donora, PA, in October 1948 killed 20 of the town's 14,000 residents and left half of the survivors ill.

The Chinese government proposed ambitious new anti-pollution measures in September 2013, including reducing the burning of coal near China's industrial hubs, that aim to lower PM 2.5 by 10 percent over five years. Even with the reduction, though, smog levels would remain hazardous according to international standards.

Chinese pollution has serious consequences for East Asia and the United States. Clouds of smog from China have been tracked across the Pacific, affecting air quality in South Korea and Japan, and even as far as California. - See more at: The Desolation of Smog
 
Last edited:
60 years ago, London was even more polluted than Beijing is today. The Desolation of Smog

No it wasn't. At least judging by the pictures, you can see more architecture on London pics then on Beijing ones. On almost every pic, you can see more things farther away. Meaning, the smog isn't so thick.
 
The environmental costs to Chinese economy is 6% of China's GDP every year.
 
The Great Smog of '52 or Big Smoke[1] was a severe air-pollution event that affected London during December 1952. A period of cold weather, combined with an anticyclone and windless conditions, collected airborne pollutants mostly from the use of coal to form a thick layer of smog over the city. It lasted from Friday 5 to Tuesday 9 December 1952, and then dispersed quickly after a change of weather.

Although it caused major disruption due to the effect on visibility, and even penetrated indoor areas, it was not thought to be a significant event at the time, with London having experienced many smog events in the past, so-called "pea soupers". However, government medical reports in the following weeks estimated that up until 8 December 4,000 people had died prematurely and 100,000 more were made ill because of the smog's effects on the human respiratory tract. More recent research suggests that the total number of fatalities was considerably greater, at about 12,000.[2]

It is known to be the worst air-pollution event in the history of the United Kingdom,[3] and the most significant in terms of its effect on environmental research, government regulation, and public awareness of the relationship between air quality and health.[2] It led to several changes in practices and regulations, including the Clean Air Act 1956.

1930 Meuse Valley fog - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Great Smog - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1939 St. Louis smog - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1948 Donora smog - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Awesome... you should put this note into the CCP propaganda machines. 60 years ago X country was bad... we are proudly now comparing ourselves to 60 years ago. :rofl:

Most Polluted World Cities by PM[56]
Particulate
matter,
μg/m³ (2004)City
168Cairo, Egypt
150Delhi, India
128Kolkata, India (Calcutta)
125Tianjin, China
123Chongqing, China
109Kanpur, India
109Lucknow, India
104Jakarta, Indonesia
101Shenyang, China





11310818343_fd3db1b03a_b.jpg


Countries Ranked by Air Pollution | Statistic Brain
 
Last edited:

you forgot to add , that the stats are provided by china. the same country that fudges those very stats and actually came out to say that toxic air is good for china and the military!

The same country that gets pissed off at the US embassy when it releases pollution numbers in one city...

the same country that said only 10,000 people died in the earthquake when it is was over 100,000

the same country that said there was no such thing as SARS in china.

The same country that : China Absent From Transparency International's Global Corruption Report - China Real Time Report - WSJ

you be happy with your chinese submitted stats

We are just laughing at the spin

i.e. QUOTE

1. It unifies the Chinese people.
2. It makes China more equal.
3. It raises citizen awareness of the cost of China’s economic development.
4. It makes people funnier.
5. It makes people more knowledgeable (of things like meteorology and the English word haze).
 
No it wasn't. At least judging by the pictures, you can see more architecture on London pics then on Beijing ones. On almost every pic, you can see more things farther away. Meaning, the smog isn't so thick.

London 1952 smog killed 4000 people.

you forgot to add , that the stats are provided by china. the same country that fudges those very stats and actually came out to say that toxic air is good for china and the military!

The same country that gets pissed off at the US embassy when it releases pollution numbers in one city...

the same country that said only 10,000 people died in the earthquake when it is was over 100,000

the same country that said there was no such thing as SARS in china.

The same country that : China Absent From Transparency International's Global Corruption Report - China Real Time Report - WSJ

you be happy with your chinese submitted stats

We are just laughing at the spin

i.e. QUOTE

1. It unifies the Chinese people.
2. It makes China more equal.
3. It raises citizen awareness of the cost of China’s economic development.
4. It makes people funnier.
5. It makes people more knowledgeable (of things like meteorology and the English word haze).

China provided Egypt, India's data too, beat by your low IQ

168Cairo, Egypt
150Delhi, India
128Kolkata, India (Calcutta)
125Tianjin, China
123Chongqing, China
109Kanpur, India
109Lucknow, India
104Jakarta, Indonesia
101Shenyang, China
 
London 1952 smog killed 4000 people.



China provided Egypt, India's data too, beat by your low IQ

168Cairo, Egypt
150Delhi, India
128Kolkata, India (Calcutta)
125Tianjin, China
123Chongqing, China
109Kanpur, India
109Lucknow, India
104Jakarta, Indonesia
101Shenyang, China

Now look at who is talking about low IQ . India stats are India's stats, it is not being disputed ... rather we are disputing your stats .e. it is your stats are fudged . :lol: It is your govt trying to spin on it...

This below is HIGH IQ for you I suppose :rofl:


1. It unifies the Chinese people.
2. It makes China more equal.
3. It raises citizen awareness of the cost of China’s economic development.
4. It makes people funnier.
5. It makes people more knowledgeable (of things like meteorology and the English word haze).
 
These indian idiot, don't know chinese, can't understand these, but like show their self rightous comments.

Pollution haze has happened, why can't make fun of these? these report like a humorous article, be discussed by chinese, but idiotic indian take it serious and make fun of chinese, show you high IQ or Low IQ?

Know nothing about china, but post such idiotic thread, typical idiotic indian, incurable indian!
 

Back
Top Bottom