What's new

China blocks India's bid to designate JeM Chief Masood Azhar as a global terrorist in the UN

Sir he was captured wrong. He was a joirnilists reporting truthfully over Kashmir which was against Indian wishes and India captured him to suppress freedom of expression. If some of his reader hijacked plane to get him free dont means he was involved in the hijack. How can someone in captivity be also a hijacker? My friend India fabricates many things in IOK because that is an occupied land with no freedom of speech there.
Hahahhaha. I really don't even know where to begin when someone posts something that absurd.
 
Good news, but we should keep in mind that they are not doing us a favor. If China's national interests did not perfectly align with ours, they would throw us under the bus very very fast.
 
India and it lobby miserably failed at UN in designating Masood Azhar as terrorist. There was lack of evidence against him which India failed to provide and no one can be designated as terrorist based on propaganda.

This is a developing story........

Will be updated soon.


There was a technical issue.




Following the money
The United States and its allies have had a curious relationship with Pakistan and terrorism for years, as anyone who knows their history will know. What they might not remember, however, is that in February 2007, then vice president, Dick Cheney, made a trip to Pakistan to meet with President General Pervez Musharraf. According to PBS, the secret US-backed campaign against Iran by the terror group known as Jundullah was high on Cheney’s agenda.

A few months later, ABC News reported that Jundallah, which is “responsible for a series of deadly guerrilla raids inside Iran has been secretly encouraged and advised by American officials since 2005.”

The report explains that “US relationship with Jundullah is arranged so that the US provides no funding to the group, which would require an official presidential order or ‘finding’ as well as congressional oversight.” Not to mention that former Pakistani army chief, retired General Mirza Aslam Baig, further explained that “the U.S. supports the Jundullah terrorist group and uses it to destabilize Iran.”



Okay, so the US supported the Jundullah group in Pakistan against Iran, but what does that have to do with the current situation at hand? Well, it appears that JeM and other terrorist organisations in Pakistan receive direct support from key US allies, including and especially Saudi Arabia.

For example, an action request cable archived by Wikileaks, documenting the illicit finance activities in Afghanistan and Pakistan, stated that “it has been an ongoing challenge to persuade Saudi officials to treat terrorist financing emanating from Saudi Arabia as a strategic priority.”

“Still,” the cable continues, “donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide.”

Not surprisingly, Saudi Arabia “remains a critical financial support base” for – wait for it – “Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, LeT [Lashkar-e-Taiba] and other terrorist groups.” The LeT is a Pakistan-based terrorist organisation which also has a strongfocus on Jammu and Kashmir, where the recent terror attack took place (and India’s initial response). Both LeT and JeM have received overwhelming support from Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) since the early 1990s. In fact, LeT became part of the United Jihad Council in 1993, an umbrella group for militant Islamists operating in Kashmir and in doing so, formed a direct alliance with JeM. As far as the US State Department is concerned, the two groups are almost all but completely synonymous.

The ISI itself had been a prime recipient of billions of US aid, particularly under the administration of George W. Bush. The Wikileaks cable clearly shows that the US was well aware elements within the ISI were maintaining ties to the LeT.

The cable also noted that Qatar, Kuwait and the UAE have provided support to LeT and other terrorist groups operating in the region as well. All of these countries are US allies.

Furthermore, a separate Wikileaks cable confirmed that Saudi Arabia and the UAE have been funnelling money not just to LeT but to JeM directly, stating that:

“Locals believed that charitable activities being carried out by Deobandi and Ahl-e-Hadith organizations, including Jamaat-ud-Dawa, the Al-Khidmat Foundation, and Jaish-e-Mohammed were further strengthening reliance on extremist groups and minimizing the importance of traditionally moderate Sufi religious leaders in these communities. Government and non-governmental sources claimed that financial support estimated at nearly 100 million USD annually was making its way to Deobandi and Ahl-e-Hadith clerics in the region from ‘missionary’ and ‘Islamic charitable’ organizations in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates ostensibly with the direct support of those governments.”

Saudi Arabia itself has been considered to be somewhat of a safe haven for jihadists targeting India, including and especially the LeT. An investigation also found that Saudi Arabia funnelled funds to anti-Indian terror groups through Hajj pilgrims, and the Diplomat lamented that JeM hunts for potential recruits among the 150,000 devout Indians visiting Mecca every year.

Read more

So, to summarise: the US has a long and documented history of backing anti-Iranian Sunni-based Pakistani terror groups. Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies have been funnelling financial support to the LeT, who has a direct alliance and operates in the same area as the JeM (who also receives direct funding from Saudi Arabia), which recently claimed responsibility for an attack which killed at least 40 Indian police personnel.

It’s not exactly rocket science. Call me a little bit suspicious, but perhaps this is why Saudi Arabia was quite open in its assurances to Islamabad that it need not go after JeM directly, even while the group’s leadership apparently continues to live comfortably inside Pakistan.

And what no one really seems to be talking about is the implications this wider geostrategic struggle has for the region. Saudi Arabia wants to win Pakistan over in a tug-of-war game in which Islamabad finds itself in the centre, and in doing so, is committing $10 billion to build an oil refinery in the Gwadar port project, which actually puts a major Saudi project on Iran’s border.

Most disturbing is the revelation that Saudi Arabia is also being rumoured to have nuclear weapons on order from Pakistan. If it isn’t bad enough that India and Pakistan have nuclear weapons and are now potentially launching air strikes into each other’s territory, the idea that these apocalyptic weapons could one day end up in the hand of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the country currently launching a genocidal war in Yemen and backing known jihadists right across the wider region, all the whilst constantly threatening war with Tehran, is nothing short of suicidal.

According to Israeli media, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s (MBS) recent visit to Pakistan has essentially cemented Pakistan’s inclusion in anti-Iran Arab NATO. Will these countries rush to Pakistan’s aid as it is pummelled by Indian fighter jets? Or will diplomacy and cooler heads eventually prevail?

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/452461-india-pakistan-showdown-terrorism/

Mod edited: always add the link
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Breaking: China blocks India's move at UNSC to ban Moulana Masood Azhar, Indian media claims
Whats-App-Image-2019-03-13-at-11-18-13-PM.jpg


 
Sir his past links are irrefutable ..he was captured in Kashmir and was released on hijacked plane!


Support a struggle inside KASHMIR
And no militancy (openly) from Pakistan

Anything apart from this is a liability

China has a limit
Which stupid says pakistan is supporting any militancy in kashmir?
OH you mean the Indian narrative ?
Then bring the evidence if you hve any that any person, any political or non political party is supporting any militancy in anywhere in this world, while we have very huge proof like kalbhushan, that India is supporting terrorists in Pakistan?
If CHINA has limits, and this and that them they wouldn't be vetoed the SC council move, hve u seen what China said doing the veto??
They too asked proofs, Tht azhar masood is a terrorist????
No one just say anything and Pakistan should hve to bow down to thier demands sorry its not possible, if world can't stop state terrorism in kashmir then they don't hve any dam right to dictate Pakistan?
Pakistan isn't a weak state and all of of the super powers had thier vital interests with pakistan including usa, and the time for the carot and stick policy is not working and it's days are gone?
We have seen even a former UK primeminster Tony Blair lied to UN and the whole world finding the WMD in Iraq?
So stop telling us Indian narrative, we have enough power to break it down in pieces at our will
 
china is raising the right point.they are asking for evidence to proof that masood azhar is responsible for indian attacks.now this should be the job of our government but look at china,defending our case based on facts.this is very shameful for present government who is now arresting madrassa people just because of uncle sam.this defensive policy only humiliate pakistan.india is a liar.it lied to all foreign countries thousand times.when you lie hundred times,people will think that may be you are right.our government should ask help from china or at least ask them to correct our foreign policy.

Pakistani foreign policy belongs to Pakistan alone. It should not cave to pressure from anyone.
 
Pakistan don't want to take this man either, but we should have some solid reasons & evidence to get rid of this situation, otherwise be ready for another v2.0 TTP.
Besides when these organizations are helping the government in mainstreaming them, when they are willingly submissing themselves to the government and their militant wing after re-education would be inducted in army as sepoy or etc...
So why create a fiasco by directly punishing their leadership.
Pakistan is working on nap that involves ban and end of these organizations.
It is easier said then done.
They have banned the organisations.
Now they need to re-educate the militant wings and then induct them...
Then they would reintroduce new circulam in their madrassas.
Their charities would be hand over by the government.
And their leaders would never been seen or heard on Internet or TV ...
And that's how you get rid of them.
 

Back
Top Bottom