What's new

At China-led regional summit, India refuses to back Beijing’s infrastructure vision

Vanguard One

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 20, 2019
Messages
1,307
Reaction score
-7
Country
Ireland
Location
Ireland
  • At the SCO summit, India refuses to endorse statements promoting China’s Belt and Road Initiative
  • India is more concerned with ‘divergent priorities’. ‘They’ve always said it was a bad idea,’ analyst says
1688961884722.png

India’s leader used the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit to press for more cooperation against regional terrorism. Photo: EPA-EFE

Despite a pitch from Chinese President Xi Jinping, India refused to back his signature Belt and Road Initiative during a summit chaired by India, a move experts had expected.

During the virtual Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit on Tuesday, Xi said the infrastructure project would facilitate regional cooperation, and trade and investment, and he called for better coordination in Belt and Road projects.

In a joint declaration, India, which has just completed its one-year presidency of the SCO, did not support the belt and road strategy.

“The statement has been like this since India joined SCO as a full member in 2017. India does not quite agree with endorsing China’s [Belt and Road

Initiative] in the joint declaration, and it has its own version of infrastructure development projects. China has expected the lack of backing from India,” said Zhu Yongbiao, a professor at Lanzhou University’s School of Politics and International Relations.

“Instead, the declaration showed the SCO is about seeking common ground while preserving differences,” he said.


Raffaello Pantucci, a senior fellow at the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, said India had a practical reason for withholding its endorsement.

“The Belt and Road goes through contested territory in Kashmir with Pakistan … There’s a sort of practical dilemma always for the Indians to try to engage with the SCO with the Belt and Road Initiative. They’ve always been very reticent. They’ve always said it was a bad idea,” said Pantucci.

In his summit speech, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi stressed the need for cooperation to fight regional terrorism, underlining a divergence from Beijing and Moscow.

“Terrorism has become a threat to regional and global peace … We have to fight together against terrorism that may be in any form and any manifestation,” Modi said.

Others made more concrete appeals. Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev urged more energy cooperation and said SCO member states should set up an investment fund. Xi repeated a call to establish an SCO Development Bank.

Russian President Vladimir Putin suggested “payment infrastructures” be set up to boost regional economic integration and build an “independent financial structure”.

Both China and Russia called for wider use of national currencies in trade between SCO members, in a push for deeper economic integration within the bloc.

But Pantucci said India has other options.

“I don’t think they feel the same sort of position. They’ve got lots of Western powers that are eager to sort of engage with them and develop free trade areas and free trade relationships,” he said.

“There was no real concurrence on what everyone wanted to do and achieve … [and that became] a question of divergent priorities.”

As Modi spoke about the terrorist threats faced by the nation, he said “some countries use cross-border terrorism as an instrument of their policies and provide shelter to terrorists”.

“SCO must not hesitate to criticise countries that support cross-border terrorism as part of state policy. There should be no place for double standards on such serious matters,” Modi said.

While Pakistan was not mentioned directly, Li Hongmei, a research fellow at the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies, said it was an obvious reference to India’s neighbour, which Modi wanted the SCO to jointly pressure.

China hopes the SCO will become a platform for both security and economic cooperation, but India remains more concerned about terrorism, which has worsened since the Taliban took over Afghanistan, Li said.

“Regional connectivity was also mentioned in Modi’s speech, [but] this is a secondary concern or secondary goal of India, and counterterrorism is India’s number one goal in SCO,” she said, adding that the Indian economy has shown signs of “desinicisation” since the deadly border clash with Chinese troops in the Galwan Valley in 2020.

Despite lingering tensions from the border dispute, Pantucci said New Delhi remained active in the regional bloc and has led several working groups, including those focused on the digital economy.

“But it is also very clear that there is clearly a reticence from an Indian perspective to get too deeply enmeshed, because of their hostile relationship with China and [that] they like to project a kind of more agnostic view and the SCO is a good example in their minds of how they do that,” he said.

 
The different between China and India...

India is still having an ex-colony mentality, which is anyone who is investing in India means wanting to rob India's wealth.

China is opening the door as wide as possible for foreign investment up to the level it becomes the world factory. China is welcoming Singapore to build and run their port, and Singapore port is one of the most efficient in the world. China uses foreign money, knowledge, technology to build their country... as much as possible.

And infrastructure is extremely important to the economy. Infrastructure is not a prestige monument, but the function. The greater the infrastructure means the wealthier a country is. No wealthy country lacks infrastructure. When someone is offering help to build your country's infrastructure, it means someone is giving you a tool to make a lot of wealth, opening the door to modernity. For a great country, it's better to starve for not building infrastructure.

India's action looks like a big win for India while the truth India is losing the game.

When everyone is already reaching the moon, India is still sitting and waiting.
 
Last edited:
China is opening the door as wide as possible for foreign investment up to the level it becomes the world factory. China is welcoming Singapore to build and run their port, and Singapore port is one of the most efficient in the world. China uses foreign money, knowledge, technology to build their country... as much as possible.

Does China allow Google, Netflix to operate in their country ? Does China allow foreign companies to operate in their country freely ?

Why do you expect India to behave any differently ?
 
Chairing a China led organization and saying 'fcuk you!' to China has its own share of fun.
Fool, isn't your slum India against Chinese BRI since its inception ? So, would anybody expect India to have a change of heart to support BRI this time, lol, don't flatter yourself. China and Russia should kick India the US mole out of SCO.
 
Does China allow Google, Netflix to operate in their country ? Does China allow foreign companies to operate in their country freely ?

Why do you expect India to behave any differently ?
Lol, US companies don't want to obey Chinese laws, that's why they are out.
 
Fool, isn't your slum India against Chinese BRI since its inception ? So, would anybody expect India to have a change of heart to support BRI this time, lol, don't flatter yourself. China and Russia should kick India the US mole out of SCO.

If any country actually improved their economic fortunes because of BRI you might have a better case

Look at the flagship project of the BRI - CPEC. Pakistan economic fortunes may not moved a little bit for the positive after $62 billion in investments
 
Fool, isn't your slum India against Chinese BRI since its inception ? So, would anybody expect India to have a change of heart to support BRI this time, lol, don't flatter yourself. China and Russia should kick India the US mole out of SCO.

Actually, it would be a blessing for India if it moves out. Literally speaking, BRICS and SCO are just another forum with China is the only player to be counted.
 
Chinese companies don't want to obey Indian laws too
BS.

If any country actually improved their economic fortunes because of BRI you might have a better case

Look at the flagship project of the BRI - CPEC. Pakistan economic fortunes may not moved a little bit for the positive after $62 billion in investments
We are talking India and BRI. Your opinion of CPEC is yours only.
 
Lol, US companies don't want to obey Chinese laws, that's why they are out.

Because they are way too political instead of just doing business.

They say they support democracy (in the name of people), but in reality, the same company or the share owners of the company pay politicians to bend the rules and gives advantages to them instead of the people.
 
Fool, isn't your slum India against Chinese BRI since its inception ? So, would anybody expect India to have a change of heart to support BRI this time, lol, don't flatter yourself. China and Russia should kick India the US mole out of SCO.

China should kick India out of both SCO and BRICS.

India is a slave country.

Chinese companies don't want to obey Indian laws too

Chinese companies obey Chinese laws.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom