What's new

Analysis: Bush's Pakistan policy -- forget 'Plan B,' time for 'Plan C'

Neo

RETIRED

New Recruit

Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Analysis: Bush's Pakistan policy -- forget 'Plan B,' time for 'Plan C'
By Ed Henry
CNN

Ed Henry is a CNN White House correspondent.

CRAWFORD, Texas (CNN) -- What's next for the U.S. in Pakistan?

Unrest continues for a second day in Karachi, Pakistan, Saturday after the assassination of Benazir Bhutto.

That's the burning question President Bush must contemplate as he tries to get some down time for the New Year's holiday.

He has a slew of foreign policy challenges to confront in 2008 -- ranging from Iraq to Afghanistan, Iran and North Korea to name just a few.

Perhaps none is as pressing on January 1 as the unfolding crisis in the wake of the assassination of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto.

The stakes for the U.S. are enormous, from the fear of Pakistan's nuclear weapons getting into the hands of extremists to questions about whether President Pervez Musharraf is focused hard enough on the war on terror and hunting down Osama bin Laden.

The Bush administration finds itself in a box after sticking so long with the policy of standing by Musharraf's side at all costs, and it has little choice but to stay with him now, otherwise the White House would run the risk of making Pakistan even less stable.

So do not expect Bush's policy to shift much at all, despite questions about whether Musharraf has misused billions of dollars in U.S. aid intended to fight terror. "He has been an absolute reliable partner in dealing with extremists and radicals," Bush told CNN's Wolf Blitzer in November.

But with Musharraf's grip on his government slipping, the Bush administration had recently turned to what you might call "Plan B," a potential power-sharing pact between Bhutto and Musharraf.

Don't Miss
Bhutto's aides suggest cover-up
Bhutto's death casts doubt on January elections
In Depth: Benazir Bhutto assassinated
In the wake of Bhutto's murder, the U.S. faces a bunch of bad options, so the White House is now searching for what might be dubbed "Plan C" -- finding someone to unite a nation teetering on the brink.

"That's the key dynamic to watch now and that will determine whether Musharraf and others in the country can move ahead," said Daniel Markey of the Council of Foreign Relations.

One option is former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. The U.S. had kept its distance from him because of his connections to Islamist parties, but in light of the current disarray the Bush administration is taking another look.

Another option would be for the U.S. to scrap the goal of democracy and let Musharraf focus on cracking down on extremists. But Bush is committed to his "Freedom Agenda," spreading democracy around the world, and U.S. officials say they still want free and fair elections in Pakistan as early as next month.

The most acceptable option may be that the winner of the elections form a partnership with Musharraf. But finding someone to fill the Bhutto half of the partnership will obviously be a Herculean task.

Those elections are scheduled to take place on January 8, coincidentally the very same day Bush is headed to Israel for a mission that was supposed to focus on Israeli-Palestinian peace. But the issue of broader stability of the Mideast has suddenly shot to the top of that trip's agenda.

Analysis: Bush's Pakistan policy -- forget 'Plan B,' time for 'Plan C' - CNN.com
 
Very sticky situation indeed for the United States. To think that my arab friends family kept saying the CIA assasinated Bhutto. They don't understand how scared Americans are of our nukes falling into terrorist hands which is why they loved Bhutto. Let her become PM, and the US can maintain it's charade of supporting democracy while at the same time getting what it wants in terms of the war on terror.
 
The stakes for the U.S. are enormous, from the fear of Pakistan's nuclear weapons getting into the hands of extremists to questions about whether President Pervez Musharraf is focused hard enough on the war on terror and hunting down Osama bin Laden.

They just dont get fed up bringing the issue of nuclear weapons in anyway that they can. Even the pentagon has said it that they dont see any danger of the nuclear weapons falling into the wrong hands yet the media doest seem to let it go.
If i would be granted three wishes, one out of three would be to make the western media shut their pie hole once and for all which is running wide open these days.:angry:
 
america is fed up with pakitan and pakistan's falls promises to help them in war in terrorr which they never realy do.
 
Natalie,

Pakistan is also fed up of america---this sword is double edged. Pakistan is also tired of empty promises, threat of sanctions, interference in the internal affairs, interference in the external affairs, hand picking a candidate to rule pakistan, a verbal assault on the pakistan at all times, no long lasting committment by america over any issues---there is a huge big laundry list of issues that pakistan has with america. ask some other memebrs and they will come out with some more.
 
america is fed up with pakitan and pakistan's falls promises to help them in war in terrorr which they never realy do.

America is fed up? I say let them be, let them cut off aid. What you dont understand is that America has no choice but to stick with us. Now if America leaves us, then Russia and China will come, and I am 100% sure they can give us a better deal with less strings attached. Now you say Pakistan fails to keep its promises. Maybe you haven't noticed we have killed or captured more people then any other country. What you and others have to understand are the ground realities. We have done our best and our best is better then any other country.
 
US has no choice other than President Pervaiz Musharraf in there plan "D', "E","F" till "Z". Who knows they will ask him to Rule the country for atleast another 5~10 Years
 
Bush has no ‘Plan B’ for Pakistan

WASHINGTON: For the Bush Administration, there is no plan B for Pakistan, following the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, which has dramatically altered Pakistani politics.

According to a report published by the Washington Post on Sunday, Benazir’s death has left Washington even more dependent on President Pervez Musharraf as the lone pro-US leader in a nation facing growing extremism. “Despite anxiety among intelligence officials and experts, the administration is only slightly tweaking a course charted in the past 18 months to support the creation of a political centre around Musharraf,” according to US officials. “Plan A still has to work,” an official involved in Pakistan policy told the Post. “We all have to appeal to moderate forces to come together and carry the election and create a more solidly based government, then use that as a platform to fight the terrorists.” US policy is wedded to Musharraf, despite growing warnings that his “dictatorial ways” are untenable.

The Post quotes Robert Templer of the International Crisis Group as saying, “This Administration has had a disastrous policy towards Pakistan, as bad as the Iraq policy. They are clinging to the wreckage of Musharraf, flailing around. Musharraf has outlived all possible usage to Pakistan and the US.”

He is of the view that without Musharraf, moderate forces, coming from the Pakistan People’s Party, Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League, the moderate Balochistan National Party and the mostly Pashtun Awami National Party could create a more legitimate centrist political space. But with Musharraf having won a five-year presidential term in October, the looming question centres on who will become prime minister. Benazir was expected to assume that role, a move US officials believed would have bolstered Musharraf and US interests. Now there are no obvious heirs. “We have a room full of tigers in Pakistan,” one US official said. “This is a really complicated situation, and we have to use our influence in a lot of ways but also realise we can’t determine the outcome.” khalid hasan

Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
 
Let Bush figure out his plan for America first before making one for Pakistan
 
Currently the Pakistani Army has 9 Corps. The tenth one is the recently raised Army Strategic Force Command (ASFC), responsible for bearing the national strategic and nuclear assets. Initially a Division, but then raised to the status of a Corps.

So, I don't think there is a ny danger of terrorists getting hands in Pakistani Nukes, this is a rumour or a propaganda raised by western media.
 
Bush is leaving in 2008....we better start listening to Hillary and Obama a little harder...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom