What's new

AIIB (Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank) news

Hehe, wise and pragmatic decision by the British. :)

UK submits application to join AIIB | Business Spectator

UK submits application to join AIIB
Paul Pennay

The UK officially lodged an application to join the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) yesterday, according to a statement from China's Ministry of Finance.

The ministry said that the application will be considered in keeping with due process and in consultation with the other founding members.

If all goes to plan, the UK will be recognised as a founding member of the bank by the end of March.

The ministry said that it welcomed the UK's decision to apply to join the bank.

Lou Jiwei, China's Finance Minister, recently said that 27 countries had expressed a willingness to become founding members of AIIB.

When the bank was officially founded in October 2014, 21 countries agreed to become founding members, including China, India and Singapore.

Since then, Indonesia, New Zealand and other countries have joined the bank, according to an article in The Paper,

The cut off date for becoming a founding member of the AIIB is March 31, 2015.

-------------------------------------------------

My comments
:-

The clock is ticking to be a founding member - have to join by 31 March 2015. The pressure is on.

Today, the Australian Treasurer Joe Hockey says Australia will now consider joining AIIB.

Initially, Australia turned down the invitation by China to become one of the founding members of the AIIB, saying that Australia would like to see more transparency in the governance of the bank. All of a sudden, with the clock ticking, this is no longer an issue because Britain has applied to join. :lol: My friends, may I remind you that "Money Really Talks". All of a sudden, the news regarding AIIB in my country Australia is now sounding more and more positive. This is how the media works. Before that, there were so much doubts about AIIB.

All Asean countries are on board.

Central Asian countries such as Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan are in. I am wondering why Russia has not joined yet.

Mongolia is already in.

New Zealand is already in.

Hong Kong has announced that they will join.

China has extended an invite to Japan.

My money is that South Korea will also jump ship and join.

Each passing day, the Americans are looking more and more silly. They will be the only one left which has not join.

This is getting more and more exciting in seeing how all these pan out. So much about trying to encircle and contain the rise of China.

:lol::lol::lol:

Indeed. Money talks, let the investments come in, I say!
 
USA doesn't want competitions or institutions that's outside of its dominating influences or control. An American always heads the World Bank, an European always heads the IMF and a Japanese always heads the Asian Development Bank, even though these are supposedly international institutions. With the AIIB , it will give developing countries a choice to choose a source of loan and money. It is this competitions that scares the USA. Also, AIIB will also lessen some influences of Asian Development Bank and that's its controller, Japan, is against it.

In the end, AIIB will be good for developing countries as it give them a fair-er institutions which they can borrow loans/money from.
the US has control of the world bank, has veto power in the IMF, controls ADB through japan so it doesnt want others to challege these institutions.
 
It is not a zero sum game for the above mentioned financial institutions isnt it?
The establishment of AIIB is a blessing for those places in need of funding.
The Americans lives up to their ugly name by intervening in the process

Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

images

Finest Chinese porcelain dinner set from 景德镇 Jing Dezhen
 
A Bretton Woods moment in Asia
China is trying to clone IMF and the World Bank. The world should notice

edit-web-bretton-woods--621x414.jpg


China is experiencing its Bretton Woods moment. Flush with a huge pile of cash, Beijing is on a bank-creation spree. Last year it took the lead in forming the Brics (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) Bank. In 2013, it announced plans to create the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB). It has tied up close to $110 billion in both projects. On Thursday, Britain signalled its intent to become a founding member of AIIB. This is another signal of the global financial and political realignments that are underway. As expected, the reaction from the US has been cold.

Officially, AIIB is expected to meet the infrastructure investment needs of the Asian region. Last year, China doubled its contribution to the bank from the original $50 billion to $100 billion. This amount dwarfs its share in the Brics Bank which stands at $10 billion.

While the Brics Bank is limited to five countries, AIIB will have a wider membership. So far, 22 countries, including India, have joined the bank. Most of the bank’s members are concentrated in Asia, Central Asia and the Middle East. AIIB is open to all countries, but three key nations in the Asia-Pacific have not signed up: Japan, South Korea and Australia. This is a story in itself.

The proposed banks are China’s answer to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. China’s claims should be taken with a pinch of salt as unlike IMF and the World Bank, Beijing’s geopolitical goals are too enmeshed with the economic aims of these banks. Unlike the Brics Bank—where each country has one vote each and the share capital of a country cannot be increased without unanimous approval of all members—AIIB is a different creature. Negotiations on its operating rules are yet to be finalized and it is not clear if it will adhere to the one member, one vote rule as in the case of the Brics Bank. If it does have an equal vote pattern, it will constrict China’s goals.

Three issues merit attention: the size and structure of these banks, their lending priorities and territorial reach. Far from being alternatives to IMF and the World Bank, these institutions have different goals.

First, consider the magnitude involved. In AIIB, China is the dominant partner. It began with a promise of $50 billion as its share. Last year it promised to double it to $100 billion. While this will be quite smaller than that of the $165 billion Asian Development Bank (ADB), let alone IMF and the World Bank, this does give very considerable heft to China in lending across countries and political influence.

The latter point is key to the exercise. Unlike the Bretton-Woods institutions, that service all countries with development problems and the management of temporary balance of payments problems, the goals of the China-led banks are much more limited. These are straightforward lending banks and specifically infrastructure lending institutions. This is a much more specialized task as compared to managing global financial frictions and development. Any institution with these goals requires much greater membership and acceptability—which IMF and the World Bank have. The corollary is clear: with greater scope of lending by China comes much greater political leverage. This is reinforced by the membership structure of these banks: IMF and World Bank have 188 members; AIIB has just 22.

Finally, these banks have the potential to shift the world’s political and economic centre of gravity away from the West to China. This point lies in the future but the seeds are being sown now. Britain’s eagerness to join AIIB is an indicator of things to come. The great failure of these western institutions lies in their unchanging nature. It is a travesty that countries such as Italy should have greater voting rights than India; France more than China. It is this inability to change with the time in tune with economic realities that is letting China have its way. The losers will be western countries and the wider world.

The world’s poor countries need infrastructure and that requires money. The West does not have enough of it to lend, China does. But along with that opportunity to benefit come many strings. IMF may be infamous for insisting on “reform conditionalities” but these have stood the test of time. When China lends, an army of Chinese workers, companies and political nudging come with the package. Countries such as India should be aware of that.

Read more at: http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/L2LTKEPrR8XvMWzcnLFPpK/A-Bretton-Woods-moment-in-Asia.html?utm_source=copy
 
Defying US, European allies say will join China-led bank
The move is seen as a diplomatic blow for the United States, reflecting European eagerness to partner with China’s fast-growing economy

ministergermany.jpg

German finance minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said Europe’s biggest economy, a major trade partner with Beijing, would be a founding member of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Photo: Reuters


Paris/Beijing: Germany, France and Italy said on Tuesday they had agreed to join a new China-led Asian investment bank after close ally Britain defied US pressure to become a founder member of a venture seen in Washington as a rival to the World Bank.

The concerted move to participate in Beijing’s flagship economic outreach project was a diplomatic blow for the United States, reflecting European eagerness to partner with China’s fast-growing economy, the second largest in the world.

The concerted move to participate in Beijing’s flagship economic outreach project was a diplomatic blow for the United States, reflecting European eagerness to partner with China’s fast-growing economy, the second largest in the world.

It comes amid prickly trade negotiations between Brussels and Washington, and at a time when EU and Asian governments are frustrated that the US Congress has held up a reform of voting rights in the International Monetary Fund due to give China and other emerging economies more say in global economic governance.

German finance minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said Europe’s biggest economy, a major trade partner with Beijing, would be a founding member of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.

A French finance ministry official told Reuters that Paris “confirms France’s participation and highlights agreement between Germany, France and Italy” on the matter, first reported by the Financial Times.

The Italian Treasury said the Europeans had agreed to work to ensure the new institution “follows the best standards and practices in terms of governance, safeguards, debt and procurement policies”.

French foreign minister Laurent Fabius told reporters: “We are indeed considering this idea positively. We are looking at the precise modalities internally in France, then we’ll have the opportunity to discuss it with other European countries.

“You have seen that the British have already joined. We have been working on this prospect for quite some time,” he added.

The AIIB was launched in Beijing last year to spur investment in Asia in transportation, energy, telecommunications and other infrastructure. It was seen as a rival to the Western-dominated World Bank and the Asian Development Bank.

Washington has questioned whether it will have high standards of governance and environmental and social safeguards.

It is seen as a key vector to spread Chinese “soft power” in the region, possibly at the expense of the United States. The World Bank is traditionally run by a US nominee and Washington also has the most influence at the IMF.

China said earlier this year a total of 26 countries had been included as AIIB founder members, mostly from Asia and the Middle East. It plans to finalise the articles of agreement by the end of the year.

‘High watermark’

China’s state-owned Xinhua news agency said South Korea, Switzerland and Luxembourg were also considering joining. An Indian government official said New Delhi had also heard that Luxembourg, an EU member, as well as non-EU Switzerland planned to participate.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei would not comment on which countries had applied, and repeated that the bank would be “open, inclusive, transparent and responsible”.

Washington’s top diplomat for east Asia signalled on Tuesday that concerns about the AIIB remained, but the decision on whether to join was up to individual nations.

“Our messaging to the Chinese consistently has been to welcome investment in infrastructure but to seek unmistakable evidence that this bank ... takes as its starting point the high watermark of what other multilateral development banks have done in terms of governance,” US assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Russel said in Seoul.

“Every government can make its own decision about whether the way to achieve that goal is by joining before the articles of agreement are clarified or by waiting to see what the evidence looks like as the bank starts to operate.”

Visiting Beijing, European Parliament President Martin Schulz said he welcomed the involvement of four EU nations, but added: “Such new organisations must answer to the requirements of international standards. That is quite important.”

A government official in India, one of the countries that has joined, said the members of the AIIB would meet in Almaty, Kazakhstan, on 29-31 March to discuss the articles of agreement.

China has said 31 March is the deadline for accepting founder-members into the organisation.

Japan, Australia and South Korea remain notable regional absentees from the AIIB, although Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott said at the weekend he would make a final decision on membership soon.

South Korea has said it is still in discussions with China and other countries about its possible participation.

Japan, China’s main regional rival, has the biggest shareholding in the Asian Development Bank (ADB) along with the United States. By convention, the Manila-based bank is headed by a Japanese.

Japan is unlikely to join the AIIB, but ADB head Takehiko Nakao told the Nikkei Asian Review that the two institutions were in discussions and could work together.

“We’ve begun sharing our experience and know-how,” Nakao was quoted as saying. “Once the AIIB has actually been established, it’s conceivable that we would cooperate.” Reuters

Read more at: http://www.livemint.com/Politics/1LxE5ap2gsyxQ7bRvnzPWM/Defying-US-European-allies-say-will-join-Chinaled-bank.html?utm_source=copy

:china: Glad to see BeiJing chose a SMART & BEST way ... China will go further ! :coffee:
 
Good going China.:tup:

Though you would need to do more than form a bank to erode Western hegemony on finance. Dollar dominated international economy is greatest strength of US (not military), and if trends are any indication, dollar is going to reign supreme for at least half a century.

Though if supremacy of dollar could be eroded, it would be beneficial for all countries (including EU ,though to a lesser extent) as US would not be able to export its inflation overseas.As of today, US is only country where monetary easing does not ruin value of your currency.
 
2015.03.31 is the endline to apply for member of AIIB, just see whether Britain, France, Germany going in ?
View attachment 203926


Current formal member nations

View attachment 203927

South Korea and Australia haven't decided yet.

Though it is very likely that Australia will wanna be part of it. Korea don't know, because they have been giving mixed signals.
 
South Korea and Australia haven't decided yet.

Though it is very likely that Australia will wanna be part of it. Korea don't know, because they have been giving mixed signals.
Just yesterday, the AIIB official website showed S.Korea & Australia as formal member of AIIB ... but news does't prove it yet, recent days will read official voice.
 
Also, don't get complacent. This is nowhere near any Bretton woods. This is an event of as much significance as the founding of the Asian Development Bank, NOT the world bank.

Though I would like to see a collapse of Bretton Woods, there is much more to it. Bretton Woods agreements also included and oversaw US dollar as reserve currency, and the overall US financial hegemony.

This is standard case of Americans overblowing "threat" to raise alarm etc. The way they do with their military. China should not be complacent, and keep going ahead.

Just yesterday, the AIIB official website showed S.Korea & Australia as formal member of AIIB ... but news does't prove it yet, recent days will read official voice.

Don't know about the "official site," especially since the bank is basically at the stage of consideration. There needs to be a discussion on its rules, and then the functioning of the bank.

Trust me, I follow these news widely, and there has been no official announcement of any sort, neither from China or the respective countries. Abbot did indeed say that he will decide by the end of the week. Let's see.
 
It is mostly the Western press that blows stuff out of proportion, be it pro or con. A lot of disinformation and rhetorical and abstract analyses that edge toward madness.

Just like what happened with the Myanmar issue.

China is as resolute and cool-headed as it has always been.

China wants to "economize" the issue while the US side likes to "securitize" it. The regular dichotomy.

**

AIIB not a gamble between China, US

Global Times Published: 2015-3-17 23:13:01

The China-initiated Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) has met with US resistance since the very beginning. China would not have been so determined if it were several years ago.

The UK applied to become a founding member of the AIIB last week, followed by a few other European and Asian countries that have the same intentions. Prospects for the AIIB seem promising. Many analysts believe that the current situation proves the US lacks the ability to contain a rising China. As China has won the race around the AIIB, it has also gained some important rights for the future.

But China will not turn the issues around the AIIB into a gamble between China and the US. China will not respond to such speculation that its "One Belt, One Road" initiative is a countermeasure to the US pivot to Asia strategy. An approach that sets the US as an adversary is contrary to China's doctrine.

Both the "One Belt, One Road" initiative and the AIIB are China's grand strategies to enter the international community. The comments and interpretation of the outside world cannot all be complimentary or help promote Sino-US mutual trust. China is bound to face a dubious US.

China's development requires it to stick to the principles of independence and take measures that may be deemed "assertive" by the outside world.

Since the concept of the AIIB has been proposed, it has attracted 21 founding members. A number of countries have also showed their interest, and when the UK made an application, many more followed suit, even though the US remains at odds.

But the AIIB has brought more positive aspects to China's diplomacy. China's endeavor does not lead to extreme tension between China and the US, but gains more cooperation and understanding from European and Asian countries.

One reason is that the AIIB fits the interests of most countries. The US tries to contain it with a geopolitical mind-set, but it lacks a strong case.

As the Chinese economy develops with a growing scale and it interacts with the world more, it is bound to take more initiatives. As long as China seeks joint development and this is not aimed at the US, the world will eventually understand it and cooperate with it.

The favorable news about the AIIB points to a promising future for the "One Belt, One Road" initiative. It is a compliment to China's diplomacy. Chinese society will gain confidence and accumulate experience about how the country can play its role in a complex international environment.

Many people are worried that China's diplomatic environment may be manipulated by the US, but the evolution of the AIIB shows that China is its own master. Perhaps the US may become a member of the AIIB one day. As China develops smoothly, this is not that impossible.
 

Back
Top Bottom