What's new

Afghan-American Senator faces DEATH THREATS for CASTE Bill

Mirzali Khan

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 25, 2020
Messages
5,857
Reaction score
-3
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States

Lawmaker Faces Violent Threats for Trying to Make California the First State to Ban Caste Discrimination​


The California state lawmaker who introduced a bill that would make the state the first in the nation to outlaw caste-based discrimination is receiving Islamophobic threats from the U.S. and abroad. State sen. Aisha Wahab says her office was flooded with dozens of hateful calls, hundreds of emails, and individuals yelling at staff in her district office after she introduced the legislation last week.

Caste is a system of social hierarchy that has been especially pervasive in South Asia. It dates back more than 3,000 years but even today is the basis of discrimination for those considered to be lower caste or falling outside the system, including Dalits, who have been ostracized as “untouchables.”


Caste discrimination has made its way overseas to the U.S., too. A 2018 survey by Equality Labs—a nonprofit that advocates for Dalits—found that one in four Dalits in the U.S. say they faced verbal or physical assault and two out of every three reported facing discrimination at work.

Wahab’s proposal comes after Seattle became the first American city to add caste to its anti-discrimination laws last month. California’s university system added caste to its non-discrimination policy across its 23 campuses last January

California has long been in the spotlight for caste-related discrimination. In 2001, Lakireddy Bali Reddy—one of Berkeley’s richest landlords, who owned more than 1,000 rental properties, was convicted of transporting minors for illegal sexual activity; federal officials accused him of bringing at least 25 Indian laborers to the U.S. through false pretenses, some of whom were Dalit. More recently, in 2020, California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing sued Cisco Systems over a Dalit Indian engineer who alleged caste discrimination. Last year, Tanuja Gupta, a senior manager at Google News, resigned after a talk that she organized with Tehnmozhi Soundararajan, the founder of Equality Labs, was canceled amid a disinformation campaign claiming Soundararajan was Hindu-phobic.

This is the environment into which Wahab, the first Muslim and Afghan American elected to California’s state senate, introduced a bill that would explicitly include caste as a protected category in California’s anti-discrimination laws. The bill has been introduced but not yet come up for a vote in either chamber.

TIME spoke with Wahab about the issue of caste discrimination, how her legislation would address the problem, and the threats she has received in recent days.

How did you first learn about caste discrimination?

I first learned about caste like many other Americans did—through public school education and world history. I heard stories from friends; one mentioned that her parents immigrated from India to the U.S. because they belonged to different castes and their families didn’t accept each other. Some friends spoke about how their families expected them to marry people who shared the same last name, suggesting they were of a higher caste. In the last couple of years, I heard a lot about how caste can emerge as an issue in job interviews, especially in the tech world.

How have you seen caste manifest in the U.S.?

You see it in the hiring process, as well as in the education, health care and housing world. Landlords sometimes will not rent out to people of a lower caste. The discrimination is happening in a lot of different industries. It’s hard to identify and explain when it’s not one of the mainstream groups that are being discriminated against.

How would your legislation address caste-based discrimination?

It’s largely believed that California’s civil rights law does cover caste to some degree, because some people will put it under the concept of ancestry or race. But caste is very specific; it encompasses more than just those two factors. We are just trying to clarify the law to explicitly include protection against discrimination based on a person’s caste, which we define as a system of social stratification, in which people are characterized by hereditary status, social barriers and other forms of segregation.

What have you been hearing from your own constituents? Was there a particular incident that spoke to the urgency of this legislation?

My constituents have spoken to me about caste-based discrimination in housing and education. Many Dalit women have spoken about receiving death and rape threats for speaking out.

I’ve been asked: don’t you think that an Indian American should carry this particular bill? And to that I would say, as an individual who cares about civil and human rights, if you see something wrong, you fix it. You don’t have to be of a particular community to do that.

Can you tell me about the kinds of threats and harassment you and your staff have received?

My last name is Wahab, so they love to tie it to Wahhabism, or call me a jihadist or a Talibani. Basically, every racial slur and dog whistle.

My office has received a lot of violent threats. Within the first 24 hours of introducing the bill, the Senate received hundreds of emails in opposition to and in support of the legislation. Some who felt very strongly came into our district office and tried to intimidate our staff by talking about the Mughal Empire, which is several hundred years old. It doesn’t have any place in this country to base any type of discrimination on something that happened overseas hundreds of years ago.

We’ve had several people come into the office with varying levels of anger. Some just wanted to learn more. Others have been far more belligerent—yelling, screaming and being very verbally abusive to staff.

People filed formal complaints with the California senate, the senate committee on legislative ethics, the secretary of the senate, the California fair political practices commission and the office of the governor.
These are just to deter us from focusing on the bill. It’s a distraction. We will comply with any investigation; there’s nothing for us to hide.

International communities have been watching this bill, too. Some, including a former Indian colonel, appeared on news panels
[video id=LJ0BtZQg]
in India asking for the death of individuals who are opponents to India inside and outside the country—as it pertains to this bill.

I’m proud to carry this bill. I’m happy to take the hits that I’m taking. All the racist slurs against me, the calls, emails, and people harassing my staff at our office. They are talking about several-hundred-year-old empires and old country politics. They’re conflating different issues to distract us from the job at hand, which is making sure this bill passes.

How have you been navigating your own safety?

I’ve never actually worried too much, to be honest with you. I’m one of those people who believe that any day you can potentially get hit by a bus, so I try to live my life as freely as possible and I’m also not going to cower in the face of threats.

The secretary of the senate has been concerned by some of the responses their office has received. They have asked me if I need armed security or fitting for a bulletproof vest. The state legislature is focused on making sure that all of us are safe, including my staff, which is my number one priority. But at the same time, I’m going to continue moving this bill forward. It’s not going to scare me.

How have you been navigating your own safety?

I’ve never actually worried too much, to be honest with you. I’m one of those people who believe that any day you can potentially get hit by a bus, so I try to live my life as freely as possible and I’m also not going to cower in the face of threats.

The secretary of the senate has been concerned by some of the responses their office has received. They have asked me if I need armed security or fitting for a bulletproof vest. The state legislature is focused on making sure that all of us are safe, including my staff, which is my number one priority. But at the same time, I’m going to continue moving this bill forward. It’s not going to scare me.

How’s your Ramadan been? Has this affected how the month has felt for you?

I’ll be honest with you, I don’t actually practice. I’ve never claimed to be a religious individual and I’m not a representative of the entire religious community. But we can be intersectional in our identity and we’re not always 100% what people expect us to be based on our identities.


@Maula Jatt @PakSarZameen47 @Menace2Society @Pakstallion @Vapnope @Areesh @DESERT FIGHTER @Desert Fox 1 @N.Siddiqui @Norwegian @TNT @Imad.Khan @Dalit @ziaulislam @EternalMortal @lastofthepatriots @WarKa DaNG @Warking @Talwar e Pakistan @WinterFangs @kingQamaR @Menace2Society @Indus Pakistan @Ghazwa-e-Hind @Norwegian @PakFactor @akramishaqkhan @Zornix @pakpride00090 @Abid123 @Goritoes @SecularNationalist @PakistaniandProud @PAKISTANFOREVER @Dual Wielder @Great Janjua @ahaider97 @PakFactor @Sayfullah
@SaadH @villageidiot @Olympus81
@Mobius 1 @General Dong @Genghis khan1 @alphapak @RealNapster @Kharral @Mobius 1 @Goenitz @Muhammad Saftain Anjum @waz @SQ8 @AA_ @Mobius 1 @Great Janjua @waz
 
Last edited:
Such bills are useless.

If you want don't want caste discrimination then stop issuing visas to North Indians, Gujaratis, Brahman and Banias.
 
1680194987784-jpeg.922747
 
Such bills are useless.

If you want don't want caste discrimination then stop issuing visas to North Indians, Gujaratis, Brahman and Banias.
That would be wrong too. Bills like this, if passed, are going to be cited to prevent discrimination based on race, because caste based discrimination is basically akin to racism (as one is born into caste).

This is remarkable development for the rights of all US residents. Also the person that sponsored it isn’t even a practicing Muslim (which she states herself), and one from an Afghan background. This has more to do with the climate in the Bay Area and maintaining the liberties of everyone living and working there.

I suspect the vitriol is because, this calls into question this tenet in some people’s beliefs. The ramifications of this if it becomes law could be wide ranging and global over the next few decades.
 
Last edited:
Why is there such a commotion against a discrimination bill?
You want to disrupt 5000 year old way of life and don't even expect Islamophobic hatred and death threats?

You can't have your cake and eat it too. :D
 
That would be wrong too. Bills like this, if passed, are going to be cited to prevent discrimination based on race, because caste based discrimination is basically akin to racism (as one is born into caste).

This is remarkable development for the rights of all US residents. Also the perform that sponsored it isn’t even a practicing Muslim, and one from an Afghan background. This has more to do with the climate in the Bay Area and maintaining the liberties of everyone living and working there.

I suspect the vitriol is because, this calls into question this tenet in some people’s beliefs. The ramifications of this if it becomes law could be wide ranging and global over the next few decades.
Be real.

Indians are a tiny minority in the US. These North Indians & Gujaratis in the US will play the race card if you poke nose in their affairs.

Why is there such a commotion against a discrimination bill?
Because a Muslim introduced it.

Muslims would be outraged too if a Hindu introduced a bill banning sectarian discrimination among Muslims.

This bill won't end caste discrimination.

India has strictest caste discrimination on paper. But nothing has changed on the ground. Dalits still get humiliated, raped and murdered.
 
Muslims would be outraged too if a Hindu introduced a bill banning sectarian discrimination among Muslims.
Sectarianism is one thing. There is no such thing as sectarian discrimination because their is no hierarchy of sects. Everyone thinks their shit smells like roses.

So you can't ban sectarian discrimination because then you'd have to ban sects i.e. decide on a unified code that's going to favor some sects more than the other. So, it's not ending discrimination. It's creating it.
 
Be real.

Indians are a tiny minority in the US. These North Indians & Gujaratis in the US will play the race card if you poke nose in their affairs.


Because a Muslim introduced it.

Muslims would be outraged too if a Hindu introduced a bill banning sectarian discrimination among Muslims.

This bill won't end caste discrimination.

India has strictest caste discrimination on paper. But nothing has changed on the ground. Dalits still get humiliated, raped and murdered.

In California and the Silicon Valley in particular this has become a real issue. Lawsuits about discrimination can cost companies lots of money, so having a law to prevent this kind of discrimination decreases the liability of the companies and puts the burden on the individual hiring managers and enrollment officers at universities.

P.s. even if a Hindu-American legislator introduced a bill against sectarianism within the Muslim community, I don’t think the vast majority of Muslims would care. Sectarianism isn’t a significant issue in the Muslim-American community.
 
Last edited:

How’s your Ramadan been? Has this affected how the month has felt for you?

I’ll be honest with you, I don’t actually practice. I’ve never claimed to be a religious individual and I’m not a representative of the entire religious community. But we can be intersectional in our identity and we’re not always 100% what people expect us to be based on our identities.

You can make as much law as you want. You cannot make people practice.
 

How’s your Ramadan been? Has this affected how the month has felt for you?

I’ll be honest with you, I don’t actually practice. I’ve never claimed to be a religious individual and I’m not a representative of the entire religious community. But we can be intersectional in our identity and we’re not always 100% what people expect us to be based on our identities.
That's woke religion for you. Wonder if State sen. Aisha Wahab thinks this answer will work with Munkar Nakeer. smh

@Areesh
 
That's woke religion for you. Wonder if State sen. Aisha Wahab thinks this answer will work with Munkar Nakeer. smh

@Areesh

You're right, but to get things done you are going to have to rely on non-practicing Muslims.

A non-practicing non-Orthodox Muslim helped create Pakistan. The orthodox more practicing elements opposed it.
 
Some liberal Sikhni on cnn wrote an article about caste discrimination and she titled it “South Asian” in the headline. I confronted her on Twitter that it’s strictly an Indian issue since 100% of known cases involves Indian on Indian hate (brown on brown). She blocked me. Then I hash-tagged CNN on the same tweet.

It’s a problem across America. Indians in IT would rather hire other Indians from similar background.

I literally had a older White guy tell me in private that if a team has 8 Indians and 2 Whites or Asians on it, they will find ways to get rid of the non Indians and bring on two more Indians.

This older guy is my mentor. Has worked in my field for over 35 years now.

We work on an advanced analytics team and I had to reach out to another team on the same project to determine where a specific set of data sat. The head Indian refused to share this information. I told him we work on the same project and company like wtf?

They’re not good team workers. Some are very professional but most are piece of sh*ts.
 

Back
Top Bottom