Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Farah Sohail said:

Yes didnt hear Justice Ijaz Afzal's remarks for long time.. He must be silently thinking on how to bail out Nawaz .sharif from all this phadda....

I think the final verdict can be a divided decision.....

Justce khosa
Justice Ijaz ul Hasan (the other Justice Ijaz....not Ijaz Afzal.. He also raises some very good questions) can give decision against Nawaz Sharif
Dont know abt Justice Gulzar... He is mostly silent

While pakora judge can be 50/50 if other majority judges give decision agst nawaz sharif..tu hosakta hai woh bhi against hojaye.. He can swing both ways... Pakora judge kabhi kabhi sahi baat bhi kar leta hai.... Never thought I would say this...lolll...

Abt justice Ijaz Afzal...lolll.. The less said abt him, the better...ye tu pakka pakka nawaz sharif ki taraf hai

So. Its mostly upto...which side do Justice Gulzar and pakora judge go?

Click to expand...

Emmie said:

Whoever gets the judgment in his favor, the judgement for sure will have dissenting note(s).

Justice Azmat is a very smart judge, he never stops grilling the lawyers. Justice Gulzar is not talkative, he has a very good record being judge at high court of Sindh.

IMO justice Khosa, justice Ejaz Ul Ahsan & justice Gulzar are on same page. Justice Azmat is unpredictable, justice Ejaz Afzal is highly predictable and I think he has taken a position already.

Click to expand...

Emmie said:

@Farah Sohail @PakSword Did Bukhari in his arguments refer to Justice Bandiyal's judgement surfaced lately? Judgement rules that a candidate also has to reveal status of being a trustee, on very same ground PTI lawmaker Rai Hassan Nawaz was declared disqualified for misdeclaration. As per Maryam she's only a trustee of Neilsen and Nescoll, going by the ruling her husband had to declare his wife status.

Click to expand...

Farah Sohail said:

Dont know abt it

Click to expand...

Emmie said:

Whoever gets the judgment in his favor, the judgement for sure will have dissenting note(s).

Justice Azmat is a very smart judge, he never stops grilling the lawyers. Justice Gulzar is not talkative, he has a very good record being judge at high court of Sindh.

IMO justice Khosa, justice Ejaz Ul Ahsan & justice Gulzar are on same page. Justice Azmat is unpredictable, justice Ejaz Afzal is highly predictable and I think he has taken a position already.

Click to expand...

mr.robot said:

Sir! It looks like that Bench's head also has a lot influence over steering the direction. Khosa Sahib was comparatively dull under Jamali. Also, Khosa Sahib is going to be next CJ. He is overseeing it very well.

Justice Gulzar will be CJ after Khosa and down in the row Justice Ijaz-ul-Hassan is also going to be CJ. Three upcoming CJs are sitting in this case.

Click to expand...

Farah Sohail said:

I dont think tht bench head has any veto power.... He has only tht much legal standing as the other judges... Their votes count equally.. No veto power...

Click to expand...

Emmie said:

Argument of the day "apply article 66 to PM's speech in parliament and you'll find no contradiction"

Article 248 won't earn defense counsel anything, same is true for article 19.

So, five & half days and all we have technicalities. RIP to merit.

Click to expand...

Emmie said:

Hope he raises this when given time to rebut.

Click to expand...

Where assets, liabilities, earnings and income of an elected or contesting candidate are camouflaged or concealed by resort to different legal devices including benami, trustee, nominee, etc. arrangements for constituting holders of title, it would be appropriate for a learned Election Tribunal to probe whether the beneficial interest in such assets or income resides in the elected or contesting candidate in order to ascertain if his false or incorrect statement of declaration under Section 12(2) of the ROPA is intentional or otherwise.

Click to expand...

Emmie said:

@Farah Sohail @PakSword Did Bukhari in his arguments refer to Justice Bandiyal's judgement surfaced lately? Judgement rules that a candidate also has to reveal status of being a trustee, on very same ground PTI lawmaker Rai Hassan Nawaz was declared disqualified for misdeclaration. As per Maryam she's only a trustee of Neilsen and Nescoll, going by the ruling her husband had to declare his wife status.

Click to expand...

PakSword said:

No Idea.

Click to expand...