What's new

What is Kashmir Worth to Pakistan?

C130

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
8,092
Reaction score
-1
Country
United States
Location
United States
What would Pakistan be willing pay to have India controlled Kashmir and Jammu??? everything has it's price.

IMO India should just sell it to Pakistan before war breaks out. The demographics alone are favoring Muslims over Hindus,Buddhists, and others.

How about $100 billion dollars?? paid over 10 years, can use a portion of this to pay the Hindu families that will have to be resettled, and the rest fighting poverty in the other states of India, and on strengthening the military.
 
Its not about Pakistan or India.


Its about Kashmiris who are suffering from Indian Brutal Occupation for over 70 years.



They should be given the right to choose their future , A PLEBISCITE .



I don't think there is any rocket science in that.
 
What would Pakistan be willing pay to have India controlled Kashmir and Jammu??? everything has it's price.

IMO India should just sell it to Pakistan before war breaks out. The demographics alone are favoring Muslims over Hindus,Buddhists, and others.

How about $100 billion dollars?? paid over 10 years, can use a portion of this to pay the Hindu families that will have to be resettled, and the rest fighting poverty in the other states of India, and on strengthening the military.

Why does any one have to be resettled at all, Hindus/Buddhists can stay on in Kashmir. The prize is that India will join the regional economic partnership, get access to Central Asia, buy permanent peace, maybe even become a super power if they can grow up. The economic dividends will cover all the costs.
 
What would Pakistan be willing pay to have India controlled Kashmir and Jammu??? everything has it's price.

IMO India should just sell it to Pakistan before war breaks out. The demographics alone are favoring Muslims over Hindus,Buddhists, and others.

How about $100 billion dollars?? paid over 10 years, can use a portion of this to pay the Hindu families that will have to be resettled, and the rest fighting poverty in the other states of India, and on strengthening the military.
yeah cost is being paod also but in terms of blood and more importantly in terms of lost-future.
as far as cost from Pakistan is concerned then i must say 100b$ for independence is just a cost which can be paid even by Kashmiris if given the voice to raise.
 
What would Pakistan be willing pay to have India controlled Kashmir and Jammu??? everything has it's price.

IMO India should just sell it to Pakistan before war breaks out. The demographics alone are favoring Muslims over Hindus,Buddhists, and others.

How about $100 billion dollars?? paid over 10 years, can use a portion of this to pay the Hindu families that will have to be resettled, and the rest fighting poverty in the other states of India, and on strengthening the military.
Its about humanity
Pakistan declares it's entity wd azad Kashmir with local governance of president and prime minister with all the benefits they are getting and they are living in peace while there other families who are other side of loc suffering pellets ,blindness deaths rape hunger and curfew since 90/100 days
Thats the reason Pakistan worth occupied Kashmir to be ffee
U wil see Pakistani flags in iok slogans against India and pro Pakistan and Indians can claim this as pak funded the little kids to do so lol
 
Why does any one have to be resettled at all, Hindus/Buddhists can stay on in Kashmir. The prize is that India will join the regional economic partnership, get access to Central Asia, buy permanent peace, maybe even become a super power if they can grow up. The economic dividends will cover all the costs.
India already has access to Central Asia. A rail road and highway connecting all of Central Asia right from the dock - Chabahar.
 

Same here
What Kashmir worth?
Nothing! but for us Everything.
Hahaahaaa mashaAllah I was going t PC QUOTE the great man words here but I saw this :smitten:

India already has access to Central Asia. A rail road and highway connecting all of Central Asia right from the dock - Chabahar.
Do u have idea how much it will cost u more
 
India already has access to Central Asia. A rail road and highway connecting all of Central Asia right from the dock - Chabahar.

Unfeasible, to many if's, don't know what Iran and Pak will work out on CPEC yet. A mirage.
 
Do u have idea how much it will cost u more

Since we have been using that route, it isn't costing us more because. Maybe using CPEC will cost us less, but not as must as the cost of moving our forces back from Kashmir.
 
Do u have idea how much it will cost u more
It might cost us marginally more (remember sea transportation is the cheapest form of transportation) in terms of cross platform movement of goods at Chabahar i.e from dock to rail. But that is par for the course. Particularly as India is a big country that goods will be exported to Chabahar right from Bengal(East India) to Andra pradesh (South) as well as Gujarat (West).

A marginal increase in costs won't make a big difference.

Unfeasible, to many if's, don't know what Iran and Pak will work out on CPEC yet. A mirage.
It does not affect us what Iran and Pakistan work out with CPEC. The port of Chahbahar is being built. Iran is also connecting Chahbahar with the Russian led pan-Central Asian transport corridor called North-South Corridor also along with India(infact India exported part of the steel rails required for laying down the rail road).

So our routes will continue to work regardless of CPEC or no CPEC or Iran joining CPEC or Iran abstaining from CPEC.

All that has no bearing on us.
 
Since we have been using that route, it isn't costing us more because. Maybe using CPEC will cost us less, but not as must as the cost of moving our forces back from Kashmir.
It's ur decision of using chahbar,india tried to play good card here for his own use so good luck with that
Let the south Asia prevails prosperity and economically stronger region it may become
U may keep 300k more doesn't matter it will cost u more but bringing peace into Kashmir it's really necessary for India otherwise it will not gona stop
 
What would Pakistan be willing pay to have India controlled Kashmir and Jammu??? everything has it's price.

IMO India should just sell it to Pakistan before war breaks out. The demographics alone are favoring Muslims over Hindus,Buddhists, and others.

How about $100 billion dollars?? paid over 10 years, can use a portion of this to pay the Hindu families that will have to be resettled, and the rest fighting poverty in the other states of India, and on strengthening the military.


It has purely to do with ideology and securing water for self.

Ideology - because justification of two nation theory. For India, it is rejection of the same. Hence, a stalemate.

Water - self evident.

So, what price? We will give 200 Billion dollars and IWT with 80% of water as existing. They can vacate the area under them.
 
What would Pakistan be willing pay to have India controlled Kashmir and Jammu??? everything has it's price.

IMO India should just sell it to Pakistan before war breaks out. The demographics alone are favoring Muslims over Hindus,Buddhists, and others.

How about $100 billion dollars?? paid over 10 years, can use a portion of this to pay the Hindu families that will have to be resettled, and the rest fighting poverty in the other states of India, and on strengthening the military.
A beautiful logic to occupy and sell.
The big countries will occupy the small countries and then sell to their nation.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom