What's new

Kashmir was never an integral part of India

why do these Pakistanis feel compelled to talk about India all the time? It is really boring to have to remind them again and again to stop wet dreaming about any part of India including J&K. They should be focused full time in repairing theoir broken country and revamping their ruined generations!
 
The same thing could be said about Tibet and Xinjiang.

All the best.

Dear indian,

Thank you for your comments.

However, the parallel provided is invalid.

Both Chinese provinces are flourishing. Free Chinese Tibet has higher per capita income than your beautiful country.

Xinjiang is becoming the growth engine in the western region. CPEC will further provide an extra boost. Human condition has changed for much better in both provinces. And it is only going to get better only.

Only sad part of Tibet is under indian occupation...i.e. indian occupied South Tibet.

After unification with the motherland Free South Tibet will enjoy the same progress as the Free Tibet.


All the best with the development of your beautiful country...it would need to become constructive and normal state first though.


With regards,

SPF

@Chinese-Dragon @TaiShang @beijingwalker @Shotgunner51 @cnleio @long_ @ChineseTiger1986 @cirr
 
Ms Roy has more credibility in her little finger than all of our venal politicians and generals put together and I mean both pk and hind.

A great writer, principled, strong and speaks the truth.

She is not a traitor, but a patriot, but you Indians cannot see a great leader even if one slapped u. Too busy gorging urself on the flesh of the poor and oppressed kashmiris to care.
 
Dear indian,

Thank you for your comments.

However, the parallel provided is invalid.

Both Chinese provinces are flourishing. Free Chinese Tibet has higher per capita income than your beautiful country.

Xinjiang is becoming the growth engine in the western region. CPEC will further provide an extra boost. Human condition has changed for much better in both provinces. And it is only going to get better only.

Only sad part of Tibet is under indian occupation...i.e. indian occupied South Tibet.

After unification with the motherland Free South Tibet will enjoy the same progress as the Free Tibet.


All the best with the development of your beautiful country...it would need to become constructive and normal state first though.


With regards,

SPF

@Chinese-Dragon @TaiShang @beijingwalker @Shotgunner51 @cnleio @long_ @ChineseTiger1986 @cirr

After all that prosing, and bombast, you still can't remove your troops. So choose your metaphors carefully next time.

I notice you howled for help the first time someone slapped your big, flabby back for you.
 
Both the regions of Tibet and Xinjiang are now heavily infested by the Han population which have been relocated to these regions as a matter of state policy.

The indigenous culture has been destroyed.

There is economic progress in the region but it's only for the Hans and not the locals.

And one shouldn't preach others if they can't do it themselves.
 
What about your Leader Nehro
its been more than 50 years since he died and since 40 + years since shimla accord was signed which made kashmir issue a bilateral issue than a UN issue go and read it first and also read first 3 conditions of so called peblicite in kashmir .... but make no mistake under any circumstances there is no power in this world that can force india to give away kashmir if you have power come and take it by force
 
What about your Leader Nehro
Nehru was a coward who couldn't pursue his "forward policy" when the going got tough, he let Pak take part of Kashmir & let China annex Tibet knowing fully well that it'd lead them at India's doorstep, in fact one could argue if he had accepted Jinnah's demand wrt Muslim dominated areas we could still have had a unified India. Alas the first, & worst, PM in our history set us back centuries (J&K won't be solved in my lifetime, I think) partly due to his lust for the chair of PM. That's my opinion, at least.
 
Ms Roy has more credibility in her little finger than all of our venal politicians and generals put together and I mean both pk and hind.

A great writer, principled, strong and speaks the truth.

She is not a traitor, but a patriot, but you Indians cannot see a great leader even if one slapped u. Too busy gorging urself on the flesh of the poor and oppressed kashmiris to care.

I don't agree with your last sentence, but I agree with the rest.
 
its been more than 50 years since he died and since 40 + years since shimla accord was signed which made kashmir issue a bilateral issue than a UN issue go and read it first and also read first 3 conditions of so called peblicite in kashmir .... but make no mistake under any circumstances there is no power in this world that can force india to give away kashmir if you have power come and take it by force
There is no Power in the whole world who can stop the struggle of Kashmiri People whos is demanding their Independence from India, it is bitter truth once we have position to get kashmir but thanks to Pakistani traitor Nawaz who call back our troops from Kargil war and we missed the chance for getting Kashmir
But one day you will free Kashmir according to the wishes of Kashmiri people,
You hindus never let any other religion live freely in India.
 
Nehru was a coward who couldn't pursue his "forward policy" when the going got tough, he let Pak take part of Kashmir & let China annex Tibet knowing fully well that it'd lead them at India's doorstep, in fact one could argue if he had accepted Jinnah's demand wrt Muslim dominated areas we could still have had a unified India. Alas the first, & worst, PM in our history set us back centuries (J&K won't be solved in my lifetime, I think) partly due to his lust for the chair of PM. That's my opinion, at least.

Your opinion is so defective that it is not even worth the trouble to refute. Please stop spewing Sanghi prejudices and do your homework and return to the forum.
 
Nehru was a coward who couldn't pursue his "forward policy" when the going got tough, he let Pak take part of Kashmir & let China annex Tibet knowing fully well that it'd lead them at India's doorstep, in fact one could argue if he had accepted Jinnah's demand wrt Muslim dominated areas we could still have had a unified India. Alas the first, & worst, PM in our history set us back centuries (J&K won't be solved in my lifetime, I think) partly due to his lust for the chair of PM. That's my opinion, at least.
He was great leader of Hindu religion Indian and due to their policies you are living with muslims, sikh and many more believers but now Every other religion are unhappy with Hindus.

What about him, Mr. Mudasser?
I got response from your fellow indian who did not respect their Great Leader
 
He was great leader of Hindu religion Indian and due to their policies you are living with muslims, sikh and many more believers but now Every other religion are unhappy with Hindus.


I got response from your fellow indian who did not respect their Great Leader

Good. Now go back to doing your homework.
 
There is no Power in the whole world who can stop the struggle of Kashmiri People whos is demanding their Independence from India, it is bitter truth once we have position to get kashmir but thanks to Pakistani traitor Nawaz who call back our troops from Kargil war and we missed the chance for getting Kashmir
But one day you will free Kashmir according to the wishes of Kashmiri people,
You hindus never let any other religion live freely in India.
Oh a fortune teller, pray do tell when will this miracle happen?

So, the same war in which Pak army abandoned it's deal soldiers' body & labeled them as Mujahedin?

Yeah except the majority of them don't want to be with Pak either, but of course you'll deny that as usual.

He was great leader of Hindu religion Indian and due to their policies you are living with muslims, sikh and many more believers but now Every other religion are unhappy with Hindus.


I got response from your fellow indian who did not respect their Great Leader
He was (un)arguably a great freedom fighter, he wasn't pro Hindu though.

That's because our founding made this nation what it is today based on our common history, shared culture & of course geography. Unfortunately for some reason Pakistan distanced itself from our (India's) shared history & the fact that it is an Islamic republic today has only hampered it's growth, remember Jinnah's version of Pak was much different from what it is today & present day Pak is mostly Zia's doing.

The point is he (Nehru) didn't do anything different than what Gandhi, Patel et al did for (unity of) India just that his political ambitions & foreign policy were cringeworthy, in hindsight.
 

Back
Top Bottom