What's new

Southern Han Chinese and their relationship with the Baiyue

Status
Not open for further replies.
The progressive phenotype of Huaxia is the best looking in East Asia.

If the Huaxia culture is not beautiful, then Wuyue/Minyue/Nanyue wouldn't want to join it.

Take a relax, chinese bro.

I don't think Hua Xia phenotype is presented for Chinese beauty today.

I think Hua Xia is like this.

IMG_1845.jpg



and now,

Img214559732.jpg


After mixing with Bai Yue, Dongji or beidi, chinese have today also big eyes.
 
Last edited:
Did someone claim Nan Yue Kingdom was Vietnamese? Is this supposed to be a joke?

It was established by a Qin dynasty general called Zhao Tuo with Qin troops. The capital was located in modern day Guangzhou. There is nothing remotely Vietnamese about it.
 
Take a relax, chinese bro.

I don't think Hua Xia phenotype is presented for Chinese beauty today.

I think Hua Xia is like this.

IMG_1845.jpg



and now,

Img214559732.jpg


After mixing with Bai Yue, Dongji or beidi, chinese have today also big eyes.

Well, your claim just got debunked in our previous post.
 
Did someone claim Nan Yue Kingdom was Vietnamese? Is this supposed to be a joke?

It was established by a Qin dynasty general called Zhao Tuo with Qin troops. The capital was located in modern day Guangzhou. There is nothing remotely Vietnamese about it.
Exactly,I ask Vietnamese members to name one reason why it was Vietnamese and then all of sudden they disappear.
 
If her phenotype is not Huaxia, then what it is?

Of course, it is the pure Huaxia phenotype. Here is the Chinese drama about the King of Yue Goujian, and it is also dubbed in Vietnamese.

The Xishi in this drama also has this kind of phenotype, so probably the real Xishi also looked like that, it is the genuine Huaxia phenotype, while the Baiyue phenotype is fugly, even the Baiyue people themselves hate it.


Why you look down at Wu Yue beauty ?, don't forget that adviser Fun Li : 范蠡 had a great "beauty tactic" to give Thi Di Quang to Wu King Fuchai .
 
Why you look down at Wu Yue beauty ?, don't forget that adviser Fun Li : 范蠡 had a great "beauty tactic" to give Thi Di Quang to Wu King Fuchai .

Xishi is a Huaxia beauty, and this is the Wuyue(Baiyue) beauty.

GeUTu1c.jpg


Why you look down at Wu Yue beauty ?, don't forget that adviser Fun Li : 范蠡 had a great "beauty tactic" to give Thi Di Quang to Wu King Fuchai .

BTW, hopefully you can enjoy the Chinese drama dubbed in Vietnamese.
 
Well, your claim just got debunked in our previous post.

no, Hua Xia was small eyes. Today Chinese is mixed with four Ji Dong Ji, bei di, Xi rong and bai yue, you could have both small and big eyes.

Xishi is a Huaxia beauty, and this is the Wuyue(Baiyue) beauty.

GeUTu1c.jpg




BTW, hopefully you can enjoy the Chinese drama dubbed in Vietnamese.

It is not true Xi Shi in real history in the past.
 
no, Hua Xia was small eyes. Today Chinese is mixed with four Ji Dong Ji, bei di, Xi rong and bai yue, you could have both small and big eyes.



It is not true Xi Shi in real history in the past.

These people are pure the unmixed relics of Huaxia, they can have big eyes as well.

konThJ2.jpg

HjPaDFM.jpg
 
Take a relax, chinese bro.

I don't think Hua Xia phenotype is presented for Chinese beauty today.

I think Hua Xia is like this.

IMG_1845.jpg



and now,

Img214559732.jpg


After mixing with Bai Yue, Dongji or beidi, chinese have today also big eyes.
You think ancient VN people contribute positive to southern Han. Wow... what a logic. By your logic VN people have big eyes and big head so that you people is ok.

As a southern Han 吴越 has nothing to do with VN. You have no need to prove your superioty by connecting your ethnic and history with 吴越.

Dont wanna hurt you but your logic and sense is really funny. Help yourself to drag you out of darkness and get yourself teached.

Clear?
 
Last edited:
There are several Chinese commenters who make examples to show that they are close. Nowadays, I would not want to rebut them in their face. What they have shown can be a mis-information, but as I Southern Chinese, I will say their examples are perfectly right, nevertheless, trying to mislead.

If I go and rebut, these PRC could get so irrational that they make an all out war with me.

The better understanding of Mandarin, Cantonese and Min Nan/Taiwanese is
  1. they are 100% mutually unintelligible.
  2. The colloquial lexicon and grammar can be very different.
  3. The literal lexicon could be much more similar. Just like Vietnamese and Korean, literal part of their languages are much more similar to Mandarin.
  4. Nevertheless, there are a lot of overlap between Northern and Southern Chinese lexicon that make it a Chinese language. I believe if Vietnam and Korea are ruled by China as long as us, both the language will be purge of alien components and get very converge to Chinese.
There may be barely such things as literal Cantonese, as Cantonese can pronounce mandarin sentences and lexicon using their phonetics and tones. So that is one factor that make Cantonese very Chinese.
just because the pronunciation make Mandarin very Chinese?why use the western standard and cut off the character?there are no inheritance or variation?you tell me chinese character was invented by one man?there existed character first or pronunciation first is important for savage tribes?of cause you dont want to be chinese and use chinese language,just give up chinese characters,only use alphabet(if it could be superiorer than western language) or invented another characters systerm(a joke).
 
An international study has found that the Chinese people originated not from Peking Man in northern China, but from early humans in East Africa who moved through South Asia to China some 100,000 years ago, Hong Kongs Ming Pao daily reported yesterday in a finding that confirms the single origin theory in anthropology.

According to the newspaper, a research team led by Jin Li (of Fudan University in Shanghai has found that modern humans evolved from a single origin, not multiple origins as some experts believe.

In China, school textbooks teach that the Chinese race evolved from Peking Man, based on a theory that humans in Europe and Asia evolved from local species.

But Jin and his fellow researchers found that early humans belonged to different species, of which only the East African species developed into modern humans.

This new finding nullifies the theory that the ancestors of the Chinese people were Peking Man who lived in northern China 400,000 years ago.

Based on DNA analyses of 100,000 samples gathered from around the world, a number of human families evolved in East Africa some 150,000 years ago, said Li Hui, a member of Jins team.

About 100,000 years ago, some of those humans began to leave Africa, with some people moving to China via South and Southeast Asia, Li said.

According to the newspaper article, it has been proven that the 65 branches of the Chinese race share similar DNA mutations with the peoples of East and Southeast Asia.

It said that the Shanghai scientists were part of an international team comprised of researchers from Russia, India, Brazil and other nations in a five-year project studying the geographic and genealogical routes related to the spread and settlement of modern humans.

copy from: trinicenter.com - Ancient Chinese

LOL. Dude, quit using article from 2004. Anthropology and science have evolved since then. And there are scientific proof that humans did not soley origniated from Africa. Neanderthals also existed not just homo sapiens. In fact genetics can prove that every person who isn't black has at least 1-3% Neanderthal gene.

So no, the Africo-centric view on human origin is just not cutting it anymore.
 
But most of the overseas Chinese are Cantonese. You sure about Tang originating from Town because they don't sound similar.

Overseas Chinese use this term "Tang" because it was one of China's strongest dynasty, so it's use as a term for "Chinese"
 
You think ancient VN people contribute positive to southern Han. Wow... what a logic. By your logic VN people have big eyes and big head so that you people is ok.

As a southern Han 吴越 has nothing to do with VN. You have no need to prove your superioty by connecting your ethnic and history with 吴越.

Dont wanna hurt you but your logic and sense is really funny. Help yourself to drag you out of darkness and get yourself teached.

Clear?

read my comments again, the debate now is about beauty of Hua Xia and Wu Yue with Mr. Chinese Tiger1986.

Qiang is the close relative of Huaxia, and their males carry almost 100% O3a.

The unmixed Huaxia probably looked like them.

Don't make you more funny, The Qiang ethnic group has been officially recognized as ethnically distinct by the People's Republic of China. They are not Han Chinese, like Hmong Mien, Zhuang ... etc, understand ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom