China's multilayered missile defense system

[neehar]

are you dumb or what??do you even read what I posted??It says India is working on Phase-2 while Phase-1 is complete(which is protection against SRBM and MRBM like Pakistan's Hatf series missiles and Chinese M-11) while Phase-II will be against IRBM(range upto 5000 km)..we take one step at a time..and India tested its ABM several times more than China did in the last decade..how many tests China did on its ABm system??2 right???India tested this missiles over 10 times within 7 years(read it,I already posted)..so,don't say Indian tech is paper based..

ur wasting ur time with kids..

 

[Beast]

ur wasting ur time with kids..

Indeed. India cheerleader are trying hard with their propaganda of misleading readers and and using twisted information to paint a false illusion of India superior ABM system which is kids play compare to USA and China ABM system. Do some exoatmospheric mid course interception before you all come back and brag about it.

 

[GR!FF!N]

That's not the problem. You can test even 1000 times and all is atmospheric interception which means its nothing compare to exoatmospheric mid course interception done by China even its 2-3 times demonstrated. You purposely avoid my enquiries on exoatmospheric mid course interception which India has no demonstrated any capabilites of doing it. therefore India ABM is inferior to China one. You claimed India ABM has exoatmospheric mid course interception in mind but thats paper talk only.

Nice try. But you failed.

damn..you have some serious comprehensive problem..PAD system is itself a combination of Endo and Exo atmospheric missiles..we tested several Exo Atmospheric test in the past..but for mid course interception(its not the best way,which is Boost Phase),thats not the only way to destroy a missile..It has various levels,Boost phase(Boeing Yal-1),Mid course(GMD),terminal etc..China,Israel(Arrow-3) and USA(GMD) has demonstrated tech about Mid course,but what if Mid course Interception fails??what kind of ABM China has developed to counter it in terminal phase??Indian PAD has two tier for that purpose only,one for Exo Atmospheric and then another for Endo Atmospheric..next step is PDV,which will ensure the kill upto 99%.not every kind of missile needs Mid course Intercept,which is the best way to handle ICBM,but needs heavier ABM.Indian PAD is comparable with american THAAD,which works in the same way..India has working on Phase-II,which will also be exo atmospheric and will handle IRBM..there is no need for protection against ICBM yet..

Missile defense - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[neehar]

Indeed. India cheerleader are trying hard with their propaganda of misleading readers and and using twisted information to paint a false illusion of India superior ABM system which is kids play compare to USA and China ABM system. Do some exoatmospheric mid course interception before you all come back and brag about it.

.we've provided u with the details.u can believe what u want.
ur living in a stone age..russia has an exosperic abm,france has it,u.k has it and india has it way back in 2006..now we're in to second level of defence.wake up

Space Militarization—India in Double Dilemma
ABM-1 Galosh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A Good Step for NATO Missile Defense
http://aimt.unob.cz/articles/09_02/09_02 (8).pdf

as i said dont quote me with ur stupid age old facts.tell me when something solid is there.if u have any info related to the topic post it ..

 

[Beast]

.we've provided u with the details.u can believe what u want.
ur living in a stone age..russia has an exosperic abm,france has it,u.k has it and india has it way back in 2006..now we're in to second level of defence.wake up

Space Militarization—India in Double Dilemma
ABM-1 Galosh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A Good Step for NATO Missile Defense
http://aimt.unob.cz/articles/09_02/09_02 (8).pdf

as i said dont quote me with ur stupid age old facts.tell me when something solid is there.if u have any info related to the topic post it ..

A simple search on goggle can easily find out who has demonstrated exoatmospheric mid course interception. As I say, you all are trying too hard to hide your inferiority....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-ballistic_missile

The technology and experience from the successful anti-satellite test using a ground-launched interceptor during January 2007 was immediately applied to current ABM efforts and development.[18][19]
China carried out a land-based anti-ballistic missile test on 11 January 2010. The test was exoatmospheric and done in midcourse[20] phase and with a kinetic kill vehicle. China is the second country after US that demonstrated intercepting ballistic missile with a kinetic kill vehicle, the interceptor missile was a SC-19.[20][21] The sources suggest the system is not operationally deployed as of 2010.[20][22]
On January 27, 2013, China did another anti ballistic missile test. According to the Chinese Defence Ministry, the missile launch is defensive in character and is not aimed against any countries. Experts hailed China's technological breakthrough because it is difficult to intercept ballistic missiles that have reached the highest point and speed in the middle of their course. Only 2 countries, including the US, have successfully conducted such a test in the past decade. [23]

Not even Russian has demonstrated of that capabilities... And You Indian dare to brag about it?

 

[Screambowl]

The problem is all the so called India tech is paper based. I can also say China has a sixth gen super stealth fighter if goes by your theory? Have you demonstrated exoatmospheric mid range ICBM interception? No...

You can say you have a fully operational ABM system from exoatmospheric to atmostpheric interception. But if you have not demonstrate it. It's as good as farting.

youtube it and you will see if it paper based or reality based. you should put some efforts.

 

[Beast]

youtube it and you will see if it paper based or reality based. you should put some efforts.

Read the above reply before you think you are smart. I dare to say again its PAPER BASED.

I bet you don't even know what's exoatmospheric mid course interception about....

 

[Screambowl]

Read the above reply before you think you are smart. I dare to say again its PAPER BASED.

were you born on papers? lol, simply see the video of trials ..

 

[Beast]

were you born on papers? lol, simply see the video of trials ..

I have seen it and its not exoatmospheric mid course interception. You are in serious of denial..

 

[Fsjal]

That's not the problem. You can test even 1000 times and all is atmospheric interception which means its nothing compare to exoatmospheric mid course interception done by China even its 2-3 times demonstrated. You purposely avoid my enquiries on exoatmospheric mid course interception which India has no demonstrated any capabilites of doing it. therefore India ABM is inferior to China one. You claimed India ABM has exoatmospheric mid course interception in mind but thats paper talk only. Btw, China will not use IRBM to hit India. ICBM like DF-31 will be the prefer Ballistic Missile. So your ABM system is only effective against Pakistan one but nothing to stop Chinese DF-31.

Nice try. But you failed.

Good information here.

Question: Didn't China converted their Anti-Sat missiles to ABM?
I saw this from some article. Forgot the name

 

[Screambowl]

I have seen it and its not exoatmospheric mid course interception. You are in serious of denial..

i know what exa atmospheric is, but I am not aware about any progress towards this project. you can search on net. but the point is seeker technology, if you have it then you can hit a target even beyond 120km altitude. And India has the seeker technology. And much better technologies in space organisation, but they are not allowed to be used in Defence.

 

[rcrmj]

That's not the problem. You can test even 1000 times and all is atmospheric interception which means its nothing compare to exoatmospheric mid course interception done by China even its 2-3 times demonstrated. You purposely avoid my enquiries on exoatmospheric mid course interception which India has no demonstrated any capabilites of doing it. therefore India ABM is inferior to China one. You claimed India ABM has exoatmospheric mid course interception in mind but thats paper talk only. Btw, China will not use IRBM to hit India. ICBM like DF-31 will be the prefer Ballistic Missile. So your ABM system is only effective against Pakistan one but nothing to stop Chinese DF-31.

Nice try. But you failed.

man you have been in the forum for quite a bit, and you still dont get these delusional kids?

they will never accept their high tech capability is as much as a kintergarden kid boasts that he/she wants to be a scientist in future```so to put this short``Day Dreaming

 

[Fsjal]

i know what exa atmospheric is, but I am not aware about any progress towards this project. you can search on net. but the point is seeker technology, if you have it then you can hit a target even beyond 120km altitude. And India has the seeker technology. And much better technologies in space organisation, but they are not allowed to be used in Defence.

I wouldn't say that except if there is evidence. China is ahead in space and ballistic missile tech.

Anyway, you could give sources, if there is.

 

[Beast]

Good information here.

Question: Didn't China converted their Anti-Sat missiles to ABM?
I saw this from some article. Forgot the name

Yes, they did.... And its demonstrated. People tend to ignore when comes to ABM, they are a few level of ABM from the most basic of tactical ABM which demonstrated intercepting of Scud-D short range Ballistic missile. They move slower and therefore easier to intercept it.

Patriot , S-300 ,SM-1 are all capable of doing it. Then came the more tricky one of intercepting IRBM which Israel Arrows system , Russian S-400 , Aster 30 and SM-2 or PAC-3 of USA to get the job done.

Finally with ABM-7 of Russian at exoatmospheric togther with USA SM-3 and finally China HQ-26. They represent the most difficult and most hardest to carry out becos it occurs at very high attitude, at space level plus the super fast speed of ICBM. But so far only 2 countries has demonstrated real exoatmospheric mid course interception which is USA and China. Both deploy the kinetic kill method while Russia one which has not demonstrated any of it is using proximity fuse of nuclear warhead.

 

[rcrmj]

i know what exa atmospheric is, but I am not aware about any progress towards this project. you can search on net. but the point is seeker technology, if you have it then you can hit a target even beyond 120km altitude. And India has the seeker technology. And much better technologies in space organisation, but they are not allowed to be used in Defence.

its new`india has seeker technology``lol, they all imported from Russia and Isreal

' And India has the seeker technology. And much better technologies in space organisation, but they are not allowed to be used in Defence'

lol the level of indians naivety, if india did 'have' that techs who is to stop you lot from using it?

and do you know why all your so-called 'indigenous' projects always take too long and too much budget? the reality is you do not have the core techs as always, and have to buy from others, or to ask technological advanced nations to tailor make```

the best humiliating example is the tiny plane called the 'Lost Cause Aircraft'