genmirajborgza786
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2006
- Messages
- 4,303
- Reaction score
- 20
- Country
- Location
J-10 vs F-16 !
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
J-10 is F-16 if you look back into the project: Yes to some extend it is far superior that the F-16 Block30 that is just performance if we add what we want Avionic all all kind of **** it will be as good as Block-52. I have talked to our kids who have tested the J-10, according to them " you get a buzz flying it" They were pretty impressed with the machine.
J-10 is F-16 if you look back into the project: Yes to some extend it is far superior that the F-16 Block30 that is just performance if we add what we want Avionic all all kind of **** it will be as good as Block-52. I have talked to our kids who have tested the J-10, according to them " you get a buzz flying it" They were pretty impressed with the machine.
.However, after the government's official acknowledgment of the existence of the J-10, an interview with J-10 pilots (such as test pilot Li Cunbao (李存宝) revealed that a domestic engine is highly unlikely to equip the J-10 in the near future.[citation needed] In this interview, publicized in January 2007, the pilots claimed that though the domestic Chinese engine could match the performance of the Russian design in every aspect, there was a very serious drawback - the domestic Chinese engine took much longer to reach the same level of performance as its Russian counterpart (according to Mr. Li Cunbao, as well as other pilots who flew the J-10 fitted with the WS-10, it took at least 50% longer, and in several other aspects, almost 100% longer.)[citation needed] Although this would only translate to a ~1 minute difference at most, it was enough to affect the pilot's ability to safely recover the aircraft by restarting the engine rather than abandoning the aircraft in a forced ejection. Another significant drawback of the domestic Chinese engine is the lack of a FADEC (Full Authority Digital Engine Control) feature. This has been addressed, however, the current FADEC-equipped WS-10 is not reliable enough to be considered for service
JK!,
Interesting piece. I am sure the engine will take a few years to get fully mature to be in the service. I will not really worry about it much. They will definitely take care of this problem.
New Recruit
New Recruit
Cross between J-10 & F-16:
f 16(israel).....!!