What's new

PAC And HAL Good Paint Job or Workmanship

Windjammer

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
41,290
Reaction score
181
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
Indians on PDF, due to their nature, often refer to products such as JF-17 built in Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC) as a mere paint job. Albeit the sheer frustration and heartburn is understandable. However, since the Indians claim that their LCA Tejas is indigenous and pride product of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) . Let's compare the two respective aircraft for their paint job and workmanship.

Tejas, Excellent paint job.

1613399757796.png


But a close look at the aircraft reveals some average workmanship.

1613399919605.png


Underneath the aircraft, it seems like patchwork and gun casing and surrounding has very basic if not poor finish.


1613400373265.png


JF-17 Thunder. An Average Paint Job.

1613400818256.png


Workmanship and Finishing.

1613401621926.png


1613401358822.png


JF-17 Gun Port.

1613401948483.png


Hope that clears the doubt as who is good at paint jobs and who is professional in workmanship. :D
 
The metal alloy that JF-17 was made in China. It was rolled into panels in China. It was pressed and shaped in China. It was screwed together partly in China. Final screw and paint in Pakistan
as opposed to hamarey Tejas ka bhi bataiye na fir, please.
 
The metal alloy that JF-17 was made in China. It was rolled into panels in China. It was pressed and shaped in China. It was screwed together partly in China. Final screw and paint in Pakistan
Well in that case you should also visit China since you also have few lose screws.
BTW, you claim to make the SU-30 in India.....do try selling even a tyre to another operator. :lol:

 
Should I post the pic of JF-17 fitted with Door hinges at the Cockpit canopy? Paintjob? Any aircraft flying faces wear and tear, and paint in some areas start to fade whichever the aircraft is. Wonder how desperate people are to open threads on who paints their aircraft best? PAC or HAL?
 
Indians on PDF, due to their nature, often refer to products such as JF-17 built in Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC) as a mere paint job. Albeit the sheer frustration and heartburn is understandable. However, since the Indians claim that their LCA Tejas is indigenous and pride product of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) . Let's compare the two respective aircraft for their paint job and workmanship.

Tejas, Excellent paint job.

View attachment 716514

But a close look at the aircraft reveals some average workmanship.

View attachment 716515

Underneath the aircraft, it seems like patchwork and gun casing and surrounding has very basic if not poor finish.

View attachment 716520

JF-17 Thunder. An Average Paint Job.

View attachment 716521

Workmanship and Finishing.

View attachment 716523


View attachment 716522

JF-17 Gun Port.

View attachment 716525

Hope that clears the doubt as who is good at paint jobs and who is professional in workmanship. :D

damnnnn rivets off surface .. this is massive safety hazard
 
Tejas are good for being shot down or suicide mission by their own pilots
 
The metal alloy that JF-17 was made in China. It was rolled into panels in China. It was pressed and shaped in China. It was screwed together partly in China. Final screw and paint in Pakistan
Still gives you PIA......lols :lol:
 
The metal alloy that JF-17 was made in China. It was rolled into panels in China. It was pressed and shaped in China. It was screwed together partly in China. Final screw and paint in Pakistan
Wrong. The raw sheet metal and alloys are procured against international tenders. Go look at PAC tenders. Also look at the machines at PAC, better than any thing HAL has. Suppose they are just for show.
 
as opposed to hamarey Tejas ka bhi bataiye na fir, please.
Lo soun lo fir.......your Tejas has had more implants than Frankenstein .

''What actually happened between 1983 and 2000? First, let us take the promise of indigenous development. In 1986 an agreement was quietly signed with the United States that permitted DRDO to work with four US Air force laboratories. The to-be-indigenously-developed engine for the LCA -- Kaveri -- was forgotten and the US made General Electric F-404 engine was substituted. Radar was sourced from Erricson Ferranti, carbon-fibre composite panels for wings from Alenia and fly-by-wire controls from Lockheed Martin. Design help was sought from British Aerospace, Avion Marcel Dassault and Deutsche Aerospace. Wind tunnel testing was done in the US, Russia and France. As for armaments -- missiles, guns, rockets and bombs -- every last item was to be imported.''

https://www.rediff.com/news/2001/jan/13nad.htm

Despite being in the works since 1983, the fighter is nowhere near indigenisation and almost 70% of the aircraft’s systems still need to be imported.


Read more at:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
 

Back
Top Bottom