Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The dates are 1017, 1038 on one of them and 1070 on another. These are over 350 years old.
I can't confirm the inscriptions though they do appear to be correct. Maybe @raptor22 @Hack-Hook @mohammad45 could help.
just googled it, if it is fasli calendar then the year 1017 is 1610 AD.Thank You
I wonder if these dates( years) correspond to 1605-27,1628-58 & 1658 - 1707 AD ?
Nice picsView attachment 441203 View attachment 441204 View attachment 441210 View attachment 441211 The inscriptions on the spinel are in Persian are the names of Jahangir, Shah Jahan & Aurangzeb with possibly their dates of reign.
Can anyone help by identifying which is which ?
View attachment 441210 View attachment 441210
Were Mughals Persians?@AmirPatriot I think these are Qamari dates which are for 400 to 417 years ago.
Shah Jahan
صاحبقران ثانی شاه جهان 1038
View attachment 441213
Aurangzeb
عالمگیر شاه 1017
View attachment 441214
Akbar
شاه اکبر جهانگیر شاه 1017
View attachment 441215
Were Mughals Persians?
Bro, i am not a Persian. But didn't wonder so much, if Mughals are Persians :Uzbek/Turkic but their court language was Persian, court language of Delhi Sultanate was Persian even before the Mughals conquered.
Mughals with high possibility are from Persians. Their words, writings and historic symbols prove it, i guess.
That map involves Uzbekistan.Turkic from Uzbekistan.
Mughals with high possibility are from Persians. Their words, writings and historic symbols prove it, i guess.
Maybe he was an other IranianNo, go learn history. simple wikipedia search will tell you that they were Turks from Uzbekistan, its written in their own books like Baburnama aka Tuzk e Baburi.
Maybe he was an other Iranian
By the by, better to end this discussion.