What's new

Is Indian Aircraft Carrier a Big Threat for Pakistan Navy?

Is Indian Aircraft Carrier a Big Threat for Pakistan Navy?​



Answer : NO! Pakistan Navy and rest of the forces are biggest threat to Pakistan, its Navy, its Aawaam and every damn thing in between. Don't believe me? Ask Imran bhai!
 
Indian navy has been in stagnation for many decades now. They no longer have capability to go on the offensive against Pakistan or Block PN. Their Aircraft carriers are sitting ducks.

Is Indian Aircraft Carrier a Big Threat for Pakistan Navy?​



Answer : NO! Pakistan Navy and rest of the forces are biggest threat to Pakistan, its Navy, its Aawaam and every damn thing in between. Don't believe me? Ask Imran bhai!

We know IK is an Indian asset.
 
Indian navy has been in stagnation for many decades now. They no longer have capability to go on the offensive against Pakistan or Block PN. Their Aircraft carriers are sitting ducks.



We know IK is an Indian asset.
Don't underestimate enemy dude IN way way ahead of PN in terms of capabilities
 
Entirely agree with you. No more war please. Yeh sure we will have rivalry.
Sir when war is inevitable you can't turn the back. You need to study more about Hindutva.

This rivalry will be ending by making one country History!

No common person will bear Kashmir women getting raped everyday. I believe: Evil ends....!!!!
 
The possession of an aircraft carrier is of significant value for any navy. The idea behind the development of an aircraft carrier is to project power at a long distance in peacetime and achieve air dominance at sea during a war. It restricts the adversary warships outside of a designated area, acts as a coercive tool, protects interests at sea, and exercises influence over an area. All major powers having interests outside of their territories have developed them, especially after World War II when the potential of carriers to strike targets accurately at a long-distance using aircraft was effectively demonstrated. India operates one aircraft carrier; another is under sea trials, and the third one is planned. The possession of these carriers lifts India as a major power in the Indian Ocean Region. However, the possession of carriers may have more utility during peacetime than a full-fledged war due to the growing effectiveness and success of anti-ship capabilities.

Indian Maritime Doctrine and Aircraft Carriers

Indian Maritime Doctrine outlines a large area as an area of interest for the Indian Navy to strengthen its position as a blue water force capable of operating and projecting power beyond its home waters. The doctrine enlists primary, secondary, and “other areas” as areas of interest based on the location of the Indian Diaspora and overseas investments vital for the Indian Navy. It also enlists various enabling concepts to protect interests in these areas like “sea control” and “sea denial.”


The backbone of a blue water navy is the aircraft carrier and the Indian Navy plans to possess three aircraft carriers in total, giving it the flexibility to have two operational carriers all the times. INS Vikramaditya aircraft carrier with a displacement of 45,000 tons is the current operational carrier of India. The under-trial carrier is domestically built INS Vikrant and is slated to be commissioned early next year. The construction of follow-on to Vikrant is being debated in India due to the questions on the utility of aircraft carriers in comparison to submarines. It has not been approved by the Indian Government yet. Indian Navy operates two squadrons of MiG 29K carrier-borne multi-role aircraft inducted in 2010. Various operational problems have been observed in the aircraft like engine, airframe, and fly-by-wire system.

Limitations of Indian Aircraft Carriers

While the anti-ship capabilities are becoming common, more advanced, and precise, Indian carriers are not among the most advanced in the world. There are also certain limitations of the Indian carriers to operate and effectively project power against Pakistan. Firstly, Indian carriers have limited displacement and can carry up to 36 mixes of aircraft. The limited displacement also means reduced fuel load and an operational range of aircraft, forcing it to operate near the adversary. Displacement capacity also impacts the weapons load on the aircraft. Secondly, the aircraft on the carriers are allocated defensive and offensive roles. Increasing numbers for one role can have catastrophic implications for the other. Thirdly, take-off and landing on the carrier are totally different from ground-based landing and take-off. Indian carriers use Short Take-off But Assisted Recovery (STOBAR) take-off and landing system, which has a slower take-off rate than the more advanced Catapult Assisted Take-off But Arrested Recovery (CATOBAR) system.

Carriers are Strategic Assets

The aircraft are costly affairs. Development and operational costs make a carrier a valuable asset for any navy. India acquired Vikramaditya along with 45 MiG-29K aircraft and additional modifications with the overall price ranging between $6 billion and $7 billion. The total price of the second carrier Vikrant with 36 aircraft, is likely to be $10–11 billion. At the same time, the cost of a third carrier will likely be $16–17 billion. The price factor alone makes them a strategic weapon that determines the deployment of the carrier during a war. The carrier, during peacetime, performs the power projection role when there is no threat to them. However, their deployment during the war becomes a tricky decision. It is unlikely that India will deploy them at the initial stages of a war with Pakistan. Although they are protected with a layer of defensive systems, their sinking at this stage will be a huge blow to the morale of the Indian Navy. They are likely to be deployed at the height of fighting when their entry becomes necessary to hold the opposite power.

Pakistan’s Counter Options against Aircraft Carriers

Pakistan is beefing up its muscles against the increasing number of Indian warships and capabilities. Part of its efforts is focused on developing anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) capabilities. It is developing various anti-ship capabilities to effectively neutralize the Indian advantage of large numbers of warships and aircraft carriers. There are three layers of defence against Indian aircraft if deployed against Pakistan.

Firstly, Pakistan deploys anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCM) on its submarines. Pakistan currently operates two Agosta-70 submarines that can fire Harpoon anti-ship missiles, three Agosta 90B submarines that can carry Exocet anti-ship missiles. Eight submarines are on order from China which will also have anti-ship capabilities. Secondly, it has also developed or acquired several ASCMs such as Harba ASCM launched from the ship and the air-launched CM-400AKG anti-ship missile with supersonic speed. The coastal/land-based Zarb ASCM provides the third line of defence in the coastal waters of Pakistan against the intruding carrier. The Navy is also reportedly developing a supersonic cruise missile and an anti-ship ballistic missile. The development of anti-ship ballistic missiles will create a long buffer zone against the Indian carrier depending on the missile’s range.

Indian Navy will seriously consider the growing effectiveness of Pakistan’s anti-ship capabilities for the deployment of its carriers. These capabilities will force Indian carriers to operate from a safer distance making it less useful against the country. Even if trying to carry out a blockade of Pakistan or achieve air dominance against Pakistan in the Arabian sea, it risks its survival against Pakistan’s potent anti-ship capabilities.

Source: https://cscr.pk/explore/themes/defe...craft-carrier-a-big-threat-for-pakistan-navy/
ACs are not required for Pakistan, ACs serve 2 purpose
1) Air Power Projection : There is no Part which is not accessible via IAF Airbases, India shares long border and Pakistan does not enjoy width advantage
2) Naval Blockade - Pakistan's cost line is small and navy is even smaller, western command with 4-5 warships ships are enough to stop oil supply
 
Indian navy has been in stagnation for many decades now. They no longer have capability to go on the offensive against Pakistan or Block PN. Their Aircraft carriers are sitting ducks.



We know IK is an Indian asset.
Dude what?
https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...n-of-earlier-udayagiri/slideshow/91619483.cms

just happened today(the test)

And you are saying that we are stagnant
 
Anti-Ship missiles like DF-21, 26 and DF-17, DF-100.

Indian ACs, if they one day get hands on some real functional ones, would be sitting ducks
Bro that would turn US aircraft carriers to sitting ducks, let alone Indian aircraft carriers.
 
Indian Aircraft Carrier Vikrant is equipped with 64 LRSAM missiles. In Armenia-Azerbaijan armed conflict, the Iskander ballistic missiles were successfully intercepted by the Barak-8 air defense system
It will be a sitting duck once P-282 enters service.
 
Indian Aircraft Carrier Vikrant is equipped with 64 LRSAM missiles. In Armenia-Azerbaijan armed conflict, the Iskander ballistic missiles were successfully intercepted by the Barak-8 air defense system

Does it mean our Barak can handle DF carrier killer missile?
 
Does it mean our Barak can handle DF carrier killer missile?
Buddy you know the answer better than me. If barak 8 can intercept battle proven Iskander SRBM, then why not DF-21 & DF-26? Plus both DF series missiles have horrible circular error of probability. Even our Agni Prime, new variant of Agni series missiles, are much better than these so called carrier killer missiles with better "CEP"
 
Does it mean our Barak can handle DF carrier killer missile?
😉 smokeless exhaust and a jet-vane-driven thrust vector control that enables quick reaction time on vertical launch
1656346241324.png


 
Buddy you know the answer better than me. If barak 8 can intercept battle proven Iskander SRBM, then why not DF-21 & DF-26? Plus both DF series missiles have horrible circular error of probability. Even our Agni Prime, new variant of Agni series missiles, are much better than these so called carrier killer missiles with better "CEP"
Think about it. Indians talk about "others' error". Which universe does India live in???

First learn to make qualified rifles and bullets. Then boast about India's "Brownian motion bomb". OK?
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom