What's new

Zakir Naik: Pakistan should not have been created

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not me ,but you .
Maj Gogoi did that to protect the local natives .He is the officer and he was in there for a mission to protect innocent people and officials .
So he can do anything to protect his people.Yet he protected both officials and local natives (he also sees them as Indian).

But you are saying they should have to shoot those people because of your own vested interests .


The act of a coward explained by a coward.

It does expose the mindset that seeks to justify using Indian minorities as human shields.


Noone told them to cross border for terrorist training.


Had they not, they would have been used as human shields, blinded, murdered, tortured, raped, etc. by some coward.

eFTh4UQ.jpg
 
Why don't you try telling the bold part to your fellow countrymen here?

We spent too much if you'd ask me but they blame us for the misfortune in their country.

Noone need to told them .Because they are using that for their own purposes

Noone blames you .That is just your imagination.
New gen Indians even dont know Pakistan .

The act of a coward explained by a coward.

It does expose the mindset that seeks to justify using Indian minorities as human shields.





Had they not, they would have been used as human shields, blinded, murdered, tortured, raped, etc. by some coward.

eFTh4UQ.jpg

No .You are disappointed because Maj didnt kill anyone .

They should have think that before they drove all 4 lakhs Kashmiri Pandits from Kashmir and takes arms against nation.
World already used to know this old tactics but thatvwont work any more
 
1.wrong, clearly you need education in politics and demographics, do you think Jinnah was stupid, he was a genious
i never said that jinnah is stupid. Infact in said that he was sincere to muslims and those who were against Pakistan's creation were also sincere but their point of view was different.
 
No .You are disappointed because Maj didnt kill anyone .

They should have think that before they drove all 4 lakhs Kashmiri Pandits from Kashmir and takes arms against nation.
World already used to know this old tactics but thatvwont work any more


Disappointment?! Lay off the toddy @SrNair

And do you actually believe you can justify human shields?

Once again for your eyes, the minorities of India:

6Z9KmQB.jpg



aeDrdBR.jpg


8RUnz5Z.jpg


Source: Blind in Kashmir with 100 pellets lodged in his head
 
People who do not know the history should learn it. It was not based only on the thoughts of an individual or bunch of individuals like Sir Syed Ahmad Khan who had closely observed the British take over and the communal rift starting between the Hindus and the Muslims, the congress govt post 1935 elections sealed the deal as they started implementing hindutva immediately, the Muslim students were forced to sing vandemataram and the whole school curriculum was getting revised to specifically target Muslims and thus further alienating them from the mainstream education system. And my sources are not just the books that may have been subjected to some state policy but the hair raising stories by my paternal and maternal grandparents who migrated into Pakistan leaving everything behind for a breathe of freedom and protect them from the hindu oppression that was to get institutionalised in India.

Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah, who was a liberal Muslim lawyer, educated in the England and wore English dress, joined congress first, was against AIML (All india Muslim League), then tried to act has a bridge between the two parties to bring Muslims and hindus on a single or unified platform for 7 whole years, realised that hindus who had hijacked the congress didn't want that. They were dreaming and planning for their rule over Muslims to avenge a thousand years of "slavery".

Deobandi Maulvis didn't understand this reality and they were against the creation of Pakistan even at that time due to certain reasons and one of the main reason is their funding. Zakir Naik belong to the same school of thought and thus this statement but to some extent I'm happy that he experiencing the same discrimination that the Muslims of British india under the congress govt had experienced. I hope this changes his mind.
 
So I guess you guys will not begrudge India when we prosecute Zakir Naik


I could not care less what you do with him. He is NOT one of my people. He has got ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with us. He is as alien to Pakistanis as the Eskimos, Germans & Sub Saharan Black Africans are. Not our problem. Apart from religion and his beliefs, he has EVERYTHING in common with the likes of you and all other indians. He is one of your people, your problem. He has the same race, blood, genetics, culture and heritage as YOU. Apart from religion, everything else about an indian Muslim is identical to the indian hindus and sikhs. All of whom have nothing in common with Pakistani people.
 
All hail to Jinaah's acumen to split the Indian subcontinent into two different green geography. Avoided all bloodshed & conflict for rest of the generation.
 
but still we would have been powerful enough to make them suffer too. together with dalits and moaist we could have ruled on india for another thousand years.
1. Dalit- Its a dream. Do you have any idea who was Jogendranath Mandal? Google to find it.
2. Maoist - I believe feudal system is still in Pakisthan. Maoist are are present mostly in the areas where these are present in some form or other. Moreover they are hardcore aethist.
Partision is good for Subcontinent. Otherwise the population problem in Subcontinent would have been solved.
 
I can assure you that It's safe to complain on this forum no indian ultra conservative like shive sena,bajrang dal will bother you here for your different views. :lol:
Exactly, ultra liberal society doesn't embrace Blasphemy so overwhelmingly that murderers can be exalted to iconic stature in the society.
 
Bro i agree with you.
Indian muslims are at the mercy of Indian Hindus.


Not including religion and beliefs, the indian Muslims are identical to the hindus and sikhs in EVERY OTHER WAY. Including their obsessive hatred of Pakistan. Zakir Naik is no different. Us Pakistanis need to stop assuming all perceived religious Muslims are allies of Pakistan. The reality is that they are not. Race, Culture, Heritage, Genetics and Physical appearance are just as important. If it wasn't then Pakistan & bangladesh would not have been created.
 
Not including religion and beliefs, the indian Muslims are identical to the hindus and sikhs in EVERY OTHER WAY. Including their obsessive hatred of Pakistan. Zakir Naik is no different. Us Pakistanis need to stop assuming all perceived religious Muslims are allies of Pakistan. The reality is that they are not. Race, Culture, Heritage, Genetics and Physical appearance are just as important. If it wasn't then Pakistan & bangladesh would not have been created.
True. But the treatment alot of them are getting is changing the mind of some.
 
Partition was the best thing to happen. But it would have been better if total exchange of population was done. I don't hate any religion.but I think practically. Muslims can not be loyal to any nation. It is against their religion. We are sitting on time bomb of 200 million potential traitors. That would be bloodiest civil war in history.
question is not will indian muslims revolt against India. Question is when? It is inevitable.


Apart from religion and beliefs, indian Muslims are identical to indian hindus and sikhs in EVERY OTHER WAY. They are your people, your problem. Your race, culture, heritage, genetics & physical appearance. Why should Pakistan be burdened with them? The creation of Pakistan & bangladesh was just as much about race, ethnicity, genetics, heritage and culture as it was about religion.

Look after your race, don't expect Pakistan too. If members of your race and gene pool hate you then there is something seriously wrong with your country.

True. But the treatment alot of them are getting is changing the mind of some.



Only a very small insignificant minority of them. The vast majority of indian so called "Muslims" are more anti-Pakistani than even the sikhs and hindus are. Any way, to hell with the lot of them. They've got nothing to do with us. We may as well be discussing the lives of Eskimos in the North Pole. In fact I care more about Eskimos than indian Muslims.
 
i never said that jinnah is stupid. Infact in said that he was sincere to muslims and those who were against Pakistan's creation were also sincere but their point of view was different.
most of the people against Pakistan were not sincere and believed in hindhustani nationalism.
they were hindustani first and Muslim second, or had vast political interests(though people who joined PML had interest too)
there point of view was plain wrong, and they use to dance at tunes of hindu
e.g on beef ban the so called deoband madrassa said we should respect it
the economics of this whole arrangement was never kept in mind and hindu extremist connections of congress were completely ignored
 
Noone need to told them .Because they are using that for their own purposes

Noone blames you .That is just your imagination.
New gen Indians even dont know Pakistan .



No .You are disappointed because Maj didnt kill anyone .

They should have think that before they drove all 4 lakhs Kashmiri Pandits from Kashmir and takes arms against nation.
World already used to know this old tactics but thatvwont work any more
Ok I get it you don't want to say that to them because they are belligerent and will try to label you as a traitor for having a soft spot for indian muslims.

They do blame us for the turmoil in their country but instead they should blame bush it was his so called operation to hunt obl and steal oil from iraq.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom