What's new

Zakir Naik: Pakistan should not have been created

Status
Not open for further replies.
he is right. muslims in india were left. Pakistan was broken and muslims were further divided.
If we would have been with india then we could have easily forced them to do whatever we wanted. we could have easily won elections in many indian provinces and then through their assemblies founded a new state called Pakistan with much bigger area and more provinces.
But Pakistan is what Allah wanted and it may have been for a reason.
 
he is right. muslims in india were left. Pakistan was broken and muslims were further divided.
If we would have been with india then we could have easily forced them to do whatever we wanted. we could have easily won elections in many indian provinces and then through their assemblies founded a new state called Pakistan with much bigger area and more provinces.
But Pakistan is what Allah wanted and it may have been for a reason.
Nope the country would be in civil war and many places would be like Kashmir
 
1 million people were killed in few weeks by sword and gandasays ..compare that to Syrian civil war where 250k people are killed by modern firearms and long range weapons like missiles and jets in 4 years.
Some people really want to see the world burn.
 
Nope the country would be in civil war and many places would be like Kashmir
but still we would have been powerful enough to make them suffer too. together with dalits and moaist we could have ruled on india for another thousand years.
 
India should not have been created as a Union either. Its an artificial state.
All states are to some extent artificial entities, its just that the structure of Pakistan is such that peace simply isn't viable, hence its position on the Failed States Index. If it had remained part of India the situation would be much more prosperous.
 
This guy though i have tremendous respect for him sometimes confuses me.

I guess politics is not his cup of tea or fall under his expertise.

Pakistan is nothing but a miracle and is a sign for those who wants to understand.
 
but still we would have been powerful enough to make them suffer too. together with dalits and moaist we could have ruled on india for another thousand years.
Nope muslims were incredibly weak even in 85% Muslim places like Abbotabad Hindus and Sikhs controlled the economy it would be no different from what condition of Muslims is in India today only worse

All Muslim majority states would be like Kashmir and riots would be super common
 
Oh so that's why he didn't opt for Pakistani visa. He knew that after this statement, he'll get his as$ kicked.
 
All states are to some extent artificial entities, its just that the structure of Pakistan is such that peace simply isn't viable, hence its position on the Failed States Index. If it had remained part of India the situation would be much more prosperous.

True that almost all of the states are to some extent artificial in nature but Pakistan and its creation take this ' some extent of artificiality' to the cleaners.

It is just unique.

Ask a Israeli and he will tell you how.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TMA
1 million people were killed in few weeks by sword and gandasays ..compare that to Syrian civil war where 250k people are killed by modern firearms and long range weapons like missiles and jets in 4 years.
Some people really want to see the world burn.
The hatred was always there partition only ignited it its sad to see empty mandirs in Sialkot but than again my nana is not the owner of his grandfather,s land in Jammu
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom