What's new

World renown scientist says he has found proof of God! We may be living the the 'Matrix'

Status
Not open for further replies.

SecularNationalist

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
8,046
Reaction score
-7
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Michio Kaku believes he has found evidence for God in his work. Kaku is a well respected scientist, who has helped pioneer String Theory of the universe, the idea that the universe is formed by many different dimensions of space and time.

String Theory is very complex and requires a significant background in physics to explain, but it is favored by many scientists because it succinctly answers many of the questions they have about the universe. Still, it does not provide a complete, satisfying equation for why the universe is as it is.
The problem with physics is that laws which explain why the universe works as it does on the macro level, do not apply at the micro level. Einstein's physics and quantum physics, have a gap between their explanations that scientists cannot yet explain. For example, why is it that tiny quantum particles can pop into and out of existence from nothing? String theory attempts to provide an answer to this question.

While working on String Theory, Kaku, discovered what he sees as evidence that the universe was created by an intelligence, rather than merely formed by random forces. He suggests he can explain it by what he calls, "primitive semi-radius tachyons." We do not yet have a succinct explanation of this idea from Kaku, other than he's referring to tachyons, which are theoretical particles that unbind particles from one another.

Without getting into the physics, Kaku concludes that we live in a Matrix-style universe, created by an intelligence.

"I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence", he said. "Believe me, everything that we call chance today won't make sense anymore. To me it is clear that we exists in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance."

So does this mean Kaku now believes in God? Yes and no. Nowhere does he endorse an particular religious philosophy. Instead, he may be referring to Spinosa's God, a sort of deification of the laws of the universe themselves. Einstein came to a similar conclusion.

Of course, as Catholics we believe firmly that we have been given additional instruction and information about who we are, our place in the universe, and our purpose. We believe in the God of our ancestors, written of in the Bible. And we believe seeing with the eye of faith, not science alone.

It is reassuring to see as scientists delve deeper into the mysteries of the universe, they are encountering God. It is a confirmation for us, that our faith is not in vain, and that perhaps someday at the end of all the science and research, there is a singular discovery that awaits all humanity, God Himself.
http://www.catholic.org/news/technology/story.php?id=69335
 
Why has he taken such a long time to understand that the universe was created and is being constantly controlled by ONE SUPREME BEING? A cursory look at the Kuran-i Kerim would have given him enough evidence. Better late than never..


"By heaven furnished with paths;" (Kuran, Surat adh-Dhariyat, 7)

[Kuran 67.3-4] [Allah] is the one who created seven superimposed Heavens "سبع سموات طباق". You do not see variations in the formations of the Compassionate, so redirect your sight, do you see any creation (Futtur in Arabic فطور)? Then redirect your sight again, your vision returns to you in defeat and regret.

[Kuran 51.7] And the heaven that has weaves (Hubuk in Arabic).

upload_2016-6-9_17-7-31.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why has he taken such a long time to understand that the universe was created and is being constantly controlled by ONE SUPREME BEING?

Well, believing and proving are two different things mate. That Discovery science channel guy tries to find a scientific explanation to the universe, existence and the God terms. But he should first prove if tachyons exist which is still hypothetical.
 
Well, believing and proving are two different things mate. That Discovery science channel guy tries to find a scientific explanation to the universe, existence and the God terms. But he should first prove if tachyons exist which is still hypothetical.

Belief (Iman) is up to the individual. As per Kuran-i Kerim, a person is absolutely free to believe or disbelieve in whatever he/she likes. I am just citing some facts. I am not preaching.....
 
You don't need to "Discover" GOD, just open your eyes and "HE" is right there in your face, you just need to have the vision to see him.



LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Michio Kaku believes he has found evidence for God in his work. Kaku is a well respected scientist, who has helped pioneer String Theory of the universe, the idea that the universe is formed by many different dimensions of space and time.

String Theory is very complex and requires a significant background in physics to explain, but it is favored by many scientists because it succinctly answers many of the questions they have about the universe. Still, it does not provide a complete, satisfying equation for why the universe is as it is.
The problem with physics is that laws which explain why the universe works as it does on the macro level, do not apply at the micro level. Einstein's physics and quantum physics, have a gap between their explanations that scientists cannot yet explain. For example, why is it that tiny quantum particles can pop into and out of existence from nothing? String theory attempts to provide an answer to this question.

While working on String Theory, Kaku, discovered what he sees as evidence that the universe was created by an intelligence, rather than merely formed by random forces. He suggests he can explain it by what he calls, "primitive semi-radius tachyons." We do not yet have a succinct explanation of this idea from Kaku, other than he's referring to tachyons, which are theoretical particles that unbind particles from one another.

Without getting into the physics, Kaku concludes that we live in a Matrix-style universe, created by an intelligence.

"I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence", he said. "Believe me, everything that we call chance today won't make sense anymore. To me it is clear that we exists in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance."

So does this mean Kaku now believes in God? Yes and no. Nowhere does he endorse an particular religious philosophy. Instead, he may be referring to Spinosa's God, a sort of deification of the laws of the universe themselves. Einstein came to a similar conclusion.

Of course, as Catholics we believe firmly that we have been given additional instruction and information about who we are, our place in the universe, and our purpose. We believe in the God of our ancestors, written of in the Bible. And we believe seeing with the eye of faith, not science alone.

It is reassuring to see as scientists delve deeper into the mysteries of the universe, they are encountering God. It is a confirmation for us, that our faith is not in vain, and that perhaps someday at the end of all the science and research, there is a singular discovery that awaits all humanity, God Himself.
http://www.catholic.org/news/technology/story.php?id=69335
 
In PDF GOD status belong to those who have the power to give infraction, warning, bans etc...

That's a very insightful observation you just made. Absolutely Earth shattering and infinitely genius.
 
If we say scientist finds "God particle". It don't mean it is created by god. Michio Kaku has its own style of explaining things. He is a practical person. He want to point the thing how the universe emerges. If succeed, for numb nut like us news would be "Scientists finds the GOD".
 
Why has he taken such a long time to understand that the universe was created and is being constantly controlled by ONE SUPREME BEING? A cursory look at the Kuran-i Kerim would have given him enough evidence. Better late than never..


"By heaven furnished with paths;" (Kuran, Surat adh-Dhariyat, 7)

[Kuran 67.3-4] [Allah] is the one who created seven superimposed Heavens "سبع سموات طباق". You do not see variations in the formations of the Compassionate, so redirect your sight, do you see any creation (Futtur in Arabic فطور)? Then redirect your sight again, your vision returns to you in defeat and regret.

[Kuran 51.7] And the heaven that has weaves (Hubuk in Arabic).

View attachment 309620
The same verses can be found in bible or torah .Your post does not carry much weight.
In PDF GOD status belong to those who have the power to give infraction, warning, bans etc...
Or the one who can give the negative ratings.See god punished me for my sins and gave me 16 negative ratings :lol:
 
The same verses can be found in bible or torah .Your post does not carry much weight.

Or the one who can give the negative ratings.See god punished me for my sins and gave me 16 negative ratings :lol:
Would you kindly quote such verses from the Bible or Torah? And, would you like to say that the Kuran-i Kerim doesn't carry much weight?
 
Why has he taken such a long time to understand that the universe was created and is being constantly controlled by ONE SUPREME BEING? A cursory look at the Kuran-i Kerim would have given him enough evidence. Better late than never..


"By heaven furnished with paths;" (Kuran, Surat adh-Dhariyat, 7)

[Kuran 67.3-4] [Allah] is the one who created seven superimposed Heavens "سبع سموات طباق". You do not see variations in the formations of the Compassionate, so redirect your sight, do you see any creation (Futtur in Arabic فطور)? Then redirect your sight again, your vision returns to you in defeat and regret.

[Kuran 51.7] And the heaven that has weaves (Hubuk in Arabic).

View attachment 309620

Some people say this verse is referring to more than one universe, heaven being referred to as universe. Some scientists say blackholes are pathways connecting them
 
I dare someone to mention the Quran, Bible, Torah. Look at all these salty tears, as the Natural Monotheism is gradually revealed.

Oops! Was that too harsh, better call @WebMaster .
 
Would you kindly quote such verses from the Bible or Torah? And, would you like to say that the Kuran-i Kerim doesn't carry much weight?
No i was just saying the scientist can also refer to bible or torah if the verses is all which proves the existence of god.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom