They are doing business with KRG for oil and negotiation with PKK for ceasefire. We don't support PKK with money or weapons. Iran has supported PKK with resources and intel. This is proven fact for Turkish Inteligence and was widely covered in Turkish news. Iran also supports other terrorist groups like Hezbollah and many others but also dictators who are killing their own citizens like Assad.
I think, I already mentioned showing an outsider "enemy" is one of the main tricks of traitors. Turkish news are not truthful at all especially when it comes to Iran. I remember 2-3 years ago, the headlines for all tv channels, newspapers, went like this, "Iran shoots Turks" (iran türkleri vurdu) but few of them covered the fact that they were smugglers and drug-traffickers. As you can see, in order to incite racism against Iran, the NATO subserviant govt. and media do everything they can. So, please don't expect me to believe in "widely covered news" yet with no sources at all.
Iran never supported PKK. Except, Iran did support Kurds when Saddam massacred them. But, it doesn't mean Iran supported terrorism.
As for Hezbollah, I don't know whose mouthpiece are you? Why do you think Hezbollah is terrorist? To me they are freedom fighters who saved Lebanon from Israeli occupation. If it hadn't been for them, Lebanon would have also been under Zionist invasion, siege and blockade.
As for Assad, why do you think he is a dictator? A leader who wants to protect the unity of the land and who fights international terrorist groups is not a dictator. And the fact that Syria has been standing for 3 years, despite though the treason of the gulf states, shows how he is supported by the Syrians.
And it really is ironic to me, that, you do not see Ataturk as a dictator but you see Assad such. Look up the rebellions in the time of Ataturk, like, Sheikh Said, and etc. Ataturk massacred the nation, and not just the fighters. But you see him as a hero who saved the land. So, why not see Assad the same? His opponents are brutal cannibals unlike Ataturk's opponents. And he is soft in ending it, while Ataturk was more strict. The question is, why are you seeing a secular dictator as a hero, but not another one such?
I believe, racism blurs the mind of the people most of the time. don't you agree?
P.s. I don't support Ataturk and I don't support Assad. But Assad is better than what the west is planning to install there and do there. (Divided subserviant states for greater Israel and massacre of the nations).
Brother... i am not going to throw accusations here as i'm going to be asked for sources... And it will take time to collect them.
I'm gonna ask you a question.... have you ever read the books or watch the videos of "Osman Pamukoğlu" ?
I did not read from him. Nor do I need to read mouthpieces of traitors. And it wouldn't change my stance, because in order to judge on things, you need to study and listen to both sides (i.e. a- Iran supports terrorism. b- She does not.). And looking at the events unbiased, I know it is the latter. Iran has never supported terrorism. Yet, Iran did support Kurds when Saddam was massacring them. And, I read Mr. Rafsanjani's book on his memoirs, where he states this fact. And I don't condemn them for supporting a massacred nation. But I do condemn the Kurdish treason later on.
P.s. I am a Kurd-Turk mixed person living in Turkey (CITIZEN RIZA in our terms). And I by no means am not against Kurds or Turks. But, I am against the Kurdish terrorist groups as well as the traitor "Turkish" government.
And Iran, though she is innocent in all this, is drawn by the government and media in order to show an outsider "enemy", thus divert the people from the fact that, the enemies of the nation (the government and PKK) work hand in hand to destroy the country.
Erdogan himself admits that he is one of the leading figures of the USA's re-shaping the ME and NA.
Yet, his media already fools people to look for the enemies outside. So, that people fight the non-subserviant states under the command of this American puppet. And he gets closer to his aim.
