What's new

Why China's Stock Market Bubble Is Fizzling

Skeptic

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
1,146
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
Why China's Stock Market Bubble Is Fizzling

Talk about déjà vu. On July 29, the Shanghai Composite Index fell 5%, setting off panic selling in Hong Kong and dinging even the Dow. But Chinese stocks rebounded 2.7% the next trading day, the steepest rise in two months. Fast forward to Aug. 31. The Shanghai index dropped 6.7% that day, causing panic around Asia and even in distant markets like the U.S.

That's where the similarity ends. The index is not likely to return to its previous lofty perch any time soon. Following a miserable performance in August — Chinese stocks fell nearly 22% last month — Shanghai's 81% Great Leap Forward from January to July has now been pared to 42% as of Aug. 31. That's still a hefty advance, but it's looking like the Long March backward will continue for some time.
(See pictures of China's infrastructure boom.)

Technically, what happens in the Shanghai bourse should not matter outside China. Only locals can trade in Chinese A shares, which comprise the composite index. But markets are supposed to anticipate the economy's health, so the fall in the index could possibly signal a relapse in the world's third-largest economy. The jitters in Asia and the rest of the world are rooted in the fear that China will not be able to help pull the global economy from recession, a big blow to recovery hopes given the inability of the U.S., Europe and Japan to play that role at this time.

But is the slump in the stock market really a reflection of rot in the wider economy? Not necessarily. Unlike the NYSE or the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, where institutional investors react as much to fundamentals as to greed and fear, the Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges are dominated by retail investors driven to frenzy by speculation and sentiment.

Hong Kong's Hang Seng China Enterprises Index is probably a more realistic reflection of expectations about the direction of China's economy. It advanced only 45.8% from January to July this year. The sell-off in Shanghai trimmed that gain to 35.6% as of Aug. 31 — a strong gain, but hardly the stuff of bubbles.

The question on investors' minds is whether the recovery is for real. While China's GDP growth was a better-than-expected 7.1% year-on-year in the six months to June, part of that expansion was fuelled by an astounding 201% increase in bank lending. The central bank started tightening in July, when new loans totaled just $52 billion — down sharply from $224 billion in June. The August number may come in at an even lower $36 billion or so.

The aim is to purge the asset markets of speculators, which is clearly working given the deflation of the stocks bubble in Shanghai. The danger is that policymakers may over-tighten, discouraging not only speculation but also business growth and consumer spending, which could precipitate a hard landing for the economy. So far, there's scant evidence for collapse. The latest Purchasing Managers Index numbers, released Sept. 1, show China's manufacturers are continuing to rally. The index rose to 54.0 from 53.3 in July, marking the sixth consecutive month the index has been in expansion territory (over 50.0).

Some argue that over-tightening is not the fundamental problem, however. Former Morgan Stanley star analyst Andy Xie, now an independent economist, questions the quality of China's recent growth. "The present economic 'recovery' began in February as inventories were restocked and was pushed up by the spillover from the asset market revival," he contends in a recent opinion piece in Hong Kong's South China Morning Post newspaper. "These two factors cannot be sustained beyond the third quarter."

"When the market sees the second dip looming, panic will be more intense and thorough," he warns. Xie expects this economic slowdown to gather force in the fourth quarter, coinciding with a second dip recession in the U.S. as inventory restocking and fiscal stimulus there, which are driving today's recovery, peter out. "By the middle of the second quarter next year, most of the world will have entered the second dip," he concludes. "By then, financial markets will have collapsed."

But Xie is definitely in the minority. Discounting the stock market's fall, Goldman Sachs has just boosted its growth forecast for China to 9.4% this year from 8.3% previously, and to 11.9% in 2010, from 10.9%. Bank of America Merrill Lynch is sticking to its forecast of 8.7% growth in 2009 and 10.1% in 2010.

Praising China's use of moral suasion to persuade the banks to cut back on lending instead of resorting to the blunt instrument of raising interest rates, ING sees GDP returning to its trend growth of 10% next year. The Shanghai index now "rests two standard deviations below the trend line that starts in early November 2008, which we consider strong support," says ING chief economist Tim Condon. "We do not expect the support to be broken."

Who is right? Only time will tell, of course. But China's economic policy makers have been performing admirably since they wisely held the line on devaluing the renminbi in the 1997 Asian financial crisis. Their decisive action on a massive fiscal spending program this time around has helped the economy bounce back strongly.

With luck, the doomsday scenario may not come to pass. Xie will no doubt be happy to be proved wrong, along with the rest of the world.
 
Shanghai Reality Check

Chinese stock markets don't usually drive global stock markets, but they did on Monday—Shanghai fell 6.7% and European and New York markets dipped in response. However painful, this is good news if global market watchers are finally questioning China's ability to drive global growth and "fix" the world economy.

Chinese domestic investors are already worried; Monday's rout was part of a broader decline that saw Shanghai stocks fall 23% since early August, as the nearby chart shows. Investors fret that Beijing might be getting ready to slow the monetary expansion that has fueled China's seeming boom of the past few months. Monday's news that a metals company could make its initial public offering sooner than expected also sparked worries that Beijing might hasten a flow of new offerings into the market, creating a glut of shares.

Normally a Shanghai sell-off would be a China-only phenomenon, given that the country's stock markets are heavily controlled by authorities and capital controls prevent funds from flowing in and out from abroad. But today investors everywhere are looking for clues about how strong China's economic expansion really is, given slow growth in the U.S., Europe and Japan.

They have good reason to wonder: China's four-trillion-yuan ($586 billion) stimulus, unveiled in November, has in practice become one of the biggest credit expansions in its history as Beijing funds stimulus projects by forcing banks to lend. Bank lending hit 7.4 trillion yuan in the first half of this year, despite the absence of any obviously productive uses for much of that money.

Economists increasingly believe asset bubbles are forming in the stock and property markets. Companies are stockpiling commodities. Meanwhile, China's export engine is sputtering, despite the authorities' best efforts to keep it going. There still are too few buyers abroad. China's stimulus is merely delaying a tough transition from export dependence to domestic consumption.

These problems have been masked by superficially strong economic data. GDP growth bounced to 7.9% in the second quarter, from 6.1% in the first. It even looked for awhile like the benefits were spreading—stronger exports to China were cited as a factor in improvements to the German and Japanese economies earlier this summer.

Yet, as investors abroad are noticing now, these headline data distract from warning signs that China's boom is more a credit-driven bubble. Only economic liberalization—such as deregulating industries or setting banks free to make market-driven credit decisions—will unleash sustainable Chinese growth. As for policy makers in developed economies, it's growing clearer by the day that Chinese stimulus will be no substitute for pro-growth policies of their own.

China’s Market Boom is a Result of Credit Bubble - WSJ.com
 
Useless thread, please learn proper valuation & market understanding before making such comments. :)

It is a chance to learn and it would be a better one if you could explain why the two quoted jornal articles are wrong.

Economics are not my strong point, it always seemed that there were 50 predictions and eventually one of the would be right and the other 49 forgotten.

What i dont understand is it seems to me at least that Chinas 10% year after year growth has been export driven. Just about every thing from tv's to sneakers has a made in china label on it these days. Problem is the countries buying all those goods are in or going into recesion, people are losing jobs and houses and bying less.
If the rest of the world isnt buying how does China keep growing at 10% ?
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom