El Sidd
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2017
- Messages
- 67,597
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Even indians dont want indians!!
That bit we already knew
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even indians dont want indians!!
Look, in a refugee scenario, in order to go to China, Indian refugees would have to climb the arduous and cold Himalayan mountains which is next to impossible. Hence there would be negligible number of Indian refugees going to China. When China won't be having any refugee problem why would it worry and why would this issue dissuade it from attacking India?Little bit.
Explain it to me
So the Chinese care so much about Pakistanis.
Explanation: In a refugee scenario, refugees won't climb the cold and arduous Himalayas. They would instead try to enter Pakistan.
So you mean to say that since China doesn't want refugees to pour into Pakistan, they aren't attacking India, right?
That's official. But practically speaking, weren't Chinese unhappy about Sikkim's integration to India? And if I am not wrong, they took a long time to recognize Sikkim as part of India, right?
Look, in a refugee scenario, in order to go to China, Indian refugees would have to climb the arduous and cold Himalayan mountains which is next to impossible. Hence there would be negligible number of Indian refugees going to China. When China won't be having any refugee problem why would it worry and why would this issue dissuade it from attacking India?
1. Sikkim was never really disputed as far as I know. It was always a British protectorate which became an Indian protectorate and after some trouble between a political party there and the Chogyal - the integration happened.
In 62, China was well prepared. Also in 1962 the two major powers - USA and USSR were locked at the same time in the Cuban Missile Crisis. As soon as the Crisis was over, Kennedy sent military aid. Also, Krishna Menon didn't use the Air Force in 62 which itself is bizarre.
Stars aligned for China in 1962. They had more men, better weapons. This was not the case in other conflicts.
refugees
I think the chinese have matured and look forward to the world with a different prespective than indians do. China is in the league of major game players and india is not that important anymore.
Ashamed to beat a kid like India. But not ashamed to indulge in aggression against an infant like Bhutan.someone may ashamed them that they hit baby . its not good idea to beat kids
Exactly, geographically our main threat and national interest all lies in pacific and eastern Asia, so can't think of any reason for waging a war in Himalaya region.Wars are costly and throw you decades back. China has eyes set on global stage why would they engage in a war which might throw them back a decade?
The stakes are very high now ... Both countries are nuclear nations, therefore, cannot afford the risk ,,, furthermore, Chinese are smart and they are more focus on development, unlike we south Asians who are wasting resources on weakening each others ...The provocations equal to or even graver than those in 1962 have occurred in the later years. In 1962, India merely established some forward posts. In later episodes India was more pro-active.
Example 1: The 1967 Nathu La clash
Example 2: The annexation of Sikkim in 1975
Example 3: The Sumdorong Chu standoff in 1986-87
Example 4: The Doklam standoff
In these instances, China retreated after giving a lot of warnings. Compare this with the well-prepared attack over the entire front of India-China border in 1962. Why was it so?
LOL ,What typical indian pretexts,The reasons are that you were weak and stupid enough to invade china,Don't
pretend to be an" expert",you are not.Sorry i don't get any bones today.
Chachu ya to lol ho giaexcuse me !!
Chachu ya to lol ho gia