What's new

Who killed Diana? No end to conspiracy theories

Moin91

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Nov 25, 2006
Messages
2,338
Reaction score
0
Monday, August 27, 2007
LONDON: The royals did it. It was a secret service plot. Her driver was blinded by a flash of light. Dozens of conspiracy theories continue to circulate about Princess Diana 10 years after her death.

Type “Diana” and “conspiracy theory” into the Internet search engine Google and there are 121,000 entries — fewer than Elvis (134,000) and John F Kennedy (201,000) but a lot more than Marilyn Monroe (25,100).

Among the more outlandish is the one that Diana, sick of constant media intrusion in her private life, faked her own death and went to live incognito on a tropical island with her partner Dodi Fayed.

Others, focusing on an alleged establishment plot to murder her, have been maintained by Fayed’s father Mohamed, the Egyptian-born millionaire owner of the upmarket Harrods department store in west London.

Conspiracy theorists also remember Diana’s own words in a 1995 BBC interview after splitting from Prince Charles when she said the royal family now saw her as a “problem” and a “liability” to be dealt with.

Yet a French judicial investigation and a three-year British inquiry into allegations of conspiracy to murder found no evidence to support the claims.

Former Scotland Yard chief John Stevens last December concluded the princess’s death was a “tragic accident” caused by her chauffeur Henri Paul travelling at excessive speed while over the alcohol limit for driving. There was no conspiracy, Diana was not pregnant, there was no indication she was about to marry Dodi, Paul was not blinded by a flashing light and his blood samples were not switched after his death, Stevens said.

But a Gfk NOP poll published last December ahead of “The Conspiracy Files” television series for the BBC found that nearly one in three of Britons believed Diana’s death was not an accident.

So why the persistent speculation — mostly published in cyberspace — that the crash was anything other than what royal coroner Michael Burgess in January 2004 described as a “sad, but relatively straightforward road traffic accident?”

Psychologists, sociologists and conspiracy theory specialists point to many people’s mistrust of the authorities and a deep cynicism as to the motives of those in power.

Others highlight paranoia among the fringes of society, a sense of powerlessness by individuals in the face of big business or merely a human need for answers.

Hollywood films like director Oliver Stone’s “JFK” and television series such as “The X Files” are said to encourage scepticism about “official” versions. Speculation fills the void where exact explanations are lacking.

Diana’s friend, Rosa Monckton, told the BBC programme: “Because she was such an extraordinary women, people find it completely unacceptable that someone like that should have such an ordinary death, a car crash.”

For Jude Davies, author of “Diana, A Cultural History: Gender, Race, Nation and the People’s Princess”, the phenomenon stems from her popularity, empathetic qualities and genuine grief at her passing.

Diana was seen as a mythical figure, galvanising people’s hopes and dreams but then cut short in her prime, Davies, from the University of Winchester in southern England, told AFP. This status she shared with former US president Kennedy.

“Their death then generates a vacuum into which the conspiracy theories go,” he said. “One or two years after her death there was still an intense sense of loss, which is understandable because of the emotional investment. “That’s declined to a lower level, but I think it will still be there.”



Who killed Diana? No end to conspiracy theories
 
.
There is no conspiracy: Driver was drunk and Diana/Dodi werent wearing the seat belts. No one conspired to not let these two wear the seat belts. Thounsands die evreyday in road accidents.....on 31 August, 97 it was Diana's turn.

Take care and wear the seat belts!!
 
. .
But as per many reports its looks the act carried out by the Royal family to finish a member of the family, responsible for mligning the family. And every one knows she was crossing all the boundries.
 
.
Woah conspiracy. People seem to love that word on this site. Yeah there was a conspiracy! Ya, ya there was.

You see there are 4 versions of what could have happened:

1) The driver was a suicide bomber in disguise and thought there was a bomb in the car that would blast when it would hit something.

2) Diana wanted to shoot her driver and the car crashed because of the struggle between Diana and the driver.

3) The queen wanted Diana dead so she bundled diana up and threw her in a car and told the driver to make it look like an accident. Poor driver dude lost his life in the process.

4) I was in that car with Diana and I am responsible for the "conspiracy." What you'll do if its true? :D

Comeon what could have happened? The driver was driving faster than he should have and was drunk its as simple as that. I don't think there is anything that suggests otherwise... truth is although I hate conspiracy theories seeing them as vague and senseless i also enjoy them.

My point is there should be evidence when making a claim otherwise the claims are baseless and are a target for mere mockery. I think the same goes for the Diana case. For example (in the other threads) suggestions that ISI and Bangladeshi militants are involved in the Hydrabad bombings.
 
.
This is just media trying to cash in on her death. She was going out of bounds and certainly the royals hated her, but that doesnt mean they killed her. She happened to die in a car accident just like many others who die everyday in car accidents. the media is inventing theories to sell to the public.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom