What's new

Who is more important to India and why?

Who is more important to India?

  • Myanmar

    Votes: 14 60.9%
  • Bangladesh

    Votes: 9 39.1%

  • Total voters
    23
Without a doubt Myanmar. India has a lot to learn from Myanmar. Not to mention a supa pawa would only consider another supa/regional pawa important. BD is neither a supa pawa nor a regional pawa. But Myanmar is a regional pawa close to being a supa pawa. They are much more important than weak BD.

ALL HAIL INDIA MYANMAR FRIENDSHIP
CfV8fGBUUAAvXtK.jpg
that poor l;ittle goose sagrika never knew that sangh never wanted india , but Bharat which is the oldest civilization known to mankind . huh britishers
 
. .
that poor l;ittle goose sagrika never knew that sangh never wanted india , but Bharat which is the oldest civilization known to mankind . huh britishers
Well India is reffered as Bharat in BD, in Bangla. But Bharat was more than just present day India.
Only 4? I though there were 60 millions of them.
 
.
In my opinion, Myanmar should be our priority for three reasons:
a. Natural resources
b. Not our neighbor
c. BD has been an ungrateful neighbor
 
.
Shame the poll won't let us see who voted for what.. Indians would probably overwhelmingly have voted for Myanmar. Lungis propping themselves up voting for themselves here..

not a favorite or like/dislike thing, and flame baiting aside... strategically, Myanmar is more important to India.

east Pakistan/BD are a neutered force who pose zero threat and have very little to offer India, that story got done and dusted in 71, game over.. the islamic hatred and vitriol and venom spewed by members with BD flags on this forum means NOTHING.

hate the analogy because I love dogs but they are essentially caged puppies, they ever go rabid, they'll be put down very quickly.

Myanmar would be strategically more important to India even if they were an Islamic country.
 
.
Only 4? I though there were 60 millions of them.

Yes, 4 now. By the way, what about your argument where you claimed it's imaginary?

And it's just one news, I don't wanna make a news out of every BD getting caught doing illegal sh*t.

Last time, a Rohingya was killed by military in Jammu who joined Hizbi.
 
. .
Yes, 4 now. By the way, what about your argument where you claimed it's imaginary?
I meant the number x millions is imaginary. There maybe a couple hundred thousands at most. Same for Indians in BD. Your govt can't identify that many as Bangladeshi.

And Rohingyas are not Bangladeshi. Blame it on Myanmar or someone else.
 
. .
I meant the number x millions is imaginary. There maybe a couple hundred thousands at most. Same for Indians in BD. Your govt can't identify that many as Bangladeshi.
You think the population of West Bangal and Assam exploded overnight? Even the government figures estimate at 10-20 million.
 
.
Good relations with both are important
India should not take sides and let China handle affairs at is backyard
 
.
You think the population of West Bangal and Assam exploded overnight? Even the government figures estimate at 10-20 million.
Estimate is no proof. Can you prove that they are Bangladeshi? And no being Muslim does not make one Bangladeshi. Neither speaking Bengali does.
 
.
Estimate is no proof. Can you prove that they are Bangladeshi? And no being Muslim does not make one Bangladeshi. Neither speaking Bengali does.
No, but there is a simple analysis on the border region is enough.

We are doing it and soon you will get the result.:tup:
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom