What's new

what is the relationship between Afghan and Pak?

=
=
=
Dr. Israr Ahmad thought Pakistan & Afghanistan will become one country in furure,,,

Watch from 0:13:40+ onwards...

=
=

End of the Times The Hidden Truth - By Dr. Shahid Masood Part 2 of 4 - Complete - YouTube

=
=



Can anyone bring up the video??? where
a Pakistani Army General was talking to some Americans & told them in their face that if anything , most of Afghanistan will become part of Pakistan if they went with population dynamics. Because, he said, there were more Pashtoons in Pakistan than in Afghanistan...
 
.
in culture: similar. same religions lead to some aspects of culture being the same. but pakistani culture is more closely related to indian culture (except religion) e.g. marriage styles, food, movies, sports.

in language: not similar, only pashtuns speak the same language in pakistan as afghans do. an afghan would never understand sindhi/urdu/punjabi without watching pak movies.

in political; very, very different. different alliances. afghanistan is allied with india, enough said.
 
.
what is the relationship between Afghan and Pak?in histroy,in culture,in language,in political.

would Afghan more likely to be integrated with Pak or Iran or otherwise.


Relations between Pakistan have usually been excellent. The vast majority of Afghanistanis and Pakistanis share the same religion, same ethnicies, were part of the same countries:

(examples: Durani empire, Nader Shah's empire, Mughal empire, Caliphates, and many more).

Please note that the current Afghanistan and Pakistan are different from India.

Also note that the current tyrannical regime (Hamid Karzai) in Kabul does not represent the people.

Liaquat Ali Khan and the King of Afghanistan were about to unite the two countries but L.A. Khan was assassinated.

Afghanistan is more closer to Pakistan than Iran, because Afghanistan and Pakistan are Sunni Muslim countries.

That is why there many intermarriages between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

As you know many people in Pakistan and Afghanistan don't even consider the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan to be a border since it was imposed by the colonial dogs.

Now both sides of the fence want to unite the countries.

Shukria (thanks).
 
.
in culture: similar. same religions lead to some aspects of culture being the same. but pakistani culture is more closely related to indian culture (except religion) e.g. marriage styles, food, movies, sports.

in language: not similar, only pashtuns speak the same language in pakistan as afghans do. an afghan would never understand sindhi/urdu/punjabi without watching pak movies.

in political; very, very different. different alliances. afghanistan is allied with india, enough said.

what a crock of nonsense.

Strict Punjabi is different from strict Urdu. Strict Urdu is more like Farsi.

Umm, no. Our marriage styles in Pakistan are very different from the ones in India. The marriage style and food in Rajasthan would be different from the one in western Punjab Pakistan.

Please stop putting us in the same region as in India. It is indeed a disgusting thought to put Pakistan in the same region as India.

Even USA think Pakistan in a region called the Greater Middle East:

Greater_Middle_East_%28orthographic_projection%29.svg
 
. . .
what a crock of nonsense.

Strict Punjabi is different from strict Urdu. Strict Urdu is more like Farsi.

Umm, no. Our marriage styles in Pakistan are very different from the ones in India. The marriage style and food in Rajasthan would be different from the one in western Punjab Pakistan.

Please stop putting us in the same region as in India. It is indeed a disgusting thought to put Pakistan in the same region as India.

Even USA think Pakistan in a region called the Greater Middle East:

Greater_Middle_East_%28orthographic_projection%29.svg

Your disgust for your indic origin and wish for your inclusion in middle east shows your inferiority complex. Most of the south asian muslims are converts from hinduism, mostly from low castes. As muslim rulers of india were of turk, arab and afghan origin, so local muslims linked themeselves with foriegn muslim royalties/nobilitie and begin to disgust their hindu history.
 
.
Your disgust for your indic origin and wish for your inclusion in middle east shows your inferiority complex. Most of the south asian muslims are converts from hinduism, mostly from low castes. As muslim rulers of india were of turk, arab and afghan origin, so local muslims linked themeselves with foriegn muslim royalties/nobilitie and begin to disgust their hindu history.

in islam if you speak lie you will be in the deepest holes of hell, and your pashtunism wont work there

keep it up :tup:
 
.
Your disgust for your indic origin and wish for your inclusion in middle east shows your inferiority complex. Most of the south asian muslims are converts from hinduism, mostly from low castes. As muslim rulers of india were of turk, arab and afghan origin, so local muslims linked themeselves with foriegn muslim royalties/nobilitie and begin to disgust their hindu history.

And these Muslim Turk, Arab, Afghan, were Muslims when they were forms of early humans?
 
. .
It may be that he is ashamed of his own Indic origins:

media_38565.jpg


media_38567.jpg


Statues are Haraam in Islam. The Indus River Valley civilization was an interesting civilization which is on parallel with the ancient Egyptian, Ancient Persian, and ancient Greek civilizations.

It was advanced in city planning, and in the sewage systems.

Anyways point is, Pakistan must not be associated with India. Pakistan needs to be associated with the rest of the Stans or Central Asia.

That is where we belong.

We do not belong with Hindus.
 
.
indiaharappagateway.jpg


Indus civilization

not much different from my village lolz. that building on the right.
 
. .
[:::~Spartacus~:::];3656243 said:
in islam if you speak lie you will be in the deepest holes of hell, and your pashtunism wont work there

keep it up :tup:

You shouldnt be ashamed of this fact. It doesnt matter if your ancestors were high caste hindus or low caste hindus, you are muslim now and you shouldnt look down upon those muslims whose ancestors were shodaras or dalats .Low caste hindus were victims of caste system, majority of the converts in India were from low caste hindus as they believed that islam is religion of equality and by accepting religion of their foreign muslim rulers they would be get good social status. Unfortunately it didnt happen, they were still looked down upon and muslim settlers of arab, turk, afghan, irani origin and muslim converts from high caste "shiekhs" were declared "ashrafia".....So many converts from low caste had no choice but to assume fake identity of "ashrafia" to get some respect and better status. There is no way that more than 50 crore south asian muslims are descendants foreign invaders from central asia, iran or arabia.
I have observed that desi pakistanis become very irritated when some one points out their historical links with india and hinduism. If any indian mentions some cultural , racial and linguistic similarities between india and pakistan, they strongly deny it and try very hard to prove that current pakistan was never part of india and that it is close to central asia and middle east rather than india. Foriegn muslim invaders (some of them were merely looters) like mohammed bin qasim, mehmud ghaznavi, timur , ghauri, babur, abdali etc while local rulers like ashoka, prithvi raj chauahan, porus etc have no place in pakistani history.....................it reflects inferiority complex and sever identity crisis........
 
.
You shouldnt be ashamed of this fact. It doesnt matter if your ancestors were high caste hindus or low caste hindus, you are muslim now and you shouldnt look down upon those muslims whose ancestors were shodaras or dalats .Low caste hindus were victims of caste system, majority of the converts in India were from low caste hindus as they believed that islam is religion of equality and by accepting religion of their foreign muslim rulers they would be get good social status. Unfortunately it didnt happen, they were still looked down upon and muslim settlers of arab, turk, afghan, irani origin and muslim converts from high caste "shiekhs" were declared "ashrafia".....So many converts from low caste had no choice but to assume fake identity of "ashrafia" to get some respect and better status. There is no way that more than 50 crore south asian muslims are descendants foreign invaders from central asia, iran or arabia.
I have observed that desi pakistanis become very irritated when some one points out their historical links with india and hinduism. If any indian mentions some cultural , racial and linguistic similarities between india and pakistan, they strongly deny it and try very hard to prove that current pakistan was never part of india and that it is close to central asia and middle east rather than india. Foriegn muslim invaders (some of them were merely looters) like mohammed bin qasim, mehmud ghaznavi, timur , ghauri, babur, abdali etc while local rulers like ashoka, prithvi raj chauahan, porus etc have no place in pakistani history.....................it reflects inferiority complex and sever identity crisis........

Mohammad Bin Qasim was a looter? The guy commanded an army at 17 and died at the age 19 because he was the nephew of Hajjaj bin Yusaf and new ruler couldn't stand his glorious victories. Remind me with documented facts that Bin Qasim was a looter?

Plus this division of high and low caste even exist today not in Punjab sindh but in KPK and Baluchistan too. Recall how khattaks are considered low castes by most of you people. Plus your own pashtun origins are traced back to jewish tribes who were low castes and settled in the area which is now called Afghanistan.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom