Aham Brahmasmi
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2015
- Messages
- 171
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Where they exchanged Hindus/Sikhs/Buddhist/Jains/Zorastrians/Jews in Pak territory to
India while India exchanged its Muslim population (all Urdu, Punjabi speaking Muslims to
West and all Bengali speaking ones to East. Pakistan sending people of these faiths to
India where India settles Hindu Bengalis into West Bengal and Punjabis in Indian Punjab,
Sindhis in Rajasthan and others in different parts of India. Other Muslims such as
Malabaris, Hyderabadis etc. could be given the option to choose if they want to leave.
Note that not religion alone but language would decide this agreement as well. Assuming
very not more than 10% among the other Muslims left.
How differently would history have panned out if the promise of partition of two nation
theory was executed similar to Greece-Turkey in lines as stated above. Assume also that
Sunni Kashmir valley is with Pakistan in this agreement while Ladakh, Kargil, Jammu
remains with India with Chenab valley of Jammu being decided by referendum due to more
confusing dynamic . What would be Hindu % in such a scenario in India???? Would this be
better for modern India today????
Plz be objective and dispassionate on your answer.
What if India-Pak signed Hindu-Muslim population exchange agreement in 1947 - Historum - History Forums
India while India exchanged its Muslim population (all Urdu, Punjabi speaking Muslims to
West and all Bengali speaking ones to East. Pakistan sending people of these faiths to
India where India settles Hindu Bengalis into West Bengal and Punjabis in Indian Punjab,
Sindhis in Rajasthan and others in different parts of India. Other Muslims such as
Malabaris, Hyderabadis etc. could be given the option to choose if they want to leave.
Note that not religion alone but language would decide this agreement as well. Assuming
very not more than 10% among the other Muslims left.
How differently would history have panned out if the promise of partition of two nation
theory was executed similar to Greece-Turkey in lines as stated above. Assume also that
Sunni Kashmir valley is with Pakistan in this agreement while Ladakh, Kargil, Jammu
remains with India with Chenab valley of Jammu being decided by referendum due to more
confusing dynamic . What would be Hindu % in such a scenario in India???? Would this be
better for modern India today????
Plz be objective and dispassionate on your answer.
What if India-Pak signed Hindu-Muslim population exchange agreement in 1947 - Historum - History Forums