What happened to Hindus in Kashmir in 1990s is happening again in UP's Kairana

[ranjeet]

Cold calculated attack that spared neither Hindus nor Muslims.

let him believe that only hindus died in Muslim retaliation of 92.

 

[The_Showstopper]

Gujarat riots happened in spur of the moment unlike train bombing of 1992 which was a cold, calculated attack on India.

Spur of the moment...

Headlines Today probe reveals Gujarat riots were not spontaneous and sudden

Source: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...frantic-police-warnings-ignored/1/262413.html

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Spur of the moment...

Headlines Today probe reveals Gujarat riots were not spontaneous and sudden

Source: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...frantic-police-warnings-ignored/1/262413.html

Voila! Well Justified. (even assuming this as true, the SC differs but anyway...)

 

[itachii]

Ok let me rephrase your logic... Had the Hindu rioters not killed, maimed and burnt the muslims during Bombay riots, you wouldn't have seen so many innocent lives lost in 1992 Train bombings. Now you decide, Does your logic make any sense?

I still don't get you. are you trying to say that 2002 was a result of 1992 ?

OK so burning and destroying properties of your motherland is OK when they suddenly decide that their sentiments have been hurt.

Destroying public property is no way acceptable no matter who does it, those who participate in the rampage should be arrested and sentence has to be served. destroying war memorials and rioting for muslims killed in a foreign country leaves different imprint on psyche of nation that rioting for social upliftment of your people or for a political cause. Do you think the outrage would be any different, if tamilians destroyed indian soldeirs war memorials for genocide of tamilians in SL ?

Protested? They raped, burnt and destroyed... So are you telling me that it is ok to destroy the nation's property just because you aren't being pampered enough. Its OK for MNS/Shiv Sena goons to set Bombay on fire just because of a online post but something similar happening on a smaller scale just because a community's religious figure being insulted should not be tolerated.

There is no difference for me in what MNS/shiv sena did to what muslims of malda did. From my point of view there is a difference b/w riots in haryana to malda riots(or MNS/shivsena riots). For the rape part, my stand remains same, every rapist should be hanged, doesn't matter what the context it is, or what community he belongs to.

It has already become clear, that this hoopla is all because of UP elections.

that doesn't give a right to target a community for extortion, and there by forcing people out of there homes and changing the demography.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

let him believe that only hindus died in Muslim retaliation of 92.

Probably he does not consider them 'real' Muslims. Munafiqs or murtids perhaps... Or perhaps collateral damage.

 

[The_Showstopper]

'Uneducated' teens. Plural.

OK...

Even in Bodhgaya, 'uneducated teens' not knowing who 'Gautam Buddha' was, broke his statue. Not their fault.

I only feel bad that they were not 'educated' immediately, so that no mistake could be possible on their part in the future.

Yes I understand that you were not given a chance to "educate" them the Bajrangi style

Hope the Modi government will take a note of your longings...

 

[SarthakGanguly]

doesn't give a right to target a community for extortion

They were just demanding jizya, a right given to them by their religion. It's not THEIR fault.

Hope the Modi government will take a note of your longings...

Hope so man. Hope so.

 

[ranjeet]

Spur of the moment...

Headlines Today probe reveals Gujarat riots were not spontaneous and sudden

Source: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...frantic-police-warnings-ignored/1/262413.html

Well enjoy the Headlines Today probe .. but here is what the court observed.

"The judge did not implicate officials who were working under Mr. Modi’s authority at the time, and the ruling rejected charges of conspiracy, casting the massacre instead as an episode of mob violence."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/03/world/asia/gujarat-riots-massacre-india-verdict.html?_r=0

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Well enjoy the Headlines Today probe .. but here is what the court observed.

"The judge did not implicate officials who were working under Mr. Modi’s authority at the time, and the ruling rejected charges of conspiracy, casting the massacre instead as an episode of mob violence."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/03/world/asia/gujarat-riots-massacre-india-verdict.html?_r=0

I, however do admire the religious fanaticism of Muslims in general, their courage against a numerical Hindu majority...

He has been defending the indefensible and will continue to do so till the end... I know that. Even Ladens, Memons etc will find some respectable place... Though disgusting, the steadfastness must be respected. Imagine the huge processions for dead jihadis in India itself...

Shocking how religion can completely numb senses. Of both sides.

 

[The_Showstopper]

I still don't get you. are you trying to say that 2002 was a result of 1992 ?

No I am just explaining your logic... If 2002 happened because of Godhra then it also implies that Train bombings happened because of Bombay riots... Agree?

Destroying public property is no way acceptable no matter who does it, those who participate in the rampage should be arrested and sentence has to be served. destroying war memorials and rioting for muslims killed in a foreign country leaves different imprint on psyche of nation that rioting for social upliftment of your people or for a political cause. Do you think the outrage would be any different, if tamilians destroyed indian soldeirs war memorials for genocide of tamilians in SL ?

Oh common... people were also killed in Assam riots, so no not just for foreigners. I already stated that uneducated lot don't really get to know what war memorials are forget about their importance. Oh yes upliftment of people by raping, murdering and destroying nation's properties... Highly laughable

that doesn't give a right to target a community for extortion, and there by forcing people out of there homes and changing the demography.

Demography has being changing on both the sides...

 

[ranjeet]

I, however do admire the religious fanaticism of Muslims in general, their courage against a numerical Hindu majority...

He has been defending the indefensible and will continue to do so till the end... I know that. Even Ladens, Memons etc will find some respectable place... Though disgusting, the steadfastness must be respected. Imagine the huge processions for dead jihadis in India itself...

Shocking how religion can completely numb senses. Of both sides.

Well, the liberal Dhimmis keep their hatred simmering by constantly reminding them that they are being victimized.

 

[The_Showstopper]

Well enjoy the Headlines Today probe .. but here is what the court observed.

"The judge did not implicate officials who were working under Mr. Modi’s authority at the time, and the ruling rejected charges of conspiracy, casting the massacre instead as an episode of mob violence."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/03/world/asia/gujarat-riots-massacre-india-verdict.html?_r=0

The judge speaks of individual episode/case not the entire happenings of 2002. Read your source properly

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Well, the liberal Dhimmis keep their hatred simmering by constantly reminding them that they are being victimized.

Forget them. They are boring and will be irrelevant. Check out the fan pages of Owaisi, Azam Khan and other leaders on Facebook. I love those young Moslem comments against Hindus. While one Hindu would say someone pig and the whole gang will call the Hindu all sorts of things... They are mostly technically 'Indian'. Some are from other countries as well.

 

[ranjeet]

The judge speaks of individual episode/case not the entire happenings of 2002. Read your source properly

Thank God, I thought you are going to say let the SC has the final say on this matter.

 

[The_Showstopper]

Voila! Well Justified. (even assuming this as true, the SC differs but anyway...)

Source please?