What's new

What guarantee can the Americans give Pakistanis that we can now trust you

sherdil76

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
386
Reaction score
0
"What guarantee can the Americans give Pakistanis that we can now trust you ... and that you guys are not going to be betraying us like you did in the past," one student asked at a "townhall-style" meeting Clinton held at the Government College University in Lahore.

a childish response by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton..
"I am well aware that there is a trust deficit," Clinton said. "My message is that's not the way it should be. We cannot let a minority of people in both countries determine our relationship."

LOL... its really funny that US govt still thinks americans are in favour of their illegal expeditions in Iraq and now in Afghanistan... also if tey believe Pakistani people trust them. she should study the statistics before giving any statement otherwise we Pakistani and every Muslim is sick of such jokes.
 
The best gaurantee will be for the US is to packup and leave Afganistan.

Where ever these bloody Americano's go death and destruction follows.

Most humans ever killed by any nation is US.
 
LOL... its really funny that US govt still thinks americans are in favour of their illegal expeditions in Iraq and now in Afghanistan... also if tey believe Pakistani people trust them. she should study the statistics before giving any statement otherwise we Pakistani and every Muslim is sick of such jokes.

A LOT of Americans support the operation in Afghanistan and also Iraq. This is self evident by the fact that even Obama who preached against American military foreign policy is considering bolstering NATO troops in Afghanistan.
While Iraq might have been a distraction, America succeeded there brilliantly despite the ugliness of the insurgency. Afghanistan is TOTALLY justified because the Taliban were the ones who gave sanctuary to Osama and we pounded those stone aged savages into the ground. The US will not leave Afghanistan again like it did in the 80s. This time we will make sure that Al Qaeda and Islamists never use Afghanistan as a safe haven again.

The conflict in Iraq truly helped the US military transition into the 21st century. The malaise of all those years of peace through the 90s under Democratic administration seriously crippled the US military. The terrorist threat and the War on Terror were just the right jolt required to recognize new threats and revitalize the US military and today it is much stronger that it was pre-9/11 and so are our intelligence agencies.

To answer you question: "What guarantee can Americans give Pakistan that we can trust you? ", I would like to ask "What guarantee can Pakistan give to America that we can trust you? " .
Trust is earned and I believe the history between US-Pakistan relations is an indicator of that trust ,that the US has always been there for Pakistan through the decades and will continue to see it through to become a stable and proper functioning democracy.
 
A LOT of Americans support the operation in Afghanistan and also Iraq. This is self evident by the fact that even Obama who preached against American military foreign policy is considering bolstering NATO troops in Afghanistan.
While Iraq might have been a distraction, America succeeded there brilliantly despite the ugliness of the insurgency. Afghanistan is TOTALLY justified because the Taliban were the ones who gave sanctuary to Osama and we pounded those stone aged savages into the ground. The US will not leave Afghanistan again like it did in the 80s. This time we will make sure that Al Qaeda and Islamists never use Afghanistan as a safe haven again.

The conflict in Iraq truly helped the US military transition into the 21st century. The malaise of all those years of peace through the 90s under Democratic administration seriously crippled the US military. The terrorist threat and the War on Terror were just the right jolt required to recognize new threats and revitalize the US military and today it is much stronger that it was pre-9/11 and so are our intelligence agencies.

To answer you question: "What guarantee can Americans give Pakistan that we can trust you? ", I would like to ask "What guarantee can Pakistan give to America that we can trust you? " .
Trust is earned and I believe the history between US-Pakistan relations is an indicator of that trust ,that the US has always been there for Pakistan through the decades and will continue to see it through to become a stable and proper functioning democracy.


Your iraq operation was based on lies and the entire world have seen that.

On the other hand you support operation in Afghanistan just because you are being confronted by freedom fighters there whereas you are allowing terrorists from TTP from Pakistan to pour into Afghanistan for safety when Pakistan started operation against them in South Waziristan hence yankees can never be trusted.

You people are not to be trusted by anyone in the world
 
Most humans ever killed by any nation is US.

Actually that would be Soviet Union at first place and China at second place.

Stalin killed 60 million of his OWN people while Mao desperately tried to best him but failed at a 50 million of his own.

The US is probably one of the single greatest engine for good in this world by having brought democracy to more countries than any other.
 
The conflict in Iraq truly helped the US military transition into the 21st century. The malaise of all those years of peace through the 90s under Democratic administration seriously crippled the US military. The terrorist threat and the War on Terror were just the right jolt required to recognize new threats and revitalize the US military and today it is much stronger that it was pre-9/11 and so are our intelligence agencies.
So in other words the US army had practiced its shooting and bombardment skills on innocent Iraqi people.

Iraq had nothing to with 9/11 neither any WMDs, but a lie which your zionist leaders have sold to innocent American citizens and now you people are minting the taxpayers for this unjust war
 
The US is probably one of the single greatest engine for good in this world by having brought democracy to more countries than any other.

The only country to Nuke human beings.
The only country to invade helpless countries around the globe in 21st century. Killing innocent human beings for testing their Frankinstien weapons.
 
Your iraq operation was based on lies and the entire world have seen that.

On the other hand you support operation in Afghanistan just because you are being confronted by freedom fighters there whereas you are allowing terrorists from TTP from Pakistan to pour into Afghanistan for safety when Pakistan started operation against them in South Waziristan hence yankees can never be trusted.

You people are not to be trusted by anyone in the world

Iraq was not only an American operation, it was a NATO operation and while the pretext might have been misguided, our response was just. A middle east without Saddam is better for the whole world and even his own people have judged him and found him guilty! A shot of justice that never would have taken place if not for America!

There fighters in Afghanistan are not "freedom fighters" are you call them. They only freedom they are fighting for is the freedom to be terrorists and the freedom to kill innocent civilians that they dont like in the name of Islam. The only people who consider these Terrorists "freedom fighters" are those who want these savages to kill innocent people in the name of Islam. And those people are just cowards!

As for the tribals supposedly entering Afghanistan from Pakistan- that is a misconception. The US forces and the Afghan national Army are doing everything they can to keep pressure on the Afghan border to prevent the tribals and Taliban from spilling in Afghanistan again from Pakistan.
The pakistani military is unable to control the border effectively and that is the reason Taliban are slipping into Afghanistan while you try attack them from the South.
The US is providing Pakistan with millions of dollars of military aid even as I write this message to combat your internal problems with the Taliban. The US is also funding to help repair the Pakistani electric grid and help repair 1000 water pumps to bolster the Pakistani government against the Taliban.

If you still DONT trust the US, then there is something wrong with you psyche rather than with the US.

---------- Post added at 08:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:21 AM ----------

The only country to Nuke human beings.
The only country to invade helpless countries around the globe in 21st century. Killing innocent human beings for testing their Frankinstien weapons.
This is not a response.

This is just rhetoric. :disagree:
 
Last edited:
So in other words the US army had practiced its shooting and bombardment skills on innocent Iraqi people.
iF by "innocent" you mean the folks who plant bombs in markets and buses and hotels and shopping centers then the folks who blew up 100 people just yesterday in Peshawar must be "innocent people" as well. You should ask the Pakistani military to immediately stop their actions against these "innocent people" :no:
Iraq had nothing to with 9/11 neither any WMDs, but a lie which your zionist leaders have sold to innocent American citizens and now you people are minting the taxpayers for this unjust war
True, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 or WMD's but that doesn't mean that a middle east without Saddam Hussein or an Iraq with democracy is NOT a better place! Today millions of IRaqis; Shias, sunnis and Kurds have more say and more freedom to live their lives as they wish than they ever did under Saddam. That is justification enough.

Do you know the meaning of "Zionist" ? Iraq, afghanistan etc have nothing to do with Zionism! In the muslim world "zionism" is a bad word which nobody understands but everybody uses.
Please educate yourself as to the meaning and you will clearly see that zionism has nothing to do with Iraq or Afghanistan.
 
Iraq was not only an American operation, it was a NATO operation and while the pretext might have been misguided, our response was just. A middle east without Saddam is better for the whole world and even his own people have judged him and found him guilty! A shot of justice that never would have taken place if not for America!

Most of the world think that without US bullying the world would be a better and peaceful place so does it mean US should be wipped out of the world map?

And howcome you say that ME or for that matter the world or even Iraq is a better place without Saddam and above all who gave you the right to attack Iraq and kill thousands of Iraqis just to kill Saddam?


Your misguided and unjust terrorism in Iraq has made the world more dangerouse place and that country a breeding place for hate against US and the westerners too.

His own people had criticised him but this doesnt mean they had invited to you invade their country and kill innocent Iraqis.
The same people are now saying that Iraq was a much better place under Saddam than under US invasion

There fighters in Afghanistan are not "freedom fighters" are you call them.

If they are not freedom fighters than they were neither the same when US was funding them against Russia.

They only freedom they are fighting for is the freedom to be terrorists and the freedom to kill innocent civilians that they dont like in the name of Islam. The only people who consider these Terrorists "freedom fighters" are those who want these savages to kill innocent people in the name of Islam. And those people are just cowards!

More Afghans have been killed by US bombardment and invasion than freedom fighters there. And no one is justifying killing of people in the name of religion.

As for the tribals supposedly entering Afghanistan from Pakistan- that is a misconception. The US forces and the Afghan national Army are doing everything they can to keep pressure on the Afghan border to prevent the tribals and Taliban from spilling in Afghanistan again from Pakistan.


Oh yeh US doesnt do that. Well see how US had faciliated the escape of terrorists who are killing innocent people in Pakistan.
Taliban take over Afghan province
By Syed Saleem Shahzad

ISLAMABAD - The United States has withdrawn its troops from its four key bases in Nuristan, on the border with Pakistan, leaving the northeastern province as a safe haven for the Taliban-led insurgency to orchestrate its regional battles. T

he US has retained some forces in Nuristan's capital, Parun, to provide security for the governor and government facilities. The American position concerning the withdrawal is that due to winter conditions, supply arteries are choked, making it difficult to keep forces in remote areas. The US has pulled out from some areas in the past, but never from all four main bases.

The move by the top US commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChystal, follows the death on October 3 of eight US soldiers as well as a number of Afghan National Army forces



when their outpost in Kamdesh was attacked by more than 300 militants. On July 13, 2008, nine American soldiers were killed when their outpost in Wanat was attacked by small-arms fire and rocket-propelled grenades.

Nuristan is strategically located in the Hindu Kush mountains, the vast and rugged region in which al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and his associates are believed to hide.

The province is now under the effective control of the network belonging to Qari Ziaur Rahman, a Taliban commander with strong ties to Bin Laden. This makes Nuristan the first Afghan province to be controlled by a network inspired by al-Qaeda.


In a telephone conversation on Wednesday, a militant linked to Rahman said that now that they had control of Nuristan, the militants are "marching towards Mohmand and Bajaur to help their fellow Taliban fighting against Pakistani troops", referring to two tribal agencies across the border.
Rahman is not the son of a legendary mujahideen commander, but of a cleric named Maulana Dilbar. His ties do not lie with Pakistan, but with Bin Laden, having instructed him in the lessons of the Prophet Mohammed's life.

Ziaur, in his early thirties, was raised in the camps of Arab militants, who instilled in him the passion to fight against the Americans - not only in Afghanistan, but across the globe. Ziaur did not get his command as any hereditary right. First he had to prove himself on the battlefield, which he did by taking on US troops in Kunar and Nuristan provinces. He was the first to mount operations against the US in the Karghal district of Kunar and he engineered encounters in Nuristan. (See A fighter and a financier Asia Times Online, May 23, 2008.)

Mountainous Nuristan - and adjoining Kunar province and the Mohmand and Bajaur tribal areas - provide a natural labyrinth, ideal for insurgents to establish safe heavens. The majority of Nuristan's people adhere to the strict Salafi school of thought. As a result, Arab fighters, who are mostly Salafis, have always been drawn to the area. This happened during the jihad against the Soviets in the 1980s, when a virtually autonomous Salafi "kingdom" was established with aid from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. This was later eliminated by the Taliban.

In recent years, several top al-Qaeda leaders have been spotted in the area, including al-Qaeda deputy Dr Ayman al-Zawahiri, who escaped two missile attacks by US Predator drones. During the Soviet invasion, Nuristan was one of the few areas of the country that was never under occupation. Since the US-led invasion of 2001, it, along with Kunar, has been a hot-bed of activity.

The Taliban's control of Nuristan coincides with the big Pakistani military operation in the South Waziristan tribal area against the al-Qaeda-backed Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, which has been underway for the past two weeks. As the militant who spoke to Asia Times Online said, there is now the opportunity to open a new front, with Rahman's forces on the Afghan side and those of Moulvi Faqir Mohammad on the Bajaur and Mohmand side.

This region is also home to displaced militants from Pakistan's Swat Valley, who withdrew earlier this year after a military offensive in that area. They are believed to have regrouped and are preparing for new action in Swat once the winter snows block passes, making it difficult for the army's supply lines.

The latest developments in Nuristan mark a dramatic about-turn. In late 2008, coalition forces, along with the Pakistani military, launched Operation Lion Heart. The idea was that militants would be squeezed between coalition forces in Kunar and Nuristan on the one side, and Pakistani troops in Mohmand and Bajaur on the other. Several months later, both armies announced - clearly prematurely - that they had succeeded in flushing out the insurgent sanctuaries in the region.

Lion Heart was planned following US and Pakistani intelligence reports that the Taliban bases in Mohmand and Bajaur and in Nuristan and Kunar fed into a network that went on to the Taghab Valley in Kapisa province, which is just to the north of the capital, Kabul. From here, the Taliban have been able to launch suicide squads for attacks in Kabul.

The US withdrawal from Nuristan, if it becomes permanent, will give an unprecedented boost to the Taliban in the whole region. In the immediate term, they are better placed than ever to disrupt next month's presidential election runoff between the incumbent, Hamid Karzai, and his challenger, Abdullah Abdullah. The Taliban have already issued calls for people to boycott the voting.

In a foretaste of what is to come, the Taliban on Wednesday attacked a guest house in Kabul, killing at least 12 people, including six United Nations employees, two security officials and a civilian, according to police and UN officials. Kabul police said that three attackers, all wearing suicide vests, had also been killed.
Asia Times Online :: South Asia news, business and economy from India and Pakistan



The pakistani military is unable to control the border effectively and that is the reason Taliban are slipping into Afghanistan while you try attack them from the South.

And what your forces and NATO forces are doing there on the other side of the border? How come the ill-trained fighters sneak in there in presence of your thousands of US forces?




The US is providing Pakistan with millions of dollars of military aid even as I write this message to combat your internal problems with the Taliban. The US is also funding to help repair the Pakistani electric grid and help repair 1000 water pumps to bolster the Pakistani government against the Taliban.

Most of your aid is spend on security of US staff and embassy besides there is hardly any money going to be spend for uplift of common Pakistan.

You are providing the money to your selected rulers here not for the common man. The money is for your strategic goals.

Back in the 80s you have left Pakistan and Afghanistan in the lurch and we have seen the cripling of Pakistani economy due to influx of biggest number of refugess in the world history.

If you still trust the US, then there is something wrong with you psyche rather than with the US


We can say the same for US :)
 
Most of the world think that without US bullying the world would be a better and peaceful place so does it mean US should be wipped out of the world map?

Nobody thinks like that! That is only the opinion of those who were in power before and today have lost their power to kill those they dont like and terrorist sympathizers.
Today Iraqis enjoy their new found freedoms and appreciate democracy like they never have before.

There may have been a LOT of violence and a LOT of bloodshed but a nation that has never experienced democracy and freedom and has lived only in fear has to face sacrifice to move towards true Freedom.

And howcome you say that ME or for that matter the world or even Iraq is a better place without Saddam and above all who gave you the right to attack Iraq and kill thousands of Iraqis just to kill Saddam?
Who gave Saddam the right to gas the Kurds ? Who gave Saddam the right to rule in the first place ? The Iraqi people did NOT!
Thousands of Iraqis were killed by insurgents and Shia militants who used terror tactics to conduct a guerrilla war. They are the ones who killed thousands Iraqis by using all those women and children as shields.
Those so called "warriors" hid behind the hijab of women and under the beds of Children while they fired at US soldiers and planted bombs. They killed the women and children when the used them as shields and also when the blew them up by placing bombs in markets and shopping centers!
The US Army nor NATO placed bombs in cars and markets to fight the terrorists! The real killers are the Iraqi insurgents themselves, all Iraqis know this!

Your misguided and unjust terrorism in Iraq has made the world more dangerouse place and that country a breeding place for hate against US and the westerners too.
Terrorism ? Are you on drugs ?
How are the Taliban who were born and brought up in Pakistan and today killing pakistanis with bombs have anything to do with Iraq, where most of them have never even been to ?
If Iraq is the most dangerous place than why are the bombs exploding in Afghanistan and Pakistan ?? :what:
His own people had criticised him but this doesnt mean they had invited to you invade their country and kill innocent Iraqis.
The same people are now saying that Iraq was a much better place under Saddam than under US invasion
Criticized ?? How can you "criticize" when Saddam gasses and tortures anybody who talks bad against him? His sons had Torture chambers for fun where Shias were killed slowly! How can those people "complain" ?
The US asked Saddam to leave his country and gave him 48 hours to do so peacefully. He did not! That was his fault because we had already beaten his armies once before in just 45 days! He did not care about his people and that is why he was so cruel. If America had not come, those very same Shia militants would be dying slowly in some prison under Saddam!
The common Iraqi will tell you that they want America to be there and help see them through to becoming fully independent and self sufficient. In more than 50 years the Kurds finally have a place where they can live without fear and live as they want. The Shia's of Iraq finally have peace and dignity after living in terror of Saddam's torture . Ask any average Iraqi and they will tell you that even though the violence was terrible, today things are much better.
If they are not freedom fighters than they were neither the same when US was funding them against Russia.
A freedom fighter is a person who fights for the freedom of his country, not for the freedom to be a terrorist or the freedom to practice savagery and kill everybody who you dont like. That is NOT a freedom fighter.
The people who fought against the Soviets were Afghans fighting for Afghanistan. The Taliban are mad savages who are fighting so that they can rule once again and beat women on the streets and help Al Qaeda plant bombs in markets and planes.

More Afghans have been killed by US bombardment and invasion than freedom fighters there. And no one is justifying killing of people in the name of religion.
More Afghan terrorists have been killed by US bombs!

More afghan civilians have been killed by Taliban terrorists who plant bombs in cars and in shops.

Your "freedom fighters" are doing the samething in your country too! :wave:

ISLAMABAD - The United States has withdrawn its troops from its four key bases in Nuristan, on the border with Pakistan, leaving the northeastern province as a safe haven for the Taliban-led insurgency to orchestrate its regional battles. T

he US has retained some forces in Nuristan's capital, Parun, to provide security for the governor and government facilities. The American position concerning the withdrawal is that due to winter conditions, supply arteries are choked, making it difficult to keep forces in remote areas. The US has pulled out from some areas in the past, but never from all four main bases.
Before quoting whatever you like, you should read entire article. The article you quoted clearly says " The American position concerning the withdrawal is that due to winter conditions, supply arteries are choked, making it difficult to keep forces in remote areas."
That is the US is doing the best that it can with the available resources but with Pakistan closing its border, the US forces dont have the supplies to maintain their operations like they used to. Not to forget the fact that the Afghan elections are right around the corner and they are critical for the long term stability of Afghanistan and thus security is required for that.
And what your forces and NATO forces are doing there on the other side of the border? How come the ill-trained fighters sneak in there in presence of your thousands of US forces?
NATO and US forces are not right along the other side of the border. They are deployed through out Afghanistan and there are just 50,000 troops in all in such a huge country.
But Pakistan had deployed hundreds of thousands of troops along its border and it is still not able to contain the Taliban inside its borders! Even with US intelligence support the Taliban are still getting through because of poor Pakistani border paroling.
Most of your aid is spend on security of US staff and embassy besides there is hardly any money going to be spend for uplift of common Pakistan.
So Pakistan is guarding US embassies with F-16s ?? :what:
And does it take 6 Billion dollars to guard a few compounds ?
The billions of dollars of military and civilian aid that Pakistan is getting is being used to fight your internal problem and yet despite all the help there is very little progress!
You are providing the money to your selected rulers here not for the common man. The money is for your strategic goals.
So trying to stop the people who planting bombs in your cities and killing hundreds of your own people is not Pakistan's goal ? Pakistan is not doing something that is against its own interests by getting rid of terrorists who are killing pakistanis and taking over your country. Fighting terrorists is the duty of every civilized nation. So is protecting its citizens! The US is helping the Pakistani government do that by giving you billions of dollars and supplies to do that!


Back in the 80s you have left Pakistan and Afghanistan in the lurch and we have seen the cripling of Pakistani economy due to influx of biggest number of refugess in the world history.

Pakistan was not left in the lurch. How do you account for all the foreign military aid Pakistan received during the 90s ? Besides with the Soviets repelled from Afghanistan, the US helped prevent Pakistan from becoming a Soviet target for invasion also while helping the US fulfill its own objectives.
 
Actually that would be Soviet Union at first place and China at second place.

Stalin killed 60 million of his OWN people while Mao desperately tried to best him but failed at a 50 million of his own.

... and US killed millions, but of other countries, directly by nukes and indirectly by their touts like israel etc.

The US is probably one of the single greatest engine for good in this world by having brought democracy to more countries than any other.

... i thought only american politicians make pathetic jokes... btw thanks for bringing democracy in our country, our current govt is your best ever product and other countires must learn lessons from zardari... oh how can i forgot about hamid karzai, aghans are also blessed with a democratic govt with the kind efforts of US and since then they are in peace.

last but not least, one must not ask these Yankees about the democracy in Arab states coz they will start working on them once their oil wells get dry.
 
"What guarantee can the Americans give Pakistanis that we can now trust you ... and that you guys are not going to be betraying us like you did in the past," one student asked at a "townhall-style" meeting Clinton held at the Government College University in Lahore.

Pakistan's partnership in the Baghdad Pact, CENTO and SEATO strengthened relations between the two nations. At the time, its relationship with the U.S. was so close and friendly that it was called the United States' "most-allied ally" in Asia. The U.S. suspension of military assistance during the 1965 Pakistan-India war generated a widespread feeling in Pakistan that the United States was not a reliable ally. Even though the United States suspended military assistance to both countries involved in the conflict, the suspension of aid affected Pakistan much more severely. Gradually, relations improved and arms sales were renewed in 1975. Then, in April 1979, the United States cut off economic assistance to Pakistan, except food assistance, as required under the Symington Amendment to the U.S. Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, due to concerns about Pakistan's nuclear program.
Pakistan ? United States relations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[a childish response by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton..
"I am well aware that there is a trust deficit," Clinton said. "My message is that's not the way it should be. We cannot let a minority of people in both countries determine our relationship."
Hardly childish. But she should have simply asked what guarantees Pakistani's can give Americans. Trust works both ways.

[LOL... its really funny that US govt still thinks americans are in favour of their illegal expeditions in Iraq and now in Afghanistan... also if tey believe Pakistani people trust them. she should study the statistics before giving any statement otherwise we Pakistani and every Muslim is sick of such jokes.

The US government doesn't. But the fact is they are there, and common Americans will support their troops abroad irrespective of whatever else they think of the situation. I very much doubt they assume Pakistani's trust them.
 
A LOT of Americans support the operation in Afghanistan and also Iraq. This is self evident by the fact that even Obama who preached against American military foreign policy is considering bolstering NATO troops in Afghanistan.

No, absolute majority of Americans don't support the presence of US-led Nato forces in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Read the Washington Post of today. There's an article saying 48% of Americans are of the view to increase the troops in Afghanistan, while 52% are against it. Generally, 50-70% Americans want US to vacate Afghanistan and take care of its internal business. This is what the stats says too.

Besides, I'm of the view that Obama wouldn't increase the troops in Afghanistan. Vice President Biden is against this idea. The 52% Americans are against this idea. I think Obama should take wise decisions and don't repeat the mistakes Kennedy did during the "Bay of Pigs" episode in a hope to dismantle the Castro’s government in Cuba on the advise of his military generals and CIA officials, Kennedy committed himself never to be overawed by professional military advice. Kennedy faced international humiliation. Hence, Kennedy learnt a lesson. Bush also repeated the same thing and faced so much of criticism internationally.

Obama shouldn't listen to his Generals and CIA advisers. These military men always create the fittest mess of bloodbath!!

Read Kennedy's strategy in Vietnam War. It'd be nice if Obama follows the same, with more or less no changes.

To Increase Or Not To Increase? My Distinguished Sense
 
We do not need any guarantee.
We surely do not need United Satan's of Anti-Christs help.
We wish no wars.
We wish no confrontation too.
Leave Pakistan and we shall have peace.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom