What's new

What does Trump’s tweet mean for CPEC and the region

Clutch

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
17,022
Reaction score
-3
What does Trump’s tweet mean for CPEC and the region

Listen

no-img-fb.jpg




At a time when a historic meeting of foreign ministers from China, Afghanistan and Pakistan concluded successfully on December 26, 2017 and more importantly, decided to consider expanding the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (the flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative) to Afghanistan, the timing of President Trump’s tweet is telling. The tweet – a culmination of earlier threats and policy statements, the latest being the National Security Strategy – is indicative of forging a more aggressive posture towards Pakistan to take forward geo-political interests and goals of the United States in South Asia.

On the outset, the new foreign policy of President Trump seeks to externalise US’s own failure in Afghanistan, and by blaming Pakistan, effectively absolves all responsibility that would otherwise have fallen on itself. However, Pakistan is only a means to an end in America’s quest for countering China’s expanding influence, goodwill and presence via the Belt and Road Initiative’s much-touted China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.

Furthermore, this first-of-its-kind statement by any American President towards Pakistan, attempts to portray Pakistan’s behaviour as a threat to the US national security, and the tweet coupled with the recently unveiled National Security Strategy (which dubs China as a “revisionist power” and Pakistan for all practical purposes as an enemy combatant), prepares the ground and subsequent “justification” for proactive American interference and perhaps even intervention in the region.

The United States needs a pretext to expand its footprint in South Asia, and its limited presence in Afghanistan does not suffice. The only option left to the US to counter the rising influence of China and to bolster India as a counter-weight to China is to use Pakistan as bait. Since the far-reaching and all-encompassing Belt and Road Initiative’s pivot is the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, anyone attempting to impede this would need to start with CPEC. What better way than by building and re-enforcing the “Pakistan-extremism/Taliban nexus” narrative and show it to be an existential threat to the United States?

While Pakistan has been on the frontline in the war against terror, and suffered huge civilian, military and economic casualties, rather than receiving appreciation Pakistan is once again being made out to be as “part of the problem” or rather “the problem”. While Pakistan and the US have engaged in high-level exchanges since the new US administration came into power – PM Abbasi meeting VP Pence and thereafter the US Defense Secretary meeting Pakistan’s civil-military leadership in Islamabad – a positive outcome of this dialogue is seemingly not in the interest of the US, as a good partner in Pakistan would mean no legitimacy for interference and aggression, and subsequently no substantial US presence to counter China.

Pakistan and its neighbouring countries – China, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran – need to have a coordinated response to the hostile statement of President Trump, since the consequences of this foreign policy impact all of the above. Pakistan must also double its efforts to nip the issues of trust-deficit and border management in the bud with Afghanistan, as schisms between these two countries will only leave both of them more vulnerable to foreign exploitation and interference. China’s proactive engagement and diplomacy in the Afghan peace process should be welcomed and supported, as China is seen as an above-board player with “no dogs in the fight”. Additionally, China’s engagement in Afghanistan is a “force multiplier” for Pakistan, that needs allies in an increasingly volatile neighbourhood, and the expansion of CPEC to Afghanistan will only increase Pakistan’s goodwill and influence in the former, and economically integrate the countries and the region minimising the risk of conflict and giving the three countries a shared future with shared economic development.

(The writer, Mustafa H Sayed is the Executive Director at Pakistan-China Institute)





advertisement
 
What does Trump’s tweet mean for CPEC and the region

Listen

no-img-fb.jpg




At a time when a historic meeting of foreign ministers from China, Afghanistan and Pakistan concluded successfully on December 26, 2017 and more importantly, decided to consider expanding the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (the flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative) to Afghanistan, the timing of President Trump’s tweet is telling. The tweet – a culmination of earlier threats and policy statements, the latest being the National Security Strategy – is indicative of forging a more aggressive posture towards Pakistan to take forward geo-political interests and goals of the United States in South Asia.

On the outset, the new foreign policy of President Trump seeks to externalise US’s own failure in Afghanistan, and by blaming Pakistan, effectively absolves all responsibility that would otherwise have fallen on itself. However, Pakistan is only a means to an end in America’s quest for countering China’s expanding influence, goodwill and presence via the Belt and Road Initiative’s much-touted China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.

Furthermore, this first-of-its-kind statement by any American President towards Pakistan, attempts to portray Pakistan’s behaviour as a threat to the US national security, and the tweet coupled with the recently unveiled National Security Strategy (which dubs China as a “revisionist power” and Pakistan for all practical purposes as an enemy combatant), prepares the ground and subsequent “justification” for proactive American interference and perhaps even intervention in the region.

The United States needs a pretext to expand its footprint in South Asia, and its limited presence in Afghanistan does not suffice. The only option left to the US to counter the rising influence of China and to bolster India as a counter-weight to China is to use Pakistan as bait. Since the far-reaching and all-encompassing Belt and Road Initiative’s pivot is the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, anyone attempting to impede this would need to start with CPEC. What better way than by building and re-enforcing the “Pakistan-extremism/Taliban nexus” narrative and show it to be an existential threat to the United States?

While Pakistan has been on the frontline in the war against terror, and suffered huge civilian, military and economic casualties, rather than receiving appreciation Pakistan is once again being made out to be as “part of the problem” or rather “the problem”. While Pakistan and the US have engaged in high-level exchanges since the new US administration came into power – PM Abbasi meeting VP Pence and thereafter the US Defense Secretary meeting Pakistan’s civil-military leadership in Islamabad – a positive outcome of this dialogue is seemingly not in the interest of the US, as a good partner in Pakistan would mean no legitimacy for interference and aggression, and subsequently no substantial US presence to counter China.

Pakistan and its neighbouring countries – China, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran – need to have a coordinated response to the hostile statement of President Trump, since the consequences of this foreign policy impact all of the above. Pakistan must also double its efforts to nip the issues of trust-deficit and border management in the bud with Afghanistan, as schisms between these two countries will only leave both of them more vulnerable to foreign exploitation and interference. China’s proactive engagement and diplomacy in the Afghan peace process should be welcomed and supported, as China is seen as an above-board player with “no dogs in the fight”. Additionally, China’s engagement in Afghanistan is a “force multiplier” for Pakistan, that needs allies in an increasingly volatile neighbourhood, and the expansion of CPEC to Afghanistan will only increase Pakistan’s goodwill and influence in the former, and economically integrate the countries and the region minimising the risk of conflict and giving the three countries a shared future with shared economic development.

(The writer, Mustafa H Sayed is the Executive Director at Pakistan-China Institute)





advertisement

The key to this is to assess the seriousness of the statement. Most USA policy is secretly agreed and quietly implemented and never really divulged in public, all we normally see is the consequence of the implementation. Who was this message for and why was it so blunt? Was it a moment of reflection by the President in between a break from his festivities or a genuine statement of policy and threat to Pakistan. Was it a New Year present to his friends Netanyu and Modi? Or was the President trying to ruin the festivities of the Pakistani elite? Was Trump really enunciating the start of a policy reset and aggressive stance towards Pakistan and an indirect posture towards China, Pakistan's main investor and partner? Is it time for Pakistan to start planning for North Korea type sanctions or may be we are just being put on the back foot before for a full blown assault on Iran or Palestine? If CPEC is the source of US anger then do we need to analyse are they going to gate crash the party or spoil the fun? What we do know about President Trump is that he is an excellent negotiator and a successful business man who knows the strength of his chips and how he is going to play them. He didn't have to say what he said but chose to do so at a moment of his choosing. Is this a starting position for intense negotiation to come or a warning before a hammer action on Pakistan?

There are many similarities between North Korea and Pakistan. Both have come about from colonial division and both are under threat from USA, the only difference is one of scale and location. If relationships with US have become too sour then we need to communicate , communicate and communicate until we reach mutual understanding and friendship. Else we are a step closer to Armageddon.
 
Last edited:
What we do know about President Trump is that he is an excellent negotiator and a successful business man who knows the strength of his chips and how he is going to play them. He didn't have to say what he said but chose to do so at a moment of his choosing. Is this a starting position for intense negotiation to come or a warning before a hammer action on Pakistan?

There are many similarities between North Korea and Pakistan. Both have come about from colonial division and both are under threat from USA, the only difference is one of scale and location. If relationships with US have become too sour then we need to communicate , communicate and communicate until we reach mutual understanding and friendship. Else we are a step closer to Armageddon.


What happens if the americans arent interested in communication and instead are looking for a fight? ....
 
What happens if the americans arent interested in communication and instead are looking for a fight? ....

The way pushed he pushed DARCA laws through is one evidence, quite cleverly done. I ended with the statement : "Else we are a step closer to Armageddon" incase it ended up in a fight! Because it will lead to a China/Russia V USA fight and Pakistan -v-India fight, and boy will it be dirty.
 
Trump's tweet showed that Pakistan and China have touched the US Zions and their lackeys in the Indians in all the wrong ways.
 
The key to this is to assess the seriousness of the statement. Most USA policy is secretly agreed and quietly implemented and never really divulged in public, all we normally see is the consequence of the implementation. Who was this message for and why was it so blunt? Was it a moment of reflection by the President in between a break from his festivities or a genuine statement of policy and threat to Pakistan. Was it a New Year present to his friends Netanyu and Modi? Or was the President trying to ruin the festivities of the Pakistani elite? Was Trump really enunciating the start of a policy reset and aggressive stance towards Pakistan and an indirect posture towards China, Pakistan's main investor and partner? Is it time for Pakistan to start planning for North Korea type sanctions or may be we are just being put on the back foot before for a full blown assault on Iran or Palestine? If CPEC is the source of US anger then do we need to analyse are they going to gate crash the party or spoil the fun? What we do know about President Trump is that he is an excellent negotiator and a successful business man who knows the strength of his chips and how he is going to play them. He didn't have to say what he said but chose to do so at a moment of his choosing. Is this a starting position for intense negotiation to come or a warning before a hammer action on Pakistan?

There are many similarities between North Korea and Pakistan. Both have come about from colonial division and both are under threat from USA, the only difference is one of scale and location. If relationships with US have become too sour then we need to communicate , communicate and communicate until we reach mutual understanding and friendship. Else we are a step closer to Armageddon.

It's trump. There's no need to overthink his tweets. Americans would laugh at you for putting so much thought and time into one tweet from Trump. They have been used to his mental gymnastics and his tweets are mostly a source for entertainment these days in the American media and the public.
 
It's trump. There's no need to overthink his tweets. Americans would laugh at you for putting so much thought and time into one tweet from Trump. They have been used to his mental gymnastics and his tweets are mostly a source for entertainment these days in the American media and the public.

Always best to plan for the worst case and hope for the best!
 
They mean nothing. There is no stopping to CPEC. I suppose regional and international powers should accept this reality. The sooner the better.
 
It's trump. There's no need to overthink his tweets. Americans would laugh at you for putting so much thought and time into one tweet from Trump. They have been used to his mental gymnastics and his tweets are mostly a source for entertainment these days in the American media and the public.
U may be right but it is better to prepare in advance for any untoward mishaps.
 
We should strengthen ourself internally wipe out the corrupt politicians and corrupt bureaucracy to have the funds for military,education and health.
 
Back
Top Bottom