What a brilliant answer by modi about climate change.

[STRANGER BIRD]

You will Never Believe the reply he gives about Climate Change .

https://twitter.com/x/status/924109812492795904

 

[slapshot]

This is coming from leader of a country which is in top five list of CO2 emissions. I wonder if he upholds his views in international forums or its just to pacify local audience. I wonder how does his views affect Indian intelligentsia working in the fields of science of technology and when they have to listen to such nonsense from their head of state.

 

[Suriya]

As usual it's an edited video .

 

[Joe Shearer]

As usual it's an edited video .

Why do you say that? Just because he sounds ridiculous? What did you see that shows it's edited?

 

[Quibbler]

Why do you say that? Just because he sounds ridiculous? What did you see that shows it's edited?

Its very clear the video has been made with the aim of conveying a specific tone, with the annotations all around and cutting off at exact moments to take the sentence out of context.

Even if we take the op's video on its face value, no previous leadership in the country has taken a solid stance in words and action on climate change. All previous leaderships had showed concern but were very much strong in their belief that coal and oil was India's future. It has been under this leadership that India has started taking a leading role in renewables.

To put in context read the Prime Ministers statement after US withdrew from the Paris accord. Moreover this has not been rhetoric but has been backed by policy and action. 20 GW of solar installed in the last 2 years another 20 GW in pipeline in next 2 years, similar growth in wind. National EV policy. Global stewardship in the form of Solar Alliance. Coal has put on the back burner in our national energy discussions , in part due to the proactive leadership, otherwise the same benefits would have percolated over decades

 

[Suriya]

Why do you say that? Just because he sounds ridiculous? What did you see that shows it's edited?

Cause I've watched the full clip put in by a good man to counter people like you and other Modi baiters , trolls who suffer from visceral hate for Modi .

 

[Joe Shearer]

Cause I've watched the full clip put in by a good man to counter people like you and other Modi baiters , trolls who suffer from visceral hate for Modi .

Apart from whining about trolls, what stopped you from putting up the full clip put in by a good man? Were you overcome by shyness?

Its very clear the video has been made with the aim of conveying a specific tone, with the annotations all around and cutting off at exact moments to take the sentence out of context.

Even if we take the op's video on its face value, no previous leadership in the country has taken a solid stance in words and action on climate change. All previous leaderships had showed concern but were very much strong in their belief that coal and oil was India's future. It has been under this leadership that India has started taking a leading role in renewables.

To put in context read the Prime Ministers statement after US withdrew from the Paris accord. Moreover this has not been rhetoric but has been backed by policy and action. 20 GW of solar installed in the last 2 years another 20 GW in pipeline in next 2 years, similar growth in wind. National EV policy. Global stewardship in the form of Solar Alliance. Coal has put on the back burner in our national energy discussions , in part due to the proactive leadership, otherwise the same benefits would have percolated over decades

A small quibble: could you provide something more tangible than Holmesian deduction about what is being done very clearly? Your second and third paragraphs are full of great value, but do not explain the mental numbness of the answer as it is; if you want to refute it, show us the real thing.

 

[Suriya]

Apart from whining about trolls, what stopped you from putting up the full clip put in by a good man? Were you overcome by shyness?

Full clip of the interaction was right there attached with my previous reply. You missed it . Old age i guess .

 

[Quibbler]

Apart from whining about trolls, what stopped you from putting up the full clip put in by a good man? Were you overcome by shyness?



A small quibble: could you provide something more tangible than Holmesian deduction about what is being done very clearly? Your second and third paragraphs are full of great value, but do not explain the mental numbness of the answer as it is; if you want to refute it, show us the real thing.

Thank you for appreciating my "greatly valued" content.

Again i would like to point out the video is clearly edited with boderline mal-intent . - this my my opinion.
Now coming to the point that i should show the real thing. If someone believes the earth is flat ,it is not my responsibility to go around the world to prove him wrong. However I still have the freedom to disgaree with him strongly and believe that the world is indeed round.

Coming to the latter paragraphs. I believe it was abundantly clear that it was on the basis, that his video is inconsequential and therefore useless and its existence redundant as people should be judged on intent and actions rather than edited videos.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Full clip of the interaction was right there attached with my previous reply. You missed it . Old age i guess .

LOL.

It seemed to be just a copy of the previous clip; it seems that shyness is your natural condition.

The proper clip, if it is the proper clip, is certainly a more reasonable reply by Modi; he need not be ashamed of it, it makes a very good point. But we deal with what we see, not with what might have been seen. It is for those who have seen the full clip to correct the misrepresentation. I had not seen it, and I never pretended to have seen it.

Thank you for appreciating my "greatly valued" content.

Again i would like to point out the video is clearly edited with boderline mal-intent . - this my my opinion.
Now coming to the point that i should show the real thing. If someone believes the earth is flat ,it is not my responsibility to go around the world to prove him wrong. However I still have the freedom to disgaree with him strongly and believe that the world is indeed round.

Coming to the latter paragraphs. I believe it was abundantly clear that it was on the basis, that his video is inconsequential and therefore useless and its existence redundant as people should be judged on intent and actions rather than edited videos.

Right next to your post was the post by @Suriya which made the whole matter clear, and converted sceptics and scoffers - like me - to those who respected the answer given. Instead of the long-winded and consequential defence presented, you could just have presented the original.

 

[El Sidd]

Well they are building a nuclear power plant next to the sundarbans.

I think Modi is shrewd with his words.

The left loonies will malign any efforts made by this prime minister.

 

[Guardians of the Galaxy]

This is coming from leader of a country which is in top five list of CO2 emissions. I wonder if he upholds his views in international forums or its just to pacify local audience. I wonder how does his views affect Indian intelligentsia working in the fields of science of technology and when they have to listen to such nonsense from their head of state.

We are the biggest developing country... Despite of keeping us away Nuclear Supplier Group, we are committed to reduce carbon emission.
Our courts & authorities make it were hard now to mine coal withing our country despite of huge coal reserves.
We've the 3 biggest solar power plants in the world out of top 10.

 

[Quibbler]

LOL.

It seemed to be just a copy of the previous clip; it seems that shyness is your natural condition.

The proper clip, if it is the proper clip, is certainly a more reasonable reply by Modi; he need not be ashamed of it, it makes a very good point. But we deal with what we see, not with what might have been seen. It is for those who have seen the full clip to correct the misrepresentation. I had not seen it, and I never pretended to have seen it.



Right next to your post was the post by @Suriya which made the whole matter clear, and converted sceptics and scoffers - like me - to those who respected the answer given. Instead of the long-winded and consequential defence presented, you could just have presented the original.

I did not have enough data to pull out the original. The event,the context anything. If i knew i could do it quickly i would have. Otherwise the whole point was mute, you yourself could have searched the video. Wonder why you didnt.

 

[Joe Shearer]

I did not have enough data to pull out the original. The event,the context anything. If i knew i could do it quickly i would have. Otherwise the whole point was mute, you yourself could have searched the video. Wonder why you didnt.

Not my post, not my job. If you want to defend Modi, defend him. Don't waffle; that is not a defence.

 

[Quibbler]

Not my post, not my job. If you want to defend Modi, defend him. Don't waffle; that is not a defence.

Exactly. Finally you agree with me , even if you cant comprehend it. Not my post not my job.