What's new

We will sink 2 Aircraft Carriers and kill 10000 Sailors if the US stands in way of China's SCS Goals

And yet you still miserably failed to annex and absorb bd in india! :lol: if we lost to anyone, we lost to the majority population of the two Pakistan wings, you merely helped the wretched politicians like bhutto and mujib get what they wanted. what's your excuse for getting your bungholes butchered in 1948, 1962, 1965 and 1999 except for inferior dna and p!ss poorly trained so called military? :lol:

OK now go look at that stamp again ;)...and Niazi crying like a little girl as he signs on dotted line... after chest thumping 1000 year war. I am sure you cried too as you saw your officer lot throw personal sidearms on the ground too...haha...that video got lot of air time in this very forum so much lol. "Its all part of the game I suppose"...says one mard e momin officer haha. But he actually tried something and got somewhere important, unlike you blabbing here about whatever "war" and "DNA" feelz you want to have to feel better about abject failure.
 
.
A Chinese Admiral said recently that his country's military is capable of sinking American aircraft carriers in the East and South China Seas.

Rear Admiral Luo Yuan's comments were made in a speech on Sino-U.S. relations which he gave on December 20, according to News Corp Australia Network.

Luo said that sinking American ships would resolve the ongoing territorial disputes in that part of the world.

'What the United States fears the most is taking casualties,' Admiral Luo said.

He estimated that sinking an American carrier would result in the deaths of 5,000 servicemen and women. Sinking two such ships would double the casualty toll to 10,000.

'We'll see how frightened America is,' he said.

Luo, 67, holds the rank of rear admiral in the People's Liberation Army Navy, though he is acting in an academic capacity rather than as an active service member.

He is the deputy head of the Chinese Academy of Military Sciences.

An author, social commentator, and military theorist, Luo has been known to express hawkish, anti-American views in the past.

In his remarks to the 2018 Military Industry List summit in Shenzhen. Luo boasted of China's weapons capability, which includes anti-ship ballistic and cruise missiles that could hit American carriers.

Luo said that the U.S. was vulnerable and that China should 'use its strength to attack the enemy's shortcomings.'

'Attack wherever the enemy is afraid of being hit,' he said.

'Wherever the enemy is weak…'

China and the U.S. have been at odds for years on a number of geopolitical issues, including Beijing's pressing of territorial claims in the South and East China Seas.

In the South China Sea, the United States has criticized China's construction of islands on tiny reefs and shoals and its installation of military facilities on them, including air strips and docks.

China claims 'irrefutable' sovereignty over most of the South China Sea and the islands in it, and accuses the United States of raising military tension with its navy presence there.

Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam all claim parts of the waterway, through which about $5 trillion in ship-borne trade passes each year.

Taiwan also claims the waters.

Taiwan is another sensitive issue that divides the U.S. and China.

In Beijing, the island is considered a breakaway province that must be unified with the mainland, even if it means using military force.

But Taiwan, which is formally known as the Republic of China on Taiwan, insists on autonomy.

The democratic province, which receives American weapons and aid, does not want to come under Chinese rule.

Luo warned the U.S. not to intervene in the Taiwan-China dispute.

'If the US naval fleet dares to stop in Taiwan, it is time for the People's Liberation Army to deploy troops to promote national unity on (invade) the island,' he said.

'Achieving China's complete unity is a necessary requirement.

'The achievement of the past 40 years of reform and opening-up has given us the capability and confidence to safeguard our sovereignty.

'Those who are trying to stir up trouble in the South China Sea and Taiwan should be careful about their future.'



http://www.defencenews.in/article/W...e-US-stands-in-way-of-Chinas-SCS-Goals-582386

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...wo-aircraft-carriers-kill-10-000-sailors.html
Foolish statement.

OK now go look at that stamp again ;)...and Niazi crying like a little girl as he signs on dotted line... after chest thumping 1000 year war. I am sure you cried too as you saw your officer lot throw personal sidearms on the ground too...haha...that video got lot of air time in this very forum so much lol. "Its all part of the game I suppose"...says one mard e momin officer haha. But he actually tried something and got somewhere important, unlike you blabbing here about whatever "war" and "DNA" feelz you want to have to feel better about abject failure.
Part of the game.:D
 
.
OK now go look at that stamp again ;)...and Niazi crying like a little girl as he signs on dotted line... after chest thumping 1000 year war. I am sure you cried too as you saw your officer lot throw personal sidearms on the ground too...haha...that video got lot of air time in this very forum so much lol. "Its all part of the game I suppose"...says one mard e momin officer haha. But he actually tried something and got somewhere important, unlike you blabbing here about whatever "war" and "DNA" feelz you want to have to feel better about abject failure.
once again, you missed the point as expected due to your generic retardation with which I sympathize. The point is that ultimately, our very own leaders namely bhutto and mujib actually engineered that entire civil war to occur so india can hardly claim any level of credit since the war was rigged to loose from the get go so that bhutto can have his pm ship and mujib can have his. At least we have a solid reason that discounts any claim to military glory from india. My question to you is that what is india's excuse for the humiliation it received in 48, 62, 65 and 99 except that you faced a far superior military that in spite of being smaller, india couldn't stand up against. Let's here it... I'm waiting. ;)

Oh and by the way...you won't find any bhuttos and mujibs in Pakistan now. plenty of bhuttos and mujibs in india though...just wait till your sugar daddy leaves afghanistan. the games shall begin. 8-)
 
Last edited:
.
You haven't heard? China developed a nuclear missile to kill white people and spare the blacks. And you know how we know? They tested it on their own blacks population. And called "Racist Bomb"
It's called the black lives matter bomb! What are you? Some kind of racist?
 
.
It's called the black lives matter bomb! What are you? Some kind of racist?

The surviving black population can then free the Native Americans, who can decide to send the blacks to Europe or Africa or allow them to stay. Like Israhell, Amerika needs to be wiped off the map.

Only the insane want Amerikka to continue to exist. Death to Amerika. Glory to China.

Don't fall for their wars, but if Amerika strikes China, finish off Amerika for good, don't let it ever rise from its ashes. Amerika stands for evil and genocide in the world, torturers of the good is Amerika.

Just remember, you need about 7-8000 ICBMs to help prevent war.
 
.
The surviving black population can then free the Native Americans, who can decide to send the blacks to Europe or Africa or allow them to stay. Like Israhell, Amerika needs to be wiped off the map.

Only the insane want Amerikka to continue to exist. Death to Amerika. Glory to China.

Don't fall for their wars, but if Amerika strikes China, finish off Amerika for good, don't let it ever rise from its ashes. Amerika stands for evil and genocide in the world, torturers of the good is Amerika.

Just remember, you need about 7-8000 ICBMs to help prevent war.
We know America's pain threshold. For East Asia, they are probably willing to risk a nuclear exchange, so we have to nuke them preemptively (as well as sink their carriers). Once they lose New York, Washington DC, Chicago, LA, Boston and Bay Area, they will be ready to leave East Asia.
 
.
IMG_20190104_101326.jpg
IMG_20190104_101310.jpg
 
.
We know America's pain threshold. For East Asia, they are probably willing to risk a nuclear exchange, so we have to nuke them preemptively (as well as sink their carriers). Once they lose New York, Washington DC, Chicago, LA, Boston and Bay Area, they will be ready to leave East Asia.

That is why China needs about 8000 ICBMs and 50-100 more nuclear missile subs, MAD would stop the war after several cities are nuked. And stop NATO getting involved. Having gold reserves in the tens of trillions of yuan would prevent the yuan from collapsing due to US pressure on zionist allies and zionist partners.

With about 400 kilo or smaller sized Chinese subs patrolling the East Asian waters would sink any Amerikan subs.

1000 HQ-19s would protect Chinese cities and assets.

BTW, don't sell gold to enemies, back the yuan up with gold for Chinese citizens and only those born in China. The goal is to keep the gold in China, not to sell it to foreigners.
 
.
That is why China needs about 8000 ICBMs and 50-100 more nuclear missile subs, MAD would stop the war after several cities are nuked. And stop NATO getting involved. Having gold reserves in the tens of trillions of yuan would prevent the yuan from collapsing due to US pressure on zionist allies and zionist partners.

With about 400 kilo or smaller sized Chinese subs patrolling the East Asian waters would sink any Amerikan subs.
Ugh.

A sophisticated nuclear sub costs 3-4 billion dollars. So 100 nuclear subs are going to be 400 billion dollars.

Not to mention, more people you give keys to destroy the world more chances that someone will do it, accidentally.

Lastly, this reminds me of failed french strategy from World War 2. French were so sure of their trenches that they spent massive amount of resources to build quite a few. Unfortunately, that didn't go well with Germans using Airforce. Upshot is massive defence of one kind leaves you vulnerable to attack somewhere else...
 
.
Make that 600 kilo-class sized subs patrolling East Asia.

And China would need to destroy all the Asia/Pacific Washington regime military bases and instillations. From Hawaii to the Stans. An Ultimatum, either kick out the Amerikans or render them disarmed for the war through negotiations or China will neutralize all Amerikan forces in Central Asia, South Asia and East Asia and the Pacific.

The Ultimatum would be stated before the war begins.
 
. .
.
Of course Uncle Sam will take all that lying down, smoking a cigar, drink in hand and a buxom blonde by his side, right?


I think he is ready to graduate from NDU just like that brilliant strategerist @Umair Nawaz . :D

One look at this thread and people will realise how far south this forum have gone...…….

I mean, com'on, I want to laugh about it but then I just realise how sad it was when I used to like this forum a lot.

Now it's nuke this, kill that, and 600 nuclear sub? LOL, those are submarine, not Kleenex, you don't just build them and then dispose them. How are you going to refuel 600 nuclear sub, now, that I want to see, but then I am wholeheartedly expecting stupid comment like they will refuel 1 sub a day or something like that lol.
 
. .
Of course Uncle Sam will take all that lying down, smoking a cigar, drink in hand and a buxom blonde by his side, right?


I think he is ready to graduate from NDU just like that brilliant strategerist @Umair Nawaz . :D
Uncle Sam will be begging to surrender or else PLA will launch an amphibious attack on Hawaii.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom