We need more J-10Bs

[IceCold]

dear, MAJOR
i guss, i know the whole kargill war, better thn you , cause i was one of combatant there , i really know wht happened there, & i guss , i HAD THE REAL EXPIRENCE of not having a aircover.
well, when US cutted the supplly , of spares of our dear ! F16s at the time , of kargill , PAF has the only option left , is to look over on the more ,vital sites , which were more important thn of whole of kargill war(nucklear sites etc), that was the reason behind ,why PAF not been able to put active air cover, on the TIGER HILL area.

do, you really think CHINA couldnt buy a westrn platform & CHINA really cares of the sanctions by the USA?
MY dear, when CHINA can have , state of art RUSSIAN fighters in , its inventry ! it doesnt needs mirages, or ANY OTHER less sufficiant plateforms!

bythe way, levi was a ISRAELI plateform , which was integrated in J-10s?
well comming back on the topic!
with 100+ fighter planes , with same design & avionics , it speaks itself the importance , china gives to the jet!
like J-10a or b, J-11 a or b will be more, advanced version of the same jet! & i guss if , we had a chance to further boost the plateform , with westrn tech , thn there is a chance that we can counter , IAF s su30mkiS?
THAT was my whole point, but if u didnt agree with that, thn its not a problem to waste the time!
here it is what you had said about your RAFALE thing , some couple of posts before!

. To me Rafale has a very good chance at MMRCA as France will agree to provide ToT to an extend US will not. But that a guess.


its oky for me, but reliance on westrn plateforms , never was a advantage for PAF , it never will be!
with that, thanks for reply, lets finish this , childish tit tat!
i am , fully agreed with J-10s in PAF INVENTORY , BUT with inclusion of some of J-11BS.

Batman sir why isnt military professional written beneath your nick name like its written under the nicks of other military professionals here. Sorry about being off topic related to your post, just noticed something so i pointed it out.

 

[nightrider_saulat]

what must be remembered that air power does not come cheap. It requires a major investment in terms of human development and resources allocation. A nation has to strike a balance where air power development is done in a manner that its economy and its aviation industrial base can sustain. All efforts should be made to achieve high skill levels in flying and maintenance and towards rapid development of maintenance infrastructure to reduce dependence on repair, overhaul and spare support of its combat inventory. The degree of development of aviation-based industry in a country is one of the key determinants of a nation’s air power prowess.

SIR WHY CAN'T WE PREFER F-16s OVER J-10s PLEASE ANSWER ME FULL AND FINAL THIS TIME​

 

[batmannow]

Batman sir why isnt military professional written beneath your nick name like its written under the nicks of other military professionals here. Sorry about being off topic related to your post, just noticed something so i pointed it out.

my very dear, ICECOLD sir.,
because, i not chose to be, the offer is still, in my inbox!
i had started a ,private life,& i prefre it to be private! offtopic!
it isnt , neccery tht. batman appears, to be mi;itry pro!

i dont like, boundries!Off toPIC
thanks & eid mubarak

 

[batmannow]

Lets see a canard will generate powerful vortices to scrub the wing in tight turns, slow speeds, slow landing approaches it basically helps in it. At high angles of attack the canard surface directs airflow downwards over the wing, reducing turbulence which results in reduced drag and increased lift which means it can fly very slow and not stall. It also helps in taking off from small strips which would unquestionably mean the difference between elimination and survival.
Bad thing about canards they have poor stealth characteristics, because they present large moving surfaces forward of the wing.

Rest I have to draw some diagrams which will explain better will post them later.

sory for intruption ,my very honrable, sir!


how you see, the combination of J-10 & J-11bs in plaf?

thnks & EID MUBARAK!

 

[Myth_buster_1]

SIR WHY CAN'T WE PREFER F-16s OVER J-10s PLEASE ANSWER ME FULL AND FINAL THIS TIME​

F-16 block 52+ is way better then J-10A and as good as J-10B "FC-20". I dough Europe will offer us anything that will give our "western" version of FC-20 significant edge over any 4.5 generation MRCA... If politics was not the hurgel between US and PAK i dough we would have ever gone for FC-20 in the first place... PAF still loves F-16s so much that if it was up to them... they would induct 200+ F-16s!

All what PAF needs is a good 4.5 generation MRCA partner for FC-20.... so we should have somthing like IAF.... MKI + SH.... PAF = FC-20 + Rafael

 

[nightrider_saulat]

F-16 block 52+ is way better then J-10A and as good as J-10B "FC-20". I dough Europe will offer us anything that will give our "western" version of FC-20 significant edge over any 4.5 generation MRCA... If politics was not the hurgel between US and PAK i dough we would have ever gone for FC-20 in the first place... PAF still loves F-16s so much that if it was up to them... they would induct 200+ F-16s!

All what PAF needs is a good 4.5 generation MRCA partner for FC-20.... so we should have somthing like IAF.... MKI + SH.... PAF = FC-20 + Rafael

but i think block 52/60 will surely come in the category of 4.5 generation aircraft
and fortunately we are getting those blk 52 by next year from US
and i also thinks that f-16 looks a lot more sexier then j-10
lol when it comes lethality and flexibility
sir MK where are you i need your reply on this?